Conferences – HoopSci

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	15.208	60	6.2190	2
2	Wichita State	15.107	62	2.9255	55
3	USF	12.612	73	3.1934	46
4	Memphis	7.175	114	-2.4269	293
5	Temple	6.917	115	0.1803	180
6	UAB	5.994	120	0.5317	160
7	FAU	5.989	121	-0.2636	201
8	Charlotte	0.310	154	1.4392	108
9	North Texas	-1.780	177	-3.9526	339
10	Tulane	-9.375	240	-3.0417	311
11	Rice	-12.343	264	-2.8586	306
12	ECU	-17.316	298	-4.2321	347
13	UTSA	-23.598	338	-3.8051	337

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.233	42	0.0341	38
2	USF	0.197	63	0.0198	85
3	UAB	0.168	82	0.0089	133
4	Tulsa	0.147	98	0.0482	15
5	North Texas	0.126	110	-0.0217	277
6	Temple	0.112	116	0.0004	176
7	FAU	0.081	139	0.0096	128
8	Tulane	0.037	171	-0.0289	305
9	Charlotte	0.007	192	0.0024	165
10	Memphis	-0.035	218	-0.0258	292
11	Rice	-0.086	261	-0.0285	303
12	UTSA	-0.141	293	-0.0283	301
13	ECU	-0.153	303	-0.0495	349

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	1627.474	49	-20.0217	353
2	UAB	1615.931	58	-0.8841	188
3	North Texas	1611.968	61	-4.4286	232
4	FAU	1575.397	92	-13.0477	317
5	Tulane	1540.204	129	6.8451	94
6	Wichita State	1531.915	136	0.4889	172
7	Temple	1529.111	139	0.2070	174
8	Tulsa	1523.827	153	25.3959	3
9	USF	1519.789	161	-6.0806	257
10	ECU	1461.909	234	-5.5580	250
11	Charlotte	1430.159	270	-16.0740	336
12	Rice	1423.014	280	-11.0521	300
13	UTSA	1397.274	306	2.2983	148

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	0.623	23	0.0562	2
2	FAU	0.588	48	0.0117	118
3	USF	0.559	78	0.0238	45
4	Tulane	0.522	123	0.0074	153
5	Memphis	0.522	125	-0.0340	358
6	Wichita State	0.513	139	0.0002	214
7	Temple	0.505	153	-0.0061	264
8	North Texas	0.493	190	-0.0260	353
9	UTSA	0.486	196	0.0023	192
10	UAB	0.481	208	-0.0010	225
11	ECU	0.479	211	-0.0047	255
12	Charlotte	0.460	249	0.0036	180
13	Rice	0.447	270	-0.0070	269

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	0.574	28	0.0150	63
2	Temple	0.535	102	0.0127	83
3	FAU	0.530	114	0.0028	184
4	Charlotte	0.516	164	0.0084	124
5	USF	0.511	184	0.0092	112
6	UAB	0.502	214	0.0070	137
7	Wichita State	0.501	217	0.0144	69
8	Tulane	0.493	246	-0.0269	364
9	Memphis	0.483	272	-0.0109	327
10	North Texas	0.483	273	0.0080	128
11	Rice	0.472	289	0.0007	211
12	ECU	0.438	354	-0.0199	356
13	UTSA	0.432	357	-0.0169	349

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	1.217	22	0.0546	15
2	Wichita State	1.158	66	0.0428	35
3	USF	1.153	70	0.0429	33
4	FAU	1.148	76	0.0100	176
5	Temple	1.143	85	0.0161	140
6	UAB	1.124	109	0.0073	193
7	Charlotte	1.091	158	0.0298	76
8	North Texas	1.058	207	-0.0020	241
9	Tulane	1.057	210	-0.0275	338
10	Rice	1.028	269	0.0054	201
11	Memphis	1.028	270	-0.0116	298
12	ECU	0.941	343	-0.0408	358
13	UTSA	0.933	345	-0.0510	361

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	0.120	2	-0.0031	124
2	UAB	0.128	16	-0.0047	84
3	Wichita State	0.134	26	-0.0069	47
4	Tulane	0.139	43	0.0063	299
5	Tulsa	0.143	69	-0.0075	43
6	USF	0.145	80	-0.0053	73
7	Charlotte	0.162	173	0.0041	265
8	FAU	0.165	200	0.0021	228
9	Rice	0.168	213	0.0010	207
10	UTSA	0.169	224	0.0160	359
11	ECU	0.172	247	0.0049	279
12	North Texas	0.174	266	0.0098	335
13	Memphis	0.182	292	0.0048	277

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	37.850	13	0.0302	110
2	USF	36.340	27	0.0782	9
3	Memphis	35.720	32	0.0153	181
4	UAB	34.770	52	-0.0076	307
5	Charlotte	33.550	61	0.0245	130
6	FAU	32.350	86	0.0212	147
7	North Texas	32.030	96	0.0439	66
8	Rice	31.620	106	0.0493	52
9	Tulsa	29.700	154	0.0271	121
10	ECU	29.410	161	-0.0076	306
11	UTSA	25.340	262	-0.0006	273
12	Temple	22.380	328	0.0008	261
13	Tulane	19.450	354	0.0331	96

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	0.483	11	0.0365	24
2	Temple	0.481	12	-0.0022	217
3	Tulsa	0.452	27	0.0412	18
4	USF	0.438	40	0.0015	191
5	North Texas	0.419	62	0.0064	158
6	ECU	0.417	66	0.0040	175
7	Charlotte	0.395	104	0.0082	143
8	Rice	0.391	108	-0.0124	291
9	Wichita State	0.389	111	0.0164	87
10	UAB	0.364	174	0.0066	157
11	Memphis	0.349	210	-0.0188	318
12	UTSA	0.332	247	-0.0056	243
13	FAU	0.328	257	-0.0101	272

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	127.311	24	6.2980	1
2	USF	120.281	74	2.7067	57
3	Temple	119.228	83	1.6841	126
4	FAU	118.258	93	0.7160	200
5	Wichita State	118.095	95	2.0953	94
6	Charlotte	115.743	115	1.5966	128
7	UAB	115.364	125	-0.3815	269
8	Memphis	113.043	151	-1.5195	334
9	Tulane	108.236	219	0.1833	235
10	North Texas	104.323	272	-2.6293	357
11	Rice	104.286	273	-0.3723	266
12	ECU	98.204	330	-2.7082	358
13	UTSA	94.961	351	-3.3228	364

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	41.028	60	0.5486	139
2	Wichita State	40.718	69	1.2046	75
3	FAU	40.658	71	0.4295	155
4	Tulsa	39.580	97	0.7389	102
5	Temple	38.302	161	0.7850	101
6	USF	38.025	174	1.2228	68
7	Charlotte	36.802	232	0.5941	132
8	Memphis	36.310	251	-0.4192	270
9	North Texas	36.118	261	0.4027	157
10	Rice	34.540	308	0.3806	164
11	Tulane	33.590	329	-1.8778	358
12	UTSA	32.653	343	-1.3955	347
13	ECU	32.114	354	-1.5244	351

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	89.403	10	1.1085	62
2	UAB	89.256	12	-0.3641	242
3	FAU	87.698	35	0.4459	131
4	USF	85.471	88	1.7709	25
5	Memphis	85.077	108	1.2010	54
6	UTSA	84.908	119	-1.0284	296
7	Charlotte	83.758	170	0.1265	173
8	Rice	83.713	172	0.6331	110
9	Tulsa	82.936	211	0.1059	177
10	ECU	80.990	280	-0.4075	246
11	Temple	80.565	296	-0.2949	235
12	North Texas	80.498	299	-1.1402	307
13	Tulane	77.508	350	-0.7150	272

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	47.728	81	1.0485	83
2	Tulsa	47.724	82	0.8850	103
3	FAU	46.335	141	0.1763	199
4	UAB	46.070	149	0.8106	112
5	Wichita State	45.360	181	0.6927	125
6	North Texas	45.156	191	0.9674	92
7	USF	44.598	226	0.4456	153
8	Charlotte	43.985	254	0.5588	141
9	Tulane	43.330	278	-1.9942	360
10	Memphis	42.535	300	-1.2046	340
11	Rice	41.183	329	0.0524	215
12	ECU	39.815	350	-1.3959	348
13	UTSA	38.573	361	-1.0933	330

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	68.941	23	0.3477	130
2	ECU	67.871	37	1.2320	62
3	Temple	64.436	96	0.0157	159
4	Wichita State	64.369	100	-2.8440	346
5	Memphis	63.956	110	-1.4261	291
6	North Texas	63.097	128	-0.7124	220
7	Rice	60.561	178	0.0133	162
8	FAU	58.348	222	-0.6029	210
9	UTSA	58.124	229	0.6176	111
10	Tulane	57.148	252	-1.0656	261
11	Charlotte	56.763	255	-0.5846	206
12	USF	56.041	273	-1.7083	308
13	Tulsa	51.958	331	-1.7163	309

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	32.987	8	0.7633	103
2	Wichita State	29.105	74	-0.3268	252
3	FAU	27.981	122	0.1908	172
4	Temple	27.425	150	0.4674	143
5	Memphis	26.439	196	-0.8072	296
6	North Texas	26.163	208	0.7229	109
7	USF	25.860	219	0.1537	184
8	ECU	25.625	230	-0.4127	265
9	Tulsa	24.061	285	-0.0776	218
10	Charlotte	23.931	289	-0.0081	207
11	Tulane	23.892	291	-0.7100	284
12	Rice	22.253	335	0.2158	170
13	UTSA	22.080	338	-0.2977	247

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	61.336	3	0.0303	157
2	Wichita State	57.299	36	-1.8676	319
3	ECU	54.841	74	0.7365	98
4	Memphis	54.496	82	-0.4480	208
5	Temple	52.026	139	-0.1608	175
6	FAU	51.014	162	-0.2557	187
7	Rice	50.654	171	0.3661	131
8	North Texas	50.497	174	-1.4742	301
9	UTSA	48.875	211	-0.2374	185
10	USF	47.873	241	-0.4840	210
11	Charlotte	47.525	249	-0.5435	216
12	Tulane	44.169	310	-1.3602	293
13	Tulsa	43.676	324	-1.0009	271

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	55.296	108	1.3309	104
2	FAU	55.267	109	0.6891	168
3	USF	54.880	124	0.6081	172
4	UAB	54.213	148	1.3236	106
5	Tulane	53.829	160	0.1705	218
6	Temple	53.525	169	0.9190	144
7	North Texas	52.844	190	2.7799	22
8	Wichita State	50.923	253	1.0545	127
9	Charlotte	50.868	255	0.5267	180
10	Memphis	48.471	308	-0.9290	307
11	ECU	46.747	336	-1.1967	316
12	UTSA	44.469	355	-0.4407	266
13	Rice	44.387	356	0.2080	215

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	48.042	35	1.7163	57
2	USF	43.959	93	1.7083	58
3	Charlotte	43.237	111	0.5846	160
4	Tulane	42.852	114	1.0656	105
5	UTSA	41.876	137	-0.6176	255
6	FAU	41.652	144	0.6029	156
7	Rice	39.439	188	-0.0133	204
8	North Texas	36.903	238	0.7124	146
9	Memphis	36.044	256	1.4261	75
10	Wichita State	35.631	266	2.8440	20
11	Temple	35.564	270	-0.0157	207
12	ECU	32.129	329	-1.2320	304
13	UAB	31.059	343	-0.3477	236

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	15.519	10	0.8164	54
2	Charlotte	12.871	83	0.6023	82
3	FAU	12.676	93	0.2387	147
4	Rice	12.287	120	0.1648	160
5	USF	12.166	128	1.0691	35
6	Wichita State	11.613	166	1.5314	11
7	Temple	10.877	199	0.3176	134
8	UTSA	10.573	217	-1.0979	353
9	North Texas	9.954	258	-0.3202	275
10	Memphis	9.871	263	0.3880	124
11	Tulane	9.697	272	-1.1678	359
12	UAB	8.040	344	-0.2147	246
13	ECU	6.488	360	-1.1117	355

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	39.260	45	1.1068	90
2	USF	37.598	80	2.2548	28
3	FAU	36.683	93	0.7016	126
4	Charlotte	36.234	101	0.6700	133
5	UTSA	36.033	110	-0.7909	280
6	Tulane	33.339	178	0.6452	135
7	Rice	33.059	187	0.2671	183
8	Wichita State	32.104	209	2.9761	13
9	Memphis	30.580	241	1.6490	59
10	North Texas	30.002	259	0.3340	175
11	Temple	28.539	287	-0.1341	217
12	UAB	27.920	303	-0.3943	243
13	ECU	26.149	334	-1.1440	313

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	39.825	13	1.1413	81
2	Temple	38.164	34	1.3273	66
3	Rice	37.072	60	0.1275	176
4	Charlotte	35.570	102	0.6961	122
5	Wichita State	34.824	134	1.4988	54
6	FAU	34.230	166	-0.0201	189
7	North Texas	33.003	220	-1.4265	324
8	USF	32.087	255	1.1289	83
9	Memphis	30.636	302	-1.2006	310
10	UTSA	30.139	321	-2.0538	345
11	Tulane	28.920	338	-4.2074	365
12	UAB	28.288	350	-0.4744	240
13	ECU	25.092	365	-2.3883	353

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	48.340	11	3.6538	24
2	Temple	48.090	12	-0.2209	217
3	Tulsa	45.230	27	4.1176	18
4	USF	43.790	40	0.1505	191
5	North Texas	41.910	62	0.6435	158
6	ECU	41.690	66	0.3986	175
7	Charlotte	39.470	104	0.8194	143
8	Rice	39.140	108	-1.2438	291
9	Wichita State	38.940	111	1.6366	87
10	UAB	36.390	174	0.6553	157
11	Memphis	34.950	210	-1.8765	318
12	UTSA	33.220	247	-0.5583	243
13	FAU	32.750	257	-1.0133	272

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	28.865	6	2.1770	22
2	USF	27.034	19	0.7749	123
3	Tulsa	27.022	20	3.1985	5
4	Temple	26.812	23	-0.2784	241
5	North Texas	23.633	90	-0.6850	286
6	ECU	23.396	96	0.0827	197
7	Wichita State	22.768	114	0.3504	163
8	Charlotte	22.638	121	1.1870	74
9	UAB	22.340	134	-0.1554	228
10	Rice	21.425	160	-0.3815	250
11	FAU	20.842	182	-0.0930	219
12	Memphis	20.294	201	-0.7087	289
13	UTSA	17.380	302	-1.2058	322

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	37.261	15	2.7205	23
2	Temple	36.825	20	-0.3299	238
3	USF	36.333	24	0.7199	145
4	Tulsa	34.428	44	3.0330	17
5	North Texas	34.068	50	0.1913	192
6	Wichita State	33.168	71	1.5324	74
7	ECU	32.967	76	0.0049	209
8	Charlotte	32.215	92	0.6735	152
9	UAB	32.066	99	0.5114	172
10	Rice	31.262	122	-0.7164	279
11	Memphis	28.988	189	-1.0884	302
12	FAU	27.669	233	-0.6347	273
13	UTSA	26.753	255	-0.8206	284

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	79.184	7	3.6237	9
2	Tulane	77.495	24	0.3759	159
3	FAU	74.631	89	1.1539	89
4	USF	73.410	119	0.5908	129
5	Temple	72.978	137	-0.3019	214
6	Charlotte	70.369	216	1.9845	43
7	ECU	70.134	229	-0.7943	245
8	Memphis	69.764	238	0.0260	190
9	Rice	69.643	245	0.5368	139
10	UAB	69.423	251	-1.7712	306
11	North Texas	69.166	257	-3.0961	344
12	Wichita State	68.520	269	-2.0043	315
13	UTSA	67.192	298	-2.0789	318

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	58.190	66	2.4840	61
2	Tulsa	58.113	68	-0.2592	249
3	North Texas	56.424	116	2.1692	77
4	Tulane	53.676	170	0.4209	190
5	Memphis	52.184	203	-0.5986	273
6	Charlotte	50.897	237	1.0550	145
7	Temple	49.570	261	1.4454	117
8	UAB	49.415	268	-0.9546	290
9	Rice	48.979	276	-0.2214	240
10	FAU	47.233	311	-2.0256	333
11	ECU	46.181	329	-1.0201	293
12	UTSA	46.160	330	1.5264	107
13	Wichita State	43.549	347	1.6106	103

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	6.678	28	-0.9040	33
2	Temple	7.067	45	-0.5476	91
3	Tulsa	7.373	67	-0.7231	65
4	Tulane	7.813	102	-0.0561	209
5	USF	7.967	115	-0.7115	67
6	FAU	8.581	180	-0.2272	162
7	UAB	8.655	188	-0.1023	194
8	ECU	8.824	205	0.4101	305
9	Charlotte	8.847	207	0.0711	244
10	North Texas	9.013	228	-0.0582	207
11	Rice	9.329	247	-0.8222	47
12	UTSA	10.572	328	1.0921	355
13	Memphis	10.983	337	0.5747	324

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	2.757	9	-0.4973	54
2	Wichita State	3.154	37	-1.0916	2
3	FAU	3.176	40	-0.4993	52
4	Tulane	3.479	70	-0.3766	90
5	Charlotte	3.643	92	-0.5194	45
6	ECU	4.285	189	-0.0432	211
7	North Texas	4.581	228	-0.0925	195
8	UAB	4.611	238	0.1808	281
9	Memphis	5.070	287	-0.0297	217
10	Rice	5.098	296	-0.6307	30
11	Temple	5.303	311	-0.1138	178
12	UTSA	5.666	329	0.1234	262
13	USF	5.958	348	0.0872	248

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Charlotte	27.431	42	0.2746	119
2	Temple	26.774	48	-0.0344	149
3	ECU	25.946	68	0.5520	78
4	Tulane	25.751	76	0.3719	109
5	Tulsa	24.635	106	1.2666	25
6	USF	24.395	116	-1.8752	325
7	Wichita State	24.029	134	0.6306	68
8	Rice	23.989	135	-2.2824	350
9	Memphis	23.849	146	-0.9999	254
10	North Texas	22.859	178	-1.6399	309
11	UAB	21.746	228	0.1746	129
12	FAU	21.063	252	-0.7873	234
13	UTSA	19.982	286	-0.5179	203

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	78.902	9	1.5361	45
2	Memphis	73.796	76	-0.0516	246
3	UTSA	73.710	79	1.1117	74
4	UAB	72.706	112	-0.7044	319
5	Rice	71.834	153	1.2775	60
6	FAU	71.825	154	1.3876	57
7	ECU	71.781	159	0.2908	197
8	Tulsa	71.527	171	1.5323	46
9	Tulane	69.021	273	-0.0056	240
10	Wichita State	67.965	314	-1.3169	350
11	Temple	67.227	329	-1.6051	361
12	North Texas	65.895	353	1.6992	33
13	Charlotte	65.352	356	-0.5640	308

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.458	30	0.0011	185
2	Wichita State	0.472	55	-0.0021	144
3	Memphis	0.488	93	-0.0067	102
4	UAB	0.491	106	-0.0062	109
5	UTSA	0.494	114	-0.0073	96
6	USF	0.510	171	0.0045	216
7	Tulsa	0.514	187	0.0009	182
8	Rice	0.516	199	0.0080	248
9	Temple	0.521	218	-0.0103	72
10	Charlotte	0.526	240	-0.0051	120
11	FAU	0.531	252	0.0113	275
12	Tulane	0.531	255	-0.0054	116
13	ECU	0.536	262	-0.0026	141

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.966	48	-0.0119	101
2	Wichita State	0.970	54	-0.0172	76
3	UAB	1.001	90	-0.0235	56
4	USF	1.014	111	0.0052	196
5	Memphis	1.028	133	-0.0047	135
6	Tulsa	1.042	153	-0.0019	149
7	FAU	1.066	189	0.0040	186
8	Temple	1.075	212	-0.0110	103
9	ECU	1.077	216	-0.0117	102
10	Rice	1.078	220	0.0056	198
11	Tulane	1.079	222	-0.0152	84
12	Charlotte	1.087	235	-0.0136	92
13	UTSA	1.099	256	0.0081	214

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	0.195	31	0.0008	174
2	North Texas	0.189	45	0.0075	67
3	Memphis	0.178	96	0.0072	75
4	ECU	0.173	118	0.0090	54
5	Tulsa	0.165	164	0.0075	66
6	Tulane	0.162	179	0.0063	81
7	Rice	0.161	189	0.0105	38
8	FAU	0.159	204	0.0090	53
9	Wichita State	0.157	214	0.0011	165
10	UAB	0.156	225	0.0012	164
11	UTSA	0.143	294	-0.0101	337
12	Charlotte	0.140	313	-0.0009	200
13	Temple	0.136	329	0.0020	149

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	78.160	10	0.0299	3
2	Wichita State	75.720	42	0.0135	43
3	FAU	75.650	46	0.0000	148
4	Temple	74.790	70	-0.0054	208
5	Charlotte	74.030	97	0.0044	112
6	Tulsa	73.950	104	-0.0018	168
7	North Texas	71.780	172	-0.0061	218
8	USF	71.690	174	0.0045	110
9	ECU	71.170	190	-0.0156	285
10	Rice	70.000	238	-0.0168	292
11	Tulane	68.170	295	-0.0167	291
12	Memphis	66.850	313	-0.0161	288
13	UTSA	65.140	335	-0.0112	252

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	0.305	60	-0.0148	57
2	Wichita State	0.320	90	-0.0071	106
3	Temple	0.320	91	-0.0046	124
4	Tulsa	0.332	121	0.0105	217
5	ECU	0.348	160	0.0009	159
6	FAU	0.356	174	0.0146	253
7	Tulane	0.356	177	-0.0025	137
8	UTSA	0.375	215	-0.0160	49
9	Rice	0.382	235	-0.0120	77
10	USF	0.424	310	-0.0070	107
11	Memphis	0.426	312	0.0275	310
12	Charlotte	0.429	316	-0.0102	86
13	North Texas	0.471	346	0.0049	181

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	102.988	42	-0.7378	64
2	Memphis	105.869	71	0.9073	181
3	North Texas	106.102	74	1.5152	221
4	USF	107.669	103	-0.4491	78
5	UAB	109.371	119	-0.9456	51
6	Tulsa	112.103	163	0.1783	122
7	FAU	112.269	166	1.0061	189
8	Temple	112.310	169	1.5953	232
9	Charlotte	115.433	227	0.1574	119
10	ECU	115.520	229	1.5704	229
11	Rice	116.629	243	2.4188	292
12	Tulane	117.611	256	3.3173	336
13	UTSA	118.558	268	0.4614	148

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	31.255	20	-0.0236	180
2	Memphis	33.549	61	-0.9486	58
3	USF	33.649	62	0.0249	185
4	Wichita State	34.370	88	-0.5753	108
5	UAB	35.313	123	-1.1277	44
6	Tulsa	36.058	149	-0.7609	83
7	Charlotte	36.948	183	-0.4960	122
8	Tulane	37.442	205	-0.2524	150
9	UTSA	37.558	211	0.4732	244
10	FAU	37.599	215	0.2942	224
11	Rice	37.747	222	0.5878	262
12	ECU	37.880	229	-0.1315	165
13	Temple	38.350	253	-0.5861	106

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	77.143	29	-0.1736	185
2	North Texas	77.205	31	-0.9530	83
3	Memphis	80.904	111	-0.6602	117
4	FAU	80.917	112	-1.7296	33
5	Charlotte	81.451	129	0.3443	250
6	ECU	81.493	130	-0.6633	116
7	Tulsa	81.997	148	-1.2380	57
8	UAB	82.207	160	-0.7840	104
9	Rice	82.784	179	-0.0460	210
10	Wichita State	83.055	193	-0.6990	112
11	Tulane	83.613	216	-0.1078	204
12	Temple	85.460	286	0.3649	252
13	UTSA	88.152	340	2.1408	352

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	40.229	41	0.4381	229
2	Wichita State	41.434	65	-0.3215	131
3	Memphis	41.561	70	-0.8033	78
4	UAB	42.605	99	-1.0099	58
5	UTSA	42.653	101	-0.6146	97
6	USF	43.988	148	0.1621	186
7	Tulsa	44.170	155	-0.2151	140
8	Tulane	45.013	198	-0.2516	134
9	Temple	45.049	200	-0.8894	67
10	Charlotte	45.503	222	-0.7443	82
11	Rice	45.541	224	0.7248	256
12	ECU	46.516	267	0.1153	175
13	FAU	46.592	269	1.3055	302

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	55.700	61	-1.5368	63
2	Tulane	56.648	84	0.4824	257
3	UTSA	58.675	131	-0.8180	116
4	Tulsa	59.674	162	-1.1964	84
5	Charlotte	59.756	167	-0.2715	181
6	Temple	59.980	176	-0.5421	146
7	ECU	60.054	180	0.3230	238
8	UAB	60.440	190	-1.1817	88
9	USF	61.266	212	-0.4094	162
10	North Texas	61.504	218	0.8297	283
11	Wichita State	63.123	262	-1.3872	72
12	FAU	64.602	303	0.0490	210
13	Rice	65.121	314	0.8269	282

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	21.883	31	-1.1018	50
2	North Texas	22.704	48	0.5428	268
3	USF	22.875	55	-0.3918	136
4	Tulane	24.042	99	0.3125	223
5	Tulsa	24.363	114	-1.1195	48
6	UAB	24.539	122	-1.6762	12
7	Wichita State	24.799	135	-0.6675	99
8	Charlotte	25.177	160	-1.0274	53
9	UTSA	25.615	184	0.3449	233
10	ECU	26.344	222	0.5125	261
11	Temple	26.408	224	-0.4278	131
12	FAU	26.998	245	0.7555	288
13	Rice	27.742	276	0.4880	256

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	45.101	52	-1.6156	56
2	USF	47.233	107	-0.5037	162
3	North Texas	47.608	117	-0.0747	218
4	Tulane	47.647	118	0.4627	262
5	Charlotte	48.368	144	-0.1676	209
6	ECU	48.959	156	-0.2852	197
7	Tulsa	49.073	161	-1.8144	45
8	UAB	49.837	191	-1.4539	68
9	Temple	51.108	233	-0.3034	194
10	UTSA	51.430	248	0.4909	265
11	FAU	52.138	267	-1.1535	96
12	Wichita State	52.313	269	-1.6402	54
13	Rice	53.905	299	0.6417	276

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	46.999	51	1.0061	249
2	Wichita State	48.223	79	0.1730	175
3	UAB	49.138	98	-1.9569	22
4	USF	49.246	100	-0.3487	121
5	Memphis	49.338	104	-0.4185	117
6	Tulsa	50.213	122	-0.4280	116
7	UTSA	50.220	123	0.1212	170
8	Rice	50.476	131	0.1677	173
9	Tulane	51.391	160	0.5678	211
10	Charlotte	52.011	186	-1.7457	26
11	FAU	52.382	198	2.5202	339
12	Temple	52.463	200	-0.5050	109
13	ECU	53.746	237	1.0954	258

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Rice	34.879	52	-0.8269	84
2	FAU	35.398	63	-0.0490	156
3	Wichita State	36.877	104	1.3872	294
4	North Texas	38.496	148	-0.8297	83
5	USF	38.734	154	0.4094	204
6	UAB	39.560	176	1.1817	278
7	ECU	39.946	186	-0.3230	128
8	Temple	40.020	190	0.5421	220
9	Charlotte	40.244	199	0.2715	185
10	Tulsa	40.326	204	1.1964	282
11	UTSA	41.325	235	0.8180	250
12	Tulane	43.352	282	-0.4824	109
13	Memphis	44.300	305	1.5368	303

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	8.551	27	-0.5664	59
2	Wichita State	9.570	74	0.0922	192
3	Rice	10.005	113	0.0998	194
4	FAU	10.601	151	-0.4613	82
5	UAB	10.774	167	0.5485	283
6	USF	10.774	168	0.4168	258
7	ECU	11.536	226	-0.6439	47
8	Memphis	11.666	233	0.1532	209
9	Tulsa	11.695	237	0.3586	247
10	Charlotte	11.771	246	0.5314	278
11	Temple	11.942	257	-0.1583	135
12	UTSA	11.943	258	0.1283	204
13	Tulane	13.400	323	-0.5649	61

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	28.779	59	-0.5761	109
2	Rice	28.878	61	-0.6877	98
3	North Texas	29.596	86	-0.8783	84
4	USF	29.910	93	0.3301	213
5	Wichita State	30.742	121	0.9412	268
6	UAB	32.370	172	0.6699	244
7	ECU	32.534	177	-0.3781	131
8	Tulsa	32.924	184	0.5763	235
9	Charlotte	33.083	187	0.5119	229
10	Temple	34.352	233	0.6683	243
11	Memphis	35.803	277	0.9554	269
12	Tulane	35.966	283	-0.5705	111
13	UTSA	36.723	298	1.6499	317

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	28.001	13	-1.4646	57
2	Wichita State	29.567	37	-0.5234	130
3	UAB	32.018	118	0.2768	210
4	Memphis	32.394	138	-0.8504	107
5	UTSA	33.062	163	-1.1855	74
6	ECU	33.296	175	-2.4909	10
7	Rice	34.400	234	0.9713	270
8	Temple	34.540	241	-1.1610	75
9	Tulsa	34.909	253	0.4242	224
10	USF	35.284	263	0.8677	260
11	Charlotte	35.715	275	1.7230	319
12	FAU	36.052	288	-0.8190	112
13	Tulane	37.481	325	-1.4696	56

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	30.490	60	-1.4813	57
2	Wichita State	32.010	90	-0.7071	106
3	Temple	32.020	91	-0.4610	124
4	Tulsa	33.170	121	1.0474	217
5	ECU	34.790	160	0.0938	159
6	FAU	35.560	174	1.4612	253
7	Tulane	35.630	177	-0.2542	137
8	UTSA	37.510	215	-1.6011	49
9	Rice	38.190	235	-1.1973	77
10	USF	42.420	310	-0.7045	107
11	Memphis	42.580	312	2.7468	310
12	Charlotte	42.910	316	-1.0205	86
13	North Texas	47.140	346	0.4935	181

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	18.667	85	-0.6196	83
2	Wichita State	18.729	89	-0.6594	77
3	Temple	18.899	96	0.2268	183
4	Tulane	19.627	131	-0.4499	101
5	Tulsa	20.147	150	0.8410	249
6	ECU	20.353	159	-0.2581	130
7	FAU	20.791	173	0.2717	188
8	Rice	22.296	238	-0.7147	71
9	UTSA	22.833	253	-0.2690	128
10	Charlotte	22.984	262	-0.8974	52
11	USF	23.318	272	0.0583	159
12	Memphis	24.043	304	1.2731	291
13	North Texas	25.506	332	-0.5788	90

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	24.791	55	-1.3455	30
2	Temple	26.604	94	-0.2799	126
3	Wichita State	26.764	101	-0.6365	90
4	Tulsa	26.952	110	0.5390	195
5	ECU	27.816	141	0.0771	161
6	FAU	28.681	162	0.6335	204
7	Tulane	29.365	187	-0.2253	133
8	Rice	30.971	235	-0.9559	51
9	UTSA	31.711	254	-0.4808	100
10	USF	32.799	283	-0.4269	109
11	Memphis	34.227	318	1.8843	305
12	Charlotte	34.421	319	-0.8873	59
13	North Texas	36.445	344	0.2580	176

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Charlotte	65.585	17	-1.7171	58
2	Tulane	67.458	47	-1.1254	93
3	Wichita State	67.689	52	-1.6842	61
4	Temple	70.110	127	0.8097	261
5	USF	70.280	133	0.8738	263
6	North Texas	70.424	145	-2.3173	32
7	Memphis	71.044	164	-0.1990	169
8	Rice	71.330	176	0.1247	202
9	ECU	72.260	213	-0.8363	109
10	FAU	72.877	238	-0.7547	120
11	UTSA	73.438	266	0.4369	238
12	Tulsa	74.177	288	1.5540	312
13	UAB	76.922	348	1.6159	316

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	46.512	52	0.6318	207
2	North Texas	48.852	96	-0.0171	159
3	Wichita State	48.885	97	2.4244	311
4	Charlotte	50.840	140	-0.3452	125
5	Temple	52.201	169	1.0362	240
6	USF	52.257	171	-0.7463	97
7	UAB	52.822	186	-1.2173	68
8	Rice	53.329	199	-0.6543	101
9	UTSA	53.648	207	0.8906	229
10	ECU	53.713	208	-2.1580	31
11	Tulsa	54.307	223	1.7945	281
12	Tulane	57.487	292	-1.3563	61
13	Memphis	59.515	316	1.0989	243

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	12.412	33	0.1054	166
2	Memphis	12.316	34	0.8519	39
3	North Texas	11.770	48	0.4096	93
4	Tulane	11.395	65	0.4597	85
5	Tulsa	10.828	99	1.0234	23
6	UAB	10.534	117	0.3412	111
7	ECU	10.265	133	0.2350	135
8	Rice	10.017	147	1.1053	20
9	UTSA	9.477	182	-0.7135	326
10	Wichita State	8.301	270	-0.3793	279
11	FAU	7.840	292	-0.2889	252
12	Charlotte	7.823	295	0.3983	97
13	Temple	7.414	317	-0.3150	256

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	7.725	16	0.3651	87
2	North Texas	7.412	22	0.8960	12
3	Tulane	6.693	33	-0.0160	179
4	Temple	5.787	82	-0.1695	233
5	USF	5.778	84	0.1380	132
6	Charlotte	5.628	90	0.6431	28
7	Rice	5.614	91	0.5720	40
8	Memphis	5.547	96	-0.2357	258
9	UTSA	5.504	99	0.0119	164
10	Wichita State	5.321	117	-0.5294	323
11	ECU	4.841	161	-0.1252	208
12	UAB	4.659	178	-0.2110	250
13	Tulsa	2.843	334	-0.1994	244

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	19.696	9	-1.2958	10
2	Tulsa	23.103	65	0.6197	258
3	ECU	23.605	88	0.2616	196
4	Tulane	24.727	146	-0.1800	125
5	Temple	24.777	148	0.0952	170
6	Wichita State	24.888	156	0.0143	155
7	FAU	24.993	167	0.1298	175
8	UTSA	25.376	194	-0.3456	96
9	Rice	26.579	252	-0.2108	117
10	Charlotte	27.548	291	-0.7067	50
11	USF	27.673	298	0.2989	203
12	Memphis	28.255	320	0.7081	267
13	North Texas	30.298	355	1.0191	311

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	79.381	4	1.0398	68
2	Memphis	73.823	72	0.4523	148
3	UTSA	72.373	124	0.9078	83
4	Rice	72.073	142	0.9786	76
5	UAB	72.010	144	-0.8536	327
6	FAU	71.711	159	1.1218	52
7	ECU	71.040	199	0.4653	145
8	Tulsa	70.882	204	1.0603	65
9	Tulane	69.654	250	-0.0007	236
10	Wichita State	68.621	290	-0.5036	300
11	North Texas	67.798	315	1.6900	30
12	Temple	67.513	326	-1.6350	360
13	Charlotte	66.010	352	0.6838	117