Conferences – HoopSci

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	22.538	34	5.3824	8
2	Bowling Green	17.488	50	6.3397	2
3	Miami (OH)	8.629	102	3.1303	37
4	Buffalo	8.244	107	6.3840	1
5	E Michigan	4.580	130	5.4480	6
6	Kent State	1.509	154	-0.4795	205
7	Toledo	-1.933	180	0.2481	165
8	UMass	-2.413	184	-0.5742	209
9	Cent Michigan	-9.775	244	-0.0571	179
10	N Illinois	-11.376	257	2.6508	49
11	W Michigan	-11.381	258	1.2315	110
12	Ball State	-17.423	303	-0.5988	210
13	Ohio	-17.875	308	-3.1169	318

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.283	37	0.0494	30
2	Bowling Green	0.241	56	0.0538	24
3	Akron	0.234	61	0.0275	83
4	Buffalo	0.113	126	0.0674	10
5	E Michigan	0.052	165	0.0305	77
6	UMass	0.034	174	0.0049	164
7	Kent State	0.016	182	-0.0087	215
8	Toledo	-0.013	199	0.0072	157
9	Cent Michigan	-0.015	201	0.0008	180
10	W Michigan	-0.020	202	0.0019	172
11	N Illinois	-0.048	223	0.0000	183
12	Ball State	-0.082	247	-0.0336	298
13	Ohio	-0.153	290	-0.0629	346

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	1642.522	31	6.5550	92
2	Kent State	1605.104	62	5.9127	101
3	Miami (OH)	1574.255	87	18.5040	13
4	Toledo	1537.907	129	-15.5906	333
5	UMass	1503.177	179	-0.7042	180
6	E Michigan	1483.314	210	12.9274	37
7	Bowling Green	1481.072	213	7.7642	84
8	Ohio	1467.872	231	-15.7371	334
9	Buffalo	1444.623	261	14.9181	23
10	Cent Michigan	1442.562	264	-1.0137	186
11	W Michigan	1427.636	279	15.3522	21
12	Ball State	1425.828	282	-8.2605	279
13	N Illinois	1359.223	347	-5.0662	241

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	0.604	46	0.0476	5
2	Akron	0.594	53	0.0190	63
3	Bowling Green	0.563	83	0.0361	16
4	Kent State	0.537	122	-0.0068	209
5	Toledo	0.532	132	-0.0063	205
6	E Michigan	0.513	160	-0.0033	184
7	Miami (OH)	0.509	165	0.0075	120
8	Ohio	0.497	181	-0.0049	200
9	W Michigan	0.454	249	0.0044	138
10	UMass	0.443	270	-0.0155	253
11	N Illinois	0.442	274	0.0185	64
12	Cent Michigan	0.424	292	-0.0244	295
13	Ball State	0.319	360	-0.0220	288

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.618	7	0.0121	82
2	Akron	0.617	8	0.0313	5
3	Kent State	0.580	31	0.0239	19
4	Toledo	0.555	88	0.0102	100
5	Buffalo	0.548	102	0.0161	56
6	N Illinois	0.537	128	0.0055	141
7	Bowling Green	0.531	151	0.0098	106
8	UMass	0.515	189	0.0122	81
9	Cent Michigan	0.512	195	0.0098	105
10	E Michigan	0.491	270	-0.0031	236
11	W Michigan	0.489	280	0.0016	187
12	Ball State	0.478	312	-0.0201	348
13	Ohio	0.475	315	-0.0249	358

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	1.276	6	0.0475	14
2	Miami (OH)	1.256	14	0.0360	36
3	Kent State	1.195	41	0.0352	39
4	Buffalo	1.173	60	0.0519	10
5	Toledo	1.138	84	0.0146	133
6	Bowling Green	1.120	111	0.0304	56
7	N Illinois	1.078	175	0.0170	118
8	Cent Michigan	1.055	214	0.0117	150
9	UMass	1.033	246	0.0105	162
10	E Michigan	1.008	278	-0.0104	260
11	W Michigan	0.987	304	-0.0164	284
12	Ohio	0.977	311	-0.0422	352
13	Ball State	0.948	332	-0.0331	339

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.137	53	-0.0008	157
2	Buffalo	0.138	59	-0.0141	8
3	Miami (OH)	0.147	95	-0.0071	54
4	Ohio	0.159	156	0.0079	295
5	Bowling Green	0.159	159	0.0020	204
6	Toledo	0.162	178	0.0045	246
7	Kent State	0.162	182	-0.0001	168
8	Ball State	0.164	187	-0.0001	169
9	W Michigan	0.179	261	0.0043	243
10	E Michigan	0.180	266	0.0054	268
11	Cent Michigan	0.180	268	0.0081	301
12	UMass	0.181	271	0.0033	228
13	N Illinois	0.181	273	0.0046	248

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	0.435	61	0.0610	19
2	Kent State	0.430	65	0.0501	36
3	Akron	0.412	90	0.0119	176
4	N Illinois	0.405	96	0.0497	39
5	Toledo	0.381	131	0.0498	37
6	Miami (OH)	0.373	139	0.0072	218
7	Buffalo	0.355	169	0.0126	169
8	W Michigan	0.348	184	-0.0135	329
9	Ball State	0.338	207	0.0100	189
10	UMass	0.328	228	-0.0014	278
11	Bowling Green	0.314	261	0.0232	120
12	E Michigan	0.289	294	-0.0043	290
13	Ohio	0.252	336	0.0140	157

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	0.591	1	0.0470	13
2	Kent State	0.444	56	0.0146	118
3	N Illinois	0.412	89	0.0076	160
4	Miami (OH)	0.410	99	0.0253	71
5	UMass	0.400	113	0.0009	221
6	Ohio	0.391	128	0.0231	82
7	Bowling Green	0.374	159	0.0031	195
8	W Michigan	0.344	218	-0.0190	322
9	Ball State	0.330	250	-0.0515	362
10	E Michigan	0.316	283	-0.0010	234
11	Toledo	0.314	286	-0.0131	299
12	Akron	0.288	319	0.0022	207
13	Cent Michigan	0.269	338	-0.0142	305

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	129.506	5	4.1511	3
2	Buffalo	116.173	59	4.4144	1
3	Miami (OH)	114.553	72	1.1637	63
4	Kent State	114.234	77	2.7410	16
5	Bowling Green	110.276	113	0.4036	108
6	Toledo	109.807	116	-0.1787	158
7	N Illinois	104.696	191	2.7545	15
8	E Michigan	102.219	218	-0.0669	150
9	Cent Michigan	102.183	222	-0.1947	162
10	Ohio	100.808	239	-1.8692	269
11	UMass	100.359	246	-2.2094	296
12	W Michigan	98.142	271	-1.1219	227
13	Ball State	92.802	322	-3.0694	336

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	46.482	2	2.0101	11
2	Miami (OH)	42.124	36	0.5395	126
3	Toledo	41.444	58	0.8264	88
4	Cent Michigan	39.808	101	1.1331	58
5	Kent State	39.805	102	1.1292	59
6	Bowling Green	38.747	133	1.0302	68
7	UMass	36.749	224	0.4207	144
8	E Michigan	36.735	227	-0.3431	238
9	N Illinois	36.516	239	0.7986	97
10	W Michigan	35.547	269	-0.3711	242
11	Buffalo	35.227	277	0.3692	156
12	Ohio	34.614	291	-1.7471	348
13	Ball State	33.699	315	-0.6034	266

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	88.839	27	-0.4430	210
2	Cent Michigan	87.461	50	0.5819	100
3	Toledo	84.789	116	0.2580	139
4	Bowling Green	84.176	135	1.1084	62
5	E Michigan	83.845	147	-0.4715	212
6	Ball State	83.060	175	2.7702	10
7	Kent State	81.459	238	-0.8374	257
8	Ohio	81.279	245	-0.5936	230
9	Miami (OH)	80.738	262	-0.4144	207
10	W Michigan	80.577	268	-1.1196	288
11	UMass	80.391	276	-0.8421	258
12	N Illinois	79.699	290	0.7026	83
13	Buffalo	76.912	340	-0.4727	214

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	52.719	10	2.6985	7
2	Miami (OH)	52.289	14	0.9166	92
3	Toledo	49.037	62	0.8228	101
4	Kent State	48.837	66	1.6123	39
5	Bowling Green	45.998	155	0.6243	129
6	Cent Michigan	45.963	157	1.1636	73
7	Buffalo	45.954	158	0.7330	113
8	N Illinois	45.700	169	0.6463	125
9	UMass	45.590	172	0.9238	91
10	W Michigan	44.097	231	0.0922	189
11	E Michigan	43.998	235	-0.1981	230
12	Ohio	42.554	289	-1.9262	355
13	Ball State	41.222	314	-2.0600	357

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	68.988	30	0.3077	139
2	E Michigan	68.593	35	0.5222	120
3	Cent Michigan	65.894	74	0.6762	112
4	Toledo	65.113	89	-1.1815	259
5	Ohio	63.309	128	0.5339	119
6	Bowling Green	63.153	130	0.0598	157
7	UMass	62.275	140	-1.6783	291
8	Ball State	58.630	214	-2.0744	310
9	N Illinois	56.888	246	0.7218	103
10	Akron	55.637	268	0.7246	102
11	Miami (OH)	54.017	302	-1.2579	266
12	Buffalo	53.854	304	-2.1918	318
13	Kent State	52.648	322	-2.6636	333

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	30.718	38	0.5250	117
2	Akron	30.681	41	1.3950	34
3	Cent Michigan	30.286	48	1.3253	41
4	E Michigan	28.425	100	-0.0751	193
5	W Michigan	27.682	133	-0.3911	235
6	UMass	27.335	151	0.0459	175
7	Bowling Green	26.806	178	0.2547	151
8	Miami (OH)	26.692	184	0.1165	169
9	Ohio	26.601	190	-0.7490	283
10	Kent State	24.829	253	-0.1542	202
11	N Illinois	23.610	286	0.7962	84
12	Ball State	23.034	299	-1.0296	318
13	Buffalo	21.560	333	-0.9619	315

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	58.202	26	0.2413	123
2	Cent Michigan	56.891	42	0.8350	84
3	Toledo	55.525	61	-0.7275	220
4	W Michigan	55.168	71	-0.5621	205
5	Bowling Green	53.216	106	0.7388	92
6	Ohio	51.456	147	0.0970	137
7	UMass	50.184	177	-1.8887	312
8	Akron	49.073	204	0.3935	112
9	Ball State	48.565	219	-0.1105	153
10	N Illinois	45.050	279	0.8382	83
11	Miami (OH)	43.390	309	-1.3096	270
12	Kent State	42.998	318	-2.7328	345
13	Buffalo	41.151	342	-1.9995	317

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	62.575	19	2.4281	37
2	Miami (OH)	61.854	24	2.0309	51
3	Kent State	58.227	57	2.5094	31
4	Toledo	55.390	126	1.5504	78
5	UMass	54.552	143	1.8278	62
6	Cent Michigan	52.788	192	1.4485	83
7	Buffalo	52.523	197	0.1368	217
8	N Illinois	51.971	211	0.8277	139
9	Ohio	50.917	245	-2.0751	349
10	Bowling Green	50.134	267	-0.2892	248
11	W Michigan	50.020	273	-0.2673	247
12	E Michigan	49.937	276	-0.1545	236
13	Ball State	47.746	315	-1.9456	343

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	47.352	44	2.6636	33
2	Buffalo	46.146	62	2.1918	48
3	Miami (OH)	45.983	64	1.2579	100
4	Akron	44.363	98	-0.7246	264
5	N Illinois	43.112	120	-0.7218	263
6	Ball State	41.370	152	2.0744	56
7	UMass	37.725	226	1.6783	75
8	Bowling Green	36.847	236	-0.0598	209
9	Ohio	36.691	238	-0.5339	247
10	Toledo	34.887	277	1.1815	107
11	Cent Michigan	34.106	292	-0.6762	254
12	E Michigan	31.407	331	-0.5222	246
13	W Michigan	31.012	336	-0.3077	227

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	15.801	10	0.6150	76
2	Miami (OH)	15.433	14	0.4230	105
3	Kent State	14.976	29	1.2834	17
4	Buffalo	13.668	57	1.3311	16
5	N Illinois	12.907	86	0.0024	181
6	Bowling Green	11.942	128	0.7755	45
7	Toledo	10.726	208	0.3014	121
8	Ball State	10.665	212	0.4262	104
9	Cent Michigan	9.521	271	-0.1922	223
10	UMass	9.414	277	0.3748	108
11	E Michigan	8.310	320	-0.2680	238
12	Ohio	8.014	329	-0.9981	344
13	W Michigan	7.865	334	0.0200	178

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	39.766	47	-0.8364	276
2	Kent State	38.461	68	1.8954	43
3	Miami (OH)	37.348	84	0.8953	120
4	Buffalo	35.762	120	1.5268	65
5	N Illinois	34.649	141	-0.1356	212
6	Ball State	34.495	145	2.8806	17
7	Bowling Green	30.960	228	0.3696	158
8	Cent Michigan	30.570	238	-0.2531	221
9	UMass	30.208	251	1.0466	106
10	Ohio	29.822	256	-0.6905	262
11	Toledo	29.264	272	0.9856	113
12	E Michigan	25.642	331	-0.7128	264
13	W Michigan	25.410	336	-0.5575	250

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	41.426	9	0.5525	114
2	Akron	41.125	14	2.9553	4
3	Buffalo	38.208	42	2.0283	22
4	Kent State	37.143	66	1.1531	63
5	N Illinois	36.635	88	-0.2478	201
6	Toledo	36.601	89	0.0364	170
7	Bowling Green	36.321	99	1.3819	51
8	Ball State	31.920	240	-1.5816	320
9	E Michigan	31.462	252	-0.5096	222
10	W Michigan	31.415	256	0.7016	102
11	UMass	31.173	264	0.4923	119
12	Cent Michigan	30.157	289	-0.6898	245
13	Ohio	24.774	356	-2.7039	354

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	59.091	1	4.7010	13
2	Kent State	44.416	56	1.4625	118
3	N Illinois	41.244	89	0.7651	160
4	Miami (OH)	40.977	99	2.5334	71
5	UMass	39.956	113	0.0909	221
6	Ohio	39.124	128	2.3121	82
7	Bowling Green	37.364	159	0.3111	195
8	W Michigan	34.410	218	-1.8976	322
9	Ball State	32.951	250	-5.1515	362
10	E Michigan	31.566	283	-0.0992	234
11	Toledo	31.383	286	-1.3137	299
12	Akron	28.769	319	0.2177	207
13	Cent Michigan	26.853	338	-1.4209	305

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	33.140	1	3.1232	4
2	Miami (OH)	25.915	53	2.1013	32
3	Kent State	24.902	75	-0.0214	217
4	Bowling Green	22.586	130	0.2059	186
5	N Illinois	21.902	141	0.1050	199
6	Ohio	20.500	189	0.2738	175
7	UMass	20.364	199	-0.1638	238
8	Toledo	20.203	209	-0.4963	273
9	W Michigan	19.786	220	-0.9047	309
10	E Michigan	19.060	248	-0.0855	227
11	Akron	18.108	278	-0.0204	216
12	Ball State	16.727	316	-2.5289	359
13	Cent Michigan	16.388	321	-0.9083	310

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	44.576	1	3.3914	9
2	Kent State	34.747	62	0.5169	169
3	Miami (OH)	31.979	113	1.8222	66
4	N Illinois	31.352	127	0.6214	157
5	UMass	31.261	131	-0.0613	237
6	Ohio	31.039	138	1.6665	76
7	Bowling Green	30.414	158	0.4138	180
8	W Michigan	26.297	272	-1.8909	344
9	Toledo	26.191	275	-1.0205	308
10	Ball State	25.837	284	-3.2672	359
11	E Michigan	25.611	292	-0.2984	251
12	Akron	24.503	307	0.0439	231
13	Cent Michigan	22.863	332	-1.0476	310

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	77.944	33	1.8789	52
2	Toledo	76.966	49	1.0320	86
3	Buffalo	75.242	83	1.9040	51
4	Bowling Green	75.066	87	-0.2172	194
5	W Michigan	74.996	90	2.0724	39
6	E Michigan	73.342	122	0.4722	137
7	Cent Michigan	71.228	181	-0.7219	240
8	Akron	70.484	201	-0.5098	223
9	Kent State	69.625	231	-2.4157	321
10	N Illinois	69.437	238	-1.3853	281
11	Ohio	68.265	262	-2.2761	318
12	Ball State	66.254	304	-0.8725	253
13	UMass	63.704	332	-0.7281	242

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	62.044	30	5.0118	5
2	UMass	60.515	42	1.9443	68
3	Akron	58.235	85	0.1195	201
4	Cent Michigan	56.498	114	3.2378	26
5	Toledo	55.522	132	1.1877	117
6	Buffalo	54.058	153	0.1703	196
7	Bowling Green	53.320	169	3.5997	18
8	N Illinois	52.572	188	-0.4284	228
9	Miami (OH)	51.660	203	-0.7502	253
10	Ball State	51.557	206	-0.6477	247
11	E Michigan	49.381	252	1.0315	130
12	W Michigan	48.332	266	0.4774	168
13	Ohio	43.117	340	-2.3928	328

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	5.777	17	-0.7065	69
2	Buffalo	6.130	34	-1.2138	18
3	Kent State	7.284	90	-0.5929	98
4	Ball State	7.559	108	-0.1768	183
5	Miami (OH)	7.576	109	-0.4426	128
6	W Michigan	8.172	146	0.0025	223
7	Bowling Green	8.255	151	0.3085	289
8	Toledo	8.269	152	-0.5212	112
9	N Illinois	9.446	250	0.1653	262
10	Ohio	9.554	254	0.5189	317
11	E Michigan	9.784	267	-0.0345	217
12	UMass	10.101	283	-0.0830	200
13	Cent Michigan	10.767	318	0.1553	259

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	2.218	13	-0.5368	49
2	Buffalo	2.981	51	-0.4416	70
3	Kent State	3.184	70	-0.3911	87
4	Akron	3.890	140	-0.0155	224
5	UMass	4.338	203	-0.2172	139
6	Cent Michigan	4.571	230	-0.4234	75
7	Toledo	4.577	231	-0.2952	116
8	Ohio	4.865	266	0.3200	313
9	W Michigan	5.252	301	0.2323	292
10	Bowling Green	5.311	305	-0.0403	212
11	N Illinois	5.344	310	0.6596	356
12	Ball State	5.695	330	0.5101	343
13	E Michigan	7.166	362	0.9282	363

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	28.622	29	0.9100	63
2	UMass	28.533	32	0.8103	73
3	Ohio	27.669	58	0.4325	120
4	Bowling Green	27.232	65	1.2120	34
5	Kent State	26.536	80	-1.1110	293
6	E Michigan	23.950	162	-0.4629	234
7	Miami (OH)	22.923	196	0.1893	146
8	Toledo	21.933	225	-2.2127	349
9	N Illinois	20.908	257	-0.8650	273
10	W Michigan	20.554	265	-1.2243	301
11	Cent Michigan	20.215	271	-2.1662	346
12	Akron	19.938	278	-0.7026	255
13	Ball State	19.659	290	-1.8011	332

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	81.359	4	3.6480	5
2	UMass	75.761	62	-0.0787	263
3	W Michigan	75.434	71	0.5019	181
4	Akron	75.294	76	0.3754	204
5	Miami (OH)	73.821	122	0.3509	208
6	Ohio	72.789	166	0.1028	244
7	Toledo	72.209	185	0.8912	136
8	Bowling Green	71.946	198	-0.2789	286
9	Cent Michigan	71.443	225	1.4941	70
10	N Illinois	71.143	235	-0.9682	341
11	E Michigan	70.675	243	-0.1453	271
12	Ball State	69.794	270	-0.3503	294
13	Buffalo	67.125	344	-1.9817	364

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.475	80	-0.0222	13
2	E Michigan	0.487	116	-0.0140	47
3	Miami (OH)	0.502	150	-0.0055	111
4	UMass	0.507	168	0.0053	230
5	W Michigan	0.514	190	-0.0055	112
6	Cent Michigan	0.518	198	0.0074	256
7	Akron	0.523	210	0.0150	308
8	Buffalo	0.529	233	-0.0111	66
9	Kent State	0.540	268	0.0071	254
10	Ball State	0.547	281	0.0075	258
11	Ohio	0.557	301	0.0103	282
12	N Illinois	0.583	341	0.0161	314
13	Toledo	0.586	344	0.0067	248

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.923	36	-0.0307	39
2	E Michigan	0.985	87	-0.0356	25
3	Miami (OH)	0.994	97	-0.0045	142
4	UMass	1.000	112	0.0037	182
5	Buffalo	1.052	179	-0.0257	50
6	Akron	1.074	211	0.0329	319
7	W Michigan	1.080	216	0.0069	204
8	Kent State	1.088	231	0.0033	180
9	Ball State	1.091	236	0.0090	218
10	Toledo	1.093	242	-0.0132	97
11	Cent Michigan	1.099	250	0.0244	288
12	N Illinois	1.171	320	0.0171	255
13	Ohio	1.184	333	0.0417	342

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.218	9	0.0059	86
2	Toledo	0.214	15	0.0202	2
3	Miami (OH)	0.191	57	-0.0001	198
4	Akron	0.187	80	0.0054	92
5	Ball State	0.184	89	0.0054	95
6	Buffalo	0.182	94	0.0049	102
7	UMass	0.179	105	0.0001	195
8	N Illinois	0.175	121	0.0063	78
9	E Michigan	0.175	124	0.0055	91
10	Kent State	0.165	179	0.0017	160
11	W Michigan	0.151	250	0.0007	179
12	Ohio	0.149	259	-0.0061	307
13	Cent Michigan	0.137	316	-0.0068	315

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	0.799	7	0.0249	6
2	Miami (OH)	0.769	47	0.0041	113
3	Bowling Green	0.748	87	-0.0099	245
4	E Michigan	0.742	109	0.0139	40
5	Buffalo	0.731	139	0.0005	146
6	Kent State	0.728	147	0.0063	94
7	W Michigan	0.715	184	-0.0165	293
8	Cent Michigan	0.686	253	-0.0114	254
9	Ball State	0.675	278	-0.0063	216
10	N Illinois	0.670	286	-0.0090	239
11	Akron	0.669	288	-0.0273	339
12	Toledo	0.652	318	-0.0192	302
13	Ohio	0.647	325	-0.0236	329

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	0.208	6	-0.0209	32
2	Ball State	0.246	18	-0.0019	120
3	E Michigan	0.268	31	-0.0311	7
4	Ohio	0.326	107	-0.0126	67
5	Akron	0.329	111	-0.0012	125
6	Buffalo	0.346	144	-0.0081	83
7	Miami (OH)	0.358	167	0.0048	171
8	W Michigan	0.383	213	0.0058	176
9	N Illinois	0.404	246	-0.0040	103
10	Kent State	0.414	259	0.0141	232
11	Cent Michigan	0.418	264	0.0284	308
12	Bowling Green	0.432	284	0.0443	346
13	UMass	0.494	335	0.0421	340

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	92.788	28	-4.5102	8
2	E Michigan	97.640	56	-4.7861	5
3	UMass	102.771	119	-1.0760	149
4	Miami (OH)	105.924	161	-0.9852	161
5	Akron	106.968	185	-1.2213	134
6	Buffalo	107.929	199	-1.1889	138
7	W Michigan	109.523	225	-1.9658	86
8	Ball State	110.225	232	-1.2550	131
9	Toledo	111.740	255	-0.4447	202
10	Cent Michigan	111.958	260	0.8079	288
11	Kent State	112.725	271	3.6164	363
12	N Illinois	116.072	309	0.0360	229
13	Ohio	118.682	332	2.1086	342

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	29.939	18	-2.1877	9
2	UMass	32.287	51	-0.6353	101
3	Miami (OH)	34.458	102	-0.2970	143
4	W Michigan	35.514	137	-0.6409	99
5	E Michigan	35.652	142	-1.0492	61
6	Kent State	35.891	151	-0.1190	169
7	Buffalo	36.208	154	-1.0831	56
8	Akron	37.582	217	1.1845	325
9	Cent Michigan	37.991	237	0.6844	274
10	Ball State	39.911	298	-0.0831	176
11	N Illinois	40.466	315	0.8857	296
12	Ohio	41.611	335	1.5508	345
13	Toledo	42.166	344	-0.1174	171

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	72.607	3	-2.6696	9
2	Bowling Green	74.255	11	-1.1972	81
3	Miami (OH)	78.344	71	-0.1365	207
4	Kent State	80.004	105	-0.7567	120
5	N Illinois	80.698	124	-0.3043	179
6	Buffalo	81.016	135	0.0140	217
7	Akron	83.185	208	0.6129	273
8	W Michigan	83.286	211	0.3242	252
9	Toledo	83.741	222	-0.7917	113
10	E Michigan	83.958	235	0.0297	221
11	Cent Michigan	85.132	272	0.0277	220
12	Ball State	85.477	286	-0.5540	150
13	Ohio	87.799	329	2.2725	357

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	40.840	66	-2.0840	11
2	E Michigan	42.247	102	-1.4465	30
3	W Michigan	42.785	119	-0.9846	63
4	Miami (OH)	43.947	154	-0.3648	125
5	UMass	44.515	167	0.6202	255
6	Cent Michigan	44.837	182	0.8130	275
7	Buffalo	44.978	190	-1.2567	42
8	Akron	45.115	194	1.1301	306
9	Kent State	45.173	197	0.2838	205
10	Ball State	46.891	259	0.2853	206
11	Ohio	47.434	280	0.5885	249
12	N Illinois	50.311	340	1.3028	320
13	Toledo	50.548	345	0.3542	214

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	50.502	15	-2.0707	48
2	Kent State	53.010	32	-1.4567	81
3	Buffalo	53.507	36	-2.7046	26
4	Bowling Green	54.401	49	-1.7468	65
5	Toledo	56.197	86	-1.8682	60
6	N Illinois	56.505	93	-1.2339	100
7	UMass	56.737	96	-0.8914	126
8	Akron	57.978	122	-0.8865	127
9	Ball State	58.217	131	-0.7151	143
10	Ohio	58.626	147	-1.6444	75
11	Cent Michigan	59.832	172	0.9214	292
12	E Michigan	60.721	194	-1.3701	89
13	Miami (OH)	62.277	238	0.3877	247

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	20.392	24	-1.7352	17
2	W Michigan	21.383	38	-1.4030	34
3	Kent State	22.158	52	-0.6741	86
4	UMass	23.188	81	-0.1836	167
5	Buffalo	23.610	97	-1.2850	37
6	Miami (OH)	24.726	145	-0.0318	201
7	E Michigan	24.784	146	-1.1833	43
8	Akron	25.485	179	0.3976	255
9	Cent Michigan	25.990	202	0.8013	304
10	Ball State	26.701	232	-0.7786	77
11	Ohio	27.048	244	0.4250	261
12	N Illinois	27.498	271	0.3757	250
13	Toledo	28.752	295	-0.5061	107

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	40.767	11	-1.9394	55
2	UMass	41.176	12	-2.2902	38
3	W Michigan	42.024	22	-1.5677	81
4	Kent State	42.771	30	-1.6074	74
5	Buffalo	43.329	38	-2.2861	39
6	N Illinois	45.388	81	-1.2912	98
7	Toledo	47.053	130	-2.0530	49
8	Akron	48.214	162	-0.4611	188
9	Miami (OH)	48.822	169	0.1793	244
10	Ball State	49.488	187	-1.0032	133
11	Cent Michigan	50.868	223	0.7876	292
12	E Michigan	50.980	227	-1.1100	118
13	Ohio	51.552	241	-0.0466	228

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	47.953	86	-1.4873	46
2	Bowling Green	50.439	137	-1.7263	37
3	W Michigan	50.570	141	-1.5035	44
4	Miami (OH)	50.773	148	-0.3438	118
5	Cent Michigan	51.842	174	0.9308	248
6	Akron	51.853	177	1.0978	262
7	Ohio	52.821	201	0.8976	244
8	Kent State	52.954	206	0.5283	211
9	Buffalo	54.485	240	-0.1799	139
10	Ball State	55.192	257	-0.0945	150
11	UMass	56.995	296	2.2594	334
12	N Illinois	60.785	344	2.2534	331
13	Toledo	61.657	348	1.4832	295

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	37.723	128	-0.3877	119
2	E Michigan	39.279	172	1.3701	277
3	Cent Michigan	40.168	194	-0.9214	74
4	Ohio	41.374	219	1.6444	291
5	Ball State	41.783	235	0.7151	223
6	Akron	42.022	244	0.8865	239
7	UMass	43.263	270	0.8914	240
8	N Illinois	43.495	273	1.2339	266
9	Toledo	43.803	280	1.8682	306
10	Bowling Green	45.599	317	1.7468	301
11	Buffalo	46.493	330	2.7046	340
12	Kent State	46.990	334	1.4567	285
13	W Michigan	49.498	351	2.0707	318

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	9.099	66	-0.4517	87
2	Bowling Green	9.547	100	-0.4525	86
3	Miami (OH)	9.732	107	-0.2652	126
4	E Michigan	10.868	196	0.1341	212
5	Cent Michigan	12.001	249	-0.1169	159
6	Akron	12.098	257	0.7869	320
7	Buffalo	12.598	288	0.2018	225
8	N Illinois	12.967	299	0.5100	282
9	Ball State	13.210	308	0.6955	308
10	Toledo	13.413	315	0.3887	259
11	Kent State	13.733	331	0.5552	288
12	W Michigan	14.131	339	0.7621	314
13	Ohio	14.563	349	1.1259	346

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	29.521	90	-0.3158	139
2	UMass	31.430	150	-0.3794	130
3	E Michigan	32.978	192	1.1398	282
4	Bowling Green	33.488	202	0.7421	248
5	Cent Michigan	34.264	224	-0.7600	96
6	Akron	34.971	239	1.0740	277
7	N Illinois	35.309	251	0.9869	268
8	Ball State	35.988	272	0.4492	222
9	Ohio	36.247	281	2.3190	334
10	Toledo	36.688	294	1.2613	288
11	Kent State	37.232	303	0.8507	260
12	Buffalo	37.687	312	2.3001	332
13	W Michigan	41.262	351	1.8919	318

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	28.804	59	-1.1077	81
2	Bowling Green	29.325	68	-1.7858	39
3	E Michigan	32.363	155	-0.9766	94
4	Miami (OH)	32.902	174	-0.6119	128
5	Buffalo	33.377	195	-1.6152	49
6	Cent Michigan	33.839	215	0.2826	219
7	Akron	34.662	233	1.3525	314
8	W Michigan	34.885	241	0.6161	252
9	Toledo	36.096	281	-0.4204	144
10	Kent State	36.277	286	0.9288	282
11	N Illinois	37.044	300	0.6612	256
12	Ball State	37.094	302	1.0860	294
13	Ohio	40.727	351	0.9138	280

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	20.789	6	-2.0868	32
2	Ball State	24.649	18	-0.1846	120
3	E Michigan	26.762	31	-3.1047	7
4	Ohio	32.553	107	-1.2649	67
5	Akron	32.910	111	-0.1231	125
6	Buffalo	34.590	144	-0.8064	83
7	Miami (OH)	35.814	167	0.4820	171
8	W Michigan	38.296	213	0.5789	176
9	N Illinois	40.375	246	-0.3988	103
10	Kent State	41.424	259	1.4139	232
11	Cent Michigan	41.832	264	2.8440	308
12	Bowling Green	43.226	284	4.4335	346
13	UMass	49.420	335	4.2134	340

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	11.553	2	-1.4733	25
2	Ball State	16.097	38	0.4294	198
3	E Michigan	16.330	43	-1.5949	19
4	Akron	20.184	149	0.1384	154
5	Buffalo	20.207	153	-0.5986	75
6	Ohio	20.570	169	-0.0542	134
7	Miami (OH)	20.722	173	0.4050	190
8	Cent Michigan	21.953	211	1.1931	284
9	W Michigan	22.803	235	1.2157	287
10	Bowling Green	22.910	240	1.7533	320
11	N Illinois	23.196	253	-0.5753	78
12	Kent State	23.303	257	0.0119	139
13	UMass	26.316	320	2.0909	346

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	17.216	3	-1.8641	14
2	Ball State	20.831	17	-0.2444	107
3	E Michigan	22.690	35	-2.3060	7
4	Akron	26.820	108	-0.0532	131
5	Buffalo	27.476	123	-0.5675	81
6	Miami (OH)	27.766	131	0.3072	163
7	Ohio	28.205	147	-0.2198	111
8	W Michigan	30.810	210	0.6684	198
9	Bowling Green	31.054	219	2.9662	348
10	Kent State	32.040	240	0.6034	189
11	N Illinois	32.257	244	-0.4223	87
12	Cent Michigan	35.050	305	2.3441	326
13	UMass	35.888	321	2.4000	329

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	64.301	26	-0.3434	158
2	Toledo	66.915	66	-0.6003	140
3	Ohio	70.310	154	0.0978	198
4	N Illinois	71.007	178	-0.7375	128
5	Bowling Green	71.911	201	-1.3930	77
6	Kent State	72.035	205	-1.5389	68
7	Buffalo	72.505	221	-0.7416	127
8	UMass	72.661	230	1.0958	278
9	E Michigan	73.627	254	1.0984	279
10	W Michigan	73.987	261	2.6312	355
11	Miami (OH)	74.823	281	0.9316	261
12	Akron	74.944	284	0.3885	221
13	Ball State	77.062	329	2.4226	353

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	46.183	68	-2.1767	42
2	Kent State	47.574	90	-2.6646	29
3	Ohio	50.287	140	0.0677	175
4	E Michigan	50.980	154	1.4672	267
5	Bowling Green	51.022	155	-0.8158	110
6	Toledo	51.911	175	1.0524	239
7	Ball State	52.509	186	-0.3642	135
8	Akron	53.330	203	3.0032	336
9	UMass	54.260	221	-2.6704	28
10	Cent Michigan	56.904	277	1.8580	293
11	N Illinois	57.754	290	1.6253	276
12	W Michigan	57.768	291	0.9860	234
13	Buffalo	60.766	326	1.3840	259

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	13.982	13	0.3984	91
2	Toledo	12.835	23	1.4147	6
3	Buffalo	12.237	39	0.9451	18
4	Akron	11.072	81	0.1007	152
5	E Michigan	10.448	117	0.6096	54
6	Ball State	10.030	149	0.6530	47
7	Kent State	9.496	187	-0.1653	210
8	Miami (OH)	9.289	199	-0.3898	258
9	N Illinois	9.166	210	0.7910	30
10	UMass	9.086	220	-0.4616	272
11	Ohio	7.327	305	-0.3432	248
12	W Michigan	6.695	338	-0.5359	290
13	Cent Michigan	6.293	346	-0.8685	337

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	6.616	48	0.3701	74
2	Ball State	5.220	122	0.6510	29
3	Kent State	5.137	131	0.1456	128
4	Miami (OH)	4.666	172	-0.1281	214
5	E Michigan	4.377	201	0.1588	121
6	Buffalo	4.346	205	0.0644	150
7	Bowling Green	3.981	233	-0.2259	240
8	Akron	3.819	245	-0.2547	248
9	Toledo	3.560	269	0.1416	129
10	Ohio	3.007	308	-0.3783	280
11	W Michigan	2.324	339	-0.3829	282
12	N Illinois	2.227	343	-0.8051	342
13	UMass	1.571	360	-1.2364	365

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	20.177	13	-0.7088	49
2	Ball State	22.231	42	0.1257	157
3	E Michigan	22.874	63	-1.1404	14
4	Ohio	23.186	74	0.0424	135
5	Akron	23.580	92	-0.2147	101
6	Bowling Green	25.535	181	0.7782	266
7	Miami (OH)	25.541	182	0.0471	138
8	W Michigan	25.782	195	-0.1308	113
9	Kent State	26.420	225	-0.1395	111
10	Cent Michigan	26.470	226	0.1635	164
11	Buffalo	26.543	233	0.4157	210
12	UMass	29.348	321	1.6572	348
13	N Illinois	30.459	342	0.7233	258

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	78.371	20	2.3850	17
2	Akron	73.868	100	-0.2176	268
3	W Michigan	73.075	134	-0.1563	260
4	UMass	73.064	135	-0.6891	319
5	Miami (OH)	72.395	164	0.2718	201
6	E Michigan	71.969	182	0.3772	187
7	Toledo	71.407	202	0.7066	138
8	Ohio	71.207	205	-0.4859	302
9	Bowling Green	70.804	216	-0.4726	300
10	Cent Michigan	68.487	295	0.0399	235
11	N Illinois	67.037	336	-1.7673	361
12	Buffalo	66.754	338	-1.9204	362
13	Ball State	66.371	342	-1.0718	343