Conferences – HoopSci

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	16.588	45	1.9071	12
2	Tulsa	16.581	46	1.7501	16
3	Wichita State	12.712	65	0.4870	118
4	FAU	5.430	103	-0.5364	249
5	UAB	3.747	122	0.1351	155
6	Temple	3.510	125	-0.6272	258
7	Memphis	2.145	137	-1.7552	342
8	North Texas	1.406	147	-1.1697	310
9	Charlotte	0.028	155	0.5846	105
10	Tulane	-4.727	205	-0.3006	223
11	Rice	-7.367	232	-0.2289	210
12	ECU	-9.341	245	0.7602	88
13	UTSA	-23.348	343	-1.5774	336

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.169	43	-0.0050	198
2	Tulsa	0.157	49	0.0075	92
3	USF	0.150	55	0.0046	115
4	UAB	0.108	91	-0.0146	272
5	Temple	0.084	114	-0.0077	216
6	North Texas	0.081	117	-0.0165	290
7	FAU	0.080	118	-0.0084	226
8	Charlotte	0.006	192	-0.0002	159
9	Tulane	0.003	196	-0.0179	299
10	Memphis	-0.009	207	-0.0081	220
11	Rice	-0.078	278	-0.0050	199
12	ECU	-0.135	321	-0.0017	177
13	UTSA	-0.195	348	-0.0276	341

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	1634.400	51	29.4509	5
2	Tulsa	1612.884	64	29.0635	7
3	Wichita State	1608.551	68	19.9944	32
4	UAB	1603.055	72	-0.4024	185
5	North Texas	1580.325	84	-9.8992	282
6	Memphis	1558.124	106	-25.6558	354
7	FAU	1550.512	113	-12.5808	297
8	Tulane	1519.893	159	-0.3849	184
9	Temple	1481.976	208	-7.1666	263
10	Charlotte	1480.904	209	3.8554	140
11	ECU	1436.424	256	-7.7688	270
12	Rice	1425.736	268	-2.5367	220
13	UTSA	1312.216	353	-20.2777	343

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	0.597	31	0.0201	9
2	Tulsa	0.588	36	0.0071	115
3	Wichita State	0.564	59	0.0132	42
4	FAU	0.519	120	-0.0143	357
5	UAB	0.518	121	0.0076	106
6	North Texas	0.518	122	-0.0016	261
7	Tulane	0.509	151	0.0036	175
8	Charlotte	0.497	182	0.0043	160
9	Memphis	0.495	187	-0.0155	363
10	Temple	0.470	232	-0.0043	296
11	Rice	0.459	249	-0.0021	271
12	ECU	0.452	258	-0.0047	300
13	UTSA	0.411	332	-0.0049	305

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	0.558	26	-0.0185	349
2	Charlotte	0.536	83	-0.0052	218
3	FAU	0.522	146	-0.0073	239
4	USF	0.507	215	-0.0106	289
5	Temple	0.505	225	-0.0016	170
6	Tulane	0.493	282	-0.0142	325
7	Wichita State	0.492	291	-0.0060	225
8	Rice	0.488	299	-0.0002	151
9	Memphis	0.487	301	-0.0076	246
10	UAB	0.485	304	0.0062	68
11	ECU	0.468	343	0.0076	55
12	North Texas	0.464	349	-0.0123	311
13	UTSA	0.450	360	0.0010	134

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	1.189	16	-0.0124	256
2	USF	1.136	66	-0.0040	187
3	Wichita State	1.113	103	-0.0048	195
4	Charlotte	1.107	112	-0.0057	199
5	Temple	1.100	127	-0.0064	208
6	FAU	1.086	152	-0.0263	327
7	UAB	1.079	173	0.0063	110
8	Rice	1.047	250	0.0007	157
9	North Texas	1.035	275	-0.0153	281
10	Tulane	1.035	277	-0.0138	266
11	Memphis	1.025	293	-0.0022	176
12	ECU	0.999	326	0.0169	46
13	UTSA	0.958	352	0.0133	57

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	0.119	3	-0.0053	114
2	Temple	0.123	12	-0.0045	134
3	Wichita State	0.140	68	-0.0024	193
4	USF	0.141	81	-0.0049	124
5	Tulsa	0.143	89	0.0014	267
6	Tulane	0.144	100	-0.0091	44
7	North Texas	0.147	122	-0.0133	11
8	ECU	0.157	197	0.0057	330
9	UTSA	0.161	225	-0.0109	28
10	Charlotte	0.163	240	0.0013	265
11	Rice	0.164	246	-0.0016	217
12	FAU	0.170	289	0.0063	335
13	Memphis	0.176	315	-0.0106	30

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	37.210	6	-0.0121	200
2	USF	35.690	12	0.0059	54
3	Memphis	33.080	41	-0.0072	141
4	Rice	32.980	45	0.0043	65
5	North Texas	32.490	56	-0.0301	332
6	Charlotte	31.780	74	0.0131	16
7	FAU	30.400	112	-0.0234	301
8	Tulsa	30.290	114	0.0155	10
9	UAB	30.010	123	-0.0201	276
10	ECU	29.840	127	0.0149	11
11	UTSA	26.880	226	0.0020	75
12	Temple	25.760	261	-0.0131	210
13	Tulane	18.920	359	-0.0147	226

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	0.451	12	-0.0180	282
2	Tulsa	0.422	42	0.0055	117
3	Temple	0.421	44	-0.0378	351
4	USF	0.417	51	-0.0370	348
5	North Texas	0.404	64	0.0150	67
6	ECU	0.402	72	0.0036	131
7	Charlotte	0.369	142	-0.0119	242
8	Wichita State	0.369	143	-0.0054	192
9	UAB	0.366	152	-0.0098	234
10	Memphis	0.350	203	0.0199	42
11	Rice	0.343	222	-0.0307	337
12	FAU	0.340	228	0.0191	45
13	UTSA	0.304	315	-0.0040	183

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	126.104	30	1.5110	35
2	USF	120.629	66	1.1286	79
3	Charlotte	117.277	91	1.1179	82
4	Wichita State	116.729	99	0.4240	212
5	Temple	114.446	126	-0.3135	312
6	FAU	114.041	133	-0.6943	346
7	UAB	112.953	151	-0.3142	314
8	Memphis	110.118	190	-0.8710	352
9	Rice	109.114	206	1.1557	75
10	Tulane	108.818	219	-0.3321	316
11	North Texas	106.791	244	-0.4188	326
12	ECU	105.436	273	0.5927	174
13	UTSA	100.317	330	0.0194	273

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	39.385	83	-0.3343	232
2	FAU	39.010	105	-0.9408	317
3	UAB	39.007	106	0.7821	47
4	Tulsa	38.964	109	-1.1833	343
5	Charlotte	37.856	177	-0.2451	210
6	USF	37.723	184	0.4952	89
7	Temple	37.233	212	0.6874	56
8	Memphis	36.351	257	-0.3436	236
9	North Texas	35.930	281	-0.6683	279
10	Rice	35.856	283	0.5361	74
11	ECU	34.689	318	0.4377	98
12	UTSA	33.995	341	0.6871	57
13	Tulane	33.018	355	-0.8944	308

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	89.135	9	-0.0444	223
2	UAB	88.109	20	0.1169	197
3	Rice	86.354	55	2.1946	13
4	USF	86.274	58	2.6770	8
5	UTSA	86.078	70	1.4897	41
6	FAU	84.603	142	-1.7488	354
7	North Texas	84.300	154	0.1009	202
8	Memphis	83.889	177	-0.0833	230
9	Charlotte	83.353	198	0.8042	102
10	Temple	83.216	210	1.2719	55
11	Tulsa	83.134	217	1.0274	77
12	ECU	82.568	250	0.0299	213
13	Tulane	78.261	355	1.1493	64

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	46.787	82	-1.9593	360
2	FAU	46.064	125	-0.1695	177
3	Charlotte	45.602	158	-0.7578	269
4	Temple	44.859	196	0.1315	120
5	UAB	44.387	229	0.8371	51
6	Wichita State	44.081	252	-0.4453	230
7	USF	43.769	271	-0.7252	263
8	Memphis	43.355	287	-0.3410	209
9	North Texas	42.774	306	-0.9269	290
10	Tulane	42.281	320	-1.6442	352
11	ECU	42.131	327	0.5022	85
12	Rice	41.530	337	-0.3635	214
13	UTSA	39.535	360	0.2925	96

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	69.385	18	-0.0144	186
2	ECU	68.577	30	-0.2985	212
3	North Texas	67.336	44	0.8816	93
4	Memphis	66.152	64	1.4654	42
5	Wichita State	66.036	66	0.2849	154
6	Temple	63.980	114	0.9619	81
7	FAU	61.632	161	2.8240	5
8	UTSA	59.559	206	1.6871	27
9	USF	56.085	273	0.2422	158
10	Rice	55.968	276	-3.4396	364
11	Tulane	54.971	299	-2.2443	351
12	Charlotte	54.574	308	-2.1626	348
13	Tulsa	53.392	328	-1.0881	302

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	31.427	9	1.1703	30
2	Wichita State	28.974	59	-0.1277	201
3	FAU	28.236	93	0.1282	154
4	North Texas	27.632	123	-0.2120	218
5	Memphis	27.406	137	0.3891	107
6	ECU	27.139	146	0.0389	176
7	Temple	27.131	147	1.0371	38
8	USF	25.396	233	0.7428	63
9	Charlotte	24.460	280	-0.7961	307
10	Tulsa	23.957	303	-1.5707	359
11	UTSA	23.638	314	0.9096	46
12	Rice	22.611	339	-0.3270	240
13	Tulane	21.732	354	-1.3632	354

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	61.088	6	0.0819	197
2	Wichita State	58.615	19	0.2451	183
3	North Texas	56.725	42	0.7707	114
4	ECU	56.553	44	-0.1507	226
5	Memphis	55.508	57	1.2196	65
6	Temple	53.373	116	1.6765	37
7	FAU	52.034	148	1.2112	66
8	UTSA	51.200	172	2.4129	12
9	USF	48.348	233	1.6986	34
10	Rice	48.223	241	-1.9961	350
11	Charlotte	45.405	304	-1.3758	328
12	Tulsa	44.545	317	-0.3998	243
13	Tulane	42.867	341	-1.1576	313

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	54.545	89	-0.8969	283
2	Charlotte	54.335	98	-0.4116	221
3	Tulsa	53.181	144	-2.9647	362
4	USF	53.112	147	-0.4615	230
5	UAB	51.666	216	1.6498	23
6	Temple	51.361	232	0.6501	87
7	Tulane	50.519	264	-2.0588	343
8	North Texas	49.426	294	-1.2762	311
9	Wichita State	49.416	295	-0.4930	233
10	Memphis	49.319	302	-0.3817	214
11	ECU	48.049	328	0.1502	142
12	Rice	47.049	345	1.0582	55
13	UTSA	45.760	354	0.1169	144

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	46.608	38	1.0881	64
2	Charlotte	45.426	58	2.1626	18
3	Tulane	45.029	67	2.2443	15
4	Rice	44.032	90	3.4396	2
5	USF	43.915	93	-0.2422	208
6	UTSA	40.441	160	-1.6871	339
7	FAU	38.368	205	-2.8240	361
8	Temple	36.020	252	-0.9619	285
9	Wichita State	33.964	300	-0.2849	212
10	Memphis	33.848	302	-1.4654	324
11	North Texas	32.664	322	-0.8816	273
12	ECU	31.423	336	0.2985	154
13	UAB	30.615	348	0.0144	180

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	15.006	17	0.3874	73
2	Charlotte	13.395	61	0.5510	50
3	Rice	13.245	65	0.8630	22
4	USF	12.326	115	-0.2476	232
5	Tulane	11.286	175	0.4688	64
6	FAU	10.774	208	-1.0691	350
7	Wichita State	10.410	228	-0.2066	220
8	UTSA	10.357	233	-0.2225	224
9	Temple	10.102	252	-0.3497	249
10	Memphis	8.945	321	-0.7327	321
11	North Texas	8.297	340	-0.4562	278
12	UAB	7.580	354	-0.3881	265
13	ECU	7.550	355	0.3989	72

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	38.589	51	1.4271	44
2	Rice	38.132	58	4.1907	1
3	Charlotte	37.948	62	2.1800	16
4	USF	37.926	65	0.9784	75
5	Tulane	35.393	129	2.3070	11
6	UTSA	34.878	139	-0.9232	292
7	FAU	32.570	193	-2.9601	364
8	Wichita State	30.521	242	-0.2895	232
9	Temple	29.843	260	-0.4046	242
10	Memphis	28.381	292	-1.3029	317
11	North Texas	27.576	312	-0.6698	273
12	UAB	27.022	324	0.0349	187
13	ECU	26.015	342	0.1806	173

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	39.048	7	-0.3481	185
2	Charlotte	35.648	86	-0.5401	207
3	Rice	35.076	121	-0.8235	239
4	Wichita State	33.583	205	-0.9792	261
5	Temple	33.496	211	-1.4574	303
6	FAU	32.879	237	0.2665	118
7	USF	32.230	273	-1.2715	287
8	Tulane	31.333	311	-0.3140	181
9	Memphis	30.803	326	-0.9809	262
10	UTSA	29.734	348	0.2475	120
11	North Texas	29.328	356	-0.9286	256
12	ECU	29.217	358	1.3831	36
13	UAB	28.435	363	-1.2429	285

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	45.060	12	-1.8018	282
2	Tulsa	42.170	42	0.5458	117
3	Temple	42.080	44	-3.7780	351
4	USF	41.720	51	-3.6972	348
5	North Texas	40.440	64	1.5050	67
6	ECU	40.160	72	0.3570	131
7	Charlotte	36.950	142	-1.1863	242
8	Wichita State	36.910	143	-0.5447	192
9	UAB	36.620	152	-0.9790	234
10	Memphis	34.980	203	1.9915	42
11	Rice	34.310	222	-3.0693	337
12	FAU	34.000	228	1.9125	45
13	UTSA	30.360	315	-0.3947	183

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulane	26.149	11	-0.0594	168
2	Tulsa	25.980	15	0.7465	86
3	USF	25.814	18	-1.1439	305
4	Temple	25.391	23	-1.6611	335
5	North Texas	23.295	75	0.2972	127
6	ECU	22.937	93	0.4163	116
7	UAB	22.334	121	-0.5426	242
8	Wichita State	22.101	133	0.3961	117
9	Charlotte	21.591	163	-0.6312	248
10	Memphis	20.882	190	1.2052	46
11	FAU	19.777	233	0.3210	126
12	Rice	19.719	235	-1.8643	345
13	UTSA	17.485	325	0.1827	139

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	34.595	19	-2.2258	339
2	Tulane	34.049	29	-0.8842	252
3	Temple	33.952	32	-2.4355	345
4	North Texas	33.580	39	1.1459	64
5	Tulsa	33.314	45	1.0960	65
6	ECU	32.513	54	0.4497	120
7	Wichita State	31.874	76	-0.4548	212
8	UAB	31.634	85	-0.7834	238
9	Charlotte	30.197	144	-0.6232	225
10	Memphis	28.984	187	1.5968	40
11	Rice	28.863	189	-2.1369	334
12	FAU	27.768	230	0.7893	93
13	UTSA	25.178	309	0.4341	123

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tulsa	77.821	15	-0.1697	217
2	Tulane	77.767	18	2.0346	38
3	Temple	74.705	82	0.6966	136
4	USF	74.122	103	2.0305	39
5	Charlotte	71.308	217	-0.8436	273
6	FAU	70.957	230	-1.0435	287
7	Memphis	70.948	231	0.5568	149
8	UAB	70.590	241	-0.2637	224
9	UTSA	70.222	253	-0.2023	220
10	ECU	70.064	259	0.5019	156
11	Wichita State	69.218	280	1.7919	51
12	North Texas	68.582	299	-1.4789	309
13	Rice	67.914	320	-1.9373	326

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	58.599	47	-0.6594	214
2	Tulane	55.698	95	-0.4136	203
3	Tulsa	55.567	100	0.6711	119
4	Charlotte	50.233	239	1.3717	69
5	North Texas	50.097	244	0.8765	103
6	UAB	49.820	252	1.7839	43
7	Memphis	49.728	256	-2.8382	331
8	Temple	48.148	289	-3.4344	353
9	ECU	46.924	310	0.3372	147
10	Rice	46.509	317	-0.2421	188
11	FAU	46.486	318	-2.1820	303
12	UTSA	43.210	351	-2.4411	313
13	Wichita State	41.142	359	-1.8161	286

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	7.641	42	-0.3150	88
2	Temple	7.688	44	-0.3809	69
3	USF	7.995	70	-0.1766	132
4	Tulane	8.227	99	-0.4562	50
5	Wichita State	8.280	104	0.2228	239
6	North Texas	8.512	130	-1.0441	4
7	Tulsa	8.883	181	0.4063	280
8	ECU	9.178	214	0.5932	316
9	Charlotte	9.826	283	0.8679	347
10	FAU	9.879	288	0.6619	326
11	Rice	10.210	311	0.2658	254
12	Memphis	11.032	348	-0.3506	72
13	UTSA	11.040	349	-0.7138	24

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	3.597	41	0.4193	303
2	Tulsa	4.178	122	-0.0152	169
3	Charlotte	4.293	148	-0.1653	114
4	ECU	4.461	178	-0.3766	51
5	Tulane	4.492	188	0.6409	347
6	Wichita State	4.569	203	-0.2974	72
7	Rice	5.033	267	-0.0617	145
8	Temple	5.753	338	-0.3711	54
9	Memphis	5.768	339	-0.6011	11
10	UAB	5.786	341	-0.2399	84
11	USF	6.035	353	-0.2087	96
12	North Texas	6.055	354	-0.1476	118
13	UTSA	6.373	360	0.0166	182

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Temple	26.418	43	-1.2560	349
2	Tulsa	25.591	78	0.2949	139
3	Tulane	25.526	84	-0.4153	253
4	Charlotte	25.320	97	-1.3373	355
5	ECU	25.211	108	-0.5238	269
6	Memphis	24.806	132	0.8764	60
7	North Texas	24.779	133	0.3070	134
8	Wichita State	24.759	137	0.2308	152
9	USF	24.701	142	-0.5586	278
10	Rice	24.286	166	-0.6523	291
11	UAB	22.946	243	-0.3874	247
12	FAU	22.376	283	0.4817	111
13	UTSA	20.869	344	-0.0904	210

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	76.954	3	-0.7690	252
2	Memphis	73.405	31	0.9310	16
3	UAB	72.951	47	-1.4527	331
4	FAU	72.320	70	-1.0005	294
5	ECU	71.901	88	0.6873	36
6	UTSA	71.479	98	-0.4849	206
7	Tulsa	71.159	121	0.9505	14
8	Wichita State	70.579	152	1.2507	9
9	Tulane	69.798	189	0.2541	75
10	Rice	69.716	192	-0.2869	170
11	North Texas	68.251	261	2.3629	1
12	Temple	67.062	308	-0.6768	238
13	Charlotte	66.029	338	0.1130	99

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.474	25	-0.0068	87
2	North Texas	0.485	45	0.0015	181
3	Memphis	0.487	50	0.0125	306
4	USF	0.491	65	-0.0017	150
5	FAU	0.496	78	-0.0101	49
6	Tulsa	0.498	88	-0.0076	76
7	UAB	0.500	93	0.0071	250
8	Tulane	0.508	134	0.0024	195
9	Temple	0.508	140	0.0047	227
10	Charlotte	0.509	143	-0.0059	97
11	Rice	0.514	173	-0.0097	57
12	ECU	0.526	237	0.0088	271
13	UTSA	0.534	279	-0.0069	84

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	0.992	33	-0.0025	116
2	North Texas	0.992	34	0.0007	146
3	USF	1.000	38	-0.0159	46
4	UAB	1.028	80	0.0158	250
5	FAU	1.042	102	-0.0012	128
6	Memphis	1.043	106	0.0400	351
7	Tulsa	1.045	110	-0.0081	91
8	Temple	1.058	142	0.0061	179
9	Tulane	1.077	202	0.0192	266
10	ECU	1.092	239	0.0185	260
11	Rice	1.101	264	-0.0129	56
12	Charlotte	1.117	295	0.0050	174
13	UTSA	1.172	352	0.0144	239

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	0.198	8	-0.0032	168
2	USF	0.181	38	0.0153	2
3	Memphis	0.173	76	-0.0149	353
4	Tulane	0.158	157	-0.0044	195
5	ECU	0.153	194	-0.0084	282
6	UAB	0.148	225	-0.0072	260
7	Wichita State	0.147	229	-0.0044	196
8	Tulsa	0.144	249	-0.0000	96
9	Temple	0.143	251	0.0044	42
10	FAU	0.143	255	-0.0119	335
11	Rice	0.143	263	-0.0073	263
12	UTSA	0.139	294	-0.0118	333
13	Charlotte	0.121	355	-0.0073	262

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	74.950	42	-0.0080	266
2	Wichita State	74.850	49	0.0037	139
3	FAU	74.720	55	-0.0018	200
4	Temple	73.800	92	-0.0018	201
5	Tulsa	73.360	113	0.0016	159
6	USF	71.320	194	-0.0172	332
7	North Texas	71.070	214	0.0138	56
8	Charlotte	69.820	273	-0.0107	294
9	Rice	69.580	280	0.0001	173
10	ECU	69.040	296	0.0022	154
11	Memphis	67.230	334	0.0018	157
12	Tulane	66.530	343	-0.0089	274
13	UTSA	62.760	363	-0.0157	325

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	0.286	32	-0.0091	125
2	Tulsa	0.319	96	-0.0004	197
3	ECU	0.326	105	-0.0112	110
4	UTSA	0.340	136	-0.0262	26
5	Wichita State	0.343	142	-0.0020	185
6	Temple	0.366	211	0.0069	256
7	FAU	0.367	213	0.0139	304
8	Charlotte	0.374	227	-0.0393	4
9	Tulane	0.386	261	0.0118	290
10	USF	0.394	280	0.0011	207
11	Rice	0.415	309	0.0063	251
12	Memphis	0.434	331	0.0056	244
13	North Texas	0.462	351	0.0150	306

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	104.016	37	-0.0307	78
2	USF	104.041	39	-0.7270	13
3	North Texas	105.385	51	0.6138	190
4	Memphis	107.973	86	0.8842	238
5	FAU	108.611	100	-0.1439	61
6	UAB	109.206	113	-0.5092	25
7	Tulsa	109.523	120	-0.1433	62
8	Temple	110.936	143	0.3358	138
9	Tulane	113.544	188	-0.0424	76
10	ECU	114.777	212	-0.1602	56
11	Rice	116.480	238	1.3770	313
12	Charlotte	117.249	250	0.5333	169
13	UTSA	123.665	336	1.5745	330

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	32.749	9	-0.4630	72
2	USF	33.686	19	-0.5321	63
3	Memphis	34.163	34	1.0955	305
4	Wichita State	35.009	65	-0.6387	48
5	FAU	36.284	113	0.1354	152
6	Tulane	36.663	143	-0.0709	126
7	Tulsa	36.817	155	-0.2978	96
8	UAB	37.282	180	0.9953	289
9	Temple	37.359	185	-0.0377	134
10	Rice	37.603	198	-0.4738	70
11	Charlotte	38.436	247	0.7795	256
12	ECU	38.845	276	1.4455	340
13	UTSA	41.052	338	1.0067	294

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	76.851	3	-0.5773	62
2	USF	80.556	66	-0.5626	64
3	Memphis	81.096	85	0.7250	235
4	FAU	83.225	158	0.9451	260
5	Rice	83.478	166	0.6276	220
6	Temple	83.486	167	-0.7427	47
7	Wichita State	83.627	174	0.7097	231
8	Tulane	84.079	210	-0.0876	122
9	Tulsa	85.157	261	-0.0399	130
10	UAB	85.398	266	1.2211	291
11	ECU	85.405	268	0.8394	252
12	Charlotte	87.295	337	2.6724	358
13	UTSA	89.972	360	3.5546	364

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	41.950	42	-1.1196	33
2	USF	42.081	45	-0.3473	112
3	Memphis	42.113	48	0.9839	304
4	North Texas	42.559	59	-0.2060	128
5	Tulsa	43.246	86	-0.3804	104
6	UAB	43.582	99	0.5646	245
7	FAU	43.639	103	-0.3728	106
8	Tulane	43.745	108	-0.0719	144
9	Charlotte	44.124	133	-0.5317	88
10	Temple	44.903	179	0.3142	206
11	Rice	45.243	207	-0.7284	71
12	ECU	45.739	232	1.2501	324
13	UTSA	45.786	235	-0.5373	85

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	56.779	63	0.4755	230
2	UTSA	57.075	75	-1.0287	74
3	Charlotte	59.193	132	-0.9556	80
4	Tulane	59.432	140	-0.9593	79
5	USF	59.693	153	-1.6923	32
6	Tulsa	59.829	156	-0.2416	148
7	UAB	60.715	187	-0.3065	140
8	ECU	60.854	193	1.8160	323
9	North Texas	61.464	216	-2.1255	19
10	Temple	64.072	290	0.5202	239
11	Rice	64.183	297	-0.4796	117
12	FAU	64.897	317	2.4159	352
13	Wichita State	65.586	329	-1.1337	65

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	22.557	21	-0.6435	46
2	Memphis	23.439	45	0.5582	235
3	North Texas	23.557	48	-0.9886	16
4	Tulane	24.943	105	-0.6598	42
5	Tulsa	25.646	139	0.3024	188
6	Wichita State	25.894	164	-1.4690	3
7	FAU	26.387	193	1.0828	318
8	UAB	26.391	194	0.6053	247
9	Charlotte	26.510	208	0.5388	227
10	ECU	27.150	245	1.9319	360
11	UTSA	27.400	264	0.7920	270
12	Rice	27.440	266	-0.1071	131
13	Temple	27.498	268	-0.2134	106

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	46.100	43	0.7914	234
2	North Texas	47.242	70	-2.0735	8
3	USF	48.325	98	-1.6120	27
4	Tulane	50.038	157	-1.0023	51
5	Tulsa	51.028	195	-0.3091	111
6	UTSA	51.120	198	0.9605	261
7	Charlotte	51.605	221	0.8175	241
8	ECU	51.953	238	1.9856	330
9	UAB	52.008	242	0.5125	210
10	Temple	53.544	298	-0.0822	138
11	Rice	53.673	300	-0.0126	151
12	FAU	54.048	310	2.6525	348
13	Wichita State	54.808	325	-0.5212	92

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	47.109	26	0.1855	177
2	Wichita State	47.734	35	-2.6019	3
3	FAU	49.155	61	-0.1859	132
4	North Texas	49.298	65	-0.1038	146
5	Tulane	50.273	102	-0.6011	86
6	Tulsa	50.703	116	0.8247	254
7	Memphis	50.867	124	-0.1884	131
8	UAB	50.882	126	0.9241	269
9	Charlotte	51.025	133	-0.0289	156
10	Rice	51.039	134	0.0406	165
11	Temple	52.010	179	-0.3553	110
12	ECU	52.459	207	1.7063	327
13	UTSA	54.093	268	0.5886	228

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	34.414	37	1.1337	301
2	FAU	35.103	49	-2.4159	14
3	Rice	35.817	69	0.4796	249
4	Temple	35.928	76	-0.5202	127
5	North Texas	38.536	150	2.1255	347
6	ECU	39.146	173	-1.8160	43
7	UAB	39.285	179	0.3065	226
8	Tulsa	40.171	210	0.2416	218
9	USF	40.307	213	1.6923	334
10	Tulane	40.568	226	0.9593	287
11	Charlotte	40.807	234	0.9556	286
12	UTSA	42.925	291	1.0287	292
13	Memphis	43.221	303	-0.4755	136

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	9.114	35	0.8303	326
2	North Texas	9.192	38	0.5256	287
3	Temple	9.861	59	0.1758	219
4	FAU	9.897	62	-0.9474	25
5	Rice	10.164	82	-0.3667	97
6	Memphis	10.724	142	0.5372	291
7	UAB	10.891	154	0.3900	265
8	USF	11.129	184	0.1114	202
9	Tulsa	11.171	187	-0.6002	59
10	ECU	11.695	233	-0.4864	75
11	Tulane	11.720	235	0.5889	297
12	Charlotte	11.926	257	0.2407	240
13	UTSA	13.652	345	0.2146	230

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	28.819	50	1.2309	303
2	FAU	29.177	57	-1.7074	27
3	North Texas	29.609	64	1.4961	318
4	Rice	29.805	70	0.6401	246
5	Temple	29.941	73	-0.6605	104
6	USF	32.231	153	1.0494	285
7	UAB	33.390	198	0.7086	252
8	ECU	33.453	199	-1.1462	65
9	Tulane	34.042	224	0.9148	273
10	Tulsa	34.129	233	0.2692	214
11	Memphis	34.997	261	-0.0663	170
12	Charlotte	35.690	285	1.8549	338
13	UTSA	38.852	343	2.5941	356

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Memphis	30.256	18	1.6557	330
2	Wichita State	30.515	25	1.4558	321
3	North Texas	30.613	29	0.0039	182
4	UAB	31.740	58	0.0148	184
5	Tulsa	32.133	81	-2.3927	16
6	Temple	32.695	109	2.3234	351
7	Charlotte	33.268	143	-1.0883	83
8	FAU	33.684	166	-1.7056	37
9	Rice	33.772	173	-1.7402	35
10	ECU	33.890	181	-0.1332	166
11	Tulane	34.305	213	0.4576	220
12	USF	34.535	228	-0.7865	103
13	UTSA	34.877	253	-1.4149	53

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	28.610	32	-0.9108	125
2	Tulsa	31.940	96	-0.0413	197
3	ECU	32.600	105	-1.1201	110
4	UTSA	33.950	136	-2.6250	26
5	Wichita State	34.300	142	-0.1989	185
6	Temple	36.640	211	0.6873	256
7	FAU	36.740	213	1.3907	304
8	Charlotte	37.380	227	-3.9299	4
9	Tulane	38.550	261	1.1809	290
10	USF	39.420	280	0.1139	207
11	Rice	41.470	309	0.6339	251
12	Memphis	43.390	331	0.5648	244
13	North Texas	46.160	351	1.5044	306

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	17.328	33	-0.7935	72
2	Tulsa	19.609	110	0.4072	235
3	ECU	19.784	115	-0.5554	107
4	Wichita State	20.037	126	0.1996	206
5	Temple	21.246	189	0.5065	251
6	UTSA	21.484	201	-0.7893	73
7	USF	21.530	203	-0.6364	97
8	FAU	21.747	216	0.5533	259
9	Tulane	22.637	265	1.4785	335
10	Charlotte	22.880	278	-1.3046	31
11	North Texas	24.533	326	0.4733	245
12	Rice	24.767	334	0.0255	183
13	Memphis	25.160	340	1.3018	322

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	24.029	33	-0.3692	134
2	Tulsa	26.954	103	-0.0364	182
3	ECU	27.299	114	-0.5255	121
4	Wichita State	28.536	154	0.1341	197
5	Temple	29.560	197	0.5353	240
6	UTSA	29.868	209	-1.2356	58
7	FAU	30.010	215	1.2588	310
8	USF	30.993	264	-0.1166	173
9	Charlotte	31.806	284	-2.4582	4
10	Tulane	31.854	289	0.9603	289
11	Rice	33.715	326	0.8321	274
12	Memphis	34.349	334	0.9792	292
13	North Texas	34.669	343	0.8102	269

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	68.832	28	-1.6400	47
2	Wichita State	69.198	38	0.2023	192
3	North Texas	69.700	54	-0.8688	101
4	Charlotte	70.806	100	1.6287	294
5	Tulane	70.807	101	2.7761	345
6	Temple	71.173	124	0.0755	177
7	Memphis	72.223	182	1.9888	319
8	Tulsa	72.451	197	0.3284	201
9	ECU	72.480	202	-0.2173	147
10	UTSA	72.594	209	-0.2446	143
11	FAU	72.732	220	-0.1568	153
12	UAB	73.168	248	-2.3789	19
13	Rice	73.404	256	-1.5561	51

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Wichita State	43.310	13	1.0561	261
2	FAU	46.050	37	0.2440	200
3	Rice	46.938	52	-2.5568	34
4	Tulsa	48.468	87	-2.1652	52
5	North Texas	48.872	93	1.3123	271
6	Temple	49.092	97	-1.8470	70
7	UAB	49.737	117	-0.3678	155
8	Charlotte	50.862	148	2.7023	337
9	USF	51.632	166	0.7187	237
10	ECU	54.373	245	0.3686	212
11	Memphis	54.541	247	-1.2081	106
12	Tulane	55.090	259	-0.1539	170
13	UTSA	55.440	270	-2.5718	32

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	North Texas	12.739	10	-0.3533	225
2	USF	11.977	21	1.5828	2
3	Memphis	11.525	30	-1.4432	362
4	Tulane	10.682	79	-0.5046	278
5	UAB	10.219	105	-0.3540	228
6	ECU	9.222	184	-0.2925	215
7	Rice	9.183	186	-0.5978	300
8	Tulsa	9.172	190	0.0299	131
9	UTSA	8.990	200	-0.5551	289
10	Wichita State	8.467	244	-0.2586	202
11	Temple	8.384	251	0.9011	10
12	FAU	7.840	303	-0.2052	184
13	Charlotte	6.771	350	-0.1987	181

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	FAU	7.164	13	-0.6964	354
2	Tulane	6.488	27	-0.8617	362
3	North Texas	6.224	42	-0.0004	152
4	UTSA	6.042	51	0.1175	106
5	Memphis	5.928	59	0.1290	102
6	Temple	5.833	67	-0.7339	355
7	ECU	5.590	83	-0.6128	343
8	Rice	5.540	84	-0.0568	174
9	USF	5.229	114	-0.4777	322
10	Wichita State	5.197	120	-0.5540	339
11	Charlotte	5.109	129	-0.1689	229
12	UAB	4.890	154	0.2659	70
13	Tulsa	3.232	329	-0.2599	264

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UAB	19.776	3	-0.6852	68
2	ECU	22.564	43	-0.6741	70
3	Tulsa	22.952	56	-0.4716	109
4	UTSA	24.036	113	-1.0385	32
5	Wichita State	24.469	138	-0.5022	103
6	FAU	24.653	151	0.1841	232
7	Tulane	25.242	190	0.0431	215
8	Temple	25.718	220	-0.0541	193
9	Charlotte	25.719	221	-1.9934	1
10	USF	25.913	236	0.3536	274
11	Rice	27.068	305	-0.5933	81
12	Memphis	27.549	330	0.0390	214
13	North Texas	28.555	348	0.2191	246

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	USF	76.220	6	-1.6590	345
2	Memphis	73.571	27	1.0593	16
3	UAB	72.510	60	-1.3278	334
4	FAU	72.375	69	-0.7761	264
5	Wichita State	71.445	97	0.7331	33
6	ECU	71.261	104	0.7566	32
7	Tulsa	71.033	113	1.3141	12
8	UTSA	70.686	143	-0.4378	214
9	Tulane	70.127	168	0.5177	57
10	Rice	69.842	189	-0.1651	163
11	North Texas	68.887	239	2.1259	1
12	Temple	67.405	298	-1.0569	305
13	Charlotte	66.565	328	0.5948	48