Conferences – HoopSci

College Basketball Analytics, Insights, and Trends

Conferences
- America East
- American
- Atlantic 10
- ACC
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
- Big East
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
- Big West
- Coastal
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
- MAAC
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
- SEC
- Southern
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Teams
- America East
  - Albany
  - Bryant
  - Binghamton
  - Maine
  - New Hampshire
  - NJIT
  - UMass Lowell
  - UMBC
  - Vermont
- American
  - Charlotte
  - East Carolina
  - Florida Atlantic
  - Memphis
  - North Texas
  - Rice
  - Temple
  - Tulane
  - Tulsa
  - UAB
  - USF
  - UTSA
  - Wichita State
- Atlantic 10
  - Davidson
  - Dayton
  - Duquesne
  - Fordham
  - George Mason
  - George Washington
  - La Salle
  - Loyola-Chicago
  - Richmond
  - St. Josephs
  - Saint Louis
  - St. Bonaventure
  - Rhode Island
  - VCU
- ACC
  - Boston College
  - California
  - Clemson
  - Duke
  - Florida State
  - Georgia Tech
  - Louisville
  - Miami
  - NC State
  - North Carolina
  - Notre Dame
  - Pitt
  - SMU
  - Stanford
  - Syracuse
  - Virginia
  - Virginia Tech
  - Wake Forest
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
  - Arizona
  - Arizona State
  - Baylor
  - BYU
  - Cincinnati
  - Colorado
  - Houston
  - Iowa State
  - Kansas
  - Kansas State
  - Oklahoma State
  - TCU
  - Texas Tech
  - UCF
  - Utah
  - West Virginia
- Big East
  - Butler
  - Creighton
  - Depaul
  - Georgetown
  - Marquette
  - Providence
  - Seton Hall
  - St. John’s
  - UConn
  - Villanova
  - Xavier
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
  - Illinois
  - Indiana
  - Iowa
  - Maryland
  - Michigan State
  - Minnesota
  - Nebraska
  - Northwestern
  - Ohio State
  - Oregon
  - Penn State
  - Purdue
  - Rutgers
  - UCLA
  - USC
  - Washington
  - Wisconsin
- Big West
- Coastal
  - Campbell
  - Charleston
  - Drexel
  - Elon
  - Hampton
  - Hofstra
  - Monmouth
  - North Carolina A&T
  - Northeastern
  - Stony Brook
  - Towson
  - UNC Wilmington
  - William & Mary
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
  - Brown
  - Columbia
  - Cornell
  - Dartmouth
  - Harvard
  - Pennsylvania
  - Princeton
  - Yale
- MAAC
  - Canisius
  - Fairfield
  - Iona
  - Manhattan
  - Marist
  - Merrimack
  - Mt. St. Mary’s
  - Niagara
  - Quinnipiac
  - Rider
  - Sacred Heart
  - Saint Peter’s
  - Siena
- Mid-American
  - Akron
  - Ball State
  - Bowling Green
  - Buffalo
  - Central Michigan
  - Eastern Michigan
  - Kent State
  - Miami (OH)
  - Northern Illinois
  - Ohio
  - Toledo
  - UMass
  - Western Michigan
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
  - Belmont
  - Bradley
  - Drake
  - Evansville
  - Illinois State
  - Indiana State
  - Murray State
  - Northern Iowa
  - Southern Illinois
  - UIC
  - Valparaiso
- Mountain West
  - Air Force
  - Boise State
  - Colorado State
  - Fresno State
  - Grand Canyon
  - Nevada
  - New Mexico
  - San Diego State
  - San Jose State
  - UNLV
  - Utah State
  - Wyoming
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
  - American
  - Army
  - Boston University
  - Bucknell
  - Colgate
  - Holy Cross
  - Lafayette
  - Lehigh
  - Loyola (MD)
  - Navy
- SEC
  - Alabama
  - Arkansas
  - Auburn
  - Florida
  - Georgia
  - Kentucky
  - LSU
  - Mississippi State
  - Missouri
  - Oklahoma
  - Ole Miss
  - South Carolina
  - Tennessee
  - Texas
  - Texas A&M
  - Vanderbilt
- Southern
  - Chattanooga
  - East Tennessee State
  - Furman
  - Mercer
  - Samford
  - The Citadel
  - UNC Greensboro
  - VMI
  - Western Carolina
  - Wofford
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Games
Models
Statistics
Efficiency Trajectories
Articles
Contact

Search for:

Standings
Statistics
Trend Lab

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	6.551	104	-0.7235	252
2	SF Austin	2.974	130	1.8981	32
3	UT Rio Grande	-2.475	186	0.7522	107
4	Lamar	-11.003	261	-0.7613	258
5	Texas A&M-CC	-12.157	271	-1.1874	297
6	New Orleans	-12.351	274	0.7615	106
7	Nicholls	-16.184	303	-1.6577	320
8	SE Louisiana	-18.441	319	-1.4800	306
9	Houston Baptist	-21.044	330	-1.0710	286
10	Northwestern St	-21.320	334	-0.5269	232
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	-21.451	335	-0.2950	210
12	Incarnate Word	-23.663	342	-1.6191	316

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.217	30	-0.0092	240
2	SF Austin	0.177	46	0.0169	49
3	UT Rio Grande	0.042	162	0.0222	33
4	Lamar	-0.006	200	0.0008	153
5	Texas A&M-CC	-0.025	220	0.0039	119
6	Incarnate Word	-0.045	242	-0.0092	239
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	-0.062	253	0.0008	152
8	New Orleans	-0.083	274	0.0228	28
9	Nicholls	-0.103	284	0.0015	146
10	Houston Baptist	-0.123	303	-0.0052	207
11	SE Louisiana	-0.140	322	-0.0026	193
12	Northwestern St	-0.157	331	0.0131	67

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1667.056	38	11.1525	68
2	SF Austin	1606.132	67	28.1616	6
3	Texas A&M-CC	1470.303	217	-5.4395	240
4	UT Rio Grande	1461.148	231	17.8082	27
5	Nicholls	1454.597	240	-11.2959	291
6	Lamar	1443.107	257	-5.4096	238
7	SE Louisiana	1393.401	302	-16.8347	333
8	New Orleans	1387.068	311	15.9910	36
9	Northwestern St	1379.458	319	-10.6099	281
10	Incarnate Word	1359.122	334	-3.4863	214
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	1353.274	337	0.1168	178
12	Houston Baptist	1352.346	338	-0.9473	192

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.576	54	0.0027	205
2	SF Austin	0.561	65	0.0084	124
3	UT Rio Grande	0.494	190	0.0126	67
4	Texas A&M-CC	0.481	217	-0.0007	256
5	New Orleans	0.478	221	-0.0019	274
6	Nicholls	0.460	246	0.0071	139
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.456	256	0.0089	116
8	Lamar	0.448	272	0.0036	191
9	Houston Baptist	0.418	319	0.0009	235
10	Northwestern St	0.417	322	0.0028	203
11	SE Louisiana	0.413	330	0.0012	231
12	Incarnate Word	0.412	332	-0.0055	308

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	0.534	95	0.0014	170
2	McNeese	0.522	151	0.0006	183
3	SF Austin	0.521	152	0.0011	174
4	Nicholls	0.513	187	0.0037	133
5	Houston Baptist	0.505	218	-0.0118	324
6	New Orleans	0.504	227	-0.0002	193
7	Incarnate Word	0.497	256	-0.0073	280
8	Northwestern St	0.495	271	-0.0115	322
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.491	285	0.0018	161
10	Lamar	0.488	291	0.0002	187
11	Texas A&M-CC	0.480	315	-0.0048	250
12	SE Louisiana	0.465	337	0.0006	184

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1.179	28	-0.0010	204
2	SF Austin	1.124	89	0.0176	84
3	UT Rio Grande	1.112	102	0.0292	37
4	Incarnate Word	1.091	144	-0.0109	280
5	Nicholls	1.050	242	0.0031	160
6	New Orleans	1.044	256	0.0125	110
7	Lamar	1.042	260	0.0026	167
8	Northwestern St	1.036	275	-0.0146	299
9	Texas A&M-CC	1.029	283	-0.0034	221
10	Houston Baptist	1.021	301	-0.0020	212
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.990	330	-0.0078	258
12	SE Louisiana	0.964	344	-0.0134	290

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.132	23	-0.0109	29
2	McNeese	0.135	36	-0.0111	26
3	Nicholls	0.157	185	-0.0079	57
4	Incarnate Word	0.159	199	0.0041	306
5	Lamar	0.163	230	-0.0072	74
6	UT Rio Grande	0.164	240	-0.0095	40
7	Northwestern St	0.167	261	-0.0059	97
8	Texas A&M-CC	0.170	280	-0.0025	192
9	Houston Baptist	0.174	296	-0.0053	114
10	SE Louisiana	0.175	302	0.0056	319
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.185	337	-0.0031	174
12	New Orleans	0.189	345	-0.0066	87

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	34.870	22	-0.0294	328
2	Lamar	33.340	46	-0.0175	256
3	New Orleans	32.720	59	-0.0023	96
4	SF Austin	31.930	81	-0.0207	277
5	Incarnate Word	30.920	106	-0.0141	212
6	Houston Baptist	28.360	181	-0.0100	163
7	UT Rio Grande	26.770	233	0.0081	33
8	SE Louisiana	26.760	235	-0.0038	108
9	Texas A&M-CC	26.710	236	-0.0402	358
10	Nicholls	25.590	273	-0.0282	326
11	Northwestern St	23.690	322	-0.0262	315
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	22.230	340	-0.0366	353

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	0.478	5	0.0659	1
2	Texas A&M-CC	0.453	18	0.0328	24
3	Northwestern St	0.413	60	-0.0006	190
4	SE Louisiana	0.410	64	-0.0176	296
5	McNeese	0.393	101	-0.0110	265
6	Houston Baptist	0.374	148	0.0043	160
7	Nicholls	0.371	160	0.0052	155
8	Incarnate Word	0.351	206	0.0086	137
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.324	265	0.0146	93
10	SF Austin	0.320	275	0.0214	62
11	Lamar	0.297	325	0.0098	128
12	UT Rio Grande	0.292	332	0.0255	47

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	114.762	118	0.0545	256
2	SF Austin	109.404	189	2.1049	17
3	UT Rio Grande	107.926	217	0.2893	226
4	New Orleans	105.833	256	1.1531	96
5	Nicholls	103.966	279	0.5106	196
6	Lamar	103.601	286	0.5103	197
7	Incarnate Word	103.402	287	-0.8839	339
8	Houston Baptist	101.950	300	0.4859	201
9	Northwestern St	101.764	302	0.1585	238
10	Texas A&M-CC	99.053	334	-0.6150	324
11	SE Louisiana	96.806	347	-0.4759	311
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	96.551	349	0.3232	220

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	41.462	30	0.1820	150
2	SF Austin	40.642	45	-0.0210	183
3	UT Rio Grande	39.516	86	0.2933	130
4	Incarnate Word	38.092	160	-1.0202	333
5	Lamar	38.074	161	0.2223	144
6	Nicholls	36.346	251	0.4041	113
7	Texas A&M-CC	36.081	267	-1.0044	332
8	Houston Baptist	35.911	279	-0.3792	248
9	Northwestern St	35.199	306	-0.4425	260
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	34.906	310	-0.3250	237
11	New Orleans	34.606	316	-0.2459	224
12	SE Louisiana	33.007	352	-0.0065	180

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	89.994	5	-0.1479	203
2	Lamar	88.027	22	-0.2537	226
3	McNeese	87.343	30	0.6470	100
4	Incarnate Word	86.193	52	-0.4772	251
5	UT Rio Grande	84.988	116	0.6726	97
6	Nicholls	82.658	232	-0.6117	276
7	Houston Baptist	81.019	293	0.3638	135
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	80.886	301	-1.2658	329
9	Texas A&M-CC	80.576	309	-1.4048	338
10	SE Louisiana	80.395	319	0.2509	153
11	Northwestern St	79.394	333	0.1021	176
12	New Orleans	77.724	355	-1.5400	348

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	47.715	53	-0.1036	196
2	UT Rio Grande	46.469	114	0.2032	150
3	SF Austin	45.155	182	0.1158	170
4	Texas A&M-CC	44.890	205	-0.4654	253
5	New Orleans	44.756	210	0.4524	113
6	Houston Baptist	44.434	228	-0.6462	286
7	Northwestern St	44.340	236	-0.5682	272
8	Incarnate Word	44.227	244	-0.9196	317
9	Nicholls	43.984	255	0.8168	68
10	Lamar	43.329	287	0.2910	136
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	43.038	299	0.4319	117
12	SE Louisiana	41.061	346	-0.1536	209

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	68.833	25	-0.3945	229
2	Lamar	66.420	63	2.4248	9
3	New Orleans	66.249	64	1.8927	28
4	McNeese	65.399	81	-0.2305	210
5	Northwestern St	65.204	86	1.3537	61
6	Houston Baptist	63.074	126	1.7121	37
7	Incarnate Word	61.354	161	-1.1516	293
8	SF Austin	60.345	186	1.0293	90
9	SE Louisiana	59.973	194	-0.5663	247
10	UT Rio Grande	56.535	264	-0.3083	219
11	Nicholls	56.147	268	1.4488	53
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	53.904	322	0.0180	187

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	31.484	7	-0.2934	221
2	Lamar	27.838	117	0.6023	81
3	Texas A&M-CC	27.546	129	-0.8438	307
4	SF Austin	27.403	131	0.0456	174
5	UT Rio Grande	26.050	198	0.3764	113
6	Houston Baptist	26.040	200	0.4907	101
7	Northwestern St	26.034	203	0.4247	109
8	New Orleans	25.831	212	0.6170	77
9	Incarnate Word	25.640	218	-1.2495	345
10	SE Louisiana	23.830	306	-0.4060	250
11	Nicholls	23.820	307	1.2021	30
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	22.882	329	0.2725	135

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	58.658	16	1.8132	30
2	McNeese	57.032	34	0.0510	179
3	Texas A&M-CC	55.370	61	-1.3735	322
4	SF Austin	54.026	92	0.8804	94
5	Incarnate Word	52.891	120	-1.2172	307
6	Northwestern St	51.848	149	1.1211	68
7	New Orleans	51.189	169	0.4334	143
8	Houston Baptist	50.922	174	1.6982	37
9	SE Louisiana	48.309	233	-0.3515	230
10	UT Rio Grande	47.977	241	0.1469	166
11	Nicholls	46.338	281	0.8139	100
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	43.626	331	-0.6544	260

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	55.127	79	-0.4039	221
2	UT Rio Grande	54.840	92	0.7137	96
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	52.527	186	1.7410	26
4	Nicholls	51.363	232	1.4835	41
5	Houston Baptist	51.331	236	-0.7119	270
6	SF Austin	50.632	262	-0.6374	259
7	New Orleans	50.509	267	0.6962	98
8	Northwestern St	50.183	277	-0.0592	183
9	Texas A&M-CC	49.962	280	-0.4075	225
10	SE Louisiana	49.405	296	-0.7926	276
11	Incarnate Word	48.524	316	-1.2672	315
12	Lamar	47.402	335	-0.2630	209

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	46.096	44	-0.0180	179
2	Nicholls	43.853	98	-1.4488	313
3	UT Rio Grande	43.465	102	0.3083	147
4	SE Louisiana	40.027	172	0.5663	119
5	SF Austin	39.655	180	-1.0293	276
6	Incarnate Word	38.646	205	1.1516	73
7	Houston Baptist	36.926	240	-1.7121	329
8	Northwestern St	34.796	280	-1.3537	305
9	McNeese	34.601	285	0.2305	156
10	New Orleans	33.751	302	-1.8927	338
11	Lamar	33.580	303	-2.4248	357
12	Texas A&M-CC	31.167	341	0.3945	137

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	13.466	58	-0.0831	207
2	SF Austin	13.239	68	-0.0666	199
3	Nicholls	12.526	107	-0.7980	339
4	Incarnate Word	12.452	110	0.2293	126
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	12.024	132	-0.5975	317
6	Lamar	10.236	244	-0.3800	276
7	McNeese	9.978	267	0.4755	78
8	Houston Baptist	9.871	273	-0.8699	347
9	SE Louisiana	9.177	304	0.3995	88
10	Northwestern St	9.165	305	-0.8672	346
11	New Orleans	8.775	325	-0.8629	344
12	Texas A&M-CC	8.534	332	-0.1605	227

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	37.260	77	-0.6114	240
2	UT Rio Grande	37.011	87	0.5257	127
3	Nicholls	36.320	106	-1.4256	331
4	SF Austin	35.968	115	-1.0282	281
5	Incarnate Word	33.303	178	0.7400	101
6	SE Louisiana	32.086	208	0.6023	114
7	McNeese	30.312	247	0.5960	115
8	Houston Baptist	30.097	252	-1.3344	319
9	Lamar	29.369	271	-2.0669	352
10	Northwestern St	27.547	313	-1.0190	280
11	New Orleans	26.535	330	-1.9734	351
12	Texas A&M-CC	25.206	346	-0.0313	176

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	36.698	44	1.0775	86
2	Incarnate Word	36.311	64	0.1748	173
3	UT Rio Grande	35.995	80	-0.2488	217
4	Lamar	35.204	110	1.2445	77
5	Nicholls	34.773	134	-0.5685	258
6	Texas A&M-CC	33.958	195	-0.2776	224
7	Northwestern St	33.385	216	-2.1580	352
8	McNeese	33.012	235	0.6272	133
9	New Orleans	32.176	273	-1.4056	319
10	Houston Baptist	31.999	280	-1.6779	339
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	31.804	290	-0.9244	292
12	SE Louisiana	29.232	353	0.5154	144

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	47.770	5	6.5885	1
2	Texas A&M-CC	45.310	18	3.2811	24
3	Northwestern St	41.340	60	-0.0582	190
4	SE Louisiana	41.030	64	-1.7570	296
5	McNeese	39.280	101	-1.0974	265
6	Houston Baptist	37.420	148	0.4286	160
7	Nicholls	37.130	160	0.5166	155
8	Incarnate Word	35.070	206	0.8559	137
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	32.360	265	1.4578	93
10	SF Austin	31.960	275	2.1427	62
11	Lamar	29.660	325	0.9763	128
12	UT Rio Grande	29.230	332	2.5457	47

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	26.445	14	2.6062	8
2	McNeese	25.014	33	-0.9420	292
3	Northwestern St	24.016	60	0.2875	163
4	Texas A&M-CC	22.174	138	1.8304	33
5	Houston Baptist	21.213	175	1.2621	76
6	SE Louisiana	21.193	176	-1.7233	344
7	Incarnate Word	20.433	211	0.7189	119
8	Nicholls	19.751	234	0.2980	159
9	UT Rio Grande	18.711	279	2.4204	12
10	SF Austin	17.849	309	1.8689	29
11	Lamar	17.828	310	0.2057	169
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	17.129	338	0.4988	134

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	35.481	16	3.7969	2
2	Texas A&M-CC	32.990	49	1.9262	47
3	McNeese	32.982	51	-0.7055	258
4	Northwestern St	32.249	73	-0.0873	203
5	SE Louisiana	31.231	113	-1.3635	301
6	Houston Baptist	30.157	155	0.6129	141
7	Nicholls	29.727	167	0.4410	152
8	Incarnate Word	28.607	204	0.2987	165
9	SF Austin	26.588	269	2.2439	27
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	25.099	312	0.8117	122
11	Lamar	24.998	316	0.4659	151
12	UT Rio Grande	24.733	321	2.4896	15

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	76.374	36	2.2953	34
2	McNeese	75.364	65	-1.2337	296
3	New Orleans	74.158	111	-0.6892	261
4	Northwestern St	74.112	113	0.8823	123
5	Incarnate Word	71.792	198	2.8462	17
6	Houston Baptist	70.154	242	2.9356	15
7	Lamar	69.500	270	-0.5400	241
8	SE Louisiana	68.290	305	-3.4054	359
9	SF Austin	67.958	311	0.8074	132
10	Texas A&M-CC	67.553	317	1.8403	64
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	67.496	319	0.7451	139
12	Nicholls	66.981	329	-0.1845	219

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	64.241	9	-0.4487	208
2	UT Rio Grande	62.021	21	0.8618	91
3	Houston Baptist	59.690	37	2.2656	30
4	Lamar	55.592	100	-1.5727	287
5	SE Louisiana	52.931	170	-0.0906	175
6	Northwestern St	52.419	182	0.8147	93
7	Nicholls	51.827	202	-0.4635	212
8	Texas A&M-CC	51.368	214	-1.6799	295
9	New Orleans	50.862	227	1.0194	83
10	McNeese	48.996	273	-0.4883	214
11	SF Austin	48.936	276	-1.6200	292
12	Incarnate Word	44.809	335	1.0703	80

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	6.238	1	-0.5831	39
2	SF Austin	7.182	22	-1.2733	2
3	Nicholls	8.137	91	-0.4970	56
4	UT Rio Grande	8.324	107	-0.2224	122
5	Incarnate Word	8.434	125	0.5990	319
6	Texas A&M-CC	8.533	141	0.1965	241
7	Northwestern St	9.544	260	-0.2587	110
8	SE Louisiana	9.651	269	1.1954	363
9	Houston Baptist	9.739	278	-0.2780	104
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	9.854	291	0.4273	292
11	Lamar	10.365	317	0.0785	203
12	New Orleans	11.006	344	-0.6274	26

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	3.556	44	-0.2238	92
2	Nicholls	4.256	144	-0.4641	31
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	4.260	145	-0.1112	141
4	Incarnate Word	4.309	161	0.3708	292
5	SE Louisiana	4.525	196	-0.3692	49
6	Houston Baptist	4.649	215	0.3121	277
7	UT Rio Grande	4.683	226	0.2969	271
8	Northwestern St	4.719	233	-0.4666	30
9	SF Austin	4.842	249	0.0514	201
10	Lamar	4.871	253	0.2912	270
11	New Orleans	5.359	309	-0.0460	164
12	Texas A&M-CC	5.723	335	-0.0481	161

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	28.659	7	1.7543	21
2	SE Louisiana	26.227	61	-0.6084	313
3	Northwestern St	26.206	62	0.4247	173
4	McNeese	24.046	175	-0.4366	295
5	Nicholls	23.963	179	1.1247	69
6	Texas A&M-CC	23.928	183	2.4160	1
7	Houston Baptist	22.518	263	1.5006	35
8	Lamar	22.508	265	-0.7176	320
9	Incarnate Word	22.365	276	1.2917	53
10	UT Rio Grande	21.638	310	1.6633	27
11	SF Austin	21.395	324	1.0338	77
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	20.057	355	0.2746	199

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	72.116	92	0.2954	60
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	70.489	168	-0.4885	199
3	Nicholls	69.985	196	-0.5427	210
4	Texas A&M-CC	69.418	221	0.2366	69
5	SF Austin	68.254	272	-0.8635	260
6	Incarnate Word	67.862	287	-0.6083	219
7	McNeese	67.705	293	-0.3995	186
8	UT Rio Grande	67.594	299	-1.4797	338
9	Lamar	67.416	307	-0.4237	194
10	Northwestern St	66.931	318	-0.6298	223
11	SE Louisiana	66.546	333	-1.2494	316
12	Houston Baptist	65.510	353	-0.7583	248

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.465	19	0.0038	215
2	UT Rio Grande	0.483	52	-0.0083	78
3	McNeese	0.493	79	-0.0079	84
4	New Orleans	0.494	84	-0.0180	18
5	Texas A&M-CC	0.505	133	-0.0006	148
6	Lamar	0.508	144	-0.0001	159
7	SE Louisiana	0.515	186	-0.0048	109
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.524	232	-0.0149	31
9	Northwestern St	0.543	293	-0.0142	32
10	Incarnate Word	0.552	328	0.0152	312
11	Nicholls	0.555	335	0.0048	227
12	Houston Baptist	0.556	336	-0.0107	52

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.960	15	-0.0024	140
2	McNeese	0.994	43	-0.0138	70
3	UT Rio Grande	1.017	68	-0.0120	80
4	Texas A&M-CC	1.023	79	0.0087	209
5	Lamar	1.047	128	0.0255	298
6	SE Louisiana	1.063	177	-0.0043	128
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	1.080	222	-0.0139	68
8	New Orleans	1.096	256	-0.0414	8
9	Nicholls	1.109	276	0.0287	310
10	Houston Baptist	1.122	302	-0.0261	23
11	Northwestern St	1.124	305	-0.0211	41
12	Incarnate Word	1.154	333	0.0394	343

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.218	4	0.0017	104
2	Nicholls	0.196	16	-0.0104	319
3	Texas A&M-CC	0.184	35	-0.0041	213
4	SE Louisiana	0.175	74	-0.0081	284
5	SF Austin	0.162	147	0.0010	116
6	Houston Baptist	0.159	163	0.0054	51
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.159	163	-0.0127	341
8	Northwestern St	0.158	168	-0.0041	210
9	UT Rio Grande	0.157	173	-0.0095	304
10	Lamar	0.154	204	-0.0236	365
11	Incarnate Word	0.141	287	-0.0171	360
12	New Orleans	0.136	321	0.0076	27

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	74.610	63	0.0043	152
2	Lamar	73.960	87	0.0078	121
3	Texas A&M-CC	72.980	122	0.0139	58
4	SE Louisiana	71.030	213	0.0099	99
5	UT Rio Grande	70.590	229	0.0040	156
6	Houston Baptist	70.560	232	0.0018	181
7	Incarnate Word	70.460	237	0.0104	95
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	69.420	277	0.0170	39
9	New Orleans	68.740	301	0.0115	86
10	McNeese	68.310	317	0.0140	57
11	Northwestern St	67.450	328	0.0022	177
12	Nicholls	66.640	337	-0.0086	292

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	0.312	73	0.0056	219
2	SF Austin	0.317	83	-0.0361	9
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.360	193	-0.0139	89
4	UT Rio Grande	0.382	241	0.0072	231
5	Northwestern St	0.397	275	-0.0210	49
6	Nicholls	0.407	295	-0.0060	147
7	New Orleans	0.408	297	0.0202	308
8	SE Louisiana	0.429	321	-0.0127	97
9	McNeese	0.443	334	0.0194	306
10	Lamar	0.456	341	0.0047	214
11	Incarnate Word	0.461	345	0.0226	319
12	Texas A&M-CC	0.485	359	0.0459	361

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	106.430	76	0.4481	162
2	McNeese	108.211	107	0.7260	201
3	UT Rio Grande	110.401	143	-0.3455	60
4	Texas A&M-CC	111.210	158	0.3164	139
5	Lamar	114.604	227	1.2679	268
6	SE Louisiana	115.247	238	0.9788	239
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	118.002	279	0.7194	200
8	New Orleans	118.184	283	0.3936	155
9	Nicholls	120.150	307	2.1935	345
10	Houston Baptist	122.994	333	1.6119	310
11	Northwestern St	123.084	334	0.7692	206
12	Incarnate Word	127.065	357	0.8072	215

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	31.781	6	-0.8066	50
2	Texas A&M-CC	34.073	38	-0.3740	92
3	SF Austin	34.441	49	0.6319	258
4	Lamar	34.895	68	0.6189	256
5	UT Rio Grande	34.958	71	-0.1828	129
6	SE Louisiana	35.611	97	0.2245	188
7	New Orleans	36.553	143	-1.9285	5
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.096	240	-0.6210	70
9	Nicholls	38.248	253	1.1271	318
10	Northwestern St	39.088	292	-0.3719	93
11	Incarnate Word	39.695	311	1.1456	319
12	Houston Baptist	41.149	340	-0.7426	57

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	76.084	3	-1.5125	33
2	McNeese	76.982	8	-1.6537	27
3	Nicholls	78.489	31	1.3922	313
4	Lamar	79.423	51	1.8469	336
5	SE Louisiana	79.747	56	0.9661	275
6	Incarnate Word	81.073	87	0.1391	181
7	Northwestern St	82.741	149	1.3484	310
8	UT Rio Grande	83.018	162	0.5857	237
9	SF Austin	83.354	182	0.9515	274
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	84.457	239	1.3928	314
11	Houston Baptist	84.546	244	-0.8776	69
12	New Orleans	85.446	289	-1.8950	13

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	41.419	40	0.3303	211
2	McNeese	41.528	43	-0.2173	121
3	UT Rio Grande	42.139	58	-0.5242	89
4	New Orleans	42.707	75	-1.3510	29
5	Lamar	44.069	133	-0.0884	146
6	SE Louisiana	44.858	181	-0.1939	124
7	Texas A&M-CC	44.956	191	0.2436	197
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	45.402	219	-1.5449	24
9	Northwestern St	47.361	307	-1.0970	40
10	Houston Baptist	48.777	341	-0.4241	99
11	Nicholls	49.045	351	0.5654	247
12	Incarnate Word	49.126	352	1.2239	310

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	53.648	17	1.4543	310
2	New Orleans	59.238	139	0.2471	208
3	UT Rio Grande	60.960	202	1.4626	311
4	Northwestern St	61.573	216	1.2341	293
5	SE Louisiana	62.010	235	1.0289	275
6	Houston Baptist	62.037	237	2.3580	351
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	62.235	244	-0.6889	107
8	Lamar	62.796	257	0.7568	255
9	Nicholls	63.452	277	0.4563	231
10	Incarnate Word	65.032	319	-0.5374	124
11	SF Austin	65.333	327	-2.0125	27
12	Texas A&M-CC	65.376	329	1.3670	301

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	19.825	3	0.2937	228
2	Lamar	24.120	72	0.2084	208
3	UT Rio Grande	24.791	105	0.2698	220
4	SE Louisiana	24.911	111	0.5324	260
5	New Orleans	25.141	132	-0.9453	32
6	Texas A&M-CC	25.482	147	0.1261	195
7	SF Austin	25.965	176	0.4982	256
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	26.318	208	-0.9788	30
9	Northwestern St	27.558	279	-0.0277	162
10	Nicholls	27.949	295	1.0755	311
11	Houston Baptist	29.649	339	0.4651	249
12	Incarnate Word	29.890	343	0.5730	266

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	41.451	6	0.1941	194
2	SE Louisiana	49.385	152	1.4762	307
3	Texas A&M-CC	49.435	155	-0.1623	154
4	Nicholls	49.468	157	1.2531	294
5	Lamar	49.764	169	1.6048	319
6	UT Rio Grande	50.568	196	1.7049	326
7	New Orleans	50.815	207	-0.9577	67
8	Northwestern St	51.022	214	1.8095	328
9	Houston Baptist	52.265	258	1.4888	309
10	Incarnate Word	52.543	274	-0.4363	122
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	52.550	275	0.1928	193
12	SF Austin	54.435	316	-0.9700	66

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	48.143	47	2.2534	346
2	McNeese	48.313	50	0.3412	201
3	Lamar	48.576	58	-1.0299	72
4	New Orleans	49.803	92	-1.0712	67
5	UT Rio Grande	49.927	98	-0.9529	81
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	50.358	108	-2.0908	19
7	SE Louisiana	50.872	132	-0.1383	156
8	Texas A&M-CC	52.192	196	0.3129	196
9	Northwestern St	54.587	281	-1.8075	29
10	Houston Baptist	56.578	327	-0.6129	112
11	Nicholls	57.018	336	0.6958	247
12	Incarnate Word	57.227	341	1.3349	302

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	34.624	37	-1.3670	65
2	SF Austin	34.667	39	2.0125	339
3	Incarnate Word	34.968	47	0.5374	242
4	Nicholls	36.548	89	-0.4563	135
5	Lamar	37.204	109	-0.7568	111
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	37.765	122	0.6889	259
7	Houston Baptist	37.963	129	-2.3580	15
8	SE Louisiana	37.990	131	-1.0289	91
9	Northwestern St	38.427	150	-1.2341	73
10	UT Rio Grande	39.040	164	-1.4626	55
11	New Orleans	40.762	227	-0.2471	158
12	McNeese	46.352	349	-1.4543	56

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	8.476	12	0.1337	200
2	Texas A&M-CC	8.590	14	-0.5001	72
3	Incarnate Word	9.805	65	0.5726	284
4	UT Rio Grande	10.167	84	-0.4526	85
5	Nicholls	10.299	93	0.0516	176
6	SE Louisiana	10.700	134	-0.3079	122
7	Lamar	10.775	147	0.4104	258
8	New Orleans	11.412	205	-0.9832	16
9	Houston Baptist	11.500	218	-1.2077	1
10	Northwestern St	11.530	221	-0.3442	111
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	11.779	244	0.3578	249
12	McNeese	11.956	262	-1.1003	8

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	26.649	15	-1.3502	44
2	Incarnate Word	28.530	43	0.5754	238
3	SF Austin	28.919	53	1.9215	340
4	Nicholls	29.020	55	0.1392	195
5	Lamar	29.659	70	0.2421	205
6	SE Louisiana	30.361	96	-0.5101	127
7	Northwestern St	31.718	138	-0.4611	131
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	31.906	142	1.2001	301
9	Houston Baptist	32.281	154	-2.3664	5
10	UT Rio Grande	32.449	160	-1.1193	69
11	New Orleans	34.630	253	-0.9373	84
12	McNeese	35.531	281	-1.8478	24

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	29.559	19	-0.9803	68
2	UT Rio Grande	31.754	70	0.4801	223
3	Texas A&M-CC	32.203	87	-0.8511	78
4	New Orleans	32.552	103	-2.2428	11
5	McNeese	32.925	124	-1.8425	21
6	Incarnate Word	34.814	229	1.7496	321
7	SE Louisiana	34.930	241	-0.5905	105
8	Houston Baptist	35.099	250	-2.2700	10
9	Nicholls	35.220	255	-0.0351	173
10	Lamar	35.590	271	1.5008	307
11	Northwestern St	36.252	307	-0.6212	101
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	36.760	331	-0.2098	151

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	31.230	73	0.5569	219
2	SF Austin	31.700	83	-3.6125	9
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	36.020	193	-1.3908	89
4	UT Rio Grande	38.150	241	0.7202	231
5	Northwestern St	39.680	275	-2.1023	49
6	Nicholls	40.690	295	-0.5972	147
7	New Orleans	40.760	297	2.0181	308
8	SE Louisiana	42.900	321	-1.2688	97
9	McNeese	44.300	334	1.9387	306
10	Lamar	45.550	341	0.4755	214
11	Incarnate Word	46.050	345	2.2549	319
12	Texas A&M-CC	48.480	359	4.5856	361

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	18.410	62	0.0920	189
2	SF Austin	18.629	69	-1.6324	18
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	20.075	133	-0.5090	104
4	UT Rio Grande	21.653	214	-0.3865	118
5	Northwestern St	22.664	261	-1.0179	60
6	McNeese	23.932	306	1.3362	316
7	Lamar	24.091	309	0.9137	279
8	Nicholls	24.144	312	0.5773	250
9	SE Louisiana	24.353	323	-0.5672	98
10	New Orleans	25.046	337	0.7052	258
11	Texas A&M-CC	25.584	342	2.1187	354
12	Incarnate Word	26.188	350	1.0800	295

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	25.781	69	0.3429	208
2	SF Austin	25.903	76	-2.6489	7
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	29.310	188	-0.5948	114
4	UT Rio Grande	31.062	250	0.8069	260
5	Nicholls	31.092	254	0.0025	175
6	Northwestern St	32.039	285	-1.1565	65
7	McNeese	32.683	301	0.8219	263
8	SE Louisiana	33.083	312	-0.6697	104
9	New Orleans	34.208	330	0.9485	274
10	Lamar	35.579	345	1.1003	279
11	Texas A&M-CC	35.584	346	2.2202	348
12	Incarnate Word	36.289	352	1.9723	336

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	67.272	18	0.0663	173
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	67.679	23	-0.3679	131
3	UT Rio Grande	69.547	68	-3.3002	7
4	Texas A&M-CC	71.584	152	1.3433	295
5	Northwestern St	71.894	168	-0.8038	90
6	Incarnate Word	71.907	170	-0.7635	94
7	SF Austin	72.171	183	1.1621	283
8	McNeese	72.392	198	2.8584	355
9	Houston Baptist	72.592	209	-0.4475	121
10	SE Louisiana	72.774	222	-0.3372	135
11	New Orleans	72.826	225	0.1975	184
12	Nicholls	78.380	363	2.8186	353

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	45.344	31	-1.3664	83
2	Texas A&M-CC	49.848	118	-3.7656	7
3	SE Louisiana	50.104	125	0.0084	187
4	Incarnate Word	52.421	191	0.7316	250
5	Northwestern St	52.669	193	-2.4244	42
6	Nicholls	55.147	256	-0.8017	130
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	55.923	283	-0.4958	157
8	Houston Baptist	56.263	292	2.0358	321
9	Lamar	58.261	322	3.8336	361
10	McNeese	58.778	330	-0.0015	186
11	UT Rio Grande	59.326	336	-1.9847	58
12	New Orleans	60.564	346	0.4735	234

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	14.672	2	0.1869	107
2	Nicholls	12.710	13	-0.5921	295
3	Texas A&M-CC	10.492	93	-0.2517	203
4	SE Louisiana	10.298	111	-0.4052	245
5	SF Austin	9.952	132	-0.0124	156
6	Northwestern St	9.765	152	0.0158	149
7	Houston Baptist	9.404	180	-0.2175	198
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	9.403	181	-0.6963	320
9	UT Rio Grande	8.815	218	-0.8170	336
10	Lamar	8.793	219	-1.6140	365
11	New Orleans	7.833	299	0.2678	89
12	Incarnate Word	7.592	318	-1.1651	361

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	6.830	22	-0.0609	196
2	Lamar	6.493	38	-0.4407	311
3	Houston Baptist	5.348	111	0.2693	96
4	New Orleans	5.226	118	-0.3222	281
5	SF Austin	5.187	122	-0.0492	193
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	4.512	196	-0.2643	261
7	UT Rio Grande	4.167	241	0.3043	84
8	SE Louisiana	4.060	247	-0.2065	239
9	Nicholls	3.965	258	0.5413	33
10	Incarnate Word	3.930	265	-0.5717	335
11	Texas A&M-CC	3.883	270	-0.3706	295
12	Northwestern St	3.302	326	0.3314	79

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	23.510	79	0.8644	324
2	SF Austin	23.948	105	-0.7139	55
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	24.523	132	-0.6594	63
4	Northwestern St	25.761	214	-1.3287	12
5	UT Rio Grande	26.047	232	0.3521	244
6	Lamar	26.550	269	0.3828	255
7	Nicholls	26.618	277	0.5644	282
8	New Orleans	27.163	301	0.1989	220
9	SE Louisiana	27.454	313	-0.8449	45
10	Incarnate Word	28.516	343	0.2365	228
11	McNeese	28.522	344	-0.3599	106
12	Texas A&M-CC	30.088	360	0.9178	327

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	72.452	77	0.1367	94
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	70.250	174	-0.7028	254
3	Nicholls	70.088	190	-0.9079	289
4	UT Rio Grande	69.397	230	-0.9717	295
5	Texas A&M-CC	68.989	247	0.8229	23
6	SF Austin	68.059	283	-0.6000	231
7	McNeese	67.983	285	-0.3434	190
8	Lamar	67.438	308	-0.6447	241
9	Northwestern St	67.182	316	-0.2496	167
10	Incarnate Word	66.543	331	-0.2134	161
11	SE Louisiana	66.086	348	-0.9561	293
12	Houston Baptist	65.538	354	-0.0540	132

Location invert reset

Result invert reset

Game Type invert reset

Points Per Possession reset

Mean
Std
Median
Min
Max

selected out of records.

Showing - of

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Envo Magazine