Conferences – HoopSci

College Basketball Analytics, Insights, and Trends

Conferences
- America East
- American
- Atlantic 10
- ACC
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
- Big East
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
- Big West
- Coastal
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
- MAAC
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
- SEC
- Southern
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Teams
- America East
  - Albany
  - Bryant
  - Binghamton
  - Maine
  - New Hampshire
  - NJIT
  - UMass Lowell
  - UMBC
  - Vermont
- American
  - Charlotte
  - East Carolina
  - Florida Atlantic
  - Memphis
  - North Texas
  - Rice
  - Temple
  - Tulane
  - Tulsa
  - UAB
  - USF
  - UTSA
  - Wichita State
- Atlantic 10
  - Davidson
  - Dayton
  - Duquesne
  - Fordham
  - George Mason
  - George Washington
  - La Salle
  - Loyola-Chicago
  - Richmond
  - St. Josephs
  - Saint Louis
  - St. Bonaventure
  - Rhode Island
  - VCU
- ACC
  - Boston College
  - California
  - Clemson
  - Duke
  - Florida State
  - Georgia Tech
  - Louisville
  - Miami
  - NC State
  - North Carolina
  - Notre Dame
  - Pitt
  - SMU
  - Stanford
  - Syracuse
  - Virginia
  - Virginia Tech
  - Wake Forest
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
  - Arizona
  - Arizona State
  - Baylor
  - BYU
  - Cincinnati
  - Colorado
  - Houston
  - Iowa State
  - Kansas
  - Kansas State
  - Oklahoma State
  - TCU
  - Texas Tech
  - UCF
  - Utah
  - West Virginia
- Big East
  - Butler
  - Creighton
  - Depaul
  - Georgetown
  - Marquette
  - Providence
  - Seton Hall
  - St. John’s
  - UConn
  - Villanova
  - Xavier
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
  - Illinois
  - Indiana
  - Iowa
  - Maryland
  - Michigan State
  - Minnesota
  - Nebraska
  - Northwestern
  - Ohio State
  - Oregon
  - Penn State
  - Purdue
  - Rutgers
  - UCLA
  - USC
  - Washington
  - Wisconsin
- Big West
- Coastal
  - Campbell
  - Charleston
  - Drexel
  - Elon
  - Hampton
  - Hofstra
  - Monmouth
  - North Carolina A&T
  - Northeastern
  - Stony Brook
  - Towson
  - UNC Wilmington
  - William & Mary
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
  - Brown
  - Columbia
  - Cornell
  - Dartmouth
  - Harvard
  - Pennsylvania
  - Princeton
  - Yale
- MAAC
  - Canisius
  - Fairfield
  - Iona
  - Manhattan
  - Marist
  - Merrimack
  - Mt. St. Mary’s
  - Niagara
  - Quinnipiac
  - Rider
  - Sacred Heart
  - Saint Peter’s
  - Siena
- Mid-American
  - Akron
  - Ball State
  - Bowling Green
  - Buffalo
  - Central Michigan
  - Eastern Michigan
  - Kent State
  - Miami (OH)
  - Northern Illinois
  - Ohio
  - Toledo
  - UMass
  - Western Michigan
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
  - Belmont
  - Bradley
  - Drake
  - Evansville
  - Illinois State
  - Indiana State
  - Murray State
  - Northern Iowa
  - Southern Illinois
  - UIC
  - Valparaiso
- Mountain West
  - Air Force
  - Boise State
  - Colorado State
  - Fresno State
  - Grand Canyon
  - Nevada
  - New Mexico
  - San Diego State
  - San Jose State
  - UNLV
  - Utah State
  - Wyoming
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
  - American
  - Army
  - Boston University
  - Bucknell
  - Colgate
  - Holy Cross
  - Lafayette
  - Lehigh
  - Loyola (MD)
  - Navy
- SEC
  - Alabama
  - Arkansas
  - Auburn
  - Florida
  - Georgia
  - Kentucky
  - LSU
  - Mississippi State
  - Missouri
  - Oklahoma
  - Ole Miss
  - South Carolina
  - Tennessee
  - Texas
  - Texas A&M
  - Vanderbilt
- Southern
  - Chattanooga
  - East Tennessee State
  - Furman
  - Mercer
  - Samford
  - The Citadel
  - UNC Greensboro
  - VMI
  - Western Carolina
  - Wofford
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Games
Models
Statistics
Efficiency Trajectories
Articles
Contact

Search for:

Standings
Statistics
Trend Lab

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	5.277	109	-0.8805	282
2	SF Austin	1.245	151	0.9878	72
3	UT Rio Grande	-2.017	180	0.9462	76
4	Texas A&M-CC	-11.296	263	-0.9468	286
5	New Orleans	-11.663	266	0.7378	93
6	Lamar	-14.121	289	-1.3232	311
7	Nicholls	-15.479	296	-1.6092	332
8	SE Louisiana	-19.909	327	-1.8089	341
9	Houston Baptist	-20.739	329	-0.8734	280
10	Northwestern St	-20.800	330	-0.0221	182
11	Incarnate Word	-21.414	334	-1.3913	317
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	-22.913	343	-0.5313	250

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.212	28	-0.0089	230
2	SF Austin	0.174	44	0.0097	82
3	UT Rio Grande	0.049	154	0.0222	28
4	Lamar	-0.007	203	-0.0035	195
5	Texas A&M-CC	-0.020	219	0.0042	120
6	Incarnate Word	-0.045	242	-0.0096	237
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	-0.067	262	-0.0003	167
8	New Orleans	-0.078	274	0.0241	24
9	Nicholls	-0.096	287	0.0018	143
10	Houston Baptist	-0.121	309	-0.0012	177
11	SE Louisiana	-0.136	319	-0.0027	188
12	Northwestern St	-0.145	329	0.0167	44

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1685.900	28	13.6151	55
2	SF Austin	1605.683	70	27.8912	8
3	Texas A&M-CC	1486.482	200	-3.8366	231
4	UT Rio Grande	1478.140	208	22.3463	16
5	Nicholls	1461.089	230	-10.7731	284
6	Lamar	1399.328	300	-16.8371	326
7	New Orleans	1398.608	301	21.0161	21
8	Northwestern St	1382.533	311	-8.3857	263
9	SE Louisiana	1380.999	315	-20.0994	344
10	Incarnate Word	1367.026	324	-6.8722	255
11	Houston Baptist	1360.933	329	1.7411	158
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	1320.292	350	-4.9360	242

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.582	45	0.0013	224
2	SF Austin	0.552	75	0.0069	128
3	UT Rio Grande	0.498	184	0.0141	40
4	New Orleans	0.486	209	0.0007	229
5	Texas A&M-CC	0.485	213	-0.0008	248
6	Nicholls	0.470	238	0.0059	148
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.438	298	0.0034	184
8	Houston Baptist	0.430	307	0.0041	175
9	Lamar	0.429	309	-0.0003	244
10	Incarnate Word	0.427	315	-0.0046	306
11	Northwestern St	0.420	324	0.0041	174
12	SE Louisiana	0.414	333	-0.0016	264

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	0.544	65	0.0101	69
2	SF Austin	0.522	148	0.0053	132
3	McNeese	0.514	185	-0.0137	340
4	Nicholls	0.510	204	-0.0088	298
5	Incarnate Word	0.504	232	0.0049	136
6	New Orleans	0.502	243	-0.0031	223
7	Houston Baptist	0.501	250	-0.0064	266
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.496	275	0.0073	97
9	Texas A&M-CC	0.492	287	0.0096	74
10	Northwestern St	0.492	289	-0.0103	312
11	Lamar	0.478	326	-0.0172	354
12	SE Louisiana	0.470	336	0.0058	123

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1.162	41	-0.0234	334
2	SF Austin	1.129	82	0.0246	50
3	UT Rio Grande	1.120	92	0.0195	76
4	Incarnate Word	1.093	140	0.0009	196
5	New Orleans	1.047	248	0.0067	152
6	Nicholls	1.041	264	-0.0163	302
7	Texas A&M-CC	1.039	269	0.0216	61
8	Northwestern St	1.027	289	-0.0225	331
9	Lamar	1.020	300	-0.0391	357
10	Houston Baptist	1.014	314	-0.0072	250
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.999	328	0.0118	117
12	SE Louisiana	0.975	343	0.0076	142

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.129	21	-0.0106	33
2	McNeese	0.132	25	-0.0106	32
3	Incarnate Word	0.154	178	-0.0075	77
4	Nicholls	0.161	226	0.0038	313
5	UT Rio Grande	0.163	239	-0.0059	109
6	Northwestern St	0.165	249	-0.0027	183
7	Lamar	0.169	277	0.0058	329
8	SE Louisiana	0.171	292	-0.0036	154
9	Texas A&M-CC	0.174	304	0.0016	279
10	Houston Baptist	0.175	312	-0.0014	215
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.179	325	-0.0081	64
12	New Orleans	0.190	351	-0.0008	233

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	33.800	35	-0.0354	344
2	Lamar	33.710	36	-0.0057	130
3	New Orleans	33.620	37	0.0110	21
4	SF Austin	32.170	66	-0.0126	197
5	Incarnate Word	29.730	134	-0.0390	356
6	Houston Baptist	28.320	179	-0.0088	167
7	Texas A&M-CC	27.750	203	-0.0114	188
8	SE Louisiana	26.920	228	-0.0080	152
9	Nicholls	26.320	242	0.0037	59
10	UT Rio Grande	26.050	255	-0.0175	244
11	Northwestern St	23.050	327	-0.0326	335
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	22.940	329	-0.0137	219

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	0.475	3	0.0196	49
2	Texas A&M-CC	0.433	34	-0.0107	257
3	SE Louisiana	0.415	55	-0.0055	223
4	Northwestern St	0.413	58	0.0076	129
5	McNeese	0.402	77	0.0143	77
6	Houston Baptist	0.364	166	-0.0065	229
7	Nicholls	0.362	173	-0.0028	204
8	Incarnate Word	0.348	212	-0.0007	178
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.322	272	0.0108	105
10	SF Austin	0.315	287	0.0010	162
11	UT Rio Grande	0.293	333	0.0060	134
12	Lamar	0.287	340	-0.0145	282

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	113.544	137	-0.3691	313
2	SF Austin	109.970	192	1.7014	27
3	UT Rio Grande	109.071	210	0.8081	144
4	New Orleans	106.394	249	0.8077	145
5	Incarnate Word	104.489	280	-0.5834	331
6	Nicholls	103.767	290	0.2915	237
7	Houston Baptist	101.203	317	-0.0090	278
8	Lamar	101.182	319	0.0842	268
9	Northwestern St	100.894	324	-0.2711	303
10	Texas A&M-CC	100.502	328	-0.1407	285
11	SE Louisiana	98.019	346	-0.3617	310
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	97.587	348	0.3443	225

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	40.742	40	0.5703	105
2	McNeese	40.698	44	-1.1503	343
3	UT Rio Grande	39.778	75	0.5791	102
4	Incarnate Word	38.191	157	0.0263	186
5	Lamar	37.532	193	-0.7541	312
6	Texas A&M-CC	36.593	243	0.6237	96
7	Nicholls	36.135	272	-0.5512	284
8	Houston Baptist	35.986	277	0.2428	154
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	35.338	304	0.5113	114
10	Northwestern St	34.975	315	-0.7314	306
11	New Orleans	34.772	321	0.1230	169
12	SE Louisiana	33.415	349	0.5076	116

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	90.272	5	0.7561	85
2	Lamar	88.312	15	0.4749	123
3	McNeese	86.758	40	-0.7753	292
4	Incarnate Word	85.888	69	-0.4451	255
5	UT Rio Grande	84.560	141	-0.0264	197
6	Nicholls	82.906	223	0.1238	170
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	81.560	286	0.1715	165
8	Houston Baptist	81.326	291	0.3819	134
9	Texas A&M-CC	80.810	304	0.3494	140
10	SE Louisiana	80.443	317	0.2019	160
11	Northwestern St	79.178	341	-0.8469	297
12	New Orleans	78.045	356	-0.1831	224

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	47.096	74	-0.9904	328
2	UT Rio Grande	47.063	75	0.8386	68
3	Texas A&M-CC	45.382	177	0.5629	112
4	SF Austin	45.169	188	0.3430	138
5	New Orleans	44.752	214	0.1581	157
6	Incarnate Word	44.506	224	0.2654	145
7	Houston Baptist	44.382	233	0.1583	156
8	Northwestern St	44.165	249	-0.4673	265
9	Nicholls	43.632	281	-0.7023	299
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	43.251	292	0.7066	89
11	Lamar	42.596	317	-1.0907	332
12	SE Louisiana	41.555	334	0.5353	115

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	68.270	33	-1.2243	303
2	Northwestern St	66.423	60	2.7820	8
3	New Orleans	66.298	62	0.4931	126
4	Lamar	65.805	74	0.3249	143
5	McNeese	65.166	94	-0.7556	267
6	Houston Baptist	63.705	118	1.9606	27
7	Incarnate Word	60.809	176	-1.4370	316
8	SE Louisiana	60.192	188	-0.4703	231
9	SF Austin	60.168	189	0.1336	165
10	UT Rio Grande	56.009	272	-0.2212	200
11	Nicholls	55.472	288	-1.0594	292
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	53.684	325	-0.3223	210

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	31.202	11	-0.4816	271
2	Lamar	27.682	123	0.2379	146
3	Texas A&M-CC	27.620	127	-0.1060	202
4	SF Austin	27.443	133	0.2306	147
5	Houston Baptist	26.610	169	1.5626	16
6	New Orleans	26.295	184	0.8736	60
7	Northwestern St	26.120	191	0.2250	150
8	UT Rio Grande	26.039	197	0.3787	116
9	Incarnate Word	25.594	223	-0.2547	233
10	SE Louisiana	24.341	289	0.3608	122
11	Nicholls	23.585	315	-0.2422	230
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	23.121	327	0.4873	105

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	58.257	23	0.4912	130
2	McNeese	56.471	42	-1.1597	302
3	Texas A&M-CC	55.062	67	-0.8551	274
4	SF Austin	54.158	92	0.7691	97
5	Northwestern St	52.636	136	1.5518	40
6	Incarnate Word	52.230	142	-1.4869	326
7	Houston Baptist	51.675	159	1.9327	27
8	New Orleans	51.481	165	0.3143	149
9	SE Louisiana	48.505	231	-0.3174	226
10	UT Rio Grande	47.374	262	-0.0668	192
11	Nicholls	45.935	291	-0.8027	269
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	43.784	334	-0.2231	212

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	55.753	58	1.2702	53
2	McNeese	55.223	72	0.4297	126
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	52.853	172	1.5029	45
4	Houston Baptist	51.653	221	1.0878	66
5	Nicholls	51.227	233	0.0451	187
6	New Orleans	51.083	240	1.2667	54
7	SF Austin	50.772	257	-0.0073	194
8	Texas A&M-CC	50.314	278	0.4746	118
9	SE Louisiana	50.276	280	0.9753	73
10	Northwestern St	49.609	294	-0.9914	306
11	Incarnate Word	49.103	309	0.9558	74
12	Lamar	47.441	339	0.0644	184

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	46.316	41	0.3223	156
2	Nicholls	44.528	78	1.0594	74
3	UT Rio Grande	43.991	94	0.2212	166
4	SF Austin	39.832	177	-0.1336	201
5	SE Louisiana	39.808	178	0.4703	135
6	Incarnate Word	39.191	190	1.4370	50
7	Houston Baptist	36.295	248	-1.9606	339
8	McNeese	34.834	272	0.7556	99
9	Lamar	34.195	292	-0.3249	223
10	New Orleans	33.702	304	-0.4931	240
11	Northwestern St	33.577	306	-2.7820	358
12	Texas A&M-CC	31.730	333	1.2243	63

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	13.739	49	0.2004	142
2	SF Austin	13.299	66	0.3397	107
3	Incarnate Word	12.598	102	0.2811	119
4	Nicholls	12.550	107	-0.3090	258
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	12.218	125	0.0239	183
6	Lamar	9.850	272	-0.9920	354
7	McNeese	9.496	291	-0.6687	322
8	Houston Baptist	9.377	297	-1.3198	361
9	SE Louisiana	9.073	317	0.1468	153
10	Texas A&M-CC	8.974	323	0.7297	46
11	Northwestern St	8.854	326	-0.9564	350
12	New Orleans	8.477	334	-0.7506	333

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	37.776	66	0.3946	136
2	UT Rio Grande	37.186	80	0.0404	181
3	Nicholls	36.970	87	0.9265	80
4	SF Austin	36.115	113	-0.0129	190
5	Incarnate Word	33.658	166	1.0418	72
6	SE Louisiana	31.937	210	0.5193	123
7	McNeese	30.287	249	0.3844	138
8	Lamar	30.055	254	-0.0162	191
9	Houston Baptist	29.651	265	-1.5509	335
10	New Orleans	26.564	334	-0.4974	249
11	Northwestern St	26.542	335	-2.3987	358
12	Texas A&M-CC	25.748	342	1.2045	61

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	36.491	48	0.7671	109
2	UT Rio Grande	36.487	49	0.6276	119
3	Incarnate Word	36.424	51	0.0362	180
4	Texas A&M-CC	35.002	130	1.3829	61
5	Nicholls	34.280	175	-1.4375	314
6	Northwestern St	33.501	213	-0.5696	251
7	Lamar	33.252	228	-3.0906	365
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	32.009	281	0.0633	175
9	McNeese	31.445	304	-2.5780	359
10	New Orleans	31.208	314	-2.0630	347
11	Houston Baptist	30.813	326	-2.8868	363
12	SE Louisiana	28.901	360	-0.2120	207

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	47.480	3	1.9590	49
2	Texas A&M-CC	43.270	34	-1.0688	257
3	SE Louisiana	41.500	55	-0.5533	223
4	Northwestern St	41.340	58	0.7630	129
5	McNeese	40.160	77	1.4332	77
6	Houston Baptist	36.440	166	-0.6528	229
7	Nicholls	36.210	173	-0.2835	204
8	Incarnate Word	34.830	212	-0.0743	178
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	32.160	272	1.0821	105
10	SF Austin	31.540	287	0.0977	162
11	UT Rio Grande	29.280	333	0.5958	134
12	Lamar	28.750	340	-1.4491	282

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	26.640	9	1.1742	53
2	McNeese	25.337	28	0.6285	107
3	Northwestern St	23.930	54	0.1658	161
4	Texas A&M-CC	21.726	159	0.1854	159
5	SE Louisiana	21.621	166	-0.3999	247
6	Houston Baptist	20.674	196	-0.0200	190
7	Incarnate Word	20.331	212	-0.2465	228
8	Nicholls	19.323	249	-0.2152	221
9	UT Rio Grande	18.676	276	0.5874	113
10	SF Austin	18.128	307	0.9849	71
11	Lamar	17.123	337	-1.4093	332
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	17.024	339	0.1591	162

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	35.616	14	1.5963	40
2	McNeese	33.594	39	1.0643	77
3	Northwestern St	32.213	70	0.3330	148
4	Texas A&M-CC	32.119	74	-0.5454	247
5	SE Louisiana	31.801	87	-0.2042	206
6	Houston Baptist	29.445	170	-0.4152	230
7	Nicholls	29.167	183	-0.0115	180
8	Incarnate Word	28.337	211	-0.5243	242
9	SF Austin	26.618	263	0.7203	108
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	25.170	310	0.8732	97
11	UT Rio Grande	24.606	324	0.5241	127
12	Lamar	24.459	331	-1.1235	294

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	76.312	45	0.4317	161
2	McNeese	74.968	80	-0.5171	265
3	New Orleans	74.414	98	-0.0115	215
4	Northwestern St	73.991	119	-0.1945	230
5	Incarnate Word	71.360	216	-0.8659	287
6	Houston Baptist	69.896	260	0.8431	130
7	SE Louisiana	68.809	288	-0.3558	249
8	SF Austin	68.713	291	1.4522	88
9	Lamar	68.248	309	-2.7354	355
10	Texas A&M-CC	67.890	318	1.6712	67
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	67.028	333	-1.0255	301
12	Nicholls	66.746	339	-0.8717	288

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	64.316	8	-0.4028	201
2	UT Rio Grande	61.542	22	-0.9621	249
3	Houston Baptist	58.135	54	-0.6109	222
4	Lamar	55.645	102	-1.7434	299
5	SE Louisiana	52.427	177	0.1536	158
6	Nicholls	51.965	191	0.2193	150
7	New Orleans	51.755	199	1.8249	45
8	Texas A&M-CC	51.333	208	-0.8184	240
9	Northwestern St	51.231	213	-0.8903	243
10	SF Austin	49.132	265	-0.7374	233
11	McNeese	48.922	274	-0.3946	200
12	Incarnate Word	45.130	338	0.8798	90

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	5.991	1	-0.9142	13
2	SF Austin	7.082	20	-0.9515	11
3	Incarnate Word	8.135	89	-0.5092	56
4	UT Rio Grande	8.628	146	0.1585	231
5	Nicholls	8.628	147	0.7054	336
6	Texas A&M-CC	8.852	184	0.3899	286
7	Northwestern St	9.540	258	0.0139	195
8	SE Louisiana	9.648	267	0.5282	319
9	Houston Baptist	9.800	285	-0.1065	157
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	9.839	289	0.0570	205
11	Lamar	10.836	341	0.7965	344
12	New Orleans	10.926	344	-0.3561	82

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	3.425	26	-0.3521	59
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	4.262	142	-0.0590	161
3	Nicholls	4.428	180	0.0087	184
4	UT Rio Grande	4.477	188	-0.2364	89
5	SE Louisiana	4.503	192	-0.1212	140
6	Northwestern St	4.519	194	-0.5111	22
7	Incarnate Word	4.545	201	0.4608	323
8	Houston Baptist	4.733	225	0.2600	274
9	Lamar	4.865	243	0.0585	199
10	SF Austin	5.008	267	0.3650	306
11	New Orleans	5.045	274	-0.6240	11
12	Texas A&M-CC	5.559	325	-0.4943	27

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	28.607	8	0.6516	107
2	Northwestern St	26.542	41	0.8785	81
3	SE Louisiana	26.535	42	-0.0650	234
4	McNeese	24.675	140	0.7746	92
5	Texas A&M-CC	24.190	175	1.0350	56
6	Nicholls	23.669	204	0.2696	160
7	Incarnate Word	22.845	253	1.1403	46
8	Houston Baptist	22.506	277	0.4505	138
9	Lamar	22.467	281	-0.6950	321
10	SF Austin	21.650	321	0.4739	133
11	UT Rio Grande	21.647	322	0.7127	101
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	20.327	354	0.6138	112

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	71.777	95	-0.2385	154
2	Nicholls	69.597	205	-0.8889	261
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	69.453	210	-1.6701	351
4	Texas A&M-CC	68.535	250	-1.1594	299
5	SF Austin	67.934	278	-1.1428	295
6	McNeese	67.778	287	-0.0910	113
7	Lamar	67.361	297	-0.2788	160
8	UT Rio Grande	67.166	306	-1.4053	329
9	Incarnate Word	66.912	318	-1.6701	350
10	SE Louisiana	66.693	329	-0.0157	102
11	Northwestern St	66.440	333	-0.9814	276
12	Houston Baptist	65.539	350	-0.3354	168

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.475	31	0.0121	295
2	UT Rio Grande	0.480	40	-0.0082	70
3	New Orleans	0.487	58	-0.0177	25
4	McNeese	0.491	68	-0.0087	68
5	Texas A&M-CC	0.507	129	0.0062	224
6	Lamar	0.510	150	0.0090	259
7	SE Louisiana	0.525	231	0.0088	256
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.528	250	0.0007	166
9	Northwestern St	0.534	274	-0.0125	43
10	Nicholls	0.546	310	-0.0122	47
11	Incarnate Word	0.547	317	0.0015	178
12	Houston Baptist	0.547	317	-0.0194	18

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.975	25	0.0167	266
2	McNeese	0.987	32	-0.0140	64
3	UT Rio Grande	1.018	68	-0.0104	84
4	Texas A&M-CC	1.023	76	0.0047	183
5	Lamar	1.046	117	0.0144	251
6	SE Louisiana	1.077	204	0.0113	231
7	New Orleans	1.088	235	-0.0286	28
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	1.095	248	0.0165	265
9	Nicholls	1.096	251	-0.0062	120
10	Northwestern St	1.104	274	-0.0231	39
11	Houston Baptist	1.110	288	-0.0340	15
12	Incarnate Word	1.141	327	0.0024	164

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.221	3	0.0048	50
2	Nicholls	0.190	18	-0.0136	349
3	Texas A&M-CC	0.183	33	-0.0015	154
4	SE Louisiana	0.173	79	-0.0048	224
5	SF Austin	0.160	142	-0.0061	254
6	Houston Baptist	0.160	150	0.0036	61
7	Lamar	0.160	150	0.0003	113
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.158	157	-0.0048	228
9	Northwestern St	0.156	185	-0.0083	291
10	UT Rio Grande	0.152	209	-0.0106	324
11	Incarnate Word	0.142	269	-0.0056	244
12	New Orleans	0.133	330	-0.0046	221

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	74.740	63	0.0082	127
2	Lamar	73.450	113	-0.0002	220
3	Texas A&M-CC	73.260	124	0.0134	71
4	UT Rio Grande	70.910	222	0.0128	80
5	SE Louisiana	70.880	225	0.0006	209
6	Incarnate Word	70.600	237	0.0059	142
7	Houston Baptist	70.310	256	-0.0040	254
8	Northwestern St	68.790	305	0.0187	33
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	68.530	315	-0.0091	307
10	New Orleans	68.480	316	0.0056	150
11	McNeese	68.210	322	-0.0077	292
12	Nicholls	67.600	330	0.0138	66

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	0.308	68	-0.0091	138
2	SF Austin	0.310	71	-0.0263	31
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.352	167	-0.0172	78
4	Northwestern St	0.378	240	-0.0365	8
5	Nicholls	0.392	275	-0.0175	76
6	UT Rio Grande	0.397	281	0.0263	339
7	New Orleans	0.404	293	0.0099	267
8	SE Louisiana	0.422	318	-0.0119	119
9	Incarnate Word	0.429	323	-0.0343	11
10	McNeese	0.436	331	0.0119	275
11	Lamar	0.451	344	0.0030	218
12	Texas A&M-CC	0.481	357	0.0168	304

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	108.267	100	0.4728	158
2	SF Austin	108.726	108	0.9116	238
3	UT Rio Grande	111.088	153	-0.0474	77
4	Texas A&M-CC	111.799	165	0.6014	182
5	Lamar	115.302	223	1.4057	304
6	SE Louisiana	117.927	269	1.4279	312
7	New Orleans	118.057	273	0.0714	101
8	Nicholls	119.246	292	1.9275	341
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	120.500	310	0.9589	245
10	Northwestern St	121.693	327	-0.1774	59
11	Houston Baptist	121.942	328	0.9100	237
12	Incarnate Word	125.903	349	0.8679	232

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	31.717	5	-0.6720	55
2	Texas A&M-CC	34.202	41	0.0583	157
3	UT Rio Grande	34.881	63	-0.4137	82
4	Lamar	35.000	66	0.4942	238
5	SF Austin	35.331	81	1.5976	345
6	SE Louisiana	36.403	124	1.0550	303
7	New Orleans	36.472	128	-1.0209	29
8	Nicholls	37.858	219	-0.1896	117
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.636	264	0.5984	257
10	Northwestern St	38.662	266	-0.1406	125
11	Incarnate Word	39.802	316	0.6869	266
12	Houston Baptist	40.705	333	-1.0965	24

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	76.162	3	-0.9922	46
2	McNeese	76.932	5	-0.7066	73
3	Lamar	79.208	44	-0.2855	135
4	Nicholls	79.234	45	1.3688	315
5	SE Louisiana	79.938	57	0.4446	227
6	Incarnate Word	82.182	118	1.5365	320
7	UT Rio Grande	82.909	154	-0.2903	133
8	Northwestern St	83.298	172	1.6176	324
9	SF Austin	83.628	186	1.1372	289
10	Houston Baptist	84.875	248	0.4491	228
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	84.968	256	1.2245	303
12	New Orleans	86.187	308	0.0946	184

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	41.487	37	-0.4904	94
2	UT Rio Grande	42.156	50	-0.2428	118
3	New Orleans	42.307	54	-1.1667	36
4	SF Austin	42.334	55	1.2947	325
5	Lamar	44.396	147	0.9660	290
6	Texas A&M-CC	45.070	192	0.5825	235
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	45.716	234	-0.0505	145
8	SE Louisiana	45.740	236	1.0952	310
9	Northwestern St	46.513	276	-1.0772	39
10	Houston Baptist	48.091	328	-1.4824	22
11	Nicholls	48.118	329	-1.0526	41
12	Incarnate Word	48.556	341	-0.1588	133

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	53.184	15	-0.3342	142
2	New Orleans	59.683	156	0.9381	284
3	UT Rio Grande	61.695	227	1.5912	330
4	Northwestern St	61.719	228	0.5581	246
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	61.929	235	-0.9139	87
6	Houston Baptist	62.168	243	0.6387	253
7	Nicholls	62.190	244	-1.6965	27
8	SE Louisiana	62.278	247	1.4660	323
9	Lamar	62.522	253	-0.0088	184
10	Incarnate Word	64.697	308	-1.0310	69
11	SF Austin	64.860	311	-1.1889	60
12	Texas A&M-CC	65.200	322	0.1438	200

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	19.890	3	0.0281	162
2	Lamar	24.459	89	0.6793	275
3	UT Rio Grande	25.205	123	0.5428	253
4	New Orleans	25.401	130	0.0565	169
5	SE Louisiana	25.509	137	1.3427	337
6	Texas A&M-CC	25.584	143	0.1092	179
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	26.646	225	0.1942	192
8	SF Austin	26.700	227	1.6770	356
9	Northwestern St	27.189	256	-0.1150	134
10	Nicholls	27.545	274	-0.0670	143
11	Houston Baptist	29.465	339	-0.3327	101
12	Incarnate Word	29.708	343	-0.1287	133

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	41.052	5	-0.6944	85
2	Nicholls	48.926	130	-0.4899	110
3	Lamar	49.404	147	-0.2630	135
4	Texas A&M-CC	49.421	148	-0.5299	105
5	SE Louisiana	49.688	156	1.4253	312
6	UT Rio Grande	51.016	204	0.9909	285
7	Northwestern St	51.468	219	1.4215	311
8	New Orleans	51.682	231	0.9295	278
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	52.609	271	-0.0344	164
10	Houston Baptist	52.624	275	0.9012	272
11	Incarnate Word	52.909	284	0.0180	174
12	SF Austin	54.220	314	-0.2394	139

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	48.972	56	0.7987	236
2	New Orleans	49.539	76	-0.7458	87
3	Lamar	49.650	80	1.7455	330
4	SF Austin	49.665	81	3.3631	364
5	UT Rio Grande	50.114	95	-0.0807	151
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	50.888	129	0.3038	186
7	SE Louisiana	51.824	174	1.3616	297
8	Texas A&M-CC	52.520	208	0.9779	255
9	Northwestern St	53.367	238	-1.6932	35
10	Houston Baptist	55.923	315	-1.3889	49
11	Incarnate Word	56.450	328	-0.4392	109
12	Nicholls	56.783	335	0.3781	196

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	34.800	44	-0.1438	166
2	SF Austin	35.140	55	1.1889	306
3	Incarnate Word	35.303	58	1.0310	297
4	Lamar	37.478	113	0.0088	182
5	SE Louisiana	37.722	119	-1.4660	43
6	Nicholls	37.810	122	1.6965	339
7	Houston Baptist	37.832	123	-0.6387	113
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.071	131	0.9139	279
9	Northwestern St	38.281	138	-0.5581	120
10	UT Rio Grande	38.305	139	-1.5912	36
11	New Orleans	40.317	210	-0.9381	82
12	McNeese	46.816	351	0.3342	224

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	8.617	13	-0.0509	166
2	SF Austin	8.631	14	-0.0794	162
3	UT Rio Grande	9.675	50	-0.9564	19
4	Incarnate Word	10.095	77	0.8155	325
5	Nicholls	10.313	95	-0.1227	148
6	Lamar	10.541	118	-0.1850	131
7	SE Louisiana	10.893	160	-0.2877	110
8	New Orleans	11.071	176	-1.0774	15
9	Houston Baptist	11.240	192	-0.7638	36
10	Northwestern St	11.473	218	-0.0256	168
11	McNeese	11.827	249	-0.7001	40
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	11.989	260	0.4042	267

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	26.741	17	-0.4624	120
2	Incarnate Word	29.273	59	1.5185	325
3	SF Austin	29.408	61	1.3766	319
4	Lamar	29.804	70	-0.0225	181
5	SE Louisiana	30.251	84	-0.9808	70
6	Nicholls	30.308	86	1.8587	340
7	Northwestern St	31.830	138	0.1961	204
8	UT Rio Grande	31.893	140	-1.2812	46
9	Houston Baptist	32.251	151	-0.4522	121
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	32.359	155	1.2589	306
11	New Orleans	34.505	245	-0.8349	90
12	McNeese	35.880	288	-0.0122	182

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	29.237	11	-1.7671	32
2	UT Rio Grande	30.725	34	-1.4066	50
3	New Orleans	31.606	58	-2.5166	9
4	McNeese	32.310	90	-2.0427	25
5	Texas A&M-CC	32.336	91	0.3867	212
6	Nicholls	33.981	187	-2.1548	20
7	Houston Baptist	34.312	211	-2.2830	16
8	Incarnate Word	34.552	225	0.5563	226
9	Lamar	34.941	248	-0.0138	174
10	SE Louisiana	35.722	289	0.2774	199
11	Northwestern St	35.877	294	-0.4312	130
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	36.726	328	-0.2875	144

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	30.800	68	-0.9067	138
2	SF Austin	30.980	71	-2.6328	31
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	35.190	167	-1.7183	78
4	Northwestern St	37.750	240	-3.6538	8
5	Nicholls	39.220	275	-1.7515	76
6	UT Rio Grande	39.660	281	2.6296	339
7	New Orleans	40.410	293	0.9900	267
8	SE Louisiana	42.160	318	-1.1901	119
9	Incarnate Word	42.870	323	-3.4296	11
10	McNeese	43.610	331	1.1877	275
11	Lamar	45.050	344	0.3020	218
12	Texas A&M-CC	48.060	357	1.6813	304

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	18.256	60	-1.4470	27
2	Houston Baptist	18.314	61	-0.4350	127
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	20.222	138	0.0496	185
4	Northwestern St	21.578	207	-2.0053	10
5	UT Rio Grande	22.348	253	0.7464	273
6	McNeese	23.464	294	0.6464	263
7	Nicholls	23.531	301	-0.1075	168
8	SE Louisiana	24.032	312	-0.6885	97
9	Lamar	24.055	314	0.6445	262
10	Incarnate Word	24.397	322	-1.9488	12
11	New Orleans	24.807	332	0.2610	216
12	Texas A&M-CC	25.262	342	0.4059	240

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	25.388	62	-1.8675	29
2	Houston Baptist	25.558	68	-0.5379	135
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	28.902	170	-0.8311	105
4	Nicholls	30.249	233	-0.7963	110
5	Northwestern St	30.712	255	-2.3676	12
6	UT Rio Grande	32.308	295	2.1498	349
7	McNeese	32.397	298	1.0746	295
8	SE Louisiana	32.707	306	-0.5615	132
9	Incarnate Word	34.030	331	-2.2655	19
10	New Orleans	34.250	335	0.9901	288
11	Lamar	34.997	340	-0.0529	183
12	Texas A&M-CC	35.459	348	0.8641	270

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	67.990	17	1.3950	282
2	UT Rio Grande	69.114	42	-2.3613	19
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	69.335	52	2.3594	336
4	Incarnate Word	70.864	113	-1.7179	39
5	Texas A&M-CC	70.904	116	-0.7222	101
6	Northwestern St	71.167	126	-1.5096	47
7	SF Austin	71.421	135	-1.9939	29
8	McNeese	71.444	137	-0.2488	140
9	New Orleans	72.075	176	-1.1365	64
10	Houston Baptist	72.504	203	-0.4853	122
11	SE Louisiana	72.736	217	-0.8243	90
12	Nicholls	78.396	364	2.0067	319

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	46.394	43	0.3768	219
2	Texas A&M-CC	49.214	109	-1.8946	59
3	SE Louisiana	51.561	161	2.6983	342
4	Northwestern St	51.585	162	-1.7819	66
5	Incarnate Word	51.589	163	-1.2188	102
6	Houston Baptist	54.302	243	-1.6024	78
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	55.449	266	-1.1237	112
8	Nicholls	55.915	285	1.0414	270
9	McNeese	56.962	304	-3.3380	17
10	Lamar	58.259	324	1.1798	280
11	UT Rio Grande	59.525	339	0.1048	194
12	New Orleans	59.982	343	-1.0033	118

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	14.889	1	0.4463	54
2	Nicholls	12.340	17	-1.0174	349
3	Texas A&M-CC	10.472	92	0.1254	127
4	SE Louisiana	10.089	116	-0.2819	211
5	SF Austin	9.789	134	-0.5998	297
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	9.713	145	0.2373	102
7	Houston Baptist	9.460	165	0.1338	123
8	Northwestern St	9.123	195	-1.0413	351
9	Lamar	8.927	207	-0.2873	213
10	UT Rio Grande	8.531	241	-0.8208	335
11	New Orleans	7.829	307	-0.0381	156
12	Incarnate Word	7.769	309	-0.3875	240

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	6.424	33	-0.7558	353
2	Lamar	6.270	39	-0.4703	322
3	Houston Baptist	5.663	80	0.7104	16
4	New Orleans	5.286	114	0.0825	139
5	SF Austin	5.214	122	0.0671	143
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	4.547	193	-0.3672	290
7	SE Louisiana	4.125	249	-0.0470	178
8	UT Rio Grande	4.074	253	-0.0597	181
9	Nicholls	3.896	273	-0.0339	176
10	Texas A&M-CC	3.819	280	-0.1656	223
11	Incarnate Word	3.596	298	-0.7673	354
12	Northwestern St	3.402	315	0.1821	110

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	23.386	77	0.0254	208
2	SF Austin	23.782	98	-0.3327	136
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	24.328	128	-0.4781	113
4	Northwestern St	25.380	198	-0.9843	38
5	Nicholls	26.123	249	-0.4286	124
6	Lamar	26.174	251	-0.1241	176
7	UT Rio Grande	26.461	270	0.9350	348
8	SE Louisiana	27.097	304	-0.7031	76
9	New Orleans	27.338	315	0.5811	312
10	Incarnate Word	27.369	316	-1.4851	9
11	McNeese	28.549	348	0.3327	266
12	Texas A&M-CC	30.161	363	0.5252	303

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	72.170	78	-0.2537	166
2	Nicholls	69.588	209	-1.1886	314
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	69.262	218	-1.5760	345
4	UT Rio Grande	68.821	243	-1.4345	338
5	Texas A&M-CC	68.481	262	-0.2792	171
6	McNeese	67.742	285	-0.2967	174
7	SF Austin	67.622	294	-1.1317	311
8	Lamar	67.323	306	-0.3764	194
9	Northwestern St	66.626	328	-0.8557	275
10	SE Louisiana	66.306	341	0.3194	65
11	Incarnate Word	65.902	348	-1.1052	307
12	Houston Baptist	65.530	354	0.0944	96

Location invert reset

Result invert reset

Game Type invert reset

Points Per Possession reset

Mean
Std
Median
Min
Max

selected out of records.

Showing - of

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Envo Magazine