Conferences

Conferences

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	7.627	99	0.6057	107
2	Buffalo	3.199	130	-0.8225	287
3	Ohio	1.650	140	-1.3470	327
4	Akron	1.306	145	0.2696	150
5	Kent State	1.084	149	-0.0402	198
6	Miami (OH)	-9.085	260	-2.6705	357
7	Ball State	-10.297	270	-0.9950	304
8	Bowling Green	-12.752	294	-1.6708	341
9	E Michigan	-13.861	303	-1.5925	337
10	N Illinois	-14.648	310	0.2117	160
11	Cent Michigan	-16.364	320	-0.0705	206
12	W Michigan	-18.051	328	0.2392	156

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.162	50	-0.0101	226
2	Kent State	0.125	86	-0.0002	149
3	Toledo	0.123	93	0.0117	46
4	Miami (OH)	0.121	95	-0.0228	321
5	Ohio	0.100	117	-0.0027	166
6	Buffalo	0.098	119	0.0057	88
7	Bowling Green	0.019	221	-0.0104	229
8	Ball State	-0.048	283	0.0017	128
9	E Michigan	-0.059	292	-0.0056	192
10	N Illinois	-0.141	335	0.0094	58
11	W Michigan	-0.168	346	0.0017	129
12	Cent Michigan	-0.208	352	0.0038	106

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	1651.054	44	13.3632	71
2	Akron	1632.213	60	10.6887	87
3	Kent State	1625.604	63	21.7630	19
4	Ohio	1606.845	80	3.5778	161
5	Buffalo	1600.121	87	5.4938	139
6	Ball State	1478.374	204	-5.4745	237
7	Bowling Green	1460.838	216	-21.2153	333
8	Miami (OH)	1453.152	227	-8.4664	265
9	N Illinois	1402.685	285	-10.6519	281
10	E Michigan	1390.503	294	-13.8431	300
11	Cent Michigan	1374.924	312	-13.6891	299
12	W Michigan	1355.921	319	-10.2690	278

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	0.561	66	0.0028	201
2	Kent State	0.543	89	0.0041	172
3	Ohio	0.538	105	-0.0056	306
4	Akron	0.534	110	0.0117	76
5	Buffalo	0.526	124	0.0067	124
6	Ball State	0.453	252	-0.0014	265
7	N Illinois	0.445	271	-0.0017	268
8	Bowling Green	0.444	272	-0.0034	286
9	Cent Michigan	0.441	277	0.0056	141
10	Miami (OH)	0.437	283	-0.0074	326
11	W Michigan	0.429	300	0.0023	218
12	E Michigan	0.424	305	-0.0076	327

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.535	48	-0.0007	136
2	Toledo	0.534	49	-0.0106	267
3	Ball State	0.520	108	-0.0137	304
4	Buffalo	0.520	109	-0.0091	245
5	Miami (OH)	0.513	138	0.0001	129
6	Ohio	0.508	159	-0.0093	249
7	Kent State	0.507	161	0.0051	67
8	W Michigan	0.501	199	0.0004	124
9	Bowling Green	0.500	212	-0.0053	196
10	E Michigan	0.486	265	0.0021	97
11	Cent Michigan	0.479	293	-0.0012	144
12	N Illinois	0.472	309	-0.0052	193

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	1.114	17	-0.0156	265
2	Buffalo	1.084	39	-0.0132	246
3	Akron	1.082	42	0.0020	133
4	Miami (OH)	1.066	64	0.0045	113
5	Ohio	1.059	85	-0.0070	198
6	Bowling Green	1.050	100	-0.0309	338
7	Kent State	1.047	110	0.0101	79
8	Ball State	1.022	164	-0.0183	286
9	W Michigan	0.961	291	0.0129	65
10	E Michigan	0.941	320	-0.0013	157
11	Cent Michigan	0.941	322	0.0041	118
12	N Illinois	0.914	346	-0.0049	179

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	0.141	18	-0.0086	73
2	Ohio	0.142	22	-0.0019	211
3	Miami (OH)	0.143	23	0.0035	300
4	Bowling Green	0.157	70	0.0002	249
5	Akron	0.168	136	-0.0022	200
6	Kent State	0.170	158	-0.0026	193
7	Buffalo	0.174	197	-0.0002	240
8	E Michigan	0.180	240	0.0037	301
9	Cent Michigan	0.184	260	0.0014	276
10	N Illinois	0.184	262	-0.0024	197
11	Ball State	0.185	271	-0.0057	130
12	W Michigan	0.191	305	-0.0163	8

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	0.356	5	0.0013	115
2	Kent State	0.300	69	0.0007	123
3	Akron	0.296	81	-0.0009	150
4	Bowling Green	0.295	91	-0.0261	354
5	Toledo	0.284	117	0.0044	85
6	Ohio	0.256	204	0.0017	112
7	Miami (OH)	0.254	212	0.0083	49
8	Ball State	0.254	213	-0.0044	193
9	W Michigan	0.240	255	-0.0144	299
10	Cent Michigan	0.227	293	0.0131	24
11	E Michigan	0.210	322	0.0264	3
12	N Illinois	0.208	327	-0.0077	234

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.404	5	-0.0176	297
2	Ball State	0.380	21	0.0026	133
3	N Illinois	0.338	94	-0.0022	170
4	Kent State	0.327	117	-0.0067	216
5	Ohio	0.326	120	0.0383	6
6	Bowling Green	0.322	133	0.0012	143
7	Cent Michigan	0.314	154	-0.0116	259
8	E Michigan	0.306	183	-0.0121	264
9	Toledo	0.285	252	-0.0164	289
10	Buffalo	0.265	300	-0.0131	269
11	W Michigan	0.258	313	-0.0146	279
12	Miami (OH)	0.246	331	0.0082	95

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	104.846	58	0.3248	134
2	Buffalo	101.888	104	-0.6501	296
3	Akron	99.874	133	0.4560	109
4	Ohio	98.578	156	-1.1656	339
5	Miami (OH)	98.118	168	-1.7713	354
6	Kent State	97.064	189	-0.7711	316
7	Bowling Green	96.289	198	-0.0480	207
8	Ball State	94.887	223	-0.4796	276
9	W Michigan	90.294	295	0.0427	187
10	Cent Michigan	89.131	312	-0.7229	310
11	E Michigan	88.454	319	-1.0110	330
12	N Illinois	86.005	339	0.3352	132

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	41.728	9	0.2893	111
2	Buffalo	40.319	23	-0.2928	204
3	Miami (OH)	38.495	68	0.0204	153
4	Akron	37.297	124	0.2765	115
5	Bowling Green	37.218	131	-0.8054	282
6	Kent State	36.875	151	0.5473	73
7	Ohio	36.727	162	-0.9401	304
8	Ball State	34.995	272	-0.9352	302
9	W Michigan	34.562	299	0.3713	98
10	E Michigan	34.525	300	0.4449	88
11	Cent Michigan	33.068	333	0.3466	105
12	N Illinois	32.942	336	0.0440	148

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	88.767	10	0.6935	122
2	Miami (OH)	87.678	23	-0.0434	220
3	Toledo	87.071	33	2.0951	8
4	Bowling Green	85.487	67	-1.0277	325
5	Ohio	85.331	72	-0.5916	278
6	Kent State	83.770	141	0.6468	127
7	W Michigan	82.188	221	1.6072	33
8	Akron	81.269	263	0.6160	131
9	Cent Michigan	80.749	286	0.7126	117
10	E Michigan	80.187	300	1.0673	73
11	Ball State	78.932	335	0.4751	147
12	N Illinois	78.702	338	-0.1517	236

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	47.926	17	-0.6968	231
2	Akron	46.061	71	0.0466	133
3	Buffalo	45.489	97	-0.7119	233
4	Ball State	44.527	149	-1.2815	318
5	Kent State	44.134	180	0.3488	85
6	Miami (OH)	43.937	191	0.0715	126
7	Bowling Green	43.642	209	-0.3064	177
8	Ohio	43.204	237	-0.7645	250
9	E Michigan	43.197	238	0.1302	119
10	W Michigan	42.441	274	-0.4029	185
11	N Illinois	41.883	289	0.0852	122
12	Cent Michigan	41.093	320	0.0801	123

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	68.777	41	0.4352	155
2	N Illinois	66.630	77	0.5275	144
3	E Michigan	64.870	111	-1.6546	341
4	Bowling Green	62.829	164	-0.2763	242
5	Buffalo	61.708	195	0.7998	112
6	Kent State	60.115	236	0.5612	141
7	Cent Michigan	59.967	239	-1.1605	320
8	Ball State	58.893	253	-0.1349	221
9	Akron	58.543	263	1.4753	54
10	Miami (OH)	57.355	288	-0.1590	223
11	Ohio	54.775	327	-0.3847	254
12	W Michigan	54.239	334	-1.7606	346

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	32.069	3	0.7243	72
2	Buffalo	28.778	45	-0.0534	186
3	Bowling Green	26.455	138	-0.2680	221
4	E Michigan	25.936	168	0.2094	145
5	Kent State	25.804	178	0.1999	149
6	Miami (OH)	25.599	198	0.0941	161
7	Akron	25.338	218	0.4022	119
8	N Illinois	24.674	250	0.9891	37
9	Ohio	23.870	284	-0.5749	266
10	Ball State	23.240	308	-0.8059	296
11	Cent Michigan	22.095	338	0.5962	86
12	W Michigan	22.041	342	-0.6532	275

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	59.779	12	1.7782	35
2	Buffalo	54.860	84	1.1699	82
3	Bowling Green	53.812	117	-0.8349	312
4	N Illinois	52.463	155	0.3550	179
5	E Michigan	52.062	171	-0.8214	311
6	Kent State	50.454	217	0.9180	106
7	Miami (OH)	50.271	220	-0.1789	241
8	Cent Michigan	48.510	265	-0.5115	282
9	Akron	47.534	286	1.6031	46
10	Ohio	46.867	305	-0.6241	292
11	Ball State	46.396	314	0.2339	190
12	W Michigan	44.759	333	-0.5430	285

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	53.413	60	-0.2187	161
2	Akron	53.156	69	-0.6862	228
3	Buffalo	52.885	82	-1.2077	281
4	Kent State	51.729	122	-0.3862	186
5	Miami (OH)	51.257	139	0.2456	106
6	Ohio	50.970	148	-0.4659	194
7	Ball State	50.227	179	-1.5561	316
8	W Michigan	49.974	188	-0.7579	240
9	E Michigan	49.783	198	1.2827	30
10	Bowling Green	49.642	206	0.5250	79
11	N Illinois	46.430	316	1.6015	22
12	Cent Michigan	45.918	329	1.6997	19

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	45.761	25	1.7606	13
2	Ohio	45.225	32	0.3847	105
3	Miami (OH)	42.645	71	0.1590	136
4	Akron	41.457	96	-1.4753	305
5	Ball State	41.107	106	0.1349	138
6	Cent Michigan	40.033	120	1.1605	39
7	Kent State	39.885	123	-0.5612	218
8	Buffalo	38.292	164	-0.7998	247
9	Bowling Green	37.171	195	0.2763	117
10	E Michigan	35.130	248	1.6546	18
11	N Illinois	33.370	282	-0.5275	215
12	Toledo	31.223	318	-0.4352	204

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	12.897	41	-0.0737	157
2	Ohio	12.857	43	-0.3652	241
3	W Michigan	12.520	60	1.0245	9
4	Akron	11.959	84	-0.1258	168
5	Ball State	11.754	94	-0.1293	172
6	Buffalo	11.541	118	-0.2394	198
7	Kent State	11.071	146	0.3474	62
8	Cent Michigan	10.973	154	-0.2496	201
9	Bowling Green	10.763	168	-0.5374	290
10	Toledo	9.659	244	-0.4350	263
11	E Michigan	8.589	303	0.2354	86
12	N Illinois	8.268	320	-0.9452	337

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	38.464	24	0.0326	162
2	W Michigan	37.430	32	2.1502	4
3	Miami (OH)	37.407	33	0.1355	144
4	Buffalo	33.907	111	-0.4764	231
5	Akron	33.735	119	-0.9870	283
6	Kent State	33.316	127	-0.2712	207
7	Ball State	32.536	145	0.2412	130
8	Cent Michigan	32.239	157	1.2241	34
9	Bowling Green	31.675	169	-0.1928	197
10	E Michigan	28.125	265	1.8887	11
11	Toledo	27.292	288	0.3169	120
12	N Illinois	26.239	311	-0.5067	235

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ball State	37.089	27	-0.8555	237
2	Akron	35.786	66	0.6507	82
3	Toledo	35.636	71	-1.8180	307
4	Buffalo	34.543	131	-0.2626	173
5	Miami (OH)	34.435	138	-0.5270	200
6	Bowling Green	34.255	150	-1.5122	292
7	Cent Michigan	33.954	167	-1.9382	319
8	Ohio	33.173	218	-1.2047	271
9	Kent State	33.056	222	1.4502	33
10	W Michigan	33.045	223	0.8297	72
11	N Illinois	31.653	284	-3.1873	353
12	E Michigan	30.805	308	-0.8074	225

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	40.374	5	-1.7640	297
2	Ball State	38.018	21	0.2584	133
3	N Illinois	33.787	94	-0.2212	170
4	Kent State	32.656	117	-0.6659	216
5	Ohio	32.602	120	3.8307	6
6	Bowling Green	32.171	133	0.1229	143
7	Cent Michigan	31.444	154	-1.1631	259
8	E Michigan	30.574	183	-1.2141	264
9	Toledo	28.549	252	-1.6398	289
10	Buffalo	26.517	300	-1.3114	269
11	W Michigan	25.802	313	-1.4592	279
12	Miami (OH)	24.597	331	0.8230	95

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	21.662	20	-0.2274	208
2	Ball State	20.434	57	0.1731	153
3	Kent State	19.887	80	-0.4275	238
4	Bowling Green	19.809	83	-0.9450	302
5	Ohio	19.542	94	1.5410	27
6	Toledo	18.338	146	-1.7228	348
7	N Illinois	17.528	190	0.3142	132
8	Cent Michigan	16.950	218	-0.0335	177
9	Miami (OH)	16.722	237	0.4800	113
10	E Michigan	16.488	247	-1.2563	325
11	Buffalo	16.219	262	-0.4937	250
12	W Michigan	14.483	327	-0.4802	248

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	31.418	3	-1.0368	288
2	Ball State	29.488	25	0.3648	124
3	Ohio	26.805	100	2.5774	8
4	Bowling Green	26.791	102	-0.4859	232
5	Kent State	26.664	107	-0.4229	223
6	N Illinois	25.870	139	-0.1263	179
7	Cent Michigan	24.464	201	-0.6109	246
8	Toledo	24.385	206	-0.9968	281
9	E Michigan	23.681	236	-0.6034	244
10	Buffalo	22.910	260	-0.9219	276
11	Miami (OH)	21.237	311	0.6978	90
12	W Michigan	20.740	321	-0.7626	263

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	78.006	12	-0.1326	205
2	Toledo	75.674	41	-3.4009	349
3	Kent State	73.829	89	-0.5346	240
4	Ohio	72.338	141	-0.4008	229
5	Bowling Green	71.996	156	-3.2699	348
6	Buffalo	70.968	186	1.1465	114
7	E Michigan	70.341	212	-3.1854	344
8	W Michigan	69.495	246	0.0570	189
9	Ball State	68.832	263	-0.6998	252
10	Cent Michigan	68.756	267	1.7927	72
11	Akron	68.336	275	2.7571	24
12	N Illinois	67.812	293	1.7437	75

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ball State	51.378	166	-0.7128	186
2	Toledo	51.242	169	-0.9242	203
3	Buffalo	50.425	193	-0.8659	199
4	Miami (OH)	49.846	207	3.3788	8
5	Cent Michigan	49.504	216	0.6216	92
6	Kent State	49.383	220	-0.5237	172
7	Ohio	49.139	223	-2.9652	324
8	Akron	48.063	258	-2.5065	302
9	N Illinois	47.957	263	0.6632	88
10	Bowling Green	43.745	323	0.5240	97
11	W Michigan	43.280	328	1.2114	56
12	E Michigan	40.162	353	0.3894	104

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	7.155	13	-0.2702	115
2	Ohio	8.107	60	0.0216	200
3	Bowling Green	8.149	67	-0.0397	185
4	Buffalo	8.407	93	0.4253	292
5	Akron	8.465	99	0.4820	301
6	Miami (OH)	8.767	128	0.4313	294
7	Cent Michigan	9.092	173	0.1071	226
8	E Michigan	9.179	186	0.0214	199
9	N Illinois	9.197	187	0.5795	320
10	Kent State	9.404	211	0.3928	286
11	Ball State	10.102	281	-0.1118	168
12	W Michigan	10.401	300	-1.3133	2

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	3.436	27	-0.1141	128
2	Akron	3.522	37	0.3718	290
3	Kent State	3.531	38	-0.2329	90
4	Ball State	3.962	89	-0.4112	39
5	Miami (OH)	4.162	124	-0.4904	26
6	Buffalo	4.546	190	0.2885	269
7	Ohio	4.685	214	0.3715	289
8	Cent Michigan	4.686	215	-0.4940	25
9	E Michigan	4.881	249	0.0891	205
10	W Michigan	5.498	313	0.0457	189
11	Toledo	6.423	349	0.2132	244
12	N Illinois	6.627	352	0.0262	182

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	28.992	3	-0.7919	301
2	Ball State	27.087	29	-0.0789	161
3	Ohio	26.171	56	1.5067	5
4	Kent State	25.155	99	-1.1939	337
5	N Illinois	24.688	123	-0.4572	247
6	Cent Michigan	24.520	139	-0.5485	264
7	Bowling Green	23.513	210	0.0400	134
8	E Michigan	23.409	221	-0.1783	178
9	Miami (OH)	23.325	226	0.3465	90
10	Toledo	23.086	244	-0.6251	270
11	Buffalo	22.510	280	-0.1342	171
12	W Michigan	21.467	319	-0.0474	153

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	76.470	4	-0.8485	260
2	Buffalo	73.526	36	-1.1765	303
3	E Michigan	73.378	39	-1.8825	352
4	Ball State	72.994	49	-0.4988	202
5	Toledo	71.799	85	-1.6619	340
6	Miami (OH)	70.595	140	0.0144	106
7	N Illinois	70.143	162	-0.4009	186
8	Cent Michigan	70.119	163	-1.1741	302
9	Ohio	69.831	181	-0.3065	167
10	W Michigan	68.165	268	-0.3644	180
11	Kent State	67.883	278	-0.8088	254
12	Akron	65.088	342	-1.5036	331

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	0.468	45	0.0117	292
2	Buffalo	0.476	73	0.0088	264
3	Kent State	0.483	105	0.0232	349
4	Akron	0.484	112	-0.0034	99
5	Ohio	0.505	215	0.0078	250
6	N Illinois	0.509	234	-0.0148	20
7	E Michigan	0.514	256	0.0069	241
8	Miami (OH)	0.522	291	-0.0007	134
9	Ball State	0.523	297	0.0005	151
10	Bowling Green	0.526	308	0.0178	329
11	W Michigan	0.527	309	-0.0122	32
12	Cent Michigan	0.530	316	-0.0165	12

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	0.952	70	0.0363	333
2	Akron	0.964	101	-0.0064	64
3	Toledo	0.970	118	0.0256	281
4	Ohio	0.976	130	0.0283	299
5	Buffalo	0.982	147	0.0245	275
6	N Illinois	1.028	265	-0.0184	20
7	E Michigan	1.037	279	0.0230	263
8	Miami (OH)	1.047	299	0.0092	169
9	Ball State	1.051	304	0.0048	145
10	Bowling Green	1.076	333	0.0483	353
11	Cent Michigan	1.089	343	-0.0166	26
12	W Michigan	1.103	348	-0.0255	11

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	0.195	61	-0.0112	295
2	Kent State	0.187	101	-0.0066	221
3	N Illinois	0.184	115	-0.0048	189
4	Miami (OH)	0.171	195	0.0037	41
5	Akron	0.170	205	0.0050	26
6	Ball State	0.165	239	-0.0003	87
7	Bowling Green	0.165	244	-0.0094	272
8	E Michigan	0.163	256	-0.0151	337
9	Cent Michigan	0.160	274	-0.0087	263
10	Buffalo	0.157	286	-0.0046	183
11	Toledo	0.151	314	-0.0042	172
12	W Michigan	0.143	333	0.0011	72

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.770	76	-0.0067	252
2	Kent State	0.767	82	0.0028	134
3	Ohio	0.765	88	-0.0039	224
4	Ball State	0.749	159	0.0013	156
5	Buffalo	0.746	169	-0.0110	297
6	Toledo	0.740	199	-0.0100	290
7	E Michigan	0.739	204	0.0115	48
8	Miami (OH)	0.731	241	-0.0254	350
9	N Illinois	0.723	267	0.0089	66
10	Bowling Green	0.722	273	-0.0188	337
11	W Michigan	0.704	322	0.0026	136
12	Cent Michigan	0.703	324	0.0041	114

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	0.231	24	-0.0274	16
2	Akron	0.260	67	0.0025	193
3	Ohio	0.282	117	0.0179	297
4	Buffalo	0.291	140	-0.0197	36
5	E Michigan	0.299	169	-0.0172	46
6	Bowling Green	0.301	178	-0.0094	87
7	Miami (OH)	0.302	181	0.0285	334
8	W Michigan	0.318	216	-0.0030	140
9	Ball State	0.331	253	-0.0117	71
10	Kent State	0.364	311	0.0211	309
11	Cent Michigan	0.366	312	-0.0017	150
12	N Illinois	0.413	349	0.0196	302

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	95.980	131	-0.7309	56
2	Ohio	96.928	146	0.1814	219
3	Toledo	97.219	152	-0.2809	131
4	Akron	98.568	179	0.1864	223
5	Buffalo	98.689	181	0.1724	218
6	N Illinois	100.654	219	0.1235	208
7	E Michigan	102.315	254	0.5815	277
8	Ball State	105.184	300	0.5154	269
9	Cent Michigan	105.495	305	-0.6524	71
10	Miami (OH)	107.203	321	0.8992	321
11	W Michigan	108.345	338	-0.1964	147
12	Bowling Green	109.040	345	1.6228	353

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	32.455	29	1.0557	290
2	N Illinois	35.211	143	-1.0493	12
3	Akron	35.449	156	-0.5047	51
4	Ohio	35.672	175	1.0536	289
5	Toledo	36.039	195	1.9272	351
6	Buffalo	36.137	201	1.1283	294
7	Ball State	36.661	227	-0.0918	95
8	Miami (OH)	37.400	268	0.1438	143
9	E Michigan	37.796	285	1.1758	298
10	Bowling Green	37.923	291	1.8599	347
11	Cent Michigan	37.937	292	-0.6849	32
12	W Michigan	40.045	340	-0.7965	22

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	78.567	36	-0.6384	69
2	N Illinois	78.910	44	-0.1371	122
3	Ohio	80.606	89	0.7629	232
4	Ball State	82.485	164	0.5260	203
5	Cent Michigan	83.296	205	1.0880	265
6	Miami (OH)	83.513	217	-0.7574	59
7	E Michigan	83.904	235	1.6773	320
8	Akron	84.035	241	-0.3972	93
9	Bowling Green	84.318	257	1.7875	331
10	Buffalo	85.316	288	1.8148	332
11	W Michigan	87.191	330	0.0729	147
12	Toledo	88.917	352	1.7413	326

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	40.495	34	1.3010	316
2	Kent State	41.343	57	1.7452	343
3	Akron	42.279	115	-0.4130	77
4	Buffalo	42.434	124	0.4204	202
5	Ohio	44.580	248	1.0155	285
6	Ball State	44.611	252	-0.4210	76
7	Miami (OH)	44.921	261	0.4980	217
8	N Illinois	44.951	262	-1.1680	20
9	E Michigan	44.959	263	0.4795	211
10	Bowling Green	45.072	271	1.2180	304
11	Cent Michigan	45.546	292	-1.3730	13
12	W Michigan	46.010	311	-1.0465	26

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	55.945	23	-1.2018	49
2	Bowling Green	57.051	36	-1.2561	45
3	Ball State	57.136	38	-2.1861	9
4	Cent Michigan	57.510	43	-0.3434	120
5	Toledo	58.582	66	1.3340	290
6	Miami (OH)	58.740	72	0.3446	187
7	W Michigan	59.872	104	-0.9502	60
8	Ohio	62.302	178	1.8559	325
9	N Illinois	63.026	204	0.0774	164
10	E Michigan	63.869	239	-0.6297	88
11	Akron	64.455	259	-0.5300	99
12	Buffalo	67.324	330	0.4918	209

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	21.646	17	0.2852	174
2	Ball State	23.994	109	-0.9914	16
3	Toledo	24.710	142	1.9864	352
4	Bowling Green	25.088	158	0.6350	237
5	Akron	25.298	174	-0.6363	34
6	Miami (OH)	25.448	182	1.1836	301
7	Cent Michigan	25.678	202	-0.3663	63
8	N Illinois	25.868	214	-0.6030	38
9	Ohio	26.192	238	1.3796	320
10	E Michigan	26.942	264	0.5480	222
11	Buffalo	27.332	287	0.1274	145
12	W Michigan	28.438	321	-0.4854	47

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	43.977	10	-1.2592	29
2	Ball State	47.258	53	-1.5726	20
3	Bowling Green	47.886	70	-0.0350	137
4	Cent Michigan	48.048	72	0.3118	183
5	Miami (OH)	49.253	109	-0.0531	135
6	N Illinois	49.814	131	-0.0454	136
7	Ohio	50.391	157	2.0123	321
8	Toledo	52.091	206	2.3314	336
9	W Michigan	52.105	207	-0.6718	72
10	E Michigan	53.578	254	0.4326	193
11	Akron	54.325	272	-0.7706	62
12	Buffalo	57.541	333	1.5824	289

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	46.731	59	-0.5626	87
2	Toledo	47.386	87	1.2562	277
3	Buffalo	47.768	105	-1.0856	45
4	Kent State	48.837	155	2.4539	345
5	E Michigan	50.134	204	0.6009	214
6	Ball State	50.938	237	-0.4418	97
7	Miami (OH)	51.571	263	2.4979	347
8	Ohio	51.983	283	0.8972	245
9	Bowling Green	52.138	290	1.2134	273
10	N Illinois	52.602	302	-1.2279	35
11	Cent Michigan	53.128	315	-1.1614	40
12	W Michigan	54.416	335	-0.3672	108

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	32.676	29	-0.4918	150
2	Akron	35.545	100	0.5300	260
3	E Michigan	36.131	120	0.6297	271
4	N Illinois	36.974	155	-0.0774	195
5	Ohio	37.698	181	-1.8559	34
6	W Michigan	40.128	255	0.9502	299
7	Miami (OH)	41.260	287	-0.3446	172
8	Toledo	41.418	293	-1.3340	69
9	Cent Michigan	42.490	316	0.3434	239
10	Ball State	42.864	321	2.1861	350
11	Bowling Green	42.949	323	1.2561	314
12	Kent State	44.055	336	1.2018	310

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	8.805	44	1.0010	343
2	N Illinois	9.343	78	-0.4463	66
3	Ohio	9.480	88	-0.3260	99
4	Akron	10.151	157	0.1316	215
5	Kent State	10.809	221	0.7705	329
6	E Michigan	10.853	226	0.6278	309
7	Toledo	11.329	271	-0.0592	168
8	W Michigan	11.607	286	-0.3112	103
9	Miami (OH)	11.952	308	-1.0398	9
10	Cent Michigan	12.258	319	-0.3186	101
11	Ball State	12.667	328	0.8996	337
12	Bowling Green	12.836	335	1.2249	352

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	27.775	56	0.2324	216
2	N Illinois	29.097	97	-0.0917	181
3	Akron	29.710	121	0.3734	232
4	Ohio	30.216	142	-1.2493	52
5	E Michigan	30.326	148	1.2446	313
6	Miami (OH)	34.260	287	-0.7044	107
7	Kent State	34.591	297	0.6207	261
8	W Michigan	35.086	308	0.7447	272
9	Ball State	35.226	312	2.0986	349
10	Cent Michigan	35.248	314	0.7762	276
11	Bowling Green	36.432	331	1.8224	341
12	Toledo	36.825	338	-0.5901	118

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	30.281	34	0.3923	207
2	Ohio	31.006	54	0.3884	206
3	Buffalo	31.764	81	3.3752	355
4	Kent State	32.003	99	1.2414	292
5	N Illinois	32.918	153	-1.4577	35
6	W Michigan	32.965	156	-1.3940	36
7	Akron	33.642	205	-0.0449	156
8	Cent Michigan	34.743	261	-1.6329	26
9	Miami (OH)	35.274	285	-2.5079	9
10	Bowling Green	35.433	293	1.7497	317
11	Ball State	35.560	300	0.4720	215
12	E Michigan	35.696	305	0.6314	238

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	23.072	24	-2.7387	16
2	Akron	26.019	67	0.2508	193
3	Ohio	28.243	117	1.7860	297
4	Buffalo	29.139	140	-1.9669	36
5	E Michigan	29.916	169	-1.7206	46
6	Bowling Green	30.134	178	-0.9365	87
7	Miami (OH)	30.191	181	2.8507	334
8	W Michigan	31.764	216	-0.2963	140
9	Ball State	33.126	253	-1.1675	71
10	Kent State	36.414	311	2.1111	309
11	Cent Michigan	36.618	312	-0.1725	150
12	N Illinois	41.310	349	1.9584	302

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	13.585	17	-1.2393	13
2	Akron	15.322	60	0.2337	171
3	Ohio	16.762	126	1.0496	289
4	Buffalo	17.138	149	-0.8064	47
5	E Michigan	17.222	162	-0.6820	60
6	Miami (OH)	17.830	200	1.7100	332
7	Bowling Green	18.555	238	-0.0340	133
8	W Michigan	18.591	242	-0.6410	62
9	Ball State	19.105	264	-0.2320	108
10	Kent State	19.487	284	0.7458	249
11	Cent Michigan	21.256	335	-0.0592	127
12	N Illinois	23.174	354	0.6747	240

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	20.225	33	-2.1829	7
2	Akron	21.649	71	0.2308	180
3	Ohio	22.078	85	1.2814	286
4	Buffalo	24.305	160	-1.2220	33
5	E Michigan	24.495	174	-0.9132	48
6	Miami (OH)	24.526	178	2.0680	332
7	Bowling Green	24.846	197	-0.3470	104
8	W Michigan	26.437	254	-0.1287	126
9	Ball State	26.576	260	-0.7201	75
10	Kent State	27.966	304	1.5663	307
11	Cent Michigan	30.209	339	0.3410	194
12	N Illinois	31.941	353	1.4939	304

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	66.941	27	2.7235	337
2	Buffalo	69.120	89	-0.7603	89
3	Kent State	69.243	94	-0.4855	104
4	E Michigan	70.434	142	0.4512	179
5	Cent Michigan	70.468	145	-0.6602	93
6	W Michigan	71.005	170	-1.9857	29
7	Miami (OH)	71.714	209	-0.1108	134
8	Akron	71.929	228	1.0082	220
9	Ball State	72.500	257	0.7097	195
10	N Illinois	73.406	293	-0.9093	78
11	Bowling Green	74.317	322	1.0974	232
12	Ohio	76.557	351	-0.5043	102

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	40.659	12	2.4483	332
2	Buffalo	43.806	37	0.0896	201
3	Ohio	45.302	58	0.5683	241
4	E Michigan	45.627	64	-0.6721	146
5	W Michigan	49.043	133	0.1295	202
6	Ball State	49.721	151	-0.1744	175
7	Toledo	49.779	153	1.7480	310
8	Miami (OH)	49.950	158	-0.8348	131
9	Bowling Green	50.602	180	2.8053	343
10	Kent State	52.698	239	0.5398	234
11	N Illinois	54.385	273	0.9101	270
12	Cent Michigan	55.210	300	2.0664	320

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	10.826	65	-0.5724	272
2	Kent State	10.373	97	-0.3032	227
3	Buffalo	9.763	134	0.1180	121
4	Bowling Green	9.646	142	-0.7872	316
5	Akron	9.007	204	1.2574	2
6	N Illinois	8.944	213	-0.6309	287
7	Cent Michigan	8.902	218	-0.5887	277
8	Ball State	8.241	270	0.2270	85
9	Miami (OH)	7.890	285	-0.0352	164
10	Toledo	7.841	288	0.0491	139
11	W Michigan	7.765	294	0.5048	36
12	E Michigan	7.738	297	-1.2599	357

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	6.172	50	0.1702	94
2	Kent State	4.982	127	-0.3127	268
3	Akron	4.914	136	-0.1805	224
4	Miami (OH)	4.553	170	-0.2211	242
5	Bowling Green	4.540	173	0.3549	56
6	Cent Michigan	4.395	190	0.1220	110
7	E Michigan	4.385	191	-0.3207	271
8	N Illinois	3.971	235	-0.2425	248
9	Toledo	3.846	244	-0.0066	161
10	Ohio	3.702	258	0.0529	139
11	W Michigan	3.411	295	-0.2067	234
12	Ball State	3.266	308	0.2214	79

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	20.688	25	0.6206	289
2	Toledo	21.338	49	-0.6568	60
3	Miami (OH)	22.860	115	0.4099	250
4	Buffalo	23.099	132	-0.5009	74
5	Bowling Green	23.693	173	-0.2478	116
6	E Michigan	23.896	181	0.7519	309
7	Akron	24.291	200	-0.4715	78
8	Ball State	24.570	219	-0.0527	152
9	W Michigan	24.768	235	-0.1344	136
10	Kent State	26.408	313	0.2161	206
11	Cent Michigan	28.233	345	0.8963	324
12	N Illinois	29.577	355	0.5677	278

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	75.116	6	-0.7158	236
2	E Michigan	73.677	33	-1.7600	346
3	Buffalo	73.666	34	-1.3597	322
4	Ball State	72.981	48	-0.7363	242
5	Toledo	70.994	119	-1.8065	349
6	Cent Michigan	70.498	140	-1.8067	350
7	Miami (OH)	70.317	154	0.1552	87
8	N Illinois	69.542	193	-0.6029	219
9	Ohio	69.529	195	-0.2611	158
10	Kent State	68.696	240	-0.7237	238
11	W Michigan	68.163	268	-0.4445	192
12	Akron	65.118	343	-1.2426	306