College Basketball Analytics, Insights, and Trends

Quick Links
Teams
- America East
  - Albany
  - Binghamton
  - Hartford
  - Maine
  - New Hampshire
  - NJIT
  - Stony Brook
  - UMass Lowell
  - UMBC
  - Vermont
- American
  - Cincinnati
  - East Carolina
  - Houston
  - Memphis
  - SMU
  - Temple
  - Tulane
  - Tulsa
  - UCF
  - USF
  - Wichita State
- Atlantic 10
  - Dayton
  - Duquesne
  - Fordham
  - George Mason
  - George Washington
  - La Salle
  - Richmond
  - St. Josephs
  - Davidson
  - Saint Louis
  - St. Bonaventure
  - UMass
  - Rhode Island
  - VCU
- ACC
  - Boston College
  - Clemson
  - Duke
  - Florida State
  - Georgia Tech
  - Louisville
  - Miami
  - North Carolina
  - NC State
  - Notre Dame
  - Pitt
  - Syracuse
  - Virginia
  - Virginia Tech
  - Wake Forest
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
  - Baylor
  - Iowa State
  - Kansas
  - Kansas State
  - Oklahoma
  - Oklahoma State
  - TCU
  - Texas
  - Texas Tech
  - West Virginia
- Big East
  - Butler
  - Creighton
  - Depaul
  - Georgetown
  - Marquette
  - Providence
  - Seton Hall
  - St. John’s
  - UConn
  - Villanova
  - Xavier
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
  - Illinois
  - Indiana
  - Iowa
  - Maryland
  - Michigan State
  - Minnesota
  - Nebraska
  - Northwestern
  - Ohio State
  - Penn State
  - Purdue
  - Rutgers
  - Wisconsin
- Big West
- Colonial
  - Charleston
  - Delaware
  - Drexel
  - Elon
  - Hofstra
  - James Madison
  - Northeastern
  - Towson
  - UNC Wilmington
  - William & Mary
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
  - Brown
  - Columbia
  - Cornell
  - Dartmouth
  - Harvard
  - Pennsylvania
  - Princeton
  - Yale
- MAAC
  - Canisius
  - Fairfield
  - Iona
  - Manhattan
  - Marist
  - Monmouth
  - Niagara
  - Quinnipiac
  - Rider
  - Saint Peter’s
  - Siena
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
  - Air Force
  - Boise State
  - Colorado State
  - Fresno State
  - Nevada
  - New Mexico
  - San Diego State
  - San Jose State
  - UNLV
  - Utah State
  - Wyoming
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
  - Arizona
  - Arizona State
  - California
  - Colorado
  - Oregon
  - Oregon State
  - Stanford
  - UCLA
  - USC
  - Utah
  - Washington
  - Washington State
- Patriot League
  - American
  - Army
  - Boston University
  - Bucknell
  - Colgate
  - Holy Cross
  - Lafayette
  - Lehigh
  - Loyola (MD)
  - Navy
- SEC
  - Alabama
  - Arkansas
  - Auburn
  - Florida
  - Georgia
  - Kentucky
  - LSU
  - Mississippi State
  - Missouri
  - Ole Miss
  - South Carolina
  - Tennessee
  - Texas A&M
  - Vanderbilt
- Southern
  - Chattanooga
  - East Tennessee State
  - Furman
  - Mercer
  - Samford
  - The Citadel
  - UNC Greensboro
  - VMI
  - Western Carolina
  - Wofford
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
  - BYU
  - Gonzaga
  - Loyola Marymount
  - Pacific
  - Pepperdine
  - Portland
  - St. Mary’s
  - San Diego
  - San Francisco
  - Santa Clara
- WAC
Conferences
- America East
- American
- Atlantic 10
- ACC
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
- Big East
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
- Big West
- Colonial
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
- MAAC
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
- SEC
- Southern
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Statistics
Contact Us

Search for:

Conferences

Conferences

Standings
Statistics
Trend Lab

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	11.555	74	0.6063	106
2	Grand Canyon	9.179	89	0.4475	127
3	Utah Valley	5.138	113	1.2462	45
4	SF Austin	3.567	128	1.0494	63
5	Seattle	3.105	131	1.1268	53
6	Abil Christian	2.382	135	-0.3929	253
7	Sam Houston	0.999	150	2.3130	7
8	Tarleton	-1.988	182	0.1433	175
9	California Baptist	-4.418	212	-0.3099	241
10	Dixie State	-11.868	285	-0.9290	298
11	UT Rio Grande	-12.223	290	0.3218	140
12	Chicago State	-18.976	332	1.1012	57
13	Lamar	-21.488	344	-0.9657	302

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Grand Canyon	0.208	20	-0.0157	281
2	Abil Christian	0.158	55	-0.0114	241
3	Seattle	0.145	65	0.0022	124
4	New Mexico St	0.137	72	0.0042	100
5	California Baptist	0.132	79	-0.0180	296
6	Utah Valley	0.117	100	0.0024	122
7	SF Austin	0.082	144	0.0033	113
8	Sam Houston	0.082	146	0.0088	64
9	Tarleton	-0.034	272	-0.0444	358
10	Dixie State	-0.052	288	0.0010	136
11	UT Rio Grande	-0.067	300	-0.0080	206
12	Lamar	-0.116	325	-0.0172	292
13	Chicago State	-0.156	343	0.0108	50

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	1673.685	31	9.9618	96
2	Abil Christian	1619.895	68	9.3925	104
3	Sam Houston	1611.539	73	17.9890	38
4	SF Austin	1611.539	73	16.1018	48
5	Grand Canyon	1608.406	79	14.0861	63
6	Seattle	1548.521	135	17.3430	40
7	Utah Valley	1534.925	144	9.5912	102
8	Tarleton	1468.069	209	-1.7219	205
9	California Baptist	1463.178	212	-7.7112	258
10	Dixie State	1426.407	262	-7.9035	261
11	UT Rio Grande	1357.171	318	-20.1807	327
12	Lamar	1287.594	351	-30.6836	356
13	Chicago State	1283.095	352	-0.9355	197

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	0.600	24	0.0039	176
2	Grand Canyon	0.544	86	0.0158	46
3	Utah Valley	0.541	95	0.0166	37
4	SF Austin	0.538	106	0.0119	72
5	Abil Christian	0.534	109	0.0046	157
6	Seattle	0.521	130	0.0203	22
7	Sam Houston	0.511	146	0.0219	16
8	Dixie State	0.474	215	0.0084	112
9	Tarleton	0.471	221	0.0019	231
10	California Baptist	0.456	245	0.0001	253
11	UT Rio Grande	0.424	306	-0.0066	319
12	Chicago State	0.409	321	0.0083	113
13	Lamar	0.336	357	-0.0073	325

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.527	81	-0.0024	162
2	New Mexico St	0.525	88	-0.0106	270
3	Utah Valley	0.515	123	-0.0036	170
4	California Baptist	0.510	153	-0.0147	313
5	Sam Houston	0.502	190	-0.0024	160
6	UT Rio Grande	0.500	206	-0.0129	296
7	Grand Canyon	0.498	222	-0.0090	243
8	Seattle	0.494	238	-0.0099	260
9	Abil Christian	0.494	243	0.0043	72
10	Dixie State	0.483	276	-0.0154	319
11	Tarleton	0.468	324	-0.0064	206
12	Chicago State	0.463	334	-0.0046	186
13	Lamar	0.448	352	-0.0039	174

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	1.054	96	-0.0199	294
2	Abil Christian	1.040	125	0.0048	109
3	Grand Canyon	1.033	140	-0.0016	160
4	Seattle	1.030	148	-0.0172	279
5	Utah Valley	1.019	169	-0.0137	251
6	SF Austin	1.018	172	-0.0025	164
7	California Baptist	1.008	192	-0.0380	350
8	Sam Houston	1.001	214	-0.0074	200
9	Tarleton	0.980	260	-0.0162	272
10	UT Rio Grande	0.965	284	-0.0141	255
11	Dixie State	0.959	296	-0.0416	352
12	Chicago State	0.917	343	0.0053	106
13	Lamar	0.894	352	-0.0261	319

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Seattle	0.151	45	0.0040	303
2	Tarleton	0.161	88	0.0116	353
3	Abil Christian	0.164	110	0.0019	284
4	Grand Canyon	0.174	193	-0.0074	91
5	Sam Houston	0.175	200	-0.0046	157
6	New Mexico St	0.190	303	0.0014	273
7	California Baptist	0.192	308	0.0061	326
8	Dixie State	0.195	316	0.0108	352
9	UT Rio Grande	0.201	336	0.0008	260
10	Chicago State	0.201	338	-0.0153	11
11	Lamar	0.202	339	0.0118	354
12	Utah Valley	0.210	349	0.0046	308
13	SF Austin	0.210	350	0.0005	254

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Grand Canyon	0.338	14	-0.0005	142
2	SF Austin	0.330	19	-0.0039	188
3	New Mexico St	0.327	21	-0.0123	275
4	Utah Valley	0.315	41	-0.0016	160
5	Sam Houston	0.305	60	-0.0173	319
6	Chicago State	0.297	79	0.0112	35
7	California Baptist	0.285	114	-0.0125	277
8	Lamar	0.282	123	-0.0138	295
9	Abil Christian	0.269	166	-0.0132	289
10	Dixie State	0.262	186	-0.0004	139
11	Tarleton	0.253	215	-0.0149	301
12	Seattle	0.245	237	0.0045	83
13	UT Rio Grande	0.238	262	-0.0024	171

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	0.425	1	0.0086	92
2	Abil Christian	0.393	11	0.0311	16
3	Utah Valley	0.389	15	-0.0015	165
4	California Baptist	0.375	34	-0.0228	322
5	Dixie State	0.363	46	0.0233	31
6	SF Austin	0.361	48	-0.0019	167
7	New Mexico St	0.358	54	-0.0220	320
8	Tarleton	0.345	75	0.0311	17
9	Grand Canyon	0.309	168	0.0063	110
10	Chicago State	0.300	206	-0.0265	336
11	Seattle	0.289	240	0.0192	41
12	Lamar	0.265	299	0.0208	38
13	Sam Houston	0.251	324	-0.0081	227

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	102.527	90	0.0309	189
2	Grand Canyon	99.862	134	-0.6001	292
3	Abil Christian	98.766	152	0.2549	146
4	Utah Valley	98.620	155	0.1398	166
5	SF Austin	96.886	192	0.1090	174
6	Tarleton	95.857	206	0.5985	81
7	Seattle	95.561	211	-0.1911	233
8	Sam Houston	95.453	212	0.6739	73
9	UT Rio Grande	94.340	236	0.4398	118
10	California Baptist	94.309	237	-1.0835	334
11	Dixie State	89.351	308	-1.4022	348
12	Chicago State	88.826	316	1.0866	38
13	Lamar	85.867	343	-1.3060	344

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	37.413	116	-0.0698	167
2	Sam Houston	37.230	128	-0.1852	184
3	New Mexico St	37.178	134	-0.8507	291
4	Grand Canyon	36.905	147	-0.5269	246
5	Utah Valley	35.757	231	-0.6690	261
6	Seattle	35.668	237	-1.0653	318
7	Abil Christian	35.615	239	-0.8270	284
8	California Baptist	34.971	273	-1.3866	342
9	Tarleton	34.571	297	-2.1155	356
10	Dixie State	33.918	316	-1.6209	351
11	Lamar	33.466	328	-0.8039	281
12	UT Rio Grande	33.164	331	-0.7915	277
13	Chicago State	32.435	346	0.7490	49

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Sam Houston	87.401	25	-0.1193	231
2	Grand Canyon	86.390	45	0.6735	123
3	Seattle	85.448	69	-0.7524	297
4	Lamar	83.472	158	-2.4392	355
5	Chicago State	82.763	194	3.0099	1
6	Tarleton	82.429	211	-2.7845	358
7	New Mexico St	82.024	231	0.0982	204
8	Abil Christian	81.330	261	-1.8298	349
9	California Baptist	80.012	307	0.1419	194
10	Dixie State	79.600	316	-1.5405	344
11	SF Austin	79.203	329	-0.2687	247
12	Utah Valley	78.529	341	-0.6128	283
13	UT Rio Grande	75.155	358	-0.6527	288

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	47.491	29	-0.0844	149
2	Utah Valley	45.616	94	-0.5184	205
3	New Mexico St	45.400	102	-1.1590	305
4	UT Rio Grande	44.306	168	-0.8536	266
5	California Baptist	43.827	199	-1.6865	345
6	Abil Christian	43.646	208	0.0573	130
7	Grand Canyon	42.987	247	-0.9161	271
8	Sam Houston	42.882	253	-0.0442	147
9	Dixie State	42.467	271	-1.2145	310
10	Tarleton	42.087	284	-1.0536	297
11	Seattle	41.717	300	-0.8511	265
12	Lamar	40.260	338	0.0434	135
13	Chicago State	39.460	349	-0.4269	187

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Tarleton	69.346	29	-2.4394	355
2	Lamar	69.194	32	2.0095	17
3	SF Austin	68.571	44	0.2253	171
4	Utah Valley	68.474	45	-0.7520	292
5	Abil Christian	64.003	135	-0.2359	234
6	Dixie State	62.458	169	0.6809	124
7	UT Rio Grande	62.391	174	0.1250	182
8	Grand Canyon	60.771	217	-0.7099	284
9	Sam Houston	57.631	282	-0.0370	208
10	New Mexico St	57.336	290	0.1280	181
11	California Baptist	57.038	303	-2.2868	354
12	Chicago State	56.465	313	0.0030	202
13	Seattle	54.521	331	0.7887	113

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	29.312	32	0.1698	151
2	Tarleton	26.753	126	-2.5921	358
3	Utah Valley	26.522	135	-0.7728	293
4	Abil Christian	26.269	153	-1.1494	328
5	Lamar	25.842	175	0.0928	162
6	New Mexico St	25.543	201	-1.0428	319
7	Grand Canyon	25.188	222	-0.6566	276
8	UT Rio Grande	24.573	254	-0.0960	195
9	Dixie State	24.569	256	-0.8521	300
10	Sam Houston	24.507	262	0.2294	140
11	California Baptist	23.508	299	-1.7255	353
12	Seattle	22.402	330	-0.6798	278
13	Chicago State	21.272	349	0.4536	112

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	57.829	38	0.0753	211
2	Tarleton	57.067	47	-4.0311	358
3	SF Austin	54.613	94	-0.0213	223
4	Utah Valley	53.792	120	-0.8433	313
5	Grand Canyon	52.497	154	-0.3215	259
6	Abil Christian	52.114	169	-1.3728	332
7	Sam Houston	50.362	219	-0.0923	234
8	Dixie State	49.802	233	-0.3650	267
9	New Mexico St	47.004	298	0.2326	191
10	UT Rio Grande	46.961	302	-0.3769	270
11	Chicago State	46.836	306	1.8820	27
12	Seattle	46.457	313	0.2899	186
13	California Baptist	45.596	326	-1.7042	341

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	54.628	36	-2.1984	340
2	SF Austin	53.998	45	0.0690	127
3	UT Rio Grande	53.081	72	-0.0834	149
4	California Baptist	52.083	109	-1.8261	328
5	Abil Christian	50.143	181	-0.9861	255
6	Utah Valley	49.820	196	-0.2222	163
7	Dixie State	49.442	217	-1.2054	279
8	Sam Houston	49.051	235	0.5791	74
9	Grand Canyon	48.534	260	-0.9666	253
10	Seattle	48.305	268	-1.6775	324
11	Tarleton	47.239	296	-1.0973	264
12	Chicago State	45.729	330	-0.5634	205
13	Lamar	45.178	341	0.0134	139

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Seattle	45.479	28	-0.7887	246
2	Chicago State	43.535	46	-0.0030	157
3	California Baptist	42.962	56	2.2868	5
4	New Mexico St	42.664	69	-0.1280	178
5	Sam Houston	42.369	77	0.0370	151
6	Grand Canyon	39.229	142	0.7099	75
7	UT Rio Grande	37.609	185	-0.1250	177
8	Dixie State	37.542	190	-0.6809	235
9	Abil Christian	35.997	224	0.2359	125
10	Utah Valley	31.526	314	0.7520	67
11	SF Austin	31.429	315	-0.2253	188
12	Lamar	30.806	327	-2.0095	342
13	Tarleton	30.654	330	2.4394	4

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Seattle	13.265	28	-0.3854	246
2	Sam Houston	12.723	49	-0.4146	256
3	Grand Canyon	11.717	97	0.1297	105
4	New Mexico St	11.635	109	0.1922	95
5	California Baptist	11.463	123	0.3389	64
6	Chicago State	11.164	141	0.2954	73
7	Dixie State	9.349	264	-0.7689	324
8	Abil Christian	9.347	265	0.3223	69
9	Utah Valley	9.235	269	0.1037	111
10	UT Rio Grande	8.591	302	-0.6955	311
11	SF Austin	8.101	326	-0.2395	199
12	Tarleton	7.818	337	0.4766	44
13	Lamar	7.624	344	-0.8967	332

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Seattle	38.991	19	-1.0423	288
2	Sam Houston	37.039	41	-0.0270	174
3	Chicago State	35.927	63	1.1279	39
4	New Mexico St	35.020	78	-0.1344	192
5	California Baptist	34.416	97	1.8461	12
6	Grand Canyon	33.893	113	0.9949	47
7	Dixie State	29.798	216	-1.1755	303
8	Abil Christian	29.217	230	-0.4570	227
9	UT Rio Grande	28.194	263	-0.2758	209
10	Lamar	25.642	321	-2.5145	356
11	Tarleton	25.362	327	1.2466	33
12	Utah Valley	24.737	336	0.2305	132
13	SF Austin	24.590	340	-0.2474	205

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Utah Valley	36.949	32	-0.3224	181
2	Grand Canyon	34.494	135	-0.4059	187
3	Sam Houston	34.104	161	-0.9965	251
4	Seattle	33.970	164	0.0491	143
5	SF Austin	33.453	205	-0.7839	221
6	California Baptist	33.230	215	-0.5705	203
7	New Mexico St	33.025	227	1.3177	41
8	Abil Christian	31.914	271	1.8959	22
9	Chicago State	31.553	286	0.0717	140
10	UT Rio Grande	30.800	309	-2.2566	333
11	Dixie State	30.542	319	-1.1165	262
12	Tarleton	30.039	328	0.3605	108
13	Lamar	28.691	351	-0.4038	186

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	42.469	1	0.8590	92
2	Abil Christian	39.309	11	3.1109	16
3	Utah Valley	38.907	15	-0.1467	165
4	California Baptist	37.455	34	-2.2775	322
5	Dixie State	36.285	46	2.3264	31
6	SF Austin	36.105	48	-0.1862	167
7	New Mexico St	35.797	54	-2.1985	320
8	Tarleton	34.529	75	3.1059	17
9	Grand Canyon	30.880	168	0.6295	110
10	Chicago State	29.995	206	-2.6544	336
11	Seattle	28.950	240	1.9240	41
12	Lamar	26.520	299	2.0765	38
13	Sam Houston	25.056	324	-0.8119	227

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Abil Christian	23.408	1	1.8083	20
2	UT Rio Grande	21.592	22	0.8644	62
3	Utah Valley	21.200	28	-0.1348	192
4	Tarleton	21.036	37	2.1335	9
5	New Mexico St	19.842	82	-0.5703	257
6	California Baptist	19.352	108	-1.3686	332
7	SF Austin	18.857	122	0.1288	157
8	Dixie State	18.717	127	-0.1507	195
9	Seattle	18.272	151	0.7957	69
10	Grand Canyon	17.802	175	0.7622	75
11	Chicago State	15.638	285	-1.2684	328
12	Lamar	14.819	319	-0.1031	187
13	Sam Houston	12.954	350	0.0483	164

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	31.099	5	0.4195	116
2	Abil Christian	31.002	6	1.9076	22
3	Utah Valley	29.653	23	-0.2506	195
4	California Baptist	28.846	42	-1.5487	323
5	New Mexico St	28.154	56	-1.5015	321
6	Tarleton	27.925	60	1.0150	66
7	SF Austin	27.897	62	-0.0298	166
8	Dixie State	27.549	72	0.9808	69
9	Grand Canyon	26.392	120	0.7092	87
10	Chicago State	23.996	219	-1.3140	314
11	Seattle	23.745	232	1.4376	43
12	Lamar	21.601	298	0.7273	85
13	Sam Houston	21.348	307	-0.5876	242

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Seattle	76.238	27	-0.9768	265
2	Abil Christian	74.935	55	1.1429	115
3	Tarleton	74.642	63	6.4698	1
4	New Mexico St	72.281	147	1.9751	60
5	Utah Valley	71.645	169	0.5844	147
6	UT Rio Grande	68.859	261	2.3877	38
7	Lamar	68.723	268	-2.4398	325
8	Dixie State	67.395	302	-2.5596	328
9	SF Austin	67.321	305	0.2890	174
10	Grand Canyon	67.134	307	1.3973	98
11	California Baptist	66.187	323	-0.2773	219
12	Chicago State	64.499	344	-2.6570	332
13	Sam Houston	60.238	358	2.5625	33

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	California Baptist	63.602	3	-0.6965	183
2	Dixie State	60.610	13	1.5095	41
3	Utah Valley	59.461	22	0.3006	107
4	Abil Christian	56.128	57	-1.3335	234
5	SF Austin	54.602	86	-0.7937	190
6	New Mexico St	53.638	108	0.5879	95
7	Sam Houston	53.348	117	-1.2106	220
8	Seattle	51.917	152	-2.0223	280
9	UT Rio Grande	49.928	205	-1.0448	212
10	Grand Canyon	49.045	226	0.0961	125
11	Tarleton	48.935	230	-0.2504	155
12	Lamar	47.366	272	1.0809	66
13	Chicago State	44.283	318	-2.9274	321

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Abil Christian	7.477	25	0.4356	295
2	Seattle	7.645	37	0.2043	249
3	Tarleton	7.810	44	1.1406	351
4	Sam Houston	8.235	75	-0.3891	84
5	Grand Canyon	8.295	81	-0.2025	137
6	California Baptist	8.933	149	0.7218	337
7	Chicago State	9.230	192	-0.9098	10
8	UT Rio Grande	9.409	214	-0.2395	126
9	SF Austin	9.826	259	0.2620	262
10	New Mexico St	10.205	291	0.5819	321
11	Lamar	10.663	325	1.1951	352
12	Dixie State	10.809	332	1.7154	358
13	Utah Valley	11.140	343	-0.0253	188

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	California Baptist	2.875	2	-0.1584	116
2	New Mexico St	2.984	6	0.0533	193
3	Sam Houston	3.521	36	-0.6741	8
4	Lamar	4.331	150	0.0832	202
5	UT Rio Grande	4.402	167	-0.4480	33
6	Utah Valley	4.495	179	-0.0741	147
7	Grand Canyon	4.678	211	0.4437	305
8	Seattle	4.736	223	0.3896	299
9	SF Austin	4.920	256	0.3393	284
10	Abil Christian	4.927	259	0.1681	227
11	Chicago State	5.034	273	0.7883	340
12	Dixie State	5.412	306	0.0525	192
13	Tarleton	7.538	358	-0.0604	154

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Abil Christian	28.834	4	1.0302	21
2	Utah Valley	28.221	10	0.0799	129
3	UT Rio Grande	27.735	17	0.1187	123
4	California Baptist	27.715	19	-0.6477	276
5	New Mexico St	27.578	20	-0.7786	299
6	Tarleton	27.141	27	1.4155	7
7	Dixie State	26.452	43	0.5733	59
8	SF Austin	26.308	49	-0.1470	173
9	Grand Canyon	25.749	69	0.0446	132
10	Chicago State	25.659	70	-1.1728	336
11	Seattle	24.147	165	0.6109	54
12	Lamar	23.202	236	0.2955	97
13	Sam Houston	23.099	242	-0.4263	236

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Dixie State	75.560	9	-0.6278	229
2	UT Rio Grande	74.051	28	-0.1781	138
3	Abil Christian	73.663	33	-0.5525	214
4	SF Austin	73.022	47	-0.3344	173
5	Seattle	72.893	53	0.0334	104
6	California Baptist	70.004	170	-1.4139	326
7	Utah Valley	69.898	178	-1.3427	317
8	New Mexico St	68.824	229	-1.3262	315
9	Sam Houston	68.633	240	-1.7074	343
10	Lamar	68.575	244	0.1948	80
11	Grand Canyon	68.417	254	-0.7995	252
12	Chicago State	68.028	275	-1.5379	333
13	Tarleton	65.985	335	-2.2221	354

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Grand Canyon	0.436	4	0.0057	225
2	Utah Valley	0.449	11	0.0018	164
3	New Mexico St	0.455	20	-0.0149	19
4	Seattle	0.462	29	-0.0085	51
5	California Baptist	0.469	47	0.0084	257
6	Sam Houston	0.479	90	-0.0027	112
7	SF Austin	0.490	144	0.0182	334
8	Dixie State	0.500	188	-0.0170	10
9	Abil Christian	0.507	222	0.0155	322
10	Tarleton	0.513	248	0.0180	331
11	UT Rio Grande	0.513	249	0.0153	318
12	Lamar	0.518	272	-0.0051	81
13	Chicago State	0.534	327	-0.0049	84

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Grand Canyon	0.891	5	0.0147	203
2	Seattle	0.913	13	0.0079	165
3	New Mexico St	0.927	28	-0.0159	28
4	Sam Houston	0.932	34	-0.0111	38
5	Utah Valley	0.933	35	0.0006	108
6	Abil Christian	0.933	36	0.0425	346
7	SF Austin	0.941	48	0.0256	282
8	California Baptist	0.956	78	0.0060	151
9	Tarleton	0.978	139	0.0445	348
10	Dixie State	1.001	193	0.0038	134
11	UT Rio Grande	1.060	318	0.0211	252
12	Lamar	1.062	321	0.0030	126
13	Chicago State	1.088	341	-0.0035	84

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Abil Christian	0.272	1	-0.0160	343
2	SF Austin	0.234	4	-0.0024	140
3	Tarleton	0.234	5	-0.0075	238
4	Sam Houston	0.202	35	0.0003	78
5	Seattle	0.194	67	-0.0147	331
6	Grand Canyon	0.183	122	-0.0024	138
7	Dixie State	0.173	180	-0.0191	353
8	Chicago State	0.171	192	-0.0035	158
9	California Baptist	0.168	216	0.0069	17
10	Lamar	0.168	223	-0.0045	182
11	UT Rio Grande	0.166	238	-0.0010	102
12	New Mexico St	0.164	245	-0.0014	108
13	Utah Valley	0.148	321	-0.0103	285

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	0.772	67	0.0090	65
2	Sam Houston	0.769	79	0.0008	164
3	Utah Valley	0.767	83	0.0149	28
4	Seattle	0.765	90	-0.0059	241
5	California Baptist	0.745	171	-0.0013	198
6	Grand Canyon	0.739	203	-0.0007	192
7	Dixie State	0.733	233	-0.0221	344
8	Abil Christian	0.730	243	0.0007	168
9	SF Austin	0.717	284	0.0053	99
10	Lamar	0.711	303	0.0049	105
11	UT Rio Grande	0.691	335	0.0019	146
12	Chicago State	0.690	340	-0.0069	260
13	Tarleton	0.686	344	-0.0220	343

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	0.281	111	0.0110	255
2	Utah Valley	0.285	121	-0.0120	69
3	Dixie State	0.297	156	-0.0067	108
4	Grand Canyon	0.324	239	0.0235	321
5	California Baptist	0.331	251	-0.0004	169
6	Sam Houston	0.344	283	-0.0300	9
7	Tarleton	0.361	306	0.0040	210
8	UT Rio Grande	0.369	315	0.0120	260
9	SF Austin	0.373	319	0.0162	287
10	Chicago State	0.389	332	0.0021	188
11	Seattle	0.391	333	0.0062	224
12	Lamar	0.391	334	0.0128	271
13	Abil Christian	0.490	358	0.0034	206

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Grand Canyon	90.683	52	-1.0476	26
2	New Mexico St	90.971	59	-0.5754	79
3	Seattle	92.456	78	-1.3179	15
4	SF Austin	93.320	89	-0.9405	31
5	Utah Valley	93.482	93	-1.1064	22
6	Sam Houston	94.454	111	-1.6390	5
7	Abil Christian	96.384	135	0.6478	290
8	Tarleton	97.846	164	0.4551	262
9	California Baptist	98.727	185	-0.7713	49
10	Dixie State	101.219	232	-0.4732	96
11	UT Rio Grande	106.562	317	0.1180	207
12	Lamar	107.356	324	-0.3403	120
13	Chicago State	107.803	333	-0.0146	182

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Abil Christian	30.081	4	1.2760	310
2	Seattle	31.239	11	0.3459	182
3	Sam Houston	31.873	18	0.0364	124
4	Grand Canyon	31.923	20	0.0591	127
5	SF Austin	32.492	30	0.7005	238
6	New Mexico St	32.624	34	-1.0375	13
7	Utah Valley	33.998	82	-0.0453	104
8	Tarleton	34.209	92	1.7927	346
9	California Baptist	34.351	99	0.2683	166
10	Lamar	36.284	211	-0.6449	36
11	Dixie State	36.411	218	0.0564	126
12	UT Rio Grande	37.269	259	0.6023	224
13	Chicago State	37.481	270	0.0804	133

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Abil Christian	68.114	1	1.1700	274
2	SF Austin	75.815	12	-0.8170	54
3	Tarleton	76.956	16	1.2465	285
4	Seattle	77.502	23	1.7564	328
5	Sam Houston	77.636	25	0.7740	235
6	Chicago State	81.369	115	0.7227	226
7	Lamar	81.607	132	-0.1267	123
8	Grand Canyon	82.548	166	-0.6030	72
9	California Baptist	82.662	169	-1.0046	41
10	UT Rio Grande	83.236	198	-0.6636	67
11	New Mexico St	83.648	220	-0.7252	60
12	Dixie State	83.662	221	3.2543	356
13	Utah Valley	86.059	300	0.7045	222

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Grand Canyon	38.929	9	0.3667	189
2	New Mexico St	39.013	12	-1.0852	24
3	Utah Valley	39.526	19	-0.2080	108
4	Seattle	40.408	31	-0.5269	59
5	Sam Houston	41.081	49	-0.4097	80
6	California Baptist	41.648	79	0.8306	257
7	SF Austin	42.861	150	1.4506	329
8	Dixie State	43.849	201	-1.5634	7
9	Abil Christian	43.871	205	1.1491	298
10	Lamar	44.485	241	-0.7589	43
11	Tarleton	44.511	242	1.6937	340
12	UT Rio Grande	44.980	265	1.1486	297
13	Chicago State	46.312	319	-0.3085	92

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	57.273	39	1.3325	289
2	Sam Houston	57.282	40	-0.8517	66
3	Tarleton	57.698	47	-1.5841	29
4	Lamar	58.001	51	-2.4986	4
5	Abil Christian	59.166	86	-1.2849	40
6	UT Rio Grande	60.789	124	-0.2750	126
7	Dixie State	61.819	158	0.1115	166
8	SF Austin	61.859	162	0.4850	208
9	Utah Valley	62.532	187	-2.2852	8
10	Seattle	63.431	221	1.3182	288
11	Chicago State	64.378	258	1.5931	309
12	Grand Canyon	65.837	291	-0.6547	87
13	California Baptist	66.881	318	0.6360	225

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Abil Christian	20.709	6	0.5421	219
2	Sam Houston	21.306	11	-0.3371	66
3	New Mexico St	21.707	21	-0.3459	65
4	Seattle	22.308	33	0.6661	241
5	SF Austin	23.048	57	0.2854	175
6	Tarleton	23.750	95	1.5111	332
7	Grand Canyon	24.266	122	-0.2051	86
8	Lamar	24.342	127	-1.0829	11
9	Utah Valley	24.821	147	-0.7459	30
10	California Baptist	25.650	201	0.3356	183
11	Chicago State	25.995	224	0.2905	177
12	Dixie State	26.304	242	-0.0699	108
13	UT Rio Grande	26.725	254	0.0911	138

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Abil Christian	40.429	1	-0.2898	114
2	Tarleton	44.427	11	-0.4028	98
3	Sam Houston	44.429	12	-0.2085	123
4	SF Austin	46.728	37	-0.1507	128
5	Lamar	47.267	54	-2.1366	8
6	New Mexico St	47.851	69	0.5673	203
7	Seattle	49.220	107	2.2187	332
8	UT Rio Grande	50.573	160	-0.6034	81
9	Dixie State	51.865	196	2.1233	328
10	Chicago State	52.364	213	1.8597	308
11	Utah Valley	53.735	259	-1.6369	18
12	Grand Canyon	54.279	270	-1.0039	40
13	California Baptist	55.228	297	-0.2195	120

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Grand Canyon	44.758	18	0.5258	201
2	New Mexico St	45.667	30	-1.2903	31
3	Seattle	45.912	37	-0.7837	66
4	Utah Valley	46.472	50	0.2709	177
5	California Baptist	46.779	63	0.8179	232
6	Sam Houston	47.834	112	-0.5905	81
7	SF Austin	49.493	179	0.8103	231
8	Chicago State	50.029	201	-1.2850	32
9	Dixie State	51.156	246	-2.1076	9
10	Abil Christian	51.505	261	1.6493	311
11	Lamar	52.409	299	0.0618	153
12	Tarleton	53.469	322	3.1713	356
13	UT Rio Grande	53.927	330	0.9025	246

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	California Baptist	33.119	41	-0.6360	134
2	Grand Canyon	34.163	68	0.6547	272
3	Chicago State	35.622	101	-1.5931	50
4	Seattle	36.569	138	-1.3182	71
5	Utah Valley	37.468	172	2.2852	351
6	SF Austin	38.141	197	-0.4850	151
7	Dixie State	38.181	201	-0.1115	193
8	UT Rio Grande	39.211	235	0.2750	233
9	Abil Christian	40.834	273	1.2849	319
10	Lamar	41.999	308	2.4986	355
11	Tarleton	42.302	312	1.5841	330
12	Sam Houston	42.718	319	0.8517	293
13	New Mexico St	42.727	320	-1.3325	70

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Grand Canyon	7.657	6	0.2642	250
2	California Baptist	8.701	38	-0.0673	166
3	Seattle	8.930	50	-0.3201	100
4	Utah Valley	9.177	69	0.7006	321
5	Abil Christian	9.372	82	0.7340	324
6	SF Austin	9.444	85	0.4150	276
7	Dixie State	10.107	153	0.1263	212
8	Tarleton	10.459	187	0.2816	252
9	UT Rio Grande	10.544	195	0.5111	292
10	Sam Houston	10.567	197	0.3735	267
11	New Mexico St	10.917	238	-0.6916	30
12	Chicago State	11.486	281	-0.2101	130
13	Lamar	11.942	306	0.4379	280

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	California Baptist	27.434	46	-0.7851	100
2	Abil Christian	27.685	51	1.4597	328
3	Grand Canyon	28.269	70	0.4009	235
4	Seattle	28.282	71	-0.4623	132
5	Chicago State	29.005	91	-1.1371	66
6	SF Austin	29.088	96	-0.6663	108
7	Dixie State	31.796	214	1.1309	301
8	Utah Valley	32.324	230	2.3414	353
9	Tarleton	32.528	240	1.6493	336
10	UT Rio Grande	32.664	247	-0.0602	188
11	Sam Houston	33.207	263	0.9825	289
12	Lamar	34.340	291	2.0099	346
13	New Mexico St	35.796	321	-1.2925	47

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Grand Canyon	26.204	2	0.5988	233
2	Utah Valley	27.944	4	0.6964	247
3	New Mexico St	30.681	45	-1.1063	57
4	California Baptist	31.079	56	0.5912	231
5	Seattle	31.434	69	-0.5256	112
6	UT Rio Grande	31.652	75	1.6766	312
7	Tarleton	31.965	95	-0.2497	135
8	SF Austin	32.211	112	2.1294	335
9	Sam Houston	32.231	115	0.5957	232
10	Dixie State	32.811	147	-0.7092	101
11	Abil Christian	33.175	172	0.8998	269
12	Lamar	34.065	229	-1.3757	38
13	Chicago State	40.103	358	1.2918	294

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	28.085	111	1.1022	255
2	Utah Valley	28.461	121	-1.2028	69
3	Dixie State	29.661	156	-0.6676	108
4	Grand Canyon	32.437	239	2.3486	321
5	California Baptist	33.082	251	-0.0402	169
6	Sam Houston	34.400	283	-2.9967	9
7	Tarleton	36.134	306	0.3948	210
8	UT Rio Grande	36.940	315	1.1976	260
9	SF Austin	37.281	319	1.6184	287
10	Chicago State	38.867	332	0.2078	188
11	Seattle	39.081	333	0.6227	224
12	Lamar	39.122	334	1.2786	271
13	Abil Christian	48.962	358	0.3404	206

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Utah Valley	16.103	88	-0.5553	65
2	Dixie State	16.941	139	0.2175	167
3	New Mexico St	16.986	142	1.1018	295
4	Grand Canyon	17.912	204	1.0240	286
5	California Baptist	18.157	216	0.1009	153
6	Tarleton	18.914	261	0.5813	228
7	Sam Houston	18.918	262	-1.5468	6
8	SF Austin	19.647	290	0.7420	248
9	Seattle	19.850	294	0.4220	202
10	UT Rio Grande	20.821	322	0.3863	194
11	Lamar	21.681	342	1.1527	300
12	Chicago State	22.306	346	-0.3025	97
13	Abil Christian	23.759	356	0.9631	279

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	22.764	110	0.7108	239
2	Utah Valley	23.735	136	-0.9177	46
3	Dixie State	24.378	165	0.6166	230
4	Grand Canyon	25.976	238	1.6649	314
5	Sam Houston	26.297	249	-2.0856	9
6	California Baptist	26.522	256	-0.5271	87
7	Tarleton	26.930	272	0.8445	246
8	SF Austin	27.499	293	1.0899	271
9	Seattle	29.561	329	1.2248	281
10	UT Rio Grande	30.051	337	0.7917	244
11	Lamar	30.787	343	1.0922	274
12	Chicago State	30.830	344	0.6491	231
13	Abil Christian	32.736	355	0.9978	261

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Seattle	66.407	19	-1.1615	59
2	California Baptist	66.566	22	1.2898	252
3	Utah Valley	68.506	64	0.7905	203
4	Dixie State	68.925	79	-0.4234	114
5	UT Rio Grande	68.958	81	-0.7696	86
6	Lamar	69.108	87	1.9416	303
7	Grand Canyon	69.182	92	0.0592	157
8	SF Austin	69.256	95	0.0749	158
9	Tarleton	69.274	96	-0.3241	119
10	Sam Houston	72.572	263	1.0395	224
11	Abil Christian	72.643	266	1.2469	248
12	Chicago State	72.831	272	-2.4010	18
13	New Mexico St	73.976	311	2.1016	313

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Grand Canyon	42.533	26	2.5836	333
2	New Mexico St	49.234	137	2.8660	345
3	Abil Christian	50.612	181	1.0741	279
4	Utah Valley	50.924	186	0.0488	197
5	Seattle	51.095	188	-1.8721	54
6	California Baptist	51.984	210	-1.6094	70
7	SF Austin	52.794	240	2.6274	335
8	Dixie State	53.830	266	2.9129	347
9	Chicago State	55.196	298	-0.4690	158
10	Sam Houston	56.011	313	-0.8941	124
11	Tarleton	58.029	335	0.4469	228
12	UT Rio Grande	59.199	341	-0.1566	177
13	Lamar	67.526	357	1.8196	313

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Abil Christian	14.692	2	-0.7072	300
2	SF Austin	12.407	19	-0.3347	233
3	Tarleton	11.362	45	-1.5441	358
4	Sam Houston	11.081	55	0.5878	30
5	Grand Canyon	9.569	153	0.0914	128
6	Seattle	9.352	170	-0.7444	308
7	Dixie State	8.880	223	-0.8851	328
8	Lamar	8.470	255	-0.6152	283
9	Chicago State	7.788	291	-0.2364	202
10	Utah Valley	7.628	303	-0.5667	271
11	California Baptist	7.317	315	0.2635	76
12	New Mexico St	7.157	323	0.1050	123
13	UT Rio Grande	7.071	330	0.2467	81

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Utah Valley	6.336	45	0.0784	129
2	New Mexico St	5.763	76	0.0656	133
3	SF Austin	5.539	87	-0.4252	308
4	Seattle	4.972	129	0.9376	6
5	Lamar	4.333	197	-0.0058	160
6	UT Rio Grande	4.280	202	-0.1231	206
7	California Baptist	3.815	246	-0.3135	269
8	Sam Houston	3.579	277	0.6614	20
9	Chicago State	3.443	294	0.5318	30
10	Dixie State	3.297	306	0.4127	48
11	Tarleton	3.237	310	-0.7155	350
12	Grand Canyon	3.147	319	-0.5054	325
13	Abil Christian	2.504	349	-0.0705	183

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Mexico St	22.754	113	-0.1736	127
2	Utah Valley	24.043	189	0.1158	182
3	Dixie State	25.574	282	-0.3709	91
4	Grand Canyon	25.670	287	0.4832	264
5	California Baptist	26.096	304	-0.6483	61
6	Sam Houston	26.438	315	-1.0198	25
7	UT Rio Grande	26.921	328	0.3817	244
8	SF Austin	26.989	329	0.8542	320
9	Tarleton	27.121	333	0.4494	259
10	Lamar	27.329	337	0.0375	166
11	Seattle	27.916	344	0.5776	279
12	Chicago State	28.751	352	0.4297	254
13	Abil Christian	30.510	357	0.2977	223

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	74.474	22	-0.7541	248
2	Dixie State	74.290	24	-0.2585	155
3	Seattle	73.126	44	-0.5206	206
4	Abil Christian	73.026	46	-0.2829	165
5	SF Austin	72.980	49	-0.7611	250
6	California Baptist	70.427	149	-1.4925	331
7	Utah Valley	70.227	160	-1.1565	297
8	New Mexico St	70.055	170	-0.9853	280
9	Grand Canyon	68.769	232	-0.5806	216
10	Lamar	68.709	236	0.0588	97
11	Sam Houston	68.126	271	-1.6918	341
12	Chicago State	68.006	276	-1.6844	339
13	Tarleton	66.871	315	-2.5632	358

Location invert reset

Result invert reset

Game Type invert reset

Points Per Possession reset

Mean
Std
Median
Min
Max

selected out of records.

Showing - of

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Envo Magazine