College Basketball Analytics, Insights, and Trends

Quick Links
Teams
- America East
  - Albany
  - Binghamton
  - Hartford
  - Maine
  - New Hampshire
  - Stony Brook
  - UMass Lowell
  - UMBC
  - Vermont
- American
  - Cincinnati
  - East Carolina
  - Houston
  - Memphis
  - SMU
  - Temple
  - Tulane
  - Tulsa
  - UCF
  - UConn
  - USF
  - Wichita State
- Atlantic 10
  - Dayton
  - Duquesne
  - Fordham
  - George Mason
  - George Washington
  - La Salle
  - Richmond
  - St. Josephs
  - Davidson
  - Saint Louis
  - St. Bonaventure
  - UMass
  - Rhode Island
  - VCU
- ACC
  - Boston College
  - Clemson
  - Duke
  - Florida State
  - Georgia Tech
  - Louisville
  - Miami
  - North Carolina
  - NC State
  - Notre Dame
  - Pitt
  - Syracuse
  - Virginia
  - Virginia Tech
  - Wake Forest
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
  - Baylor
  - Iowa State
  - Kansas
  - Kansas State
  - Oklahoma
  - Oklahoma State
  - TCU
  - Texas
  - Texas Tech
  - West Virginia
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
  - Illinois
  - Indiana
  - Iowa
  - Maryland
  - Michigan State
  - Minnesota
  - Nebraska
  - Northwestern
  - Ohio State
  - Penn State
  - Purdue
  - Rutgers
  - Wisconsin
- Big West
- Colonial
  - Charleston
  - Delaware
  - Drexel
  - Elon
  - Hofstra
  - James Madison
  - Northeastern
  - Towson
  - UNC Wilmington
  - William & Mary
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
  - Brown
  - Columbia
  - Cornell
  - Dartmouth
  - Harvard
  - Pennsylvania
  - Princeton
  - Yale
- MAAC
  - Canisius
  - Fairfield
  - Iona
  - Manhattan
  - Marist
  - Monmouth
  - Niagara
  - Quinnipiac
  - Rider
  - Saint Peter’s
  - Siena
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
  - Air Force
  - Boise State
  - Colorado State
  - Fresno State
  - Nevada
  - New Mexico
  - San Diego State
  - San Jose State
  - UNLV
  - Utah State
  - Wyoming
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
  - Arizona
  - Arizona State
  - California
  - Colorado
  - Oregon
  - Oregon State
  - Stanford
  - UCLA
  - USC
  - Utah
  - Washington
  - Washington State
- Patriot League
  - American
  - Army
  - Boston University
  - Bucknell
  - Colgate
  - Holy Cross
  - Lafayette
  - Lehigh
  - Loyola (MD)
  - Navy
- SEC
  - Alabama
  - Arkansas
  - Auburn
  - Florida
  - Georgia
  - Kentucky
  - LSU
  - Mississippi State
  - Missouri
  - Ole Miss
  - South Carolina
  - Tennessee
  - Texas A&M
  - Vanderbilt
- Southern
  - Chattanooga
  - East Tennessee State
  - Furman
  - Mercer
  - Samford
  - The Citadel
  - UNC Greensboro
  - VMI
  - Western Carolina
  - Wofford
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
  - BYU
  - Gonzaga
  - Loyola Marymount
  - Pacific
  - Pepperdine
  - Portland
  - St. Mary’s
  - San Diego
  - San Francisco
  - Santa Clara
- WAC
Conferences
- America East
- American
- Atlantic 10
- ACC
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
- Big East
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
- Big West
- Colonial
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
- MAAC
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
- SEC
- Southern
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Statistics
Contact Us

Search for:

Conferences

Conferences

Standings
Statistics
Trend Lab

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	7.468	101	-0.0309	145
2	California Baptist	-2.339	189	-0.0911	150
3	Seattle	-4.970	216	0.5629	77
4	UMKC	-7.312	234	0.8059	53
5	Grand Canyon	-7.777	244	-2.0623	345
6	Utah Valley	-8.008	245	-1.8328	337
7	CSU Bakersfield	-9.354	259	-0.5596	214
8	UT Rio Grande	-10.990	279	-0.1342	157
9	Chicago State	-39.173	353	-0.8019	248

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	California Baptist	0.151	56	0.0049	83
2	New Mexico St	0.145	61	0.0067	68
3	UMKC	0.092	122	0.0018	105
4	CSU Bakersfield	0.075	143	-0.0142	249
5	Seattle	0.052	176	-0.0075	184
6	Utah Valley	0.048	183	-0.0191	294
7	UT Rio Grande	0.027	207	-0.0033	140
8	Grand Canyon	-0.061	299	-0.0042	153
9	Chicago State	-0.176	339	-0.0217	309

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	1703.549	17	10.9791	73
2	California Baptist	1517.052	162	6.1809	118
3	Grand Canyon	1482.304	200	-9.7944	275
4	Seattle	1463.784	219	1.5080	171
5	UT Rio Grande	1463.549	220	2.3912	160
6	UMKC	1459.848	225	6.4071	115
7	Utah Valley	1458.527	229	-23.4184	339
8	CSU Bakersfield	1421.080	261	-14.3704	298
9	Chicago State	1188.482	353	-14.7372	301

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	0.544	92	0.0030	192
2	California Baptist	0.481	206	0.0123	59
3	UMKC	0.472	224	0.0046	171
4	UT Rio Grande	0.456	255	0.0158	34
5	Seattle	0.452	263	0.0176	22
6	Grand Canyon	0.450	267	-0.0051	306
7	CSU Bakersfield	0.433	295	-0.0032	280
8	Utah Valley	0.429	299	-0.0035	287
9	Chicago State	0.359	348	0.0108	85

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	0.541	29	0.0004	160
2	California Baptist	0.525	66	-0.0135	316
3	UMKC	0.521	87	0.0043	102
4	Grand Canyon	0.509	136	0.0100	39
5	Utah Valley	0.498	191	0.0023	128
6	UT Rio Grande	0.489	240	0.0031	121
7	CSU Bakersfield	0.478	284	-0.0109	297
8	Seattle	0.465	319	0.0084	57
9	Chicago State	0.464	322	0.0096	43

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	California Baptist	1.094	20	-0.0140	278
2	New Mexico St	1.090	22	0.0289	18
3	Grand Canyon	1.026	126	0.0165	62
4	Seattle	1.024	135	0.0360	6
5	UMKC	1.007	171	0.0242	31
6	UT Rio Grande	1.004	182	0.0114	92
7	CSU Bakersfield	0.992	198	-0.0268	336
8	Utah Valley	0.978	234	-0.0009	186
9	Chicago State	0.871	348	-0.0038	206

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Seattle	0.135	2	-0.0157	7
2	Grand Canyon	0.159	48	-0.0015	196
3	UT Rio Grande	0.169	99	-0.0070	88
4	California Baptist	0.174	142	-0.0010	210
5	UMKC	0.178	177	-0.0065	97
6	Utah Valley	0.188	243	0.0019	266
7	New Mexico St	0.188	244	-0.0116	31
8	CSU Bakersfield	0.188	251	-0.0018	187
9	Chicago State	0.242	351	0.0090	339

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	CSU Bakersfield	0.353	5	-0.0211	339
2	New Mexico St	0.335	20	0.0103	52
3	California Baptist	0.312	40	0.0032	101
4	UT Rio Grande	0.275	141	-0.0121	275
5	Seattle	0.266	175	-0.0092	238
6	Utah Valley	0.229	278	-0.0110	262
7	UMKC	0.219	301	0.0130	36
8	Grand Canyon	0.216	309	-0.0042	180
9	Chicago State	0.203	326	-0.0162	308

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Chicago State	0.425	9	0.0333	21
2	Grand Canyon	0.380	59	0.0131	88
3	Seattle	0.366	84	0.0074	115
4	California Baptist	0.353	121	-0.0088	235
5	Utah Valley	0.352	125	0.0165	68
6	UT Rio Grande	0.340	159	0.0012	170
7	New Mexico St	0.326	195	0.0015	164
8	CSU Bakersfield	0.313	229	-0.0148	279
9	UMKC	0.298	263	0.0082	109

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	103.352	82	-0.0251	146
2	California Baptist	100.810	133	0.2923	91
3	Grand Canyon	99.716	156	-0.3518	197
4	Seattle	96.528	206	0.5355	59
5	Utah Valley	92.772	257	-1.4812	335
6	UT Rio Grande	92.279	268	1.1403	11
7	UMKC	92.208	270	0.1940	108
8	CSU Bakersfield	91.567	280	-1.0373	308
9	Chicago State	80.274	350	-0.7500	273

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	38.169	50	0.4789	94
2	UMKC	37.106	97	0.8685	46
3	CSU Bakersfield	36.938	104	-0.6427	282
4	California Baptist	36.748	115	-0.8731	311
5	UT Rio Grande	35.961	162	0.1056	158
6	Grand Canyon	35.864	166	0.4311	101
7	Utah Valley	34.775	232	0.0005	176
8	Seattle	34.461	251	0.9595	31
9	Chicago State	28.996	352	-0.6750	286

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	CSU Bakersfield	85.076	38	0.4409	137
2	Seattle	84.961	40	0.7106	105
3	New Mexico St	83.848	87	1.8696	19
4	California Baptist	83.249	110	0.4485	135
5	UT Rio Grande	82.644	141	-0.0490	196
6	UMKC	80.909	215	0.9310	81
7	Grand Canyon	79.712	257	-0.4899	247
8	Utah Valley	78.810	293	-1.3707	324
9	Chicago State	70.769	353	-2.4398	351

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	45.711	74	-0.2967	212
2	UMKC	45.683	76	0.5632	75
3	Grand Canyon	45.317	96	0.8009	51
4	California Baptist	44.311	149	-1.3555	332
5	Utah Valley	44.130	165	0.7350	58
6	CSU Bakersfield	43.546	187	-0.8486	298
7	UT Rio Grande	43.477	190	0.1670	139
8	Chicago State	40.820	318	0.6235	69
9	Seattle	40.696	325	0.6963	63

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	CSU Bakersfield	72.476	8	-0.5126	248
2	UT Rio Grande	68.717	47	-0.8788	287
3	Grand Canyon	66.762	78	0.2431	172
4	UMKC	64.484	120	-0.4666	245
5	Chicago State	64.100	129	-2.5602	344
6	Utah Valley	62.753	167	2.2336	18
7	Seattle	62.299	180	-1.3078	312
8	California Baptist	56.833	302	0.6270	121
9	New Mexico St	53.518	336	-0.5998	258

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	CSU Bakersfield	29.635	17	-0.2361	233
2	UT Rio Grande	27.108	89	-0.0921	201
3	Grand Canyon	27.082	91	0.1468	160
4	UMKC	26.794	107	0.9633	43
5	Utah Valley	25.878	157	0.8997	54
6	Seattle	24.500	230	0.6690	75
7	New Mexico St	24.220	244	-0.2925	244
8	California Baptist	23.312	280	-1.0076	326
9	Chicago State	20.980	340	-0.7850	308

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	CSU Bakersfield	61.602	1	-0.2094	228
2	UT Rio Grande	56.876	38	-0.7437	281
3	Grand Canyon	53.218	104	-0.1794	225
4	Seattle	52.799	120	-0.7046	277
5	UMKC	52.155	136	0.1749	176
6	Utah Valley	49.383	222	0.8228	102
7	California Baptist	47.504	278	0.7202	115
8	Chicago State	45.474	320	-3.3320	352
9	New Mexico St	44.836	329	0.5625	129

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	54.002	37	-1.4939	321
2	Utah Valley	52.296	86	0.9243	71
3	Grand Canyon	51.207	131	0.2919	135
4	UMKC	50.910	137	1.7769	20
5	California Baptist	50.178	167	-2.9360	352
6	CSU Bakersfield	48.385	244	-0.2345	198
7	UT Rio Grande	48.092	262	0.4501	115
8	Seattle	46.749	304	1.7452	23
9	Chicago State	46.152	319	1.9945	13

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	46.482	18	0.5998	96
2	California Baptist	43.167	52	-0.6270	233
3	Seattle	37.701	174	1.3078	42
4	Utah Valley	37.247	187	-2.2336	336
5	Chicago State	35.900	225	2.5602	10
6	UMKC	35.516	234	0.4666	109
7	Grand Canyon	33.238	276	-0.2431	182
8	UT Rio Grande	31.283	307	0.8788	67
9	CSU Bakersfield	27.524	346	0.5126	106

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	13.949	12	0.7713	25
2	California Baptist	13.436	23	0.1345	119
3	UMKC	10.313	168	-0.0948	185
4	Seattle	9.961	197	0.2905	82
5	Utah Valley	8.897	270	-0.8992	326
6	UT Rio Grande	8.853	273	0.1977	104
7	Grand Canyon	8.782	276	0.2843	83
8	Chicago State	8.016	313	0.1100	128
9	CSU Bakersfield	7.303	336	-0.4066	250

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	39.012	16	1.3070	41
2	California Baptist	35.745	50	-0.2717	193
3	Seattle	32.162	131	1.4151	35
4	Utah Valley	29.427	213	-2.1935	342
5	UMKC	28.754	233	0.7562	75
6	Grand Canyon	26.494	285	-0.3105	197
7	UT Rio Grande	25.767	293	0.6947	83
8	Chicago State	25.295	304	0.8923	66
9	CSU Bakersfield	23.473	335	0.6503	87

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	California Baptist	37.488	19	0.5129	103
2	UMKC	36.041	51	-1.1117	268
3	New Mexico St	35.722	59	0.7240	85
4	Grand Canyon	33.851	151	2.0972	18
5	UT Rio Grande	33.600	167	-0.3421	190
6	CSU Bakersfield	31.560	261	-2.0374	332
7	Chicago State	31.043	287	-0.4125	196
8	Utah Valley	30.345	307	-1.1686	276
9	Seattle	30.263	311	-0.0659	161

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Chicago State	42.491	9	3.3253	21
2	Grand Canyon	38.044	59	1.3076	88
3	Seattle	36.595	84	0.7421	115
4	California Baptist	35.326	121	-0.8813	235
5	Utah Valley	35.199	125	1.6511	68
6	UT Rio Grande	33.959	159	0.1224	170
7	New Mexico St	32.634	195	0.1518	164
8	CSU Bakersfield	31.258	229	-1.4830	279
9	UMKC	29.762	263	0.8219	109

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Seattle	23.485	10	1.3857	37
2	California Baptist	22.450	24	0.2122	167
3	Grand Canyon	22.046	36	0.4722	127
4	Chicago State	21.097	64	0.8565	81
5	UT Rio Grande	19.609	127	0.7269	93
6	Utah Valley	19.389	137	0.8126	84
7	New Mexico St	18.721	175	1.1624	55
8	CSU Bakersfield	18.069	206	-0.9918	302
9	UMKC	16.184	294	0.7739	86

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Seattle	30.321	44	0.9901	82
2	Grand Canyon	29.561	65	0.9005	91
3	Chicago State	29.126	78	1.1059	76
4	California Baptist	28.534	95	-0.2454	208
5	UT Rio Grande	27.439	133	0.1747	163
6	Utah Valley	27.117	147	0.9609	87
7	CSU Bakersfield	26.361	181	-1.3054	303
8	New Mexico St	26.237	184	0.6930	105
9	UMKC	23.748	274	1.0722	79

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	California Baptist	78.523	7	1.6319	81
2	Seattle	76.863	19	2.3653	43
3	Grand Canyon	74.113	74	-0.2849	239
4	Utah Valley	71.624	130	0.0902	205
5	Chicago State	71.423	137	0.0486	210
6	UT Rio Grande	70.594	171	2.1196	54
7	New Mexico St	69.399	212	3.6978	4
8	CSU Bakersfield	68.611	241	-0.1566	227
9	UMKC	67.478	275	0.2034	192

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	57.431	37	0.9345	84
2	UT Rio Grande	56.636	51	1.3370	59
3	Utah Valley	54.401	110	3.8614	6
4	California Baptist	51.950	171	-1.2773	262
5	UMKC	50.800	202	0.7997	94
6	Chicago State	49.965	223	1.5869	47
7	Grand Canyon	47.840	268	-0.4158	186
8	CSU Bakersfield	46.442	293	0.4592	120
9	Seattle	42.743	335	-1.8084	291

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Seattle	7.079	20	-0.8057	20
2	UT Rio Grande	7.377	31	-0.6369	39
3	CSU Bakersfield	7.517	41	0.1009	208
4	Grand Canyon	7.858	69	-0.2155	124
5	UMKC	8.239	105	-0.4269	79
6	California Baptist	8.317	112	0.4978	307
7	Utah Valley	8.583	144	1.1127	349
8	New Mexico St	9.281	232	-0.4379	75
9	Chicago State	11.994	351	0.4583	301

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Chicago State	2.834	4	-0.6822	5
2	UT Rio Grande	2.862	6	-0.5334	22
3	New Mexico St	3.139	13	-0.1201	147
4	Grand Canyon	3.523	36	-0.5141	28
5	CSU Bakersfield	3.952	92	-0.2609	84
6	Seattle	4.167	130	-0.0575	176
7	California Baptist	4.562	214	0.4470	320
8	Utah Valley	5.116	296	0.2813	284
9	UMKC	5.966	343	-0.2178	98

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Seattle	27.996	17	0.6858	69
2	New Mexico St	27.880	21	-0.1937	224
3	Chicago State	26.822	68	1.3651	14
4	Utah Valley	26.766	70	0.9940	40
5	California Baptist	26.703	76	-0.3704	250
6	Grand Canyon	26.494	88	0.7575	64
7	UT Rio Grande	25.494	151	-0.2415	233
8	CSU Bakersfield	24.896	189	-0.7613	305
9	UMKC	23.226	276	0.4688	99

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Seattle	73.213	69	-0.3147	172
2	UT Rio Grande	73.019	76	0.3061	68
3	California Baptist	72.733	83	-0.2094	153
4	Utah Valley	71.796	116	-0.7733	248
5	Chicago State	70.948	159	-2.5588	353
6	UMKC	69.466	241	-2.0787	351
7	Grand Canyon	68.642	275	-1.0290	286
8	CSU Bakersfield	68.496	278	-1.5293	327
9	New Mexico St	65.638	341	-1.6855	341

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	California Baptist	0.470	70	0.0072	252
2	Utah Valley	0.475	88	0.0011	171
3	UMKC	0.480	108	-0.0084	68
4	Seattle	0.482	117	0.0083	260
5	New Mexico St	0.483	122	-0.0040	112
6	CSU Bakersfield	0.500	219	-0.0095	56
7	Grand Canyon	0.517	284	-0.0066	89
8	UT Rio Grande	0.532	328	0.0039	214
9	Chicago State	0.564	350	0.0089	271

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	0.917	29	-0.0014	121
2	UMKC	0.958	114	-0.0263	17
3	California Baptist	0.968	140	0.0300	322
4	Utah Valley	0.981	165	0.0151	238
5	CSU Bakersfield	0.988	182	-0.0002	127
6	Seattle	0.992	193	0.0246	300
7	UT Rio Grande	0.998	213	0.0217	284
8	Grand Canyon	1.057	322	0.0221	286
9	Chicago State	1.159	351	0.0214	281

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	0.228	10	-0.0058	227
2	UMKC	0.211	34	0.0105	12
3	New Mexico St	0.205	50	-0.0076	256
4	CSU Bakersfield	0.188	120	-0.0042	185
5	Seattle	0.178	184	0.0006	104
6	Utah Valley	0.168	257	-0.0052	205
7	Chicago State	0.159	309	-0.0086	279
8	Grand Canyon	0.154	324	-0.0116	325
9	California Baptist	0.145	342	-0.0126	331

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	0.797	16	-0.0030	219
2	CSU Bakersfield	0.794	19	-0.0070	267
3	California Baptist	0.772	56	0.0192	23
4	UMKC	0.752	140	0.0072	95
5	Utah Valley	0.750	151	-0.0086	282
6	Seattle	0.736	213	-0.0124	312
7	UT Rio Grande	0.735	215	-0.0151	329
8	Grand Canyon	0.734	219	-0.0237	349
9	Chicago State	0.700	325	0.0118	66

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Grand Canyon	0.302	123	-0.0001	169
2	New Mexico St	0.306	136	-0.0073	110
3	California Baptist	0.307	139	0.0035	188
4	Utah Valley	0.338	216	0.0180	290
5	Seattle	0.409	314	-0.0009	163
6	Chicago State	0.413	318	0.0078	232
7	UT Rio Grande	0.434	337	-0.0329	5
8	UMKC	0.459	340	0.0224	305
9	CSU Bakersfield	0.482	347	-0.0453	1

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	95.884	127	0.0059	165
2	UMKC	99.520	195	-0.6119	61
3	Utah Valley	100.780	220	0.3516	244
4	CSU Bakersfield	100.921	222	-0.4777	78
5	Seattle	101.498	236	-0.0273	156
6	California Baptist	103.149	265	0.4270	258
7	UT Rio Grande	103.269	269	1.2745	339
8	Grand Canyon	107.493	320	1.7105	350
9	Chicago State	119.448	353	0.0519	175

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	CSU Bakersfield	31.354	22	0.2045	171
2	UMKC	31.637	29	-1.2877	11
3	New Mexico St	32.664	67	0.1588	160
4	Seattle	33.558	100	0.7725	276
5	UT Rio Grande	33.947	122	0.9609	296
6	Utah Valley	34.892	167	0.3037	190
7	California Baptist	35.416	196	0.7307	269
8	Grand Canyon	37.674	304	0.9040	291
9	Chicago State	39.454	341	0.7381	270

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	73.193	5	2.2902	345
2	CSU Bakersfield	73.666	7	2.2798	344
3	UMKC	73.934	9	-1.7003	15
4	New Mexico St	77.432	45	1.1615	288
5	Seattle	78.851	80	0.2436	186
6	Chicago State	81.486	173	0.2072	177
7	Utah Valley	82.074	197	0.3599	203
8	California Baptist	84.947	310	0.1689	170
9	Grand Canyon	85.188	316	2.7960	352

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	California Baptist	41.894	104	0.7339	260
2	New Mexico St	42.209	122	-0.3793	103
3	Utah Valley	42.615	150	0.2363	186
4	Seattle	42.640	153	0.7872	271
5	CSU Bakersfield	42.678	156	-0.9794	35
6	UMKC	42.963	175	-0.5956	76
7	Grand Canyon	44.445	251	-0.1468	137
8	UT Rio Grande	46.500	328	-0.0986	142
9	Chicago State	48.470	348	0.7651	268

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	CSU Bakersfield	58.871	71	-0.7588	82
2	Grand Canyon	59.471	89	0.9230	251
3	Chicago State	60.829	129	0.8278	237
4	New Mexico St	62.101	173	-0.6577	92
5	UT Rio Grande	64.677	247	-0.5141	99
6	Seattle	64.989	258	1.8225	321
7	UMKC	66.325	292	-0.2524	130
8	California Baptist	66.571	302	-1.5298	34
9	Utah Valley	69.844	342	0.2146	186

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	CSU Bakersfield	20.409	8	-0.2591	93
2	New Mexico St	23.281	94	0.0750	151
3	UT Rio Grande	24.135	140	-0.1029	116
4	UMKC	24.305	145	-0.6582	53
5	Seattle	24.800	173	0.6579	251
6	Grand Canyon	25.400	210	1.5523	334
7	Chicago State	26.567	272	0.5366	234
8	Utah Valley	26.868	287	0.4867	227
9	California Baptist	26.902	288	0.6922	258

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	CSU Bakersfield	43.172	11	0.6300	228
2	UT Rio Grande	47.279	62	1.1018	259
3	New Mexico St	48.103	83	0.2492	187
4	UMKC	49.167	119	-1.2300	52
5	Chicago State	49.323	125	0.7749	240
6	Grand Canyon	50.675	174	2.4852	335
7	Seattle	51.336	203	1.6060	288
8	California Baptist	56.652	325	-1.3063	46
9	Utah Valley	57.291	335	0.3570	194

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Utah Valley	47.373	98	0.5280	210
2	CSU Bakersfield	47.527	105	-1.4315	39
3	California Baptist	47.728	115	2.5221	342
4	New Mexico St	48.287	137	-0.2338	134
5	Seattle	48.646	157	-0.2980	124
6	UMKC	49.296	178	0.1240	173
7	Grand Canyon	50.526	229	0.5469	214
8	UT Rio Grande	51.074	255	-1.3672	42
9	Chicago State	53.867	329	0.1185	171

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Utah Valley	30.156	12	-0.2146	168
2	California Baptist	33.429	52	1.5298	320
3	UMKC	33.675	62	0.2524	224
4	Seattle	35.011	96	-1.8225	33
5	UT Rio Grande	35.323	107	0.5141	255
6	New Mexico St	37.899	181	0.6577	262
7	Chicago State	39.171	225	-0.8278	117
8	Grand Canyon	40.529	265	-0.9230	103
9	CSU Bakersfield	41.129	283	0.7588	272

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMKC	7.333	9	-0.6295	56
2	Utah Valley	8.025	24	-0.1830	142
3	California Baptist	8.514	45	0.0385	202
4	Seattle	8.758	67	0.1147	218
5	New Mexico St	9.383	116	0.0838	212
6	UT Rio Grande	9.812	145	1.0638	337
7	CSU Bakersfield	10.944	253	0.4635	290
8	Grand Canyon	12.275	328	-0.6483	53
9	Chicago State	12.887	342	0.2015	237

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMKC	24.767	20	-0.4703	132
2	Utah Valley	24.783	21	0.0029	195
3	UT Rio Grande	25.914	33	1.1885	303
4	Seattle	27.515	76	-1.3623	39
5	California Baptist	28.294	97	1.4752	322
6	New Mexico St	29.330	132	0.9122	290
7	CSU Bakersfield	30.494	182	1.6499	328
8	Chicago State	32.163	233	-0.5678	113
9	Grand Canyon	34.513	300	0.3109	239

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	California Baptist	30.347	45	-1.7610	45
2	UMKC	30.766	58	-2.2629	21
3	New Mexico St	32.091	134	-0.8974	97
4	Seattle	32.424	145	2.2442	336
5	Utah Valley	32.871	175	-0.0528	179
6	Grand Canyon	34.939	287	-1.8088	41
7	CSU Bakersfield	35.549	309	-0.8563	102
8	UT Rio Grande	36.861	334	2.4697	345
9	Chicago State	39.933	352	1.0533	264

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Grand Canyon	30.160	123	-0.0069	169
2	New Mexico St	30.596	136	-0.7261	110
3	California Baptist	30.672	139	0.3489	188
4	Utah Valley	33.836	216	1.7950	290
5	Seattle	40.921	314	-0.0943	163
6	Chicago State	41.265	318	0.7835	232
7	UT Rio Grande	43.396	337	-3.2933	5
8	UMKC	45.900	340	2.2386	305
9	CSU Bakersfield	48.233	347	-4.5264	1

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	17.020	118	-0.5444	68
2	California Baptist	17.500	138	1.0131	273
3	Grand Canyon	18.088	173	1.0467	280
4	Utah Valley	20.256	271	1.0881	283
5	UT Rio Grande	22.137	320	-0.8142	45
6	Seattle	23.310	333	0.7374	239
7	Chicago State	24.133	342	0.4571	213
8	CSU Bakersfield	25.114	348	-0.8908	39
9	UMKC	25.167	349	0.5733	222

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	23.285	82	-0.0799	139
2	Grand Canyon	24.907	147	0.5142	213
3	California Baptist	25.505	174	0.5018	212
4	Utah Valley	27.286	231	1.6345	310
5	UT Rio Grande	31.149	320	-1.5605	26
6	Seattle	31.572	328	0.2338	176
7	Chicago State	32.819	339	0.7254	242
8	UMKC	33.108	340	0.7221	241
9	CSU Bakersfield	34.882	346	-2.4413	2

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	California Baptist	67.994	76	2.4593	319
2	UT Rio Grande	70.627	199	1.7354	281
3	New Mexico St	71.234	229	-1.8263	28
4	Grand Canyon	71.425	237	3.1940	335
5	CSU Bakersfield	72.341	281	3.2398	337
6	Utah Valley	73.356	309	-0.0149	138
7	Seattle	73.814	316	1.6334	274
8	Chicago State	74.818	340	-0.0156	137
9	UMKC	75.175	344	0.1056	155

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Utah Valley	47.297	82	1.0960	256
2	New Mexico St	47.715	90	0.2126	200
3	California Baptist	48.580	110	0.4790	219
4	Seattle	49.451	126	0.5377	222
5	UMKC	50.132	147	0.5328	221
6	CSU Bakersfield	52.900	227	-1.1701	100
7	Grand Canyon	54.860	271	0.3193	208
8	Chicago State	59.887	333	-1.9214	55
9	UT Rio Grande	60.262	334	-1.1895	98

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UMKC	11.711	22	1.1279	3
2	UT Rio Grande	11.674	23	-0.1225	189
3	New Mexico St	9.416	135	-0.0523	171
4	CSU Bakersfield	8.992	170	-0.4515	277
5	Seattle	7.935	264	0.4389	48
6	Utah Valley	7.896	268	0.0425	137
7	Grand Canyon	7.005	319	-0.5604	301
8	Chicago State	6.877	324	-1.0385	344
9	California Baptist	5.727	353	-0.1402	196

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Utah Valley	7.149	16	0.2395	77
2	UT Rio Grande	5.087	107	-0.2733	250
3	California Baptist	4.669	144	-0.3850	279
4	UMKC	4.482	160	-0.1179	194
5	CSU Bakersfield	4.164	198	-0.2459	239
6	Seattle	4.060	210	-0.4350	293
7	Chicago State	3.527	273	-0.3769	275
8	New Mexico St	2.803	336	-0.0153	154
9	Grand Canyon	1.872	353	-0.0119	153

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Grand Canyon	23.292	97	-0.2434	110
2	New Mexico St	24.229	147	0.0263	160
3	Utah Valley	24.465	158	0.6678	281
4	California Baptist	25.400	221	0.4331	241
5	Seattle	27.285	306	0.1684	186
6	UT Rio Grande	27.655	318	-1.0192	21
7	Chicago State	28.738	333	0.5997	264
8	UMKC	30.917	350	1.0102	318
9	CSU Bakersfield	31.112	351	-0.7510	40

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Seattle	73.611	49	-0.0009	119
2	Utah Valley	72.702	73	-1.0787	287
3	California Baptist	72.668	75	-0.5690	213
4	UT Rio Grande	72.093	104	0.0946	108
5	Chicago State	71.326	143	-2.6646	353
6	Grand Canyon	69.116	252	-0.6205	227
7	UMKC	69.001	259	-2.2435	352
8	CSU Bakersfield	68.419	285	-1.6294	335
9	New Mexico St	65.466	347	-1.7900	342

Location invert reset

Result invert reset

Game Type invert reset

Points Per Possession reset

Mean
Std
Median
Min
Max

selected out of records.

Showing - of

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Envo Magazine