Conferences – HoopSci

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	18.541	42	1.8827	53
2	Miami (OH)	14.210	61	2.3097	34
3	Bowling Green	6.325	106	2.0410	43
4	Buffalo	4.952	115	4.1659	3
5	UMass	1.565	147	0.4672	138
6	E Michigan	-1.126	170	2.0087	48
7	Toledo	-1.499	174	0.9553	104
8	Kent State	-1.573	175	-0.7445	238
9	Ohio	-6.834	219	-0.9186	250
10	Cent Michigan	-11.961	266	-2.7105	343
11	W Michigan	-12.342	270	-0.4330	214
12	N Illinois	-13.906	280	0.4478	142
13	Ball State	-14.336	287	-2.5571	340

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.262	25	0.0264	21
2	Akron	0.206	38	0.0065	115
3	Bowling Green	0.189	48	0.0213	38
4	Buffalo	0.103	111	0.0408	3
5	Kent State	0.045	163	-0.0063	212
6	UMass	0.039	164	0.0040	130
7	E Michigan	0.013	187	0.0076	107
8	Toledo	0.005	198	0.0077	106
9	W Michigan	-0.060	250	-0.0104	256
10	Ohio	-0.085	267	-0.0037	194
11	Cent Michigan	-0.091	273	-0.0285	340
12	N Illinois	-0.105	281	-0.0077	219
13	Ball State	-0.108	283	-0.0245	327

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	1678.599	28	8.2655	84
2	Miami (OH)	1666.506	34	32.8324	1
3	Kent State	1606.548	66	6.2548	109
4	Toledo	1526.546	140	-9.3603	280
5	Ohio	1490.880	196	-5.0206	241
6	Bowling Green	1476.226	216	11.9396	48
7	UMass	1463.412	228	-4.8734	240
8	Buffalo	1446.871	251	20.0412	14
9	E Michigan	1437.373	262	1.3791	163
10	W Michigan	1402.939	298	4.3681	128
11	Ball State	1401.529	301	-16.3057	334
12	Cent Michigan	1391.233	310	-15.9071	331
13	N Illinois	1338.396	348	-3.1433	217

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.595	39	0.0187	42
2	Akron	0.592	41	0.0078	150
3	Kent State	0.570	63	0.0161	65
4	Toledo	0.538	102	0.0074	157
5	Buffalo	0.525	121	0.0203	32
6	Bowling Green	0.513	143	0.0271	8
7	Ohio	0.502	168	0.0130	92
8	UMass	0.501	171	0.0113	101
9	E Michigan	0.468	232	0.0086	133
10	W Michigan	0.460	245	0.0171	58
11	N Illinois	0.427	307	0.0108	106
12	Cent Michigan	0.426	310	-0.0066	302
13	Ball State	0.407	329	-0.0021	270

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.601	4	0.0097	68
2	Akron	0.596	5	-0.0041	241
3	Buffalo	0.564	27	0.0192	17
4	Bowling Green	0.533	108	0.0099	66
5	Toledo	0.531	112	0.0122	51
6	UMass	0.526	131	0.0177	22
7	Kent State	0.523	142	-0.0287	365
8	W Michigan	0.506	208	-0.0013	207
9	Ohio	0.503	226	-0.0181	349
10	E Michigan	0.501	238	-0.0037	235
11	Cent Michigan	0.493	265	0.0057	124
12	N Illinois	0.485	296	-0.0007	200
13	Ball State	0.469	328	0.0008	180

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	1.260	1	0.0319	31
2	Akron	1.238	4	-0.0089	267
3	Buffalo	1.179	32	0.0291	38
4	Bowling Green	1.136	80	0.0167	93
5	Toledo	1.133	85	0.0015	199
6	Kent State	1.116	114	-0.0412	360
7	UMass	1.070	199	0.0335	28
8	Ohio	1.055	227	-0.0298	347
9	W Michigan	1.047	241	0.0149	106
10	Cent Michigan	1.039	252	0.0139	112
11	E Michigan	1.029	277	-0.0109	279
12	N Illinois	1.023	289	0.0181	87
13	Ball State	1.001	322	0.0135	120

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.140	55	-0.0096	49
2	Ball State	0.141	59	-0.0130	14
3	Akron	0.146	95	0.0058	324
4	Buffalo	0.149	111	-0.0084	59
5	Toledo	0.149	114	0.0084	341
6	Ohio	0.158	175	0.0008	244
7	Bowling Green	0.158	179	-0.0006	213
8	Cent Michigan	0.158	179	-0.0026	178
9	E Michigan	0.164	221	-0.0039	148
10	W Michigan	0.165	234	-0.0005	214
11	UMass	0.175	295	0.0021	269
12	Kent State	0.186	334	0.0109	355
13	N Illinois	0.197	353	0.0013	254

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	33.750	44	-0.0026	137
2	Kent State	33.690	45	0.0034	86
3	N Illinois	32.070	88	0.0267	8
4	UMass	31.290	108	0.0024	95
5	Toledo	29.360	158	-0.0172	257
6	W Michigan	28.550	181	0.0039	81
7	Bowling Green	28.150	196	0.0035	85
8	Cent Michigan	27.370	214	-0.0129	223
9	Buffalo	26.610	242	-0.0201	284
10	Ohio	26.470	247	-0.0048	158
11	E Michigan	26.250	253	-0.0190	273
12	Miami (OH)	23.800	317	-0.0153	237
13	Ball State	23.240	325	-0.0171	255

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	0.459	12	0.0239	67
2	Buffalo	0.440	36	-0.0202	320
3	Miami (OH)	0.415	63	0.0569	5
4	N Illinois	0.398	93	-0.0043	237
5	UMass	0.383	127	0.0022	187
6	Bowling Green	0.380	136	-0.0084	253
7	Ohio	0.377	149	0.0026	185
8	Toledo	0.348	220	-0.0083	251
9	Ball State	0.339	240	-0.0092	259
10	W Michigan	0.329	261	0.0294	39
11	E Michigan	0.319	278	-0.0079	249
12	Cent Michigan	0.305	312	0.0012	194
13	Akron	0.279	343	-0.0101	263

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	127.287	14	2.3782	24
2	Miami (OH)	123.951	40	2.3024	25
3	Buffalo	119.605	64	3.3264	2
4	Toledo	115.643	92	0.6254	171
5	Bowling Green	112.725	131	1.5045	72
6	Kent State	112.075	146	0.7800	148
7	UMass	109.835	166	1.1111	111
8	Cent Michigan	107.751	199	0.0528	231
9	Ohio	107.376	206	-0.4555	282
10	E Michigan	107.098	212	0.8098	142
11	W Michigan	106.707	218	0.7277	154
12	N Illinois	102.563	287	0.2534	206
13	Ball State	100.984	305	-1.6137	350

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	45.513	3	-0.3734	251
2	Miami (OH)	42.994	10	0.2343	137
3	Toledo	40.858	48	0.0116	178
4	Bowling Green	40.556	55	1.3282	23
5	Buffalo	39.145	112	1.4014	18
6	Cent Michigan	38.259	145	0.3571	114
7	UMass	38.183	153	1.0400	46
8	Ohio	37.719	187	-1.4581	348
9	E Michigan	37.596	193	-0.0999	195
10	W Michigan	37.176	213	-0.6335	285
11	Kent State	36.891	230	-2.0834	363
12	Ball State	35.267	299	0.5561	94
13	N Illinois	34.508	318	0.7516	66

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	88.525	15	0.1810	162
2	Toledo	85.449	88	-1.0157	304
3	Cent Michigan	84.974	106	0.1878	159
4	E Michigan	84.061	162	-0.0099	191
5	Ball State	83.823	177	0.9955	66
6	W Michigan	82.961	212	-0.5355	256
7	Bowling Green	82.757	224	0.6864	96
8	UMass	82.377	241	-0.2369	224
9	Ohio	81.639	269	-0.1124	210
10	N Illinois	81.373	276	1.6111	21
11	Buffalo	80.990	291	0.8743	76
12	Miami (OH)	80.444	311	-1.1867	316
13	Kent State	79.997	320	-0.4022	246

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	53.353	1	0.9936	54
2	Akron	51.432	8	-0.6264	275
3	Bowling Green	48.894	34	1.2124	37
4	Buffalo	48.375	44	1.3113	30
5	Toledo	47.859	54	0.6877	89
6	UMass	46.299	119	1.2505	34
7	Kent State	46.250	123	-2.2498	365
8	Ohio	46.197	125	-1.5471	347
9	Cent Michigan	45.149	179	0.2482	148
10	W Michigan	44.873	206	-0.4983	253
11	E Michigan	44.810	210	-0.1197	203
12	Ball State	42.376	312	0.0638	174
13	N Illinois	42.278	316	-0.0214	190

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	67.965	39	-0.6624	239
2	E Michigan	67.706	41	0.0357	168
3	Cent Michigan	66.043	61	-0.4393	223
4	Bowling Green	65.792	66	1.7055	25
5	W Michigan	64.402	101	-1.6944	328
6	UMass	64.344	104	-0.9351	275
7	Ohio	62.423	146	0.3124	139
8	Ball State	60.509	179	-0.3991	220
9	Kent State	55.927	269	0.2275	151
10	Akron	55.584	281	-1.2315	307
11	Buffalo	55.000	296	-0.8670	268
12	N Illinois	54.169	317	-0.2375	201
13	Miami (OH)	53.720	327	-1.1821	298

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	31.040	12	-0.7585	283
2	Bowling Green	30.428	26	1.6173	9
3	Akron	30.417	27	-0.8329	293
4	Cent Michigan	29.415	49	-0.2122	210
5	E Michigan	28.643	75	0.2875	123
6	Ohio	28.472	79	-1.0224	313
7	UMass	27.966	104	0.1772	139
8	Miami (OH)	27.831	113	0.4953	95
9	W Michigan	27.064	152	-1.2051	326
10	Ball State	24.973	256	0.3577	112
11	Buffalo	24.756	266	0.3396	113
12	Kent State	24.606	272	-0.9423	306
13	N Illinois	22.428	337	0.4653	99

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	58.110	20	-1.3419	311
2	E Michigan	57.190	30	-0.0019	165
3	Cent Michigan	55.810	54	-0.1589	191
4	Bowling Green	54.408	76	1.8719	25
5	W Michigan	53.187	110	-1.7414	337
6	UMass	53.141	113	-0.9457	278
7	Ohio	51.166	168	0.0505	160
8	Ball State	50.694	174	0.2788	139
9	Akron	49.167	217	-0.9423	277
10	Kent State	44.749	310	-0.0759	175
11	Buffalo	44.414	321	-0.1621	192
12	N Illinois	43.894	331	0.6243	106
13	Miami (OH)	43.194	340	-1.5308	324

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	64.034	1	3.2201	2
2	Akron	61.586	9	-0.6991	257
3	Buffalo	55.763	73	1.0590	56
4	Bowling Green	55.732	74	1.2214	49
5	Ohio	55.596	79	-2.0019	343
6	Kent State	55.592	80	-1.8958	340
7	Toledo	53.403	157	-0.0616	189
8	UMass	52.617	178	0.9914	63
9	Cent Michigan	52.427	186	-0.2985	215
10	E Michigan	51.033	241	0.6245	107
11	N Illinois	50.872	251	0.5872	112
12	W Michigan	50.591	266	-0.6912	255
13	Ball State	49.333	295	0.4652	130

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	46.280	39	1.1821	68
2	N Illinois	45.831	49	0.2375	165
3	Buffalo	45.000	70	0.8670	98
4	Akron	44.416	85	1.2315	59
5	Kent State	44.073	97	-0.2275	215
6	Ball State	39.491	187	0.3991	146
7	Ohio	37.577	220	-0.3124	227
8	UMass	35.656	262	0.9351	91
9	W Michigan	35.598	265	1.6944	38
10	Bowling Green	34.208	300	-1.7055	341
11	Cent Michigan	33.957	305	0.4393	143
12	E Michigan	32.294	325	-0.0357	198
13	Toledo	32.035	327	0.6624	127

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	15.163	19	-0.2610	248
2	Akron	15.096	21	0.4595	92
3	Buffalo	14.389	36	1.0618	24
4	Kent State	12.286	118	-1.1411	360
5	N Illinois	12.081	130	0.2863	129
6	Ball State	10.294	243	0.1984	146
7	UMass	10.217	249	0.8628	44
8	Bowling Green	10.128	255	-0.2890	255
9	W Michigan	10.112	256	0.5717	78
10	Toledo	9.817	270	0.7701	54
11	Ohio	9.247	301	-0.4358	300
12	E Michigan	8.953	317	-0.3875	283
13	Cent Michigan	8.845	324	0.5692	80

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	39.359	40	1.1233	64
2	N Illinois	37.479	78	0.9868	79
3	Miami (OH)	37.249	83	0.3441	147
4	Buffalo	36.576	100	1.0364	71
5	Kent State	35.249	128	-0.3263	228
6	Ball State	33.129	184	0.7167	103
7	Ohio	30.473	246	-0.1629	207
8	W Michigan	29.774	264	1.2060	52
9	UMass	29.236	275	0.7088	104
10	Cent Michigan	29.164	277	0.3467	146
11	Bowling Green	28.350	296	-1.1855	313
12	Toledo	27.339	315	0.3263	150
13	E Michigan	26.871	323	-0.0080	192

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	41.223	2	-0.9201	300
2	Buffalo	39.397	13	1.9408	25
3	Akron	38.303	25	-0.0770	215
4	Toledo	36.311	56	2.7135	12
5	Bowling Green	35.667	93	0.9397	95
6	UMass	35.428	111	2.2081	20
7	Kent State	33.822	190	-2.9945	364
8	W Michigan	33.775	193	0.4954	146
9	E Michigan	33.065	224	-1.4677	331
10	N Illinois	32.454	253	-0.0538	212
11	Ball State	31.411	300	-0.3104	238
12	Cent Michigan	29.798	340	1.5179	50
13	Ohio	29.579	344	-0.8419	295

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	45.930	12	2.3917	67
2	Buffalo	44.040	36	-2.0211	320
3	Miami (OH)	41.550	63	5.6884	5
4	N Illinois	39.840	93	-0.4288	237
5	UMass	38.340	127	0.2147	187
6	Bowling Green	37.980	136	-0.8454	253
7	Ohio	37.700	149	0.2610	185
8	Toledo	34.820	220	-0.8328	251
9	Ball State	33.930	240	-0.9214	259
10	W Michigan	32.930	261	2.9444	39
11	E Michigan	31.870	278	-0.7934	249
12	Cent Michigan	30.490	312	0.1243	194
13	Akron	27.900	343	-1.0062	263

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	25.496	29	1.1913	91
2	Buffalo	25.260	34	-0.9572	310
3	Miami (OH)	24.812	43	2.9871	5
4	Bowling Green	22.372	131	-0.7026	279
5	Toledo	21.767	154	-0.6397	275
6	N Illinois	21.241	176	0.0203	215
7	Ohio	20.776	197	0.3749	173
8	UMass	20.386	213	0.4088	171
9	W Michigan	20.187	220	2.1875	23
10	Ball State	19.241	248	0.0344	213
11	E Michigan	18.760	272	-0.5020	255
12	Cent Michigan	18.552	282	0.1040	206
13	Akron	17.437	321	-0.5398	261

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Buffalo	34.359	32	-1.0993	304
2	Kent State	34.106	39	1.7093	74
3	Miami (OH)	32.070	94	4.1347	2
4	N Illinois	31.317	120	-0.0407	215
5	Bowling Green	30.329	152	-0.4542	251
6	UMass	30.092	160	0.0965	204
7	Ohio	29.933	166	0.3528	179
8	Toledo	27.915	230	-1.0791	301
9	Ball State	27.421	248	-0.2704	235
10	W Michigan	27.312	255	2.4125	24
11	E Michigan	26.082	286	-0.7336	274
12	Cent Michigan	25.936	291	0.3420	182
13	Akron	22.927	349	-0.7775	278

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	78.765	9	1.2929	96
2	Miami (OH)	75.930	52	0.5749	148
3	Akron	75.483	63	0.5236	154
4	Kent State	74.244	98	0.0236	197
5	W Michigan	73.699	118	1.6370	73
6	Bowling Green	73.389	133	-1.8480	326
7	Buffalo	73.148	142	-0.9748	287
8	E Michigan	72.539	159	0.7879	129
9	Ohio	71.634	194	0.0044	202
10	Cent Michigan	70.595	232	-1.1668	297
11	Ball State	70.340	240	0.3435	171
12	N Illinois	67.638	312	-0.2715	227
13	UMass	67.430	318	1.3946	92

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	61.344	24	-0.0654	185
2	Akron	58.799	50	1.0906	100
3	Kent State	57.708	65	-0.4263	215
4	Cent Michigan	56.311	93	1.1246	96
5	Buffalo	54.564	127	2.3788	41
6	Miami (OH)	53.986	142	0.1857	164
7	Ball State	52.905	179	-1.3428	279
8	Toledo	51.773	217	1.1164	97
9	N Illinois	51.641	221	-0.3496	210
10	Bowling Green	51.197	227	-0.2950	202
11	W Michigan	50.763	235	-0.0625	184
12	E Michigan	49.452	269	-0.2256	197
13	Ohio	45.495	332	-2.8698	341

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ball State	6.395	7	-0.4169	79
2	Akron	7.516	45	0.9442	347
3	Toledo	7.669	56	0.4766	295
4	Bowling Green	7.752	60	-0.2875	111
5	Miami (OH)	7.922	75	-0.5898	49
6	Ohio	8.054	89	-0.4253	77
7	Buffalo	8.270	122	-0.0788	172
8	W Michigan	8.741	170	0.2561	251
9	E Michigan	9.100	213	-0.3142	103
10	Kent State	9.402	242	0.6473	314
11	Cent Michigan	9.627	275	-0.0711	175
12	N Illinois	9.874	288	-0.2980	108
13	UMass	10.080	304	0.4119	285

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	2.844	3	-0.3023	74
2	Kent State	3.475	41	0.3240	286
3	Buffalo	3.541	49	0.3444	292
4	UMass	3.825	79	-0.6281	12
5	Ohio	3.896	88	-0.1177	132
6	Cent Michigan	3.996	109	0.0974	206
7	Toledo	4.151	134	-0.7646	4
8	Akron	4.177	136	0.2987	278
9	Bowling Green	4.733	233	0.1938	238
10	Ball State	4.816	245	-0.4376	35
11	W Michigan	4.982	262	0.0160	178
12	N Illinois	5.745	341	0.5634	330
13	E Michigan	6.105	352	-0.1945	107

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	25.860	75	1.1815	69
2	UMass	25.171	100	-0.5542	320
3	Ohio	24.389	145	0.5482	160
4	Buffalo	24.232	159	-0.4256	303
5	Bowling Green	24.111	169	0.1369	222
6	N Illinois	23.606	195	1.1704	72
7	Miami (OH)	23.367	202	2.7139	2
8	E Michigan	23.056	211	-0.2773	282
9	Toledo	22.892	225	-0.4398	309
10	Cent Michigan	21.873	277	0.4464	175
11	W Michigan	21.411	303	0.4611	173
12	Ball State	21.223	311	0.4002	182
13	Akron	19.863	343	-0.1866	273

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	77.562	6	0.3301	79
2	UMass	74.717	30	-1.0966	297
3	Miami (OH)	73.456	56	0.7440	37
4	Akron	73.207	63	-0.7913	259
5	Ohio	72.681	84	-0.0032	118
6	Bowling Green	72.494	90	-0.5312	208
7	Toledo	72.030	114	-0.0523	126
8	W Michigan	71.343	140	-1.4392	330
9	N Illinois	70.450	190	-1.6505	343
10	E Michigan	69.721	220	0.6334	46
11	Buffalo	68.724	259	-0.3725	183
12	Cent Michigan	68.483	272	-0.1000	138
13	Ball State	66.769	332	-1.8471	353

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.506	145	-0.0166	12
2	E Michigan	0.507	152	0.0044	220
3	Miami (OH)	0.510	161	0.0125	308
4	Bowling Green	0.516	192	0.0123	307
5	UMass	0.516	196	0.0160	332
6	Ohio	0.520	215	-0.0033	116
7	Kent State	0.526	241	-0.0105	54
8	W Michigan	0.535	264	0.0026	197
9	Buffalo	0.537	276	0.0073	258
10	N Illinois	0.543	291	-0.0144	26
11	Ball State	0.549	310	0.0007	178
12	Cent Michigan	0.551	312	0.0016	188
13	Toledo	0.568	347	-0.0013	147

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	1.019	89	0.0347	334
2	Miami (OH)	1.036	113	0.0345	331
3	UMass	1.039	116	0.0274	305
4	Akron	1.047	142	-0.0275	23
5	E Michigan	1.052	153	0.0123	222
6	Kent State	1.085	235	-0.0102	84
7	Buffalo	1.095	251	0.0105	208
8	Ohio	1.095	252	0.0005	145
9	Ball State	1.105	267	-0.0019	133
10	N Illinois	1.118	288	-0.0228	31
11	Toledo	1.133	306	0.0117	217
12	W Michigan	1.140	316	0.0311	317
13	Cent Michigan	1.155	331	0.0008	150

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.189	32	-0.0099	325
2	Toledo	0.179	61	0.0037	82
3	Ball State	0.179	65	0.0038	79
4	Miami (OH)	0.175	78	-0.0020	181
5	Akron	0.174	87	0.0056	57
6	Ohio	0.167	121	0.0076	40
7	Buffalo	0.166	131	-0.0028	198
8	UMass	0.165	139	-0.0027	195
9	N Illinois	0.163	150	0.0017	106
10	E Michigan	0.155	204	-0.0044	229
11	Cent Michigan	0.147	256	-0.0002	137
12	Kent State	0.147	259	-0.0088	308
13	W Michigan	0.132	332	-0.0064	264

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	77.270	12	0.0052	123
2	Miami (OH)	74.400	71	-0.0139	316
3	Bowling Green	74.390	73	-0.0026	202
4	Kent State	73.360	106	0.0014	168
5	E Michigan	72.330	149	0.0005	176
6	W Michigan	70.600	226	-0.0241	350
7	Buffalo	70.290	237	-0.0038	219
8	Akron	70.210	241	-0.0065	259
9	N Illinois	69.940	256	0.0046	130
10	Ball State	68.550	294	-0.0038	217
11	Cent Michigan	67.540	317	0.0070	106
12	Ohio	66.680	334	-0.0188	334
13	Toledo	65.620	343	-0.0245	353

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	0.261	14	0.0067	214
2	Ball State	0.295	49	0.0083	230
3	Buffalo	0.317	72	-0.0068	104
4	Miami (OH)	0.329	99	-0.0002	163
5	E Michigan	0.332	108	0.0158	277
6	Akron	0.333	109	-0.0056	110
7	Ohio	0.373	216	0.0457	357
8	W Michigan	0.380	234	-0.0119	77
9	Kent State	0.390	251	-0.0172	54
10	Bowling Green	0.396	267	-0.0058	108
11	N Illinois	0.424	313	0.0055	202
12	Cent Michigan	0.431	318	0.0176	286
13	UMass	0.469	349	0.0242	313

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	106.400	90	-0.4184	86
2	E Michigan	108.224	122	-1.1991	30
3	UMass	108.270	124	0.6383	193
4	Akron	108.746	137	0.8342	214
5	Miami (OH)	109.742	156	0.2442	151
6	Kent State	113.648	215	1.7857	307
7	Ohio	114.210	227	0.3815	165
8	Buffalo	114.653	238	-0.4534	80
9	Ball State	115.320	251	0.8540	215
10	N Illinois	116.469	267	-0.0301	120
11	Toledo	117.142	273	-0.3129	98
12	W Michigan	119.049	300	1.1345	252
13	Cent Michigan	119.712	306	2.7748	356

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	34.276	55	1.1227	318
2	UMass	34.517	66	0.4934	248
3	Akron	36.457	142	-0.9043	40
4	Miami (OH)	36.593	153	1.2241	327
5	Kent State	36.661	160	-0.0897	147
6	E Michigan	37.477	209	0.2718	211
7	Ohio	38.198	251	-0.9813	33
8	N Illinois	38.632	271	-1.1053	20
9	Buffalo	38.635	272	0.6583	278
10	W Michigan	38.950	287	1.2143	325
11	Ball State	39.341	297	-0.5211	94
12	Cent Michigan	39.687	306	-0.1638	136
13	Toledo	42.704	356	0.4424	236

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	76.240	6	-0.8702	72
2	Bowling Green	77.694	22	1.1070	293
3	N Illinois	80.592	81	-0.4399	123
4	Miami (OH)	81.850	127	0.6270	242
5	Kent State	82.236	136	1.6364	333
6	Ohio	82.979	168	-1.8746	15
7	Cent Michigan	83.112	177	-1.0347	54
8	E Michigan	83.712	209	-0.5168	112
9	Ball State	83.960	225	-0.6732	90
10	Buffalo	83.974	227	0.5011	231
11	Akron	83.977	228	0.8264	264
12	W Michigan	85.578	287	2.1537	353
13	Toledo	86.192	307	0.7564	254

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	43.574	120	-1.2750	24
2	Bowling Green	44.296	156	0.7802	284
3	E Michigan	44.612	178	0.5282	251
4	Miami (OH)	44.787	189	1.0876	315
5	Kent State	44.787	190	-0.8770	51
6	UMass	45.348	216	1.1228	317
7	W Michigan	45.361	217	0.0894	185
8	Ohio	45.832	237	-0.2833	124
9	Buffalo	46.255	259	0.5444	253
10	Ball State	47.015	285	-0.2007	134
11	N Illinois	47.825	314	-1.1280	31
12	Cent Michigan	47.922	317	0.4276	235
13	Toledo	49.557	347	0.0136	170

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	53.168	16	-0.4947	132
2	Buffalo	55.834	52	-0.8319	105
3	Bowling Green	56.394	67	-0.2433	167
4	Kent State	56.408	68	-0.4411	142
5	Ball State	57.466	86	-1.2033	74
6	Akron	57.670	95	0.9248	294
7	UMass	58.401	120	-1.6868	45
8	Toledo	60.075	174	0.0927	202
9	Cent Michigan	60.289	181	0.9171	293
10	N Illinois	61.454	221	0.4207	241
11	Miami (OH)	62.809	259	0.5086	253
12	E Michigan	64.508	311	1.5177	327
13	Ohio	65.521	329	0.1405	204

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	23.161	46	0.2551	227
2	Kent State	24.097	80	-0.0360	170
3	Akron	24.679	108	-0.2090	138
4	UMass	24.865	116	-0.1239	156
5	W Michigan	24.895	119	0.3538	248
6	Ball State	26.107	200	-0.9325	41
7	Buffalo	26.186	204	0.3010	238
8	Miami (OH)	26.532	227	0.8638	326
9	E Michigan	27.384	275	0.4709	266
10	Cent Michigan	27.728	288	0.4004	253
11	Ohio	27.800	291	-0.6544	74
12	N Illinois	28.197	307	-0.5479	87
13	Toledo	30.272	349	0.5501	278

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	44.176	23	0.4849	236
2	UMass	44.287	24	-1.8343	28
3	W Michigan	45.421	43	0.6928	270
4	Kent State	46.618	69	0.5475	248
5	Buffalo	46.955	76	-0.3670	145
6	Ball State	48.166	113	-1.5223	45
7	Akron	48.427	125	1.2940	320
8	N Illinois	49.599	166	0.0851	198
9	Cent Michigan	50.009	187	0.1045	202
10	Miami (OH)	51.386	236	0.8486	283
11	Toledo	51.857	254	0.5074	243
12	E Michigan	54.079	306	0.9725	296
13	Ohio	54.311	312	-1.0623	72

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	50.041	113	-0.0608	165
2	Ohio	51.118	148	-0.5232	110
3	Akron	51.130	150	-1.2743	50
4	Miami (OH)	51.821	183	0.9002	278
5	Kent State	52.339	196	-0.5331	109
6	Bowling Green	53.279	235	0.0651	178
7	W Michigan	54.895	285	-0.0011	170
8	Ball State	55.026	288	-0.0809	161
9	Buffalo	56.027	307	1.0059	287
10	Cent Michigan	56.401	315	0.8664	275
11	UMass	56.677	319	1.8733	335
12	N Illinois	56.834	324	-1.4173	42
13	Toledo	58.582	349	0.3451	218

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	34.479	37	-0.1405	162
2	E Michigan	35.492	55	-1.5177	39
3	Miami (OH)	37.191	107	-0.5086	113
4	N Illinois	38.546	145	-0.4207	125
5	Cent Michigan	39.711	185	-0.9171	73
6	Toledo	39.925	192	-0.0927	164
7	UMass	41.599	246	1.6868	321
8	Akron	42.330	271	-0.9248	72
9	Ball State	42.534	280	1.2033	292
10	Kent State	43.592	298	0.4411	224
11	Bowling Green	43.606	299	0.2433	199
12	Buffalo	44.166	314	0.8319	261
13	W Michigan	46.832	350	0.4947	234

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	9.652	64	0.6172	293
2	Miami (OH)	10.061	90	0.3603	248
3	E Michigan	10.093	92	-0.1991	111
4	Ohio	10.398	119	-0.3269	86
5	N Illinois	10.436	124	-0.5573	51
6	Bowling Green	11.115	180	0.8676	329
7	Akron	11.778	238	-0.6954	32
8	Cent Michigan	11.960	257	-0.5642	48
9	Toledo	12.432	287	-0.1076	134
10	Buffalo	12.449	292	0.3573	247
11	Kent State	12.564	298	-0.0537	147
12	Ball State	13.234	330	0.4113	255
13	W Michigan	14.054	352	0.8604	328

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	28.669	49	-0.8123	82
2	E Michigan	29.633	80	-1.4893	28
3	Miami (OH)	30.464	102	-0.2215	153
4	N Illinois	30.993	117	-0.5250	117
5	UMass	31.953	149	0.9641	271
6	Cent Michigan	33.104	184	-1.1391	48
7	Bowling Green	33.517	203	0.6221	236
8	Toledo	34.335	237	0.2490	200
9	Akron	35.550	279	-0.4677	128
10	Kent State	35.618	281	1.0889	284
11	Ball State	35.794	285	0.8492	260
12	Buffalo	37.019	305	0.8681	263
13	W Michigan	40.158	355	1.4609	309

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	29.967	32	1.2553	287
2	Akron	32.985	133	-1.4157	43
3	Miami (OH)	33.189	143	1.3276	294
4	Buffalo	33.597	169	-0.0013	175
5	N Illinois	33.672	174	-1.1082	60
6	Bowling Green	33.798	185	1.6747	318
7	W Michigan	34.103	197	0.1891	194
8	E Michigan	34.663	233	1.9938	334
9	Kent State	35.215	255	-0.8428	84
10	Cent Michigan	35.357	260	-0.5250	114
11	Ohio	35.529	271	-0.1014	158
12	Toledo	36.026	297	-0.6344	100
13	Ball State	37.538	338	0.8157	249

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	26.050	14	0.6685	214
2	Ball State	29.510	49	0.8346	230
3	Buffalo	31.730	72	-0.6765	104
4	Miami (OH)	32.870	99	-0.0200	163
5	E Michigan	33.230	108	1.5769	277
6	Akron	33.260	109	-0.5578	110
7	Ohio	37.290	216	4.5717	357
8	W Michigan	37.970	234	-1.1888	77
9	Kent State	38.990	251	-1.7184	54
10	Bowling Green	39.600	267	-0.5834	108
11	N Illinois	42.410	313	0.5473	202
12	Cent Michigan	43.070	318	1.7561	286
13	UMass	46.920	349	2.4220	313

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	15.433	9	0.3915	199
2	Ball State	18.563	67	0.4623	209
3	Buffalo	19.759	116	-0.6207	76
4	Akron	20.051	127	-0.2442	105
5	E Michigan	20.203	134	0.8852	268
6	Miami (OH)	20.387	140	0.6370	240
7	W Michigan	22.061	223	-0.1763	117
8	Bowling Green	22.245	229	0.3553	194
9	Kent State	22.597	254	-0.7879	61
10	Ohio	22.700	259	2.3364	353
11	N Illinois	24.092	301	0.4905	215
12	Cent Michigan	24.154	304	0.9693	275
13	UMass	25.166	333	1.1342	300

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	22.265	13	0.7269	233
2	Ball State	24.339	43	0.5514	214
3	Buffalo	26.271	76	-0.2738	116
4	Miami (OH)	26.734	86	0.2086	175
5	Akron	27.187	100	-0.1129	136
6	E Michigan	27.547	109	1.1286	267
7	Bowling Green	29.618	194	-0.0295	141
8	Ohio	30.252	223	2.7461	353
9	Kent State	31.259	251	-0.8215	74
10	W Michigan	31.335	254	-0.4833	103
11	N Illinois	33.503	314	0.3738	192
12	Cent Michigan	34.836	332	0.9075	250
13	UMass	35.197	336	1.7202	316

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	69.582	71	0.7935	243
2	Toledo	69.618	72	0.0755	177
3	W Michigan	70.782	121	0.6874	234
4	N Illinois	70.989	126	0.6656	231
5	UMass	71.260	144	-0.5004	119
6	Kent State	72.308	203	-0.2959	143
7	Akron	73.016	235	-0.1110	156
8	E Michigan	74.263	290	0.0866	178
9	Ohio	74.282	292	1.3597	289
10	Bowling Green	75.459	327	2.1878	332
11	Buffalo	75.554	330	-1.6387	43
12	Miami (OH)	76.157	347	1.8553	313
13	Ball State	76.679	352	-0.1526	154

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	47.015	50	0.1999	194
2	Miami (OH)	47.816	65	0.3259	207
3	Akron	49.259	100	-1.0115	96
4	E Michigan	51.267	146	1.0000	258
5	Bowling Green	52.113	172	-1.1142	90
6	N Illinois	52.347	177	-0.9010	111
7	Toledo	52.402	178	0.9499	252
8	Ball State	54.918	250	-1.3144	75
9	W Michigan	55.929	269	0.7399	239
10	Kent State	56.208	276	0.4640	215
11	Cent Michigan	57.102	295	-1.9899	34
12	UMass	57.823	312	1.9282	313
13	Buffalo	59.031	323	0.5125	222

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	11.990	33	-0.4723	280
2	Ball State	11.371	51	0.9036	10
3	Buffalo	11.244	60	-0.0428	160
4	Toledo	10.793	85	0.5395	48
5	Akron	10.211	119	-0.6580	318
6	Miami (OH)	9.555	173	-0.1058	184
7	UMass	9.467	179	-0.0043	148
8	Ohio	8.695	232	0.5343	49
9	N Illinois	8.461	252	0.1568	109
10	E Michigan	8.452	253	-0.3930	260
11	Kent State	8.284	266	-0.6706	321
12	Cent Michigan	8.007	289	0.0909	122
13	W Michigan	6.184	358	-0.6756	323

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	6.008	65	0.3104	84
2	E Michigan	5.390	111	0.4916	47
3	Kent State	4.662	174	-0.0551	188
4	Miami (OH)	4.649	175	0.0696	153
5	Bowling Green	4.629	182	0.3158	82
6	Ohio	4.391	210	0.8053	17
7	Ball State	4.210	232	0.0236	166
8	Akron	4.031	247	-0.1886	236
9	Buffalo	3.769	278	-0.3347	284
10	Toledo	3.567	298	0.3355	75
11	W Michigan	3.385	312	0.2032	112
12	UMass	3.271	322	-0.3943	295
13	N Illinois	2.123	359	-0.6951	348

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	22.076	34	-0.1684	119
2	Akron	23.361	69	-0.1026	132
3	Miami (OH)	23.663	80	-0.1141	130
4	Buffalo	23.743	86	-0.5537	67
5	Ball State	23.878	95	0.2213	194
6	Ohio	24.716	136	1.3625	351
7	E Michigan	25.228	164	0.5778	259
8	Bowling Green	25.245	167	-0.4768	77
9	Cent Michigan	26.199	238	-0.1194	128
10	W Michigan	27.073	294	0.1557	182
11	Kent State	27.077	295	0.0508	167
12	UMass	28.672	338	0.8445	298
13	N Illinois	29.252	349	-0.0211	152

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	76.205	11	0.6340	48
2	Miami (OH)	73.947	42	1.1022	25
3	UMass	73.613	52	-0.6717	246
4	Akron	72.831	75	-0.7860	265
5	Ohio	72.476	85	0.3943	81
6	Bowling Green	71.522	127	-0.4494	207
7	Toledo	71.157	147	-0.3378	187
8	E Michigan	70.741	167	0.7005	42
9	W Michigan	70.520	182	-1.1847	320
10	N Illinois	69.276	243	-1.1967	323
11	Cent Michigan	69.240	244	0.2904	100
12	Buffalo	69.124	249	0.0085	138
13	Ball State	65.901	350	-1.3425	338