Conferences – HoopSci

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	18.318	42	0.8125	86
2	Miami (OH)	14.086	59	1.4948	28
3	Bowling Green	3.970	119	-0.2659	219
4	Toledo	2.924	132	1.5448	25
5	Buffalo	0.749	151	0.8858	75
6	Kent State	0.443	154	0.0080	182
7	UMass	-0.865	165	-0.2758	221
8	E Michigan	-3.683	193	-0.0686	194
9	Ohio	-3.819	196	0.5510	112
10	Cent Michigan	-7.160	230	0.4540	124
11	Ball State	-10.926	260	-0.2643	218
12	W Michigan	-11.594	267	-0.3784	234
13	N Illinois	-19.733	326	0.0313	176

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.245	19	0.0004	156
2	Akron	0.197	30	0.0022	133
3	Bowling Green	0.152	54	-0.0084	227
4	Buffalo	0.082	116	0.0036	124
5	Kent State	0.041	160	-0.0052	201
6	UMass	0.032	167	-0.0055	203
7	Toledo	0.013	186	0.0098	78
8	E Michigan	-0.003	199	-0.0055	206
9	Ohio	-0.063	258	0.0047	114
10	W Michigan	-0.074	271	-0.0093	232
11	Cent Michigan	-0.085	280	0.0021	135
12	Ball State	-0.108	299	-0.0055	204
13	N Illinois	-0.112	301	-0.0110	251

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	1723.562	16	18.0676	36
2	Miami (OH)	1699.007	24	33.6147	3
3	Kent State	1621.293	60	7.7794	106
4	Toledo	1545.259	123	-0.5344	191
5	Ohio	1472.604	215	-6.4858	254
6	Bowling Green	1467.148	224	2.1680	160
7	UMass	1437.182	253	-9.4232	278
8	Buffalo	1418.148	278	3.3995	141
9	Ball State	1413.549	283	-6.9675	259
10	Cent Michigan	1394.622	302	-9.1712	276
11	E Michigan	1383.234	309	-15.7236	321
12	W Michigan	1379.697	313	-6.3698	253
13	N Illinois	1321.591	348	-3.3801	226

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	0.596	31	0.0047	161
2	Miami (OH)	0.595	32	0.0214	8
3	Kent State	0.559	63	0.0091	85
4	Toledo	0.539	88	0.0059	139
5	Buffalo	0.501	176	-0.0003	246
6	UMass	0.498	186	0.0099	71
7	Bowling Green	0.497	190	0.0062	136
8	Ohio	0.493	196	0.0035	179
9	W Michigan	0.456	256	0.0064	132
10	E Michigan	0.446	273	-0.0017	265
11	Cent Michigan	0.435	301	0.0027	191
12	Ball State	0.434	305	0.0137	36
13	N Illinois	0.431	307	0.0057	143

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.592	6	-0.0097	286
2	Akron	0.586	8	-0.0041	208
3	Buffalo	0.557	28	0.0027	115
4	Toledo	0.549	50	0.0193	8
5	UMass	0.531	109	0.0020	124
6	Kent State	0.521	150	-0.0085	272
7	Bowling Green	0.520	155	-0.0040	207
8	Cent Michigan	0.520	158	0.0124	28
9	Ohio	0.510	202	-0.0090	281
10	W Michigan	0.500	248	-0.0047	216
11	E Michigan	0.499	254	-0.0099	290
12	N Illinois	0.475	331	-0.0140	330
13	Ball State	0.471	337	0.0150	18

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	1.221	4	-0.0158	290
2	Akron	1.215	5	-0.0145	278
3	Buffalo	1.144	54	-0.0075	231
4	Toledo	1.139	63	0.0078	108
5	Kent State	1.117	96	0.0040	147
6	Bowling Green	1.099	131	-0.0014	185
7	Ohio	1.083	162	0.0051	134
8	UMass	1.080	170	0.0048	137
9	Cent Michigan	1.055	228	0.0040	146
10	W Michigan	1.048	246	0.0015	162
11	E Michigan	1.016	308	-0.0219	327
12	Ball State	0.994	330	0.0238	25
13	N Illinois	0.975	342	-0.0356	355

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	0.137	47	-0.0063	91
2	Ohio	0.140	68	-0.0102	36
3	Toledo	0.140	70	0.0006	249
4	Ball State	0.145	103	-0.0041	143
5	Akron	0.146	112	-0.0014	214
6	W Michigan	0.152	158	-0.0053	109
7	Bowling Green	0.153	161	-0.0078	63
8	Buffalo	0.154	170	-0.0025	186
9	E Michigan	0.165	256	-0.0034	165
10	Cent Michigan	0.167	273	0.0066	339
11	UMass	0.168	275	-0.0024	189
12	Kent State	0.172	302	-0.0132	10
13	N Illinois	0.193	355	-0.0018	202

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	33.350	41	-0.0138	228
2	Akron	32.670	54	-0.0185	270
3	UMass	31.110	95	0.0039	72
4	Cent Michigan	27.630	204	-0.0143	234
5	W Michigan	27.570	206	-0.0214	293
6	N Illinois	27.430	210	-0.0390	361
7	Ohio	26.610	237	-0.0118	205
8	Toledo	26.510	239	-0.0334	346
9	Bowling Green	26.210	246	-0.0185	269
10	E Michigan	25.280	277	-0.0250	311
11	Buffalo	25.150	284	-0.0303	337
12	Ball State	23.750	313	-0.0143	235
13	Miami (OH)	23.040	326	-0.0245	308

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	0.453	11	0.0059	127
2	Miami (OH)	0.410	63	0.0102	100
3	Buffalo	0.404	69	-0.0192	300
4	N Illinois	0.391	101	0.0045	136
5	UMass	0.380	124	-0.0069	227
6	Ohio	0.377	131	0.0145	80
7	Bowling Green	0.373	137	0.0061	125
8	W Michigan	0.337	238	0.0224	39
9	Ball State	0.324	263	-0.0224	321
10	Cent Michigan	0.322	271	-0.0092	244
11	Toledo	0.309	304	-0.0339	353
12	E Michigan	0.300	322	-0.0073	231
13	Akron	0.293	332	0.0005	163

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	126.616	31	0.3187	228
2	Miami (OH)	123.671	49	1.4576	43
3	Toledo	118.535	79	1.0340	99
4	Buffalo	118.082	83	1.0635	93
5	Kent State	114.638	123	0.1942	253
6	Ohio	112.800	155	0.7561	147
7	UMass	112.404	157	1.5852	32
8	Bowling Green	111.479	170	0.4021	217
9	Cent Michigan	111.003	175	1.0117	103
10	W Michigan	108.805	220	1.1096	86
11	E Michigan	106.859	245	0.2233	246
12	Ball State	102.344	304	-0.2948	309
13	N Illinois	99.884	331	-0.4187	324

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	44.109	3	-0.2385	217
2	Toledo	42.180	12	1.2787	14
3	Miami (OH)	42.101	16	-0.6883	290
4	Bowling Green	39.037	105	-0.1313	198
5	Cent Michigan	38.809	119	0.4520	90
6	UMass	38.789	120	0.6767	60
7	Buffalo	38.476	138	0.2839	120
8	Ohio	38.475	139	-0.3675	246
9	E Michigan	37.476	198	-0.4864	267
10	W Michigan	36.787	235	-0.9925	328
11	Kent State	36.477	249	-0.5524	271
12	Ball State	35.226	306	1.5665	8
13	N Illinois	33.109	354	-1.0857	336

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	87.884	24	0.4004	142
2	Toledo	86.090	65	0.1350	180
3	Ball State	84.172	158	1.0546	68
4	E Michigan	83.890	173	-0.3403	256
5	W Michigan	83.651	185	-0.9185	318
6	Cent Michigan	83.349	198	-0.6542	292
7	Ohio	83.340	199	0.6998	107
8	UMass	82.765	233	0.4407	135
9	Bowling Green	82.591	242	0.4219	139
10	Kent State	81.145	295	1.1170	62
11	Buffalo	80.967	301	0.1796	169
12	Miami (OH)	80.608	312	-0.0601	210
13	N Illinois	79.829	329	-1.2038	334

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	52.223	1	-0.7632	283
2	Akron	50.253	10	-0.4531	242
3	Toledo	49.147	25	1.4408	12
4	Buffalo	47.553	51	0.1463	125
5	Bowling Green	47.223	63	-0.3465	214
6	UMass	46.926	79	0.5644	76
7	Cent Michigan	46.757	89	0.8800	45
8	Ohio	46.151	120	-0.8085	290
9	Kent State	45.166	182	-1.1207	320
10	E Michigan	44.766	207	-0.4185	233
11	W Michigan	44.061	254	-0.7113	272
12	Ball State	41.995	328	1.2838	19
13	N Illinois	41.319	341	-0.7964	288

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	67.733	40	1.5848	37
2	Toledo	67.596	41	-1.2648	319
3	Cent Michigan	66.080	68	-0.1326	198
4	Bowling Green	65.754	78	0.4665	134
5	W Michigan	64.931	98	-0.4887	243
6	UMass	64.451	102	0.4168	139
7	Ohio	61.983	152	-0.2839	210
8	Ball State	60.987	177	0.3767	146
9	Miami (OH)	55.202	293	-0.2110	205
10	Kent State	55.163	296	-0.8488	286
11	N Illinois	55.091	297	1.0552	78
12	Buffalo	54.840	303	-0.4181	231
13	Akron	54.649	305	-0.1300	197

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	31.928	6	0.4218	105
2	Cent Michigan	29.335	41	-0.0474	197
3	Bowling Green	29.080	53	-0.1033	205
4	Akron	28.960	61	-0.3505	249
5	E Michigan	28.750	68	0.4624	99
6	Ohio	28.741	70	-0.3481	248
7	UMass	28.717	72	1.2577	23
8	Miami (OH)	28.016	106	-0.3359	247
9	W Michigan	26.357	181	-1.3077	351
10	Ball State	24.858	257	1.0383	41
11	Buffalo	24.343	285	0.0897	172
12	Kent State	23.527	318	-1.1048	336
13	N Illinois	21.839	352	0.0243	183

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	58.278	23	-0.9223	291
2	E Michigan	57.000	38	1.0106	86
3	Cent Michigan	54.986	75	-0.4402	251
4	Bowling Green	54.311	92	0.6692	128
5	W Michigan	54.144	95	-0.9822	297
6	UMass	53.493	109	0.7030	124
7	Ohio	51.838	156	0.1799	179
8	Ball State	51.357	167	0.9984	88
9	Akron	47.992	247	0.0570	196
10	Kent State	44.801	311	-0.0268	208
11	Miami (OH)	44.479	321	-0.2359	233
12	Buffalo	44.251	324	-0.1143	219
13	N Illinois	43.836	334	0.2054	175

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	62.908	2	-0.1550	193
2	Akron	60.078	11	-0.7441	266
3	Ohio	55.528	65	-0.7146	265
4	Toledo	55.028	76	1.8120	17
5	Buffalo	54.684	83	0.1642	148
6	UMass	53.887	124	1.4972	27
7	Bowling Green	53.567	134	-0.7123	264
8	Cent Michigan	53.079	154	0.2078	143
9	Kent State	53.040	156	-2.1822	349
10	E Michigan	51.143	246	-0.3698	222
11	N Illinois	49.678	289	-0.0854	187
12	W Michigan	48.657	318	-1.5745	322
13	Ball State	48.339	322	1.1422	49

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	45.351	61	0.1300	169
2	Buffalo	45.160	63	0.4181	135
3	N Illinois	44.909	69	-1.0552	288
4	Kent State	44.837	70	0.8488	80
5	Miami (OH)	44.798	73	0.2110	161
6	Ball State	39.013	189	-0.3767	220
7	Ohio	38.017	214	0.2839	156
8	UMass	35.549	264	-0.4168	227
9	W Michigan	35.069	268	0.4887	123
10	Bowling Green	34.246	288	-0.4665	232
11	Cent Michigan	33.920	298	0.1326	168
12	Toledo	32.404	325	1.2648	47
13	E Michigan	32.267	326	-1.5848	329

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	15.149	14	0.1120	128
2	Buffalo	14.133	36	0.1942	109
3	Miami (OH)	14.085	38	-0.3524	250
4	Kent State	12.950	84	0.5523	50
5	N Illinois	11.270	176	-1.1100	355
6	W Michigan	10.430	226	0.3152	86
7	Ball State	10.368	230	0.5282	57
8	Toledo	10.252	236	0.8569	21
9	UMass	10.072	250	-0.5810	304
10	Bowling Green	9.957	259	-0.0281	176
11	Ohio	9.734	271	-0.0194	172
12	Cent Michigan	9.474	293	0.4994	61
13	E Michigan	8.726	329	-0.9487	342

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	39.891	30	0.3434	145
2	Buffalo	36.716	93	0.2939	155
3	Kent State	36.345	107	1.1438	56
4	Miami (OH)	36.129	113	0.1758	169
5	N Illinois	35.993	115	-1.4091	326
6	Ball State	32.814	187	0.0562	180
7	Ohio	31.502	218	0.5199	123
8	W Michigan	29.507	269	0.0636	178
9	UMass	29.272	276	-0.2623	223
10	Cent Michigan	28.362	294	-0.2139	216
11	Bowling Green	28.280	296	-0.2472	221
12	Toledo	27.813	303	1.0573	60
13	E Michigan	26.890	328	-1.3508	319

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	39.372	7	-1.2517	289
2	Buffalo	38.658	11	0.2148	129
3	Akron	38.183	18	0.1135	135
4	Toledo	37.018	35	1.5403	35
5	W Michigan	35.150	117	0.7042	90
6	Bowling Green	34.995	130	-0.0178	151
7	Kent State	34.876	137	0.4606	107
8	UMass	34.300	172	-1.8549	338
9	Cent Michigan	32.834	240	1.4944	38
10	E Michigan	32.077	280	-2.4265	359
11	Ball State	31.691	298	1.4465	40
12	N Illinois	31.383	307	-1.9534	345
13	Ohio	30.164	343	-0.4728	200

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	45.270	11	0.5861	127
2	Miami (OH)	41.010	63	1.0209	100
3	Buffalo	40.360	69	-1.9252	300
4	N Illinois	39.070	101	0.4499	136
5	UMass	37.960	124	-0.6891	227
6	Ohio	37.650	131	1.4456	80
7	Bowling Green	37.320	137	0.6138	125
8	W Michigan	33.680	238	2.2376	39
9	Ball State	32.360	263	-2.2414	321
10	Cent Michigan	32.150	271	-0.9208	244
11	Toledo	30.910	304	-3.3918	353
12	E Michigan	29.980	322	-0.7249	231
13	Akron	29.340	332	0.0479	163

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	25.751	20	0.9496	76
2	Miami (OH)	23.771	63	0.1441	163
3	Buffalo	23.289	80	-1.5108	339
4	Bowling Green	21.868	149	0.1562	159
5	Ohio	21.657	161	1.2656	43
6	W Michigan	20.767	200	1.8256	19
7	UMass	20.331	214	-0.2888	217
8	N Illinois	20.043	220	-0.2763	214
9	Toledo	19.255	252	-2.6814	363
10	Ball State	18.615	278	-1.2773	323
11	Cent Michigan	18.386	294	-0.9994	306
12	Akron	17.988	307	-1.0485	311
13	E Michigan	17.890	312	-0.2647	213

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	34.747	21	1.1648	70
2	Buffalo	31.725	84	-1.5435	317
3	Miami (OH)	31.677	85	0.9713	83
4	Ohio	30.594	132	1.3801	58
5	UMass	30.177	146	-0.3147	212
6	N Illinois	30.117	149	-0.0910	191
7	Bowling Green	29.908	157	0.7869	102
8	W Michigan	27.978	222	1.6639	39
9	Ball State	26.792	257	-1.3924	306
10	Cent Michigan	26.330	274	-0.9521	276
11	Toledo	25.440	301	-2.7952	357
12	E Michigan	24.560	326	-0.5472	234
13	Akron	24.025	340	0.0132	179

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	76.875	29	-2.2431	340
2	W Michigan	74.325	97	2.0381	40
3	Miami (OH)	73.391	139	-1.6684	320
4	Akron	73.222	152	-5.6382	365
5	E Michigan	73.075	163	0.5847	148
6	Bowling Green	73.021	167	-1.2827	298
7	Buffalo	72.838	172	-1.4772	310
8	Kent State	72.837	173	-0.0862	208
9	Ohio	71.821	203	0.0777	192
10	Ball State	69.671	272	-1.0966	292
11	Cent Michigan	68.842	290	-1.5205	313
12	UMass	66.796	342	-0.3367	234
13	N Illinois	65.939	353	-1.6684	321

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	59.547	38	-2.9108	336
2	Akron	57.197	65	-2.2857	310
3	Kent State	56.466	79	-1.1491	245
4	Cent Michigan	55.578	100	0.5708	121
5	Buffalo	54.515	125	-1.1772	249
6	Ball State	52.911	160	1.7867	44
7	Toledo	52.098	189	2.0256	36
8	N Illinois	51.975	191	-2.2671	309
9	Miami (OH)	51.224	211	-2.2346	307
10	Bowling Green	48.695	273	-0.5393	205
11	W Michigan	48.209	285	-1.1703	248
12	E Michigan	48.151	288	-1.0937	241
13	Ohio	47.776	293	0.3818	137

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ball State	7.372	30	-0.4728	48
2	Ohio	7.637	40	-0.0240	169
3	Miami (OH)	7.832	56	-0.5148	41
4	Toledo	8.097	79	0.6134	317
5	Bowling Green	8.245	102	0.1004	212
6	Akron	8.254	104	0.4827	294
7	W Michigan	8.568	135	0.2985	266
8	Kent State	8.904	182	-1.1525	2
9	Buffalo	9.033	194	0.2293	247
10	E Michigan	9.191	217	-0.0798	151
11	UMass	9.666	267	0.0050	175
12	Cent Michigan	10.370	322	0.8846	348
13	N Illinois	10.673	333	0.5451	307

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	3.123	7	-0.0248	170
2	Buffalo	3.301	15	-0.0676	150
3	Ohio	3.533	32	-0.5391	16
4	Akron	3.573	39	-0.4807	30
5	UMass	3.917	81	-0.0274	169
6	Kent State	4.014	98	0.4224	306
7	Toledo	4.441	174	-0.1142	136
8	Cent Michigan	4.536	196	0.4937	324
9	Bowling Green	4.958	251	0.0079	180
10	Ball State	5.133	284	-0.1984	102
11	E Michigan	5.351	306	-0.2774	75
12	W Michigan	5.776	340	0.1103	217
13	N Illinois	5.826	343	-0.1207	133

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	26.320	51	0.3404	146
2	Ohio	25.273	107	0.9774	58
3	UMass	24.893	129	-0.6993	318
4	Bowling Green	24.276	168	0.6801	99
5	Miami (OH)	24.259	170	0.9110	65
6	N Illinois	23.748	206	0.5623	113
7	Buffalo	23.710	209	-0.2109	243
8	Cent Michigan	22.727	262	0.2109	172
9	W Michigan	22.537	277	1.1212	47
10	Toledo	22.073	306	-1.3804	359
11	E Michigan	22.007	311	-0.8569	331
12	Ball State	21.517	332	-0.3881	271
13	Akron	20.891	342	0.7070	98

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	75.472	12	-0.8456	258
2	UMass	74.311	19	-0.3516	170
3	Miami (OH)	73.341	33	0.1243	97
4	Akron	72.111	80	-0.9434	273
5	Bowling Green	71.903	88	-0.4751	201
6	Ohio	71.899	90	0.4678	54
7	W Michigan	70.857	138	-0.0549	131
8	Toledo	70.774	145	-0.8239	252
9	N Illinois	70.276	167	-0.6394	225
10	E Michigan	69.573	202	0.4360	57
11	Buffalo	68.936	227	-0.3158	167
12	Cent Michigan	68.534	245	-0.5630	216
13	Ball State	67.207	305	0.1263	95

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	0.502	107	-0.0027	138
2	Miami (OH)	0.508	139	0.0056	239
3	Akron	0.508	141	-0.0044	117
4	Bowling Green	0.510	150	0.0022	191
5	Kent State	0.521	209	-0.0001	173
6	Ball State	0.527	241	-0.0208	16
7	Ohio	0.529	250	0.0091	279
8	UMass	0.532	265	0.0112	297
9	Cent Michigan	0.542	302	0.0083	270
10	W Michigan	0.544	308	-0.0001	172
11	Toledo	0.545	313	-0.0069	92
12	Buffalo	0.551	331	0.0096	285
13	N Illinois	0.554	339	0.0249	361

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	1.018	67	0.0093	202
2	Akron	1.032	90	-0.0201	40
3	Miami (OH)	1.033	92	0.0259	303
4	E Michigan	1.062	157	0.0051	177
5	UMass	1.074	192	0.0241	296
6	Ball State	1.075	194	-0.0335	13
7	Kent State	1.080	210	-0.0000	142
8	Toledo	1.102	267	-0.0175	50
9	Ohio	1.108	281	0.0306	325
10	Buffalo	1.111	289	0.0166	260
11	Cent Michigan	1.126	312	0.0018	160
12	N Illinois	1.140	331	0.0463	360
13	W Michigan	1.143	337	-0.0084	100

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	0.175	61	-0.0093	301
2	Ball State	0.173	76	-0.0025	162
3	Akron	0.171	84	-0.0038	190
4	Toledo	0.169	92	-0.0056	236
5	Miami (OH)	0.167	102	-0.0126	342
6	Buffalo	0.165	113	-0.0004	116
7	UMass	0.157	170	-0.0100	311
8	Cent Michigan	0.156	179	0.0039	49
9	N Illinois	0.154	193	-0.0065	252
10	Kent State	0.152	208	0.0015	80
11	Ohio	0.151	210	-0.0159	361
12	E Michigan	0.141	283	-0.0138	350
13	W Michigan	0.126	343	-0.0052	227

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	77.010	12	0.0087	98
2	Bowling Green	74.980	43	0.0048	135
3	Miami (OH)	73.950	87	-0.0182	342
4	Akron	73.190	124	0.0239	11
5	W Michigan	73.070	131	0.0163	43
6	Kent State	73.010	135	0.0003	180
7	E Michigan	72.720	150	0.0111	77
8	N Illinois	71.130	208	-0.0009	189
9	Buffalo	71.100	209	0.0008	173
10	Ball State	70.650	232	0.0123	69
11	Ohio	69.210	291	0.0056	130
12	Toledo	67.490	333	0.0085	99
13	Cent Michigan	67.180	335	0.0024	156

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	0.269	18	-0.0137	87
2	Akron	0.307	64	-0.0144	80
3	Miami (OH)	0.310	71	-0.0169	69
4	Buffalo	0.315	83	-0.0023	178
5	Ball State	0.327	107	0.0170	305
6	E Michigan	0.362	193	0.0089	261
7	Bowling Green	0.381	245	-0.0049	152
8	W Michigan	0.383	252	0.0124	284
9	Ohio	0.386	262	0.0261	334
10	N Illinois	0.387	265	-0.0344	8
11	Cent Michigan	0.400	290	-0.0213	45
12	Kent State	0.409	302	0.0336	349
13	UMass	0.455	348	-0.0212	46

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	107.509	81	0.7529	221
2	Akron	108.298	93	-0.2999	43
3	Miami (OH)	109.586	120	0.1356	104
4	E Michigan	110.542	137	0.3021	129
5	UMass	113.269	182	1.8829	343
6	Ball State	113.270	183	-0.0864	71
7	Kent State	114.195	196	0.3452	141
8	Toledo	115.612	226	-0.4961	24
9	Ohio	116.620	244	0.1785	112
10	Buffalo	117.334	253	0.4193	154
11	Cent Michigan	118.163	270	0.5574	177
12	N Illinois	119.616	297	-0.3656	36
13	W Michigan	120.399	308	1.4751	321

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	34.961	65	0.8494	274
2	UMass	35.633	88	1.2493	324
3	Akron	36.060	106	-0.6594	54
4	Kent State	36.213	113	-0.6550	55
5	Miami (OH)	37.218	177	1.7079	349
6	E Michigan	37.282	182	0.1198	173
7	Ball State	37.637	202	-1.3639	12
8	Ohio	38.821	276	0.6895	254
9	Cent Michigan	39.371	304	0.8126	269
10	W Michigan	39.498	306	-0.1809	127
11	Buffalo	39.732	310	0.8912	279
12	N Illinois	40.034	316	1.8651	355
13	Toledo	41.234	341	0.1993	187

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	77.608	10	1.1845	287
2	Bowling Green	79.532	47	0.8117	254
3	Kent State	81.330	91	-1.4263	24
4	N Illinois	82.130	115	1.5207	315
5	Ball State	82.649	131	-0.6858	66
6	Ohio	83.012	148	0.1952	179
7	Cent Michigan	83.249	163	0.1468	171
8	Miami (OH)	83.259	164	1.9944	336
9	Buffalo	83.643	184	0.0868	156
10	Akron	83.867	201	-0.0527	137
11	E Michigan	84.124	214	0.7218	240
12	W Michigan	84.730	245	-0.7289	64
13	Toledo	86.682	318	1.1846	288

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	43.215	86	-0.6337	83
2	Bowling Green	44.052	127	0.5222	238
3	E Michigan	44.352	142	-0.1030	148
4	Kent State	44.595	165	-0.0921	150
5	Miami (OH)	44.710	174	0.8292	276
6	Ball State	45.533	223	-1.4084	28
7	UMass	46.110	255	0.9178	289
8	W Michigan	46.556	278	0.2036	185
9	Ohio	46.740	284	0.8114	274
10	Cent Michigan	47.399	306	0.8567	283
11	Toledo	47.588	312	-0.3791	113
12	Buffalo	47.658	319	0.9231	290
13	N Illinois	48.602	343	1.3705	334

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	W Michigan	56.485	58	2.0512	336
2	Akron	56.858	67	-0.9039	79
3	Kent State	57.141	74	-0.9036	80
4	UMass	57.376	79	-0.6571	95
5	Buffalo	57.818	92	0.9026	271
6	Bowling Green	58.401	104	2.8517	360
7	Ball State	59.120	131	2.0550	337
8	Toledo	59.937	159	-0.3717	122
9	Cent Michigan	61.568	218	-0.0597	162
10	N Illinois	62.107	239	-1.1196	59
11	Miami (OH)	63.190	268	1.8763	324
12	E Michigan	64.315	302	0.4267	218
13	Ohio	66.830	344	-0.1879	144

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	23.341	42	-0.9206	21
2	Bowling Green	24.083	70	1.2077	328
3	Kent State	24.140	76	-0.6772	45
4	UMass	24.702	94	0.7999	272
5	Ball State	25.779	156	-0.1915	117
6	W Michigan	26.018	174	0.2632	195
7	Miami (OH)	27.180	248	1.9638	362
8	E Michigan	27.392	266	0.3424	202
9	Buffalo	27.432	268	0.7837	269
10	Cent Michigan	27.891	291	0.8328	279
11	Ohio	28.603	319	0.5699	239
12	N Illinois	28.761	325	-0.2054	111
13	Toledo	29.254	334	0.5628	236

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	44.401	19	0.1949	181
2	Kent State	46.684	61	-1.5990	24
3	Bowling Green	46.808	63	2.8390	355
4	W Michigan	47.683	84	1.2584	288
5	Akron	47.689	85	-0.7247	76
6	Buffalo	48.451	99	0.7924	239
7	Ball State	48.769	117	1.2753	290
8	N Illinois	51.129	200	0.0731	166
9	Cent Michigan	51.153	202	-0.0458	141
10	Toledo	52.011	243	0.3159	190
11	Miami (OH)	52.690	268	2.9658	359
12	E Michigan	54.155	314	0.8665	246
13	Ohio	55.507	340	0.0646	164

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Akron	49.229	66	-0.8826	74
2	E Michigan	50.361	107	0.1561	177
3	Miami (OH)	51.596	155	0.4160	212
4	Ohio	51.695	161	1.1568	292
5	Kent State	52.041	179	0.1901	183
6	Bowling Green	52.064	183	-0.6596	90
7	Ball State	53.271	237	-2.1304	11
8	W Michigan	54.854	296	-0.8260	79
9	Cent Michigan	55.553	313	1.7226	329
10	UMass	56.195	324	1.3506	310
11	N Illinois	56.205	325	-0.5669	98
12	Buffalo	56.543	334	0.5246	222
13	Toledo	56.624	335	0.8843	263

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	33.170	22	0.1879	222
2	E Michigan	35.685	64	-0.4267	148
3	Miami (OH)	36.810	98	-1.8763	42
4	N Illinois	37.893	127	1.1196	307
5	Cent Michigan	38.432	148	0.0597	204
6	Toledo	40.063	207	0.3717	244
7	Ball State	40.880	235	-2.0550	29
8	Bowling Green	41.599	262	-2.8517	6
9	Buffalo	42.182	274	-0.9026	95
10	UMass	42.624	287	0.6571	271
11	Kent State	42.859	292	0.9036	286
12	Akron	43.142	299	0.9039	287
13	W Michigan	43.515	308	-2.0512	30

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	E Michigan	9.891	63	-0.2226	141
2	Miami (OH)	10.038	76	-0.2559	133
3	Ohio	10.218	88	0.1197	209
4	Bowling Green	10.878	154	-0.3582	110
5	UMass	10.931	164	0.4494	288
6	N Illinois	11.272	201	2.0705	365
7	Cent Michigan	11.480	214	-0.0202	179
8	Ball State	11.858	248	-1.1723	12
9	Toledo	11.980	265	-0.3635	108
10	Kent State	12.072	274	0.0221	185
11	Buffalo	12.300	286	0.1076	206
12	Akron	12.719	312	0.2612	256
13	W Michigan	13.480	340	-0.4441	87

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Ohio	27.504	28	0.1306	204
2	E Michigan	29.969	75	-0.1447	166
3	Miami (OH)	30.568	103	-0.9714	83
4	N Illinois	31.001	120	1.4477	321
5	Cent Michigan	32.096	144	0.1926	215
6	Bowling Green	32.725	172	-2.0274	15
7	UMass	33.207	193	0.9896	291
8	Ball State	33.879	222	-1.9611	18
9	Kent State	34.646	253	0.1727	212
10	Toledo	34.672	254	0.8687	276
11	Buffalo	35.192	270	-0.7056	103
12	Akron	36.178	294	0.6720	259
13	W Michigan	37.047	312	-1.9873	17

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMass	32.725	109	0.4696	231
2	Miami (OH)	32.788	112	-0.3424	149
3	E Michigan	33.321	144	-0.4164	140
4	Bowling Green	33.488	156	0.9594	279
5	Toledo	34.306	217	-2.0771	27
6	Kent State	34.414	223	-0.3436	147
7	Buffalo	34.636	239	0.5787	238
8	Cent Michigan	34.892	260	-0.1742	164
9	Ball State	34.954	263	-1.9478	34
10	Akron	34.993	267	0.2352	208
11	W Michigan	35.707	289	0.7008	252
12	N Illinois	36.326	316	4.1179	364
13	Ohio	36.988	343	0.4084	221

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	26.930	18	-1.3705	87
2	Akron	30.720	64	-1.4414	80
3	Miami (OH)	30.990	71	-1.6950	69
4	Buffalo	31.540	83	-0.2339	178
5	Ball State	32.710	107	1.7051	305
6	E Michigan	36.210	193	0.8936	261
7	Bowling Green	38.090	245	-0.4877	152
8	W Michigan	38.330	252	1.2432	284
9	Ohio	38.560	262	2.6096	334
10	N Illinois	38.670	265	-3.4421	8
11	Cent Michigan	39.960	290	-2.1312	45
12	Kent State	40.880	302	3.3602	349
13	UMass	45.540	348	-2.1201	46

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	15.750	8	-1.7849	10
2	Akron	18.331	60	-0.9482	54
3	Miami (OH)	18.824	70	-0.5741	101
4	Buffalo	19.304	93	-0.3180	129
5	Ball State	20.391	140	0.5618	256
6	Bowling Green	21.028	176	-0.4110	121
7	E Michigan	21.744	214	0.4916	243
8	W Michigan	21.801	219	-0.0291	165
9	Cent Michigan	22.383	252	-1.4204	20
10	N Illinois	22.679	270	-1.1690	35
11	Ohio	22.906	279	1.5621	339
12	Kent State	23.476	300	1.2836	314
13	UMass	25.242	340	-0.5390	104

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	23.004	19	-1.0045	75
2	Akron	25.287	58	-1.0155	73
3	Miami (OH)	25.532	64	-0.9052	86
4	Buffalo	26.029	73	-0.1464	165
5	Ball State	26.380	86	1.1399	300
6	Bowling Green	29.226	184	-0.0284	177
7	E Michigan	30.088	221	1.0606	294
8	N Illinois	31.059	265	-2.2144	14
9	W Michigan	31.269	272	0.7265	256
10	Ohio	31.281	273	2.1547	346
11	Kent State	32.366	302	2.1157	345
12	Cent Michigan	32.397	303	-1.7035	31
13	UMass	34.533	338	-1.0233	70

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	68.126	15	-5.5460	1
2	Cent Michigan	68.946	31	-1.2882	69
3	W Michigan	70.049	72	-1.7379	41
4	Akron	70.974	112	-1.0541	84
5	Bowling Green	71.456	146	-2.1626	20
6	UMass	72.271	190	0.2526	193
7	Ohio	72.597	211	-0.1700	150
8	N Illinois	72.673	217	1.4905	283
9	Kent State	72.844	230	-0.5880	117
10	E Michigan	72.874	232	-1.1613	76
11	Buffalo	73.873	277	-0.8492	97
12	Miami (OH)	74.240	286	1.5373	287
13	Ball State	77.323	358	-1.4980	54

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Miami (OH)	46.785	51	-1.2473	109
2	Ohio	46.866	52	0.5571	244
3	Akron	49.566	114	-0.1404	187
4	Toledo	50.075	126	-2.0957	55
5	Bowling Green	50.809	146	-3.8581	7
6	E Michigan	51.347	162	-1.5888	85
7	Ball State	53.150	212	-1.0572	127
8	W Michigan	53.385	219	-2.4271	42
9	Kent State	53.736	230	-1.5513	89
10	N Illinois	54.117	239	2.8628	342
11	Cent Michigan	56.337	291	1.3553	285
12	UMass	58.535	328	1.4925	295
13	Buffalo	58.962	331	0.0694	205

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Bowling Green	11.531	30	-0.4678	266
2	Ball State	11.226	41	0.3063	76
3	Buffalo	10.982	62	-0.0885	162
4	Toledo	10.934	66	0.3566	65
5	Akron	10.049	117	-0.2058	185
6	Miami (OH)	9.614	149	-0.5502	285
7	UMass	9.029	194	-0.1958	182
8	Kent State	8.971	201	0.4411	51
9	Cent Michigan	8.840	217	0.1276	110
10	N Illinois	8.101	275	-0.0063	142
11	E Michigan	8.089	277	-0.6564	320
12	Ohio	7.829	304	-1.0007	354
13	W Michigan	5.784	363	-0.9505	350

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Cent Michigan	5.871	63	-0.3114	273
2	E Michigan	5.866	64	0.5033	37
3	Bowling Green	4.923	148	-0.2130	244
4	Ohio	4.659	182	0.4011	49
5	Kent State	4.400	204	-0.4937	324
6	Miami (OH)	4.253	222	-0.4026	306
7	Ball State	4.051	251	0.3113	63
8	Buffalo	4.041	253	-0.1081	192
9	Toledo	4.014	260	0.0860	124
10	Akron	3.993	266	0.1345	98
11	W Michigan	3.539	305	0.2124	87
12	UMass	2.960	342	-0.4054	307
13	N Illinois	2.648	352	-0.1593	222

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Toledo	21.666	23	-0.8123	44
2	Akron	22.466	39	-0.5658	83
3	Miami (OH)	22.479	40	-0.5339	87
4	Buffalo	23.306	70	-0.5163	92
5	Ball State	24.074	117	0.5112	288
6	Ohio	24.920	162	0.4656	285
7	Bowling Green	25.256	191	-0.3426	118
8	Cent Michigan	25.608	212	-0.5080	93
9	E Michigan	26.007	239	0.4011	275
10	W Michigan	26.193	256	-0.6832	58
11	Kent State	26.864	299	0.8814	340
12	N Illinois	27.147	307	-1.5521	4
13	UMass	28.553	347	-0.2805	136

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Kent State	74.670	13	-0.2306	168
2	Miami (OH)	73.751	27	0.3499	80
3	UMass	73.443	36	-0.3928	193
4	Akron	72.307	69	-0.4404	202
5	Ohio	72.098	79	0.3111	84
6	Bowling Green	71.131	109	-0.1542	153
7	Toledo	70.314	158	-0.3242	182
8	W Michigan	70.305	160	0.4674	65
9	E Michigan	70.077	172	0.0249	126
10	Cent Michigan	69.180	219	-0.4182	197
11	N Illinois	69.154	220	-0.5320	218
12	Buffalo	69.131	222	-0.4127	195
13	Ball State	66.388	336	0.0757	118