Conferences – HoopSci

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	17.107	44	0.6814	98
2	Miami (OH)	13.921	60	1.2160	37
3	Bowling Green	3.970	119	-0.2659	217
4	Toledo	2.924	134	1.5448	22
5	Buffalo	0.749	150	0.8858	74
6	Kent State	-0.459	160	0.0066	177
7	UMass	-0.865	164	-0.2758	219
8	E Michigan	-3.683	193	-0.0686	188
9	Ohio	-3.819	196	0.5510	111
10	Cent Michigan	-7.160	230	0.4540	119
11	Ball State	-10.926	260	-0.2643	216
12	W Michigan	-11.594	267	-0.3784	231
13	N Illinois	-19.733	326	0.0313	171

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.241	19	-0.0042	193
2	Akron	0.196	31	0.0009	147
3	Bowling Green	0.152	50	-0.0084	224
4	Buffalo	0.082	116	0.0036	122
5	Kent State	0.041	160	-0.0055	204
6	UMass	0.032	167	-0.0055	202
7	Toledo	0.013	187	0.0098	77
8	E Michigan	-0.003	199	-0.0055	205
9	Ohio	-0.063	258	0.0047	112
10	W Michigan	-0.074	271	-0.0093	230
11	Cent Michigan	-0.085	280	0.0021	134
12	Ball State	-0.108	299	-0.0055	203
13	N Illinois	-0.112	301	-0.0110	249

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	1713.132	19	17.8506	42
2	Miami (OH)	1695.849	24	30.3728	3
3	Kent State	1612.713	65	6.7690	115
4	Toledo	1545.259	122	-0.5344	189
5	Ohio	1472.604	215	-6.4858	252
6	Bowling Green	1467.148	224	2.1680	160
7	UMass	1437.182	253	-9.4232	278
8	Buffalo	1418.148	278	3.3995	143
9	Ball State	1413.549	283	-6.9675	258
10	Cent Michigan	1394.622	302	-9.1712	276
11	E Michigan	1383.234	309	-15.7236	321
12	W Michigan	1379.697	313	-6.3698	251
13	N Illinois	1321.591	348	-3.3801	226

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.593	32	0.0186	12
2	Akron	0.589	34	0.0043	159
3	Kent State	0.554	69	0.0081	99
4	Toledo	0.535	92	0.0059	139
5	Buffalo	0.496	184	-0.0003	245
6	UMass	0.494	191	0.0099	71
7	Bowling Green	0.493	193	0.0062	134
8	Ohio	0.490	202	0.0035	178
9	W Michigan	0.453	255	0.0064	131
10	E Michigan	0.442	278	-0.0017	265
11	Cent Michigan	0.431	304	0.0027	189
12	Ball State	0.430	305	0.0137	37
13	N Illinois	0.427	311	0.0057	144

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.586	8	-0.0217	360
2	Akron	0.583	9	-0.0118	305
3	Buffalo	0.557	27	0.0027	113
4	Toledo	0.549	49	0.0193	7
5	UMass	0.531	107	0.0020	123
6	Bowling Green	0.520	152	-0.0040	204
7	Cent Michigan	0.520	155	0.0124	26
8	Kent State	0.517	173	-0.0176	341
9	Ohio	0.510	202	-0.0090	268
10	W Michigan	0.500	249	-0.0047	211
11	E Michigan	0.499	255	-0.0099	278
12	N Illinois	0.475	331	-0.0140	323
13	Ball State	0.471	337	0.0150	17

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	1.213	4	-0.0271	333
2	Akron	1.209	5	-0.0266	328
3	Buffalo	1.144	54	-0.0075	220
4	Toledo	1.139	60	0.0078	98
5	Kent State	1.108	110	-0.0199	305
6	Bowling Green	1.099	128	-0.0014	170
7	Ohio	1.083	159	0.0051	123
8	UMass	1.080	169	0.0048	124
9	Cent Michigan	1.055	226	0.0040	129
10	W Michigan	1.048	245	0.0015	147
11	E Michigan	1.016	308	-0.0219	317
12	Ball State	0.994	330	0.0238	18
13	N Illinois	0.975	342	-0.0356	352

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.135	39	-0.0058	98
2	Ohio	0.140	69	-0.0102	35
3	Toledo	0.140	71	0.0006	250
4	Ball State	0.145	105	-0.0041	147
5	Akron	0.146	109	-0.0027	179
6	W Michigan	0.152	157	-0.0053	115
7	Bowling Green	0.153	163	-0.0078	64
8	Buffalo	0.154	168	-0.0025	185
9	E Michigan	0.165	257	-0.0034	166
10	Cent Michigan	0.167	273	0.0066	339
11	UMass	0.168	274	-0.0024	194
12	Kent State	0.171	298	-0.0128	14
13	N Illinois	0.193	355	-0.0018	209

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	32.950	46	-0.0232	299
2	Akron	32.330	58	-0.0252	311
3	UMass	31.110	91	0.0039	68
4	Cent Michigan	27.630	203	-0.0143	223
5	W Michigan	27.570	205	-0.0214	288
6	N Illinois	27.430	208	-0.0390	360
7	Ohio	26.610	233	-0.0118	194
8	Toledo	26.510	236	-0.0334	343
9	Bowling Green	26.210	246	-0.0185	261
10	E Michigan	25.280	277	-0.0250	309
11	Buffalo	25.150	283	-0.0303	334
12	Ball State	23.750	312	-0.0143	224
13	Miami (OH)	23.460	321	-0.0127	204

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	0.445	20	-0.0144	258
2	Buffalo	0.404	67	-0.0192	289
3	Miami (OH)	0.403	69	-0.0076	211
4	N Illinois	0.391	96	0.0045	123
5	UMass	0.380	122	-0.0069	205
6	Ohio	0.377	128	0.0145	72
7	Bowling Green	0.373	134	0.0061	114
8	W Michigan	0.337	237	0.0224	35
9	Ball State	0.324	260	-0.0224	306
10	Cent Michigan	0.322	270	-0.0092	228
11	Toledo	0.309	302	-0.0339	344
12	E Michigan	0.300	322	-0.0073	207
13	Akron	0.295	331	0.0047	122

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	126.231	29	0.1889	252
2	Miami (OH)	123.616	47	1.2815	61
3	Toledo	118.535	77	1.0340	95
4	Buffalo	118.082	82	1.0635	90
5	Kent State	113.806	136	0.1316	258
6	Ohio	112.800	155	0.7561	142
7	UMass	112.404	157	1.5852	26
8	Bowling Green	111.479	170	0.4021	216
9	Cent Michigan	111.003	177	1.0117	100
10	W Michigan	108.805	220	1.1096	83
11	E Michigan	106.859	243	0.2233	244
12	Ball State	102.344	304	-0.2948	309
13	N Illinois	99.884	331	-0.4187	325

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	43.862	3	-0.7917	298
2	Toledo	42.180	11	1.2787	12
3	Miami (OH)	41.767	23	-1.2457	346
4	Bowling Green	39.037	104	-0.1313	191
5	Cent Michigan	38.809	118	0.4520	95
6	UMass	38.789	119	0.6767	58
7	Buffalo	38.476	139	0.2839	122
8	Ohio	38.475	140	-0.3675	238
9	E Michigan	37.476	198	-0.4864	259
10	W Michigan	36.787	235	-0.9925	325
11	Kent State	36.266	263	-0.9869	323
12	Ball State	35.226	306	1.5665	7
13	N Illinois	33.109	354	-1.0857	337

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	87.723	24	-0.0735	228
2	Toledo	86.090	68	0.1350	192
3	Ball State	84.172	159	1.0546	73
4	E Michigan	83.890	176	-0.3403	264
5	W Michigan	83.651	185	-0.9185	317
6	Cent Michigan	83.349	200	-0.6542	292
7	Ohio	83.340	201	0.6998	113
8	UMass	82.765	235	0.4407	145
9	Bowling Green	82.591	248	0.4219	150
10	Kent State	81.384	291	1.4579	44
11	Miami (OH)	81.152	297	1.1587	63
12	Buffalo	80.967	303	0.1796	183
13	N Illinois	79.829	331	-1.2038	333

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	51.519	3	-2.1223	363
2	Akron	50.048	12	-0.8620	283
3	Toledo	49.147	21	1.4408	11
4	Buffalo	47.553	50	0.1463	118
5	Bowling Green	47.223	62	-0.3465	210
6	UMass	46.926	74	0.5644	72
7	Cent Michigan	46.757	83	0.8800	45
8	Ohio	46.151	118	-0.8085	281
9	Kent State	44.802	198	-1.7997	356
10	E Michigan	44.766	205	-0.4185	225
11	W Michigan	44.061	254	-0.7113	259
12	Ball State	41.995	328	1.2838	18
13	N Illinois	41.319	341	-0.7964	276

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	67.733	40	1.5848	34
2	Toledo	67.596	41	-1.2648	311
3	Cent Michigan	66.080	65	-0.1326	196
4	Bowling Green	65.754	76	0.4665	131
5	W Michigan	64.931	96	-0.4887	241
6	UMass	64.451	103	0.4168	137
7	Ohio	61.983	152	-0.2839	211
8	Ball State	60.987	176	0.3767	143
9	Kent State	55.195	293	-0.6992	267
10	N Illinois	55.091	297	1.0552	76
11	Akron	55.009	298	0.9338	89
12	Buffalo	54.840	303	-0.4181	230
13	Miami (OH)	54.373	309	-2.0805	346

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	31.928	7	0.4218	104
2	Cent Michigan	29.335	43	-0.0474	192
3	Bowling Green	29.080	52	-0.1033	200
4	Akron	28.943	61	-0.2414	223
5	E Michigan	28.750	68	0.4624	99
6	Ohio	28.741	70	-0.3481	245
7	UMass	28.717	72	1.2577	22
8	Miami (OH)	27.489	129	-1.4193	356
9	W Michigan	26.357	184	-1.3077	350
10	Ball State	24.858	255	1.0383	37
11	Buffalo	24.343	285	0.0897	165
12	Kent State	23.409	320	-1.2095	341
13	N Illinois	21.839	352	0.0243	179

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	58.278	24	-0.9223	291
2	E Michigan	57.000	37	1.0106	90
3	Cent Michigan	54.986	75	-0.4402	246
4	Bowling Green	54.311	90	0.6692	135
5	W Michigan	54.144	95	-0.9822	297
6	UMass	53.493	112	0.7030	130
7	Ohio	51.838	154	0.1799	186
8	Ball State	51.357	166	0.9984	93
9	Akron	48.202	242	0.6900	131
10	Kent State	44.960	310	0.2723	178
11	Buffalo	44.251	325	-0.1143	222
12	Miami (OH)	44.020	332	-1.2572	321
13	N Illinois	43.836	334	0.2054	185

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	62.282	2	-1.4785	316
2	Akron	59.826	13	-1.1960	306
3	Ohio	55.528	62	-0.7146	265
4	Toledo	55.028	74	1.8120	15
5	Buffalo	54.684	82	0.1642	139
6	UMass	53.887	123	1.4972	26
7	Bowling Green	53.567	133	-0.7123	264
8	Cent Michigan	53.079	150	0.2078	132
9	Kent State	52.624	176	-2.7208	359
10	E Michigan	51.143	243	-0.3698	211
11	N Illinois	49.678	288	-0.0854	178
12	W Michigan	48.657	318	-1.5745	321
13	Ball State	48.339	323	1.1422	46

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	45.627	57	2.0805	20
2	Buffalo	45.160	63	0.4181	136
3	Akron	44.991	68	-0.9338	277
4	N Illinois	44.909	69	-1.0552	290
5	Kent State	44.805	73	0.6992	99
6	Ball State	39.013	190	-0.3767	223
7	Ohio	38.017	214	0.2839	155
8	UMass	35.549	263	-0.4168	229
9	W Michigan	35.069	270	0.4887	125
10	Bowling Green	34.246	290	-0.4665	235
11	Cent Michigan	33.920	301	0.1326	170
12	Toledo	32.404	325	1.2648	55
13	E Michigan	32.267	326	-1.5848	332

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	14.919	20	-0.5503	297
2	Miami (OH)	14.278	31	0.1736	115
3	Buffalo	14.133	37	0.1942	111
4	Kent State	12.857	89	0.2227	103
5	N Illinois	11.270	177	-1.1100	354
6	W Michigan	10.430	227	0.3152	84
7	Ball State	10.368	232	0.5282	55
8	Toledo	10.252	239	0.8569	23
9	UMass	10.072	253	-0.5810	302
10	Bowling Green	9.957	260	-0.0281	173
11	Ohio	9.734	274	-0.0194	171
12	Cent Michigan	9.474	295	0.4994	59
13	E Michigan	8.726	328	-0.9487	342

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	39.522	34	-0.7635	283
2	Miami (OH)	37.132	86	2.4159	9
3	Buffalo	36.716	93	0.2939	162
4	Kent State	36.424	106	1.1855	60
5	N Illinois	35.993	117	-1.4091	327
6	Ball State	32.814	188	0.0562	186
7	Ohio	31.502	221	0.5199	131
8	W Michigan	29.507	273	0.0636	183
9	UMass	29.272	277	-0.2623	229
10	Cent Michigan	28.362	295	-0.2139	222
11	Bowling Green	28.280	297	-0.2472	227
12	Toledo	27.813	302	1.0573	68
13	E Michigan	26.890	329	-1.3508	320

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	38.914	8	-1.9169	339
2	Buffalo	38.658	11	0.2148	126
3	Akron	37.844	20	-0.8392	243
4	Toledo	37.018	33	1.5403	27
5	W Michigan	35.150	117	0.7042	85
6	Bowling Green	34.995	130	-0.0178	146
7	Kent State	34.585	150	-0.3935	191
8	UMass	34.300	169	-1.8549	334
9	Cent Michigan	32.834	241	1.4944	29
10	E Michigan	32.077	281	-2.4265	358
11	Ball State	31.691	299	1.4465	32
12	N Illinois	31.383	308	-1.9534	343
13	Ohio	30.164	343	-0.4728	201

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	44.450	20	-1.4398	258
2	Buffalo	40.360	67	-1.9252	289
3	Miami (OH)	40.310	69	-0.7605	211
4	N Illinois	39.070	96	0.4499	123
5	UMass	37.960	122	-0.6891	205
6	Ohio	37.650	128	1.4456	72
7	Bowling Green	37.320	134	0.6138	114
8	W Michigan	33.680	237	2.2376	35
9	Ball State	32.360	260	-2.2414	306
10	Cent Michigan	32.150	270	-0.9208	228
11	Toledo	30.910	302	-3.3918	344
12	E Michigan	29.980	322	-0.7249	207
13	Akron	29.490	331	0.4722	122

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	25.362	25	-0.2426	194
2	Miami (OH)	23.535	68	-0.3963	215
3	Buffalo	23.289	76	-1.5108	326
4	Bowling Green	21.868	149	0.1562	144
5	Ohio	21.657	159	1.2656	39
6	W Michigan	20.767	196	1.8256	17
7	UMass	20.331	214	-0.2888	202
8	N Illinois	20.043	220	-0.2763	200
9	Toledo	19.255	247	-2.6814	362
10	Ball State	18.615	280	-1.2773	309
11	Cent Michigan	18.386	294	-0.9994	291
12	Akron	18.122	306	-0.4906	231
13	E Michigan	17.890	312	-0.2647	198

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	34.217	25	-0.4474	211
2	Buffalo	31.725	83	-1.5435	308
3	Miami (OH)	31.420	92	-0.0157	161
4	Ohio	30.594	127	1.3801	51
5	UMass	30.177	145	-0.3147	193
6	N Illinois	30.117	147	-0.0910	170
7	Bowling Green	29.908	154	0.7869	94
8	W Michigan	27.978	222	1.6639	34
9	Ball State	26.792	257	-1.3924	291
10	Cent Michigan	26.330	269	-0.9521	259
11	Toledo	25.440	302	-2.7952	352
12	E Michigan	24.560	325	-0.5472	219
13	Akron	24.149	339	0.3286	129

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	76.875	31	-2.2431	335
2	W Michigan	74.325	97	2.0381	37
3	Akron	73.415	138	-3.9948	362
4	Miami (OH)	73.390	140	-0.7858	268
5	E Michigan	73.075	159	0.5847	148
6	Bowling Green	73.021	164	-1.2827	297
7	Kent State	72.901	169	0.1491	185
8	Buffalo	72.838	172	-1.4772	308
9	Ohio	71.821	204	0.0777	191
10	Ball State	69.671	269	-1.0966	290
11	Cent Michigan	68.842	290	-1.5205	311
12	UMass	66.796	341	-0.3367	235
13	N Illinois	65.939	353	-1.6684	318

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	59.547	38	-2.9108	336
2	Kent State	57.046	68	0.8461	105
3	Akron	56.935	71	-2.5093	317
4	Cent Michigan	55.578	99	0.5708	124
5	Buffalo	54.515	123	-1.1772	250
6	Ball State	52.911	161	1.7867	42
7	Toledo	52.098	187	2.0256	34
8	N Illinois	51.975	189	-2.2671	306
9	Miami (OH)	51.478	207	-1.0650	243
10	Bowling Green	48.695	272	-0.5393	210
11	W Michigan	48.209	285	-1.1703	249
12	E Michigan	48.151	288	-1.0937	245
13	Ohio	47.776	293	0.3818	142

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ball State	7.372	28	-0.4728	45
2	Ohio	7.637	41	-0.0240	172
3	Miami (OH)	7.776	50	-0.4904	40
4	Toledo	8.097	79	0.6134	319
5	Bowling Green	8.245	101	0.1004	207
6	Akron	8.383	115	0.6888	329
7	W Michigan	8.568	135	0.2985	262
8	Kent State	8.929	186	-0.8673	9
9	Buffalo	9.033	193	0.2293	244
10	E Michigan	9.191	216	-0.0798	157
11	UMass	9.666	269	0.0050	180
12	Cent Michigan	10.370	323	0.8846	348
13	N Illinois	10.673	332	0.5451	306

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	3.031	3	-0.2393	85
2	Buffalo	3.301	15	-0.0676	142
3	Ohio	3.533	33	-0.5391	15
4	Akron	3.674	49	-0.0857	135
5	UMass	3.917	81	-0.0274	162
6	Kent State	4.019	95	0.3181	280
7	Toledo	4.441	174	-0.1142	127
8	Cent Michigan	4.536	195	0.4937	322
9	Bowling Green	4.958	250	0.0079	179
10	Ball State	5.133	281	-0.1984	100
11	E Michigan	5.351	305	-0.2774	74
12	W Michigan	5.776	340	0.1103	211
13	N Illinois	5.826	343	-0.1207	126

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	26.120	56	-0.2828	230
2	Ohio	25.273	102	0.9774	49
3	UMass	24.893	128	-0.6993	303
4	Bowling Green	24.276	168	0.6801	85
5	Miami (OH)	24.263	170	0.4329	122
6	N Illinois	23.748	204	0.5623	100
7	Buffalo	23.710	207	-0.2109	225
8	Cent Michigan	22.727	260	0.2109	155
9	W Michigan	22.537	277	1.1212	43
10	Toledo	22.073	304	-1.3804	357
11	E Michigan	22.007	310	-0.8569	321
12	Ball State	21.517	332	-0.3881	248
13	Akron	20.943	340	0.6514	88

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	75.354	11	-0.8670	270
2	UMass	74.311	19	-0.3516	178
3	Miami (OH)	72.839	51	-1.0815	305
4	Akron	72.062	80	-0.8638	269
5	Bowling Green	71.903	87	-0.4751	204
6	Ohio	71.899	89	0.4678	51
7	W Michigan	70.857	138	-0.0549	131
8	Toledo	70.774	145	-0.8239	258
9	N Illinois	70.276	168	-0.6394	233
10	E Michigan	69.573	200	0.4360	54
11	Buffalo	68.936	227	-0.3158	175
12	Cent Michigan	68.534	246	-0.5630	221
13	Ball State	67.207	304	0.1263	96

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	0.502	106	-0.0027	133
2	Bowling Green	0.510	148	0.0022	191
3	Miami (OH)	0.511	153	0.0116	299
4	Akron	0.515	179	0.0156	329
5	Kent State	0.521	208	0.0008	177
6	Ball State	0.527	242	-0.0208	14
7	Ohio	0.529	251	0.0091	275
8	UMass	0.532	266	0.0112	296
9	Cent Michigan	0.542	302	0.0083	265
10	W Michigan	0.544	307	-0.0001	164
11	Toledo	0.545	312	-0.0069	85
12	Buffalo	0.551	331	0.0096	281
13	N Illinois	0.554	339	0.0249	361

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	1.018	65	0.0093	193
2	Miami (OH)	1.040	94	0.0309	320
3	Akron	1.042	103	0.0124	217
4	E Michigan	1.062	153	0.0051	175
5	UMass	1.074	192	0.0241	295
6	Ball State	1.075	193	-0.0335	7
7	Kent State	1.081	213	0.0043	171
8	Toledo	1.102	267	-0.0175	40
9	Ohio	1.108	281	0.0306	319
10	Buffalo	1.111	289	0.0166	253
11	Cent Michigan	1.126	312	0.0018	158
12	N Illinois	1.140	331	0.0463	362
13	W Michigan	1.143	337	-0.0084	90

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.175	59	-0.0093	294
2	Ball State	0.173	75	-0.0025	151
3	Akron	0.170	85	-0.0044	193
4	Toledo	0.169	92	-0.0056	227
5	Miami (OH)	0.166	107	-0.0086	285
6	Buffalo	0.165	109	-0.0004	103
7	UMass	0.157	167	-0.0100	305
8	Cent Michigan	0.156	178	0.0039	48
9	N Illinois	0.154	191	-0.0065	244
10	Ohio	0.151	206	-0.0159	359
11	Kent State	0.149	221	-0.0064	243
12	E Michigan	0.141	281	-0.0138	346
13	W Michigan	0.126	343	-0.0052	217

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	77.010	12	0.0087	98
2	Bowling Green	74.980	41	0.0048	131
3	Kent State	73.360	113	0.0090	93
4	Miami (OH)	73.330	115	-0.0248	356
5	W Michigan	73.070	130	0.0163	42
6	Akron	73.000	134	0.0130	62
7	E Michigan	72.720	150	0.0111	72
8	N Illinois	71.130	207	-0.0009	183
9	Buffalo	71.100	210	0.0008	165
10	Ball State	70.650	232	0.0123	67
11	Ohio	69.210	289	0.0056	126
12	Toledo	67.490	333	0.0085	99
13	Cent Michigan	67.180	335	0.0024	152

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	0.269	16	-0.0137	91
2	Miami (OH)	0.303	51	-0.0261	27
3	Akron	0.309	70	-0.0068	139
4	Buffalo	0.315	86	-0.0023	182
5	Ball State	0.327	108	0.0170	314
6	E Michigan	0.362	198	0.0089	272
7	Bowling Green	0.381	244	-0.0049	155
8	W Michigan	0.383	251	0.0124	295
9	Ohio	0.386	263	0.0261	336
10	N Illinois	0.387	266	-0.0344	9
11	Cent Michigan	0.400	290	-0.0213	46
12	Kent State	0.405	297	0.0173	315
13	UMass	0.455	348	-0.0212	47

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	107.509	78	0.7529	222
2	Akron	109.124	107	-0.3109	41
3	Miami (OH)	109.695	122	0.2177	116
4	E Michigan	110.542	136	0.3021	129
5	UMass	113.269	181	1.8829	346
6	Ball State	113.270	182	-0.0864	70
7	Kent State	114.265	197	0.2738	122
8	Toledo	115.612	226	-0.4961	26
9	Ohio	116.620	244	0.1785	109
10	Buffalo	117.334	253	0.4193	149
11	Cent Michigan	118.163	270	0.5574	177
12	N Illinois	119.616	297	-0.3656	35
13	W Michigan	120.399	308	1.4751	322

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	34.961	62	0.8494	266
2	UMass	35.633	86	1.2493	329
3	Kent State	36.277	112	-0.3334	89
4	Akron	36.528	137	0.7133	248
5	E Michigan	37.282	181	0.1198	151
6	Ball State	37.637	200	-1.3639	8
7	Miami (OH)	37.718	206	2.1452	362
8	Ohio	38.821	275	0.6895	243
9	Cent Michigan	39.371	302	0.8126	262
10	W Michigan	39.498	305	-0.1809	114
11	Buffalo	39.732	309	0.8912	275
12	N Illinois	40.034	317	1.8651	358
13	Toledo	41.234	341	0.1993	166

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	77.608	7	1.1845	284
2	Bowling Green	79.532	47	0.8117	249
3	Kent State	81.623	96	-0.4119	84
4	N Illinois	82.130	114	1.5207	306
5	Ball State	82.649	129	-0.6858	52
6	Ohio	83.012	144	0.1952	171
7	Cent Michigan	83.249	160	0.1468	163
8	Buffalo	83.643	178	0.0868	147
9	Miami (OH)	83.694	186	2.0228	333
10	Akron	83.759	190	-0.3331	95
11	E Michigan	84.124	214	0.7218	234
12	W Michigan	84.730	243	-0.7289	50
13	Toledo	86.682	317	1.1846	285

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	43.850	114	1.1758	319
2	Bowling Green	44.052	128	0.5222	238
3	E Michigan	44.352	142	-0.1030	139
4	Kent State	44.519	158	-0.2196	126
5	Miami (OH)	45.059	191	1.3520	335
6	Ball State	45.533	222	-1.4084	20
7	UMass	46.110	257	0.9178	293
8	W Michigan	46.556	279	0.2036	188
9	Ohio	46.740	284	0.8114	275
10	Cent Michigan	47.399	305	0.8567	282
11	Toledo	47.588	311	-0.3791	105
12	Buffalo	47.658	319	0.9231	294
13	N Illinois	48.602	343	1.3705	336

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	56.485	56	2.0512	336
2	Kent State	56.771	62	-1.7093	31
3	Akron	57.022	72	-0.3433	136
4	UMass	57.376	80	-0.6571	97
5	Buffalo	57.818	92	0.9026	273
6	Bowling Green	58.401	106	2.8517	360
7	Ball State	59.120	130	2.0550	337
8	Toledo	59.937	160	-0.3717	131
9	Cent Michigan	61.568	218	-0.0597	165
10	N Illinois	62.107	239	-1.1196	67
11	Miami (OH)	63.429	275	1.7349	319
12	E Michigan	64.315	302	0.4267	221
13	Ohio	66.830	342	-0.1879	150

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	23.690	53	0.1791	170
2	Kent State	24.006	66	-0.8962	21
3	Bowling Green	24.083	69	1.2077	330
4	UMass	24.702	94	0.7999	272
5	Ball State	25.779	153	-0.1915	113
6	W Michigan	26.018	174	0.2632	184
7	E Michigan	27.392	263	0.3424	195
8	Buffalo	27.432	265	0.7837	268
9	Miami (OH)	27.675	278	2.2713	364
10	Cent Michigan	27.891	290	0.8328	281
11	Ohio	28.603	319	0.5699	240
12	N Illinois	28.761	325	-0.2054	108
13	Toledo	29.254	334	0.5628	236

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	44.401	20	0.1949	182
2	Kent State	46.510	53	-1.7660	16
3	Bowling Green	46.808	62	2.8390	354
4	W Michigan	47.683	82	1.2584	289
5	Akron	47.758	84	-0.4426	98
6	Buffalo	48.451	100	0.7924	236
7	Ball State	48.769	114	1.2753	291
8	N Illinois	51.129	199	0.0731	168
9	Cent Michigan	51.153	201	-0.0458	144
10	Toledo	52.011	243	0.3159	193
11	Miami (OH)	53.178	284	2.8374	353
12	E Michigan	54.155	314	0.8665	246
13	Ohio	55.507	338	0.0646	165

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	49.849	82	0.9690	275
2	E Michigan	50.361	104	0.1561	173
3	Ohio	51.695	158	1.1568	292
4	Kent State	51.923	172	-0.1119	142
5	Miami (OH)	51.993	176	1.1282	289
6	Bowling Green	52.064	182	-0.6596	83
7	Ball State	53.271	237	-2.1304	9
8	W Michigan	54.854	295	-0.8260	74
9	Cent Michigan	55.553	313	1.7226	329
10	UMass	56.195	324	1.3506	310
11	N Illinois	56.205	325	-0.5669	89
12	Buffalo	56.543	334	0.5246	221
13	Toledo	56.624	335	0.8843	263

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	33.170	24	0.1879	216
2	E Michigan	35.685	64	-0.4267	145
3	Miami (OH)	36.571	91	-1.7349	47
4	N Illinois	37.893	127	1.1196	299
5	Cent Michigan	38.432	148	0.0597	201
6	Toledo	40.063	206	0.3717	235
7	Ball State	40.880	236	-2.0550	29
8	Bowling Green	41.599	260	-2.8517	6
9	Buffalo	42.182	274	-0.9026	93
10	UMass	42.624	286	0.6571	269
11	Akron	42.978	294	0.3433	230
12	Kent State	43.229	304	1.7093	335
13	W Michigan	43.515	310	-2.0512	30

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	9.891	61	-0.2226	131
2	Miami (OH)	10.043	75	-0.1261	155
3	Ohio	10.218	88	0.1197	205
4	Bowling Green	10.878	153	-0.3582	100
5	UMass	10.931	160	0.4494	276
6	N Illinois	11.272	196	2.0705	365
7	Cent Michigan	11.480	214	-0.0202	173
8	Ball State	11.858	246	-1.1723	11
9	Toledo	11.980	264	-0.3635	98
10	Kent State	12.271	282	0.5627	294
11	Buffalo	12.300	286	0.1076	199
12	Akron	12.838	316	0.5342	288
13	W Michigan	13.480	340	-0.4441	79

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	27.504	30	0.1306	199
2	E Michigan	29.969	75	-0.1447	160
3	Miami (OH)	30.515	97	-0.8145	92
4	N Illinois	31.001	118	1.4477	315
5	Cent Michigan	32.096	144	0.1926	205
6	Bowling Green	32.725	170	-2.0274	14
7	UMass	33.207	190	0.9896	282
8	Ball State	33.879	220	-1.9611	18
9	Toledo	34.672	252	0.8687	268
10	Kent State	35.113	264	1.3541	311
11	Buffalo	35.192	267	-0.7056	99
12	Akron	36.000	291	0.1095	193
13	W Michigan	37.047	311	-1.9873	17

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	32.725	112	0.4696	225
2	Miami (OH)	32.892	120	0.1800	198
3	E Michigan	33.321	145	-0.4164	138
4	Bowling Green	33.488	158	0.9594	275
5	Toledo	34.306	214	-2.0771	23
6	Kent State	34.499	223	0.0300	185
7	Buffalo	34.636	238	0.5787	231
8	Cent Michigan	34.892	258	-0.1742	159
9	Ball State	34.954	261	-1.9478	29
10	Akron	35.599	283	1.7834	340
11	W Michigan	35.707	287	0.7008	246
12	N Illinois	36.326	317	4.1179	364
13	Ohio	36.988	343	0.4084	212

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	26.930	16	-1.3705	91
2	Miami (OH)	30.280	51	-2.6115	27
3	Akron	30.870	70	-0.6763	139
4	Buffalo	31.540	86	-0.2339	182
5	Ball State	32.710	108	1.7051	314
6	E Michigan	36.210	198	0.8936	272
7	Bowling Green	38.090	244	-0.4877	155
8	W Michigan	38.330	251	1.2432	295
9	Ohio	38.560	263	2.6096	336
10	N Illinois	38.670	266	-3.4421	9
11	Cent Michigan	39.960	290	-2.1312	46
12	Kent State	40.480	297	1.7260	315
13	UMass	45.540	348	-2.1201	47

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	15.750	7	-1.7849	11
2	Akron	18.326	59	-0.7197	83
3	Miami (OH)	18.501	62	-1.0776	42
4	Buffalo	19.304	94	-0.3180	136
5	Ball State	20.391	140	0.5618	262
6	Bowling Green	21.028	174	-0.4110	125
7	E Michigan	21.744	215	0.4916	248
8	W Michigan	21.801	222	-0.0291	176
9	Cent Michigan	22.383	253	-1.4204	23
10	N Illinois	22.679	270	-1.1690	38
11	Ohio	22.906	280	1.5621	340
12	Kent State	23.274	292	0.5305	256
13	UMass	25.242	341	-0.5390	108

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	23.004	19	-1.0045	75
2	Miami (OH)	25.058	54	-1.6508	34
3	Akron	25.393	59	-0.4873	126
4	Buffalo	26.029	74	-0.1464	168
5	Ball State	26.380	88	1.1399	305
6	Bowling Green	29.226	185	-0.0284	183
7	E Michigan	30.088	221	1.0606	301
8	N Illinois	31.059	265	-2.2144	13
9	W Michigan	31.269	272	0.7265	265
10	Ohio	31.281	273	2.1547	348
11	Kent State	32.152	299	1.1824	307
12	Cent Michigan	32.397	305	-1.7035	31
13	UMass	34.533	339	-1.0233	72

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	68.126	16	-5.5460	1
2	Cent Michigan	68.946	29	-1.2882	69
3	W Michigan	70.049	71	-1.7379	43
4	Akron	70.738	94	-1.3534	64
5	Bowling Green	71.456	145	-2.1626	25
6	UMass	72.271	184	0.2526	198
7	Ohio	72.597	210	-0.1700	152
8	Kent State	72.651	217	-0.9830	88
9	N Illinois	72.673	218	1.4905	286
10	E Michigan	72.874	234	-1.1613	78
11	Buffalo	73.873	277	-0.8492	104
12	Miami (OH)	74.289	290	1.1497	267
13	Ball State	77.323	358	-1.4980	55

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	46.866	50	0.5571	226
2	Miami (OH)	47.305	64	0.5555	225
3	Akron	49.580	112	0.0238	183
4	Toledo	50.075	124	-2.0957	57
5	Bowling Green	50.809	143	-3.8581	8
6	E Michigan	51.347	160	-1.5888	87
7	Ball State	53.150	211	-1.0572	119
8	W Michigan	53.385	219	-2.4271	39
9	N Illinois	54.117	238	2.8628	341
10	Kent State	54.487	246	0.7151	235
11	Cent Michigan	56.337	292	1.3553	273
12	UMass	58.535	328	1.4925	283
13	Buffalo	58.962	331	0.0694	190

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	11.531	29	-0.4678	269
2	Ball State	11.226	40	0.3063	76
3	Buffalo	10.982	59	-0.0885	155
4	Toledo	10.934	63	0.3566	58
5	Akron	9.974	122	-0.3490	224
6	Miami (OH)	9.553	151	-0.4506	261
7	UMass	9.029	194	-0.1958	180
8	Cent Michigan	8.840	215	0.1276	106
9	Kent State	8.779	220	-0.1603	174
10	N Illinois	8.101	276	-0.0063	136
11	E Michigan	8.089	278	-0.6564	313
12	Ohio	7.829	304	-1.0007	352
13	W Michigan	5.784	363	-0.9505	347

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	5.871	63	-0.3114	277
2	E Michigan	5.866	64	0.5033	37
3	Bowling Green	4.923	149	-0.2130	248
4	Ohio	4.659	181	0.4011	47
5	Kent State	4.351	212	-0.5062	328
6	Miami (OH)	4.212	229	-0.3423	286
7	Akron	4.056	252	0.2653	71
8	Ball State	4.051	253	0.3113	61
9	Buffalo	4.041	255	-0.1081	196
10	Toledo	4.014	260	0.0860	119
11	W Michigan	3.539	304	0.2124	85
12	UMass	2.960	342	-0.4054	304
13	N Illinois	2.648	352	-0.1593	225

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	21.666	24	-0.8123	51
2	Akron	22.382	41	-0.6613	71
3	Miami (OH)	22.481	42	-0.3845	124
4	Buffalo	23.306	70	-0.5163	100
5	Ball State	24.074	118	0.5112	300
6	Ohio	24.920	165	0.4656	296
7	Bowling Green	25.256	192	-0.3426	134
8	Cent Michigan	25.608	211	-0.5080	101
9	E Michigan	26.007	246	0.4011	284
10	W Michigan	26.193	261	-0.6832	69
11	Kent State	26.733	296	0.3925	281
12	N Illinois	27.147	307	-1.5521	4
13	UMass	28.553	347	-0.2805	151

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	74.541	16	-0.3898	204
2	UMass	73.443	33	-0.3928	206
3	Miami (OH)	73.440	34	-0.3974	207
4	Akron	72.117	76	-0.8377	279
5	Ohio	72.098	77	0.3111	77
6	Bowling Green	71.131	107	-0.1542	158
7	Toledo	70.314	156	-0.3242	191
8	W Michigan	70.305	158	0.4674	63
9	E Michigan	70.077	174	0.0249	121
10	Cent Michigan	69.180	219	-0.4182	210
11	N Illinois	69.154	220	-0.5320	229
12	Buffalo	69.131	222	-0.4127	208
13	Ball State	66.388	334	0.0757	114