Conferences – HoopSci

College Basketball Analytics, Insights, and Trends

Conferences
- America East
- American
- Atlantic 10
- ACC
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
- Big East
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
- Big West
- Coastal
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
- MAAC
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
- SEC
- Southern
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Teams
- America East
  - Albany
  - Bryant
  - Binghamton
  - Maine
  - New Hampshire
  - NJIT
  - UMass Lowell
  - UMBC
  - Vermont
- American
  - Charlotte
  - East Carolina
  - Florida Atlantic
  - Memphis
  - North Texas
  - Rice
  - Temple
  - Tulane
  - Tulsa
  - UAB
  - USF
  - UTSA
  - Wichita State
- Atlantic 10
  - Davidson
  - Dayton
  - Duquesne
  - Fordham
  - George Mason
  - George Washington
  - La Salle
  - Loyola-Chicago
  - Richmond
  - St. Josephs
  - Saint Louis
  - St. Bonaventure
  - Rhode Island
  - VCU
- ACC
  - Boston College
  - California
  - Clemson
  - Duke
  - Florida State
  - Georgia Tech
  - Louisville
  - Miami
  - NC State
  - North Carolina
  - Notre Dame
  - Pitt
  - SMU
  - Stanford
  - Syracuse
  - Virginia
  - Virginia Tech
  - Wake Forest
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
  - Arizona
  - Arizona State
  - Baylor
  - BYU
  - Cincinnati
  - Colorado
  - Houston
  - Iowa State
  - Kansas
  - Kansas State
  - Oklahoma State
  - TCU
  - Texas Tech
  - UCF
  - Utah
  - West Virginia
- Big East
  - Butler
  - Creighton
  - Depaul
  - Georgetown
  - Marquette
  - Providence
  - Seton Hall
  - St. John’s
  - UConn
  - Villanova
  - Xavier
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
  - Illinois
  - Indiana
  - Iowa
  - Maryland
  - Michigan State
  - Minnesota
  - Nebraska
  - Northwestern
  - Ohio State
  - Oregon
  - Penn State
  - Purdue
  - Rutgers
  - UCLA
  - USC
  - Washington
  - Wisconsin
- Big West
- Coastal
  - Campbell
  - Charleston
  - Drexel
  - Elon
  - Hampton
  - Hofstra
  - Monmouth
  - North Carolina A&T
  - Northeastern
  - Stony Brook
  - Towson
  - UNC Wilmington
  - William & Mary
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
  - Brown
  - Columbia
  - Cornell
  - Dartmouth
  - Harvard
  - Pennsylvania
  - Princeton
  - Yale
- MAAC
  - Canisius
  - Fairfield
  - Iona
  - Manhattan
  - Marist
  - Merrimack
  - Mt. St. Mary’s
  - Niagara
  - Quinnipiac
  - Rider
  - Sacred Heart
  - Saint Peter’s
  - Siena
- Mid-American
  - Akron
  - Ball State
  - Bowling Green
  - Buffalo
  - Central Michigan
  - Eastern Michigan
  - Kent State
  - Miami (OH)
  - Northern Illinois
  - Ohio
  - Toledo
  - UMass
  - Western Michigan
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
  - Belmont
  - Bradley
  - Drake
  - Evansville
  - Illinois State
  - Indiana State
  - Murray State
  - Northern Iowa
  - Southern Illinois
  - UIC
  - Valparaiso
- Mountain West
  - Air Force
  - Boise State
  - Colorado State
  - Fresno State
  - Grand Canyon
  - Nevada
  - New Mexico
  - San Diego State
  - San Jose State
  - UNLV
  - Utah State
  - Wyoming
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
  - American
  - Army
  - Boston University
  - Bucknell
  - Colgate
  - Holy Cross
  - Lafayette
  - Lehigh
  - Loyola (MD)
  - Navy
- SEC
  - Alabama
  - Arkansas
  - Auburn
  - Florida
  - Georgia
  - Kentucky
  - LSU
  - Mississippi State
  - Missouri
  - Oklahoma
  - Ole Miss
  - South Carolina
  - Tennessee
  - Texas
  - Texas A&M
  - Vanderbilt
- Southern
  - Chattanooga
  - East Tennessee State
  - Furman
  - Mercer
  - Samford
  - The Citadel
  - UNC Greensboro
  - VMI
  - Western Carolina
  - Wofford
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Games
Models
Statistics
Efficiency Trajectories
Articles
Contact

Search for:

Standings
Statistics
Trend Lab

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	6.637	112	0.3743	151
2	SF Austin	2.766	142	3.4520	16
3	UT Rio Grande	-7.128	222	0.3810	150
4	Texas A&M-CC	-7.974	230	-0.9784	242
5	Lamar	-8.664	236	-0.2923	200
6	Nicholls	-11.536	261	-0.3083	202
7	New Orleans	-12.267	264	2.2742	56
8	SE Louisiana	-15.809	295	-0.6629	220
9	Incarnate Word	-16.635	304	-0.1056	181
10	Houston Baptist	-21.172	332	-0.7963	227
11	Northwestern St	-21.991	334	-1.8132	290
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	-22.846	339	0.1608	165

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.236	31	-0.0007	173
2	SF Austin	0.181	58	0.0288	27
3	UT Rio Grande	0.022	181	0.0123	92
4	Lamar	-0.011	206	-0.0012	176
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	-0.045	231	0.0078	113
6	Texas A&M-CC	-0.050	239	-0.0067	221
7	Incarnate Word	-0.053	242	0.0056	125
8	New Orleans	-0.091	270	0.0191	60
9	Houston Baptist	-0.126	293	-0.0169	285
10	Nicholls	-0.127	295	-0.0010	175
11	SE Louisiana	-0.160	321	-0.0086	233
12	Northwestern St	-0.193	337	-0.0032	197

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1638.331	42	10.9593	54
2	SF Austin	1540.213	127	13.4775	40
3	Lamar	1497.785	189	5.3167	111
4	Nicholls	1497.251	191	-1.9022	211
5	Texas A&M-CC	1494.587	199	-5.8727	247
6	Incarnate Word	1422.375	277	16.9887	23
7	Northwestern St	1415.093	286	1.3018	164
8	SE Louisiana	1411.521	289	-13.6066	321
9	UT Rio Grande	1387.409	316	0.0452	183
10	Houston Baptist	1343.430	344	2.3509	148
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	1340.992	347	3.5129	135
12	New Orleans	1338.024	349	5.8275	106

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.582	47	0.0114	114
2	SF Austin	0.536	101	0.0097	131
3	Texas A&M-CC	0.499	178	0.0085	144
4	Nicholls	0.491	193	0.0138	89
5	New Orleans	0.472	227	0.0033	204
6	UT Rio Grande	0.449	264	0.0012	220
7	Lamar	0.448	265	-0.0079	307
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.445	272	0.0215	39
9	Incarnate Word	0.441	279	0.0080	146
10	Northwestern St	0.421	315	0.0005	230
11	SE Louisiana	0.420	317	-0.0008	249
12	Houston Baptist	0.408	331	0.0008	225

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Nicholls	0.526	135	0.0185	18
2	McNeese	0.523	148	-0.0108	322
3	UT Rio Grande	0.523	148	0.0126	52
4	SF Austin	0.511	184	-0.0032	245
5	Houston Baptist	0.511	187	-0.0034	250
6	Northwestern St	0.504	219	0.0099	74
7	New Orleans	0.503	223	0.0143	36
8	Incarnate Word	0.490	268	-0.0185	359
9	Lamar	0.485	283	0.0176	22
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.483	290	-0.0103	318
11	Texas A&M-CC	0.468	328	0.0006	193
12	SE Louisiana	0.457	345	-0.0059	275

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1.198	21	-0.0036	256
2	SF Austin	1.113	122	0.0255	62
3	Incarnate Word	1.108	130	-0.0414	362
4	UT Rio Grande	1.084	169	0.0140	124
5	Nicholls	1.071	190	0.0265	57
6	Northwestern St	1.047	247	0.0164	108
7	New Orleans	1.040	258	0.0385	21
8	Lamar	1.033	268	0.0249	67
9	Texas A&M-CC	1.027	275	-0.0032	253
10	Houston Baptist	1.012	310	0.0036	195
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.987	330	-0.0165	320
12	SE Louisiana	0.962	342	-0.0219	338

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.132	22	-0.0170	4
2	McNeese	0.137	40	-0.0049	117
3	Incarnate Word	0.145	83	0.0033	270
4	Nicholls	0.165	220	0.0077	340
5	SE Louisiana	0.165	222	0.0053	308
6	Texas A&M-CC	0.169	243	0.0065	329
7	Lamar	0.172	263	0.0074	339
8	Houston Baptist	0.173	268	0.0070	335
9	UT Rio Grande	0.175	280	0.0034	273
10	Northwestern St	0.179	303	-0.0032	154
11	New Orleans	0.188	335	0.0001	217
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.199	352	0.0019	253

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	36.080	20	-0.0052	212
2	Lamar	33.550	55	-0.0057	219
3	New Orleans	33.030	67	0.0217	26
4	SF Austin	32.780	73	0.0071	106
5	Incarnate Word	28.750	180	-0.0372	362
6	Houston Baptist	26.970	235	-0.0017	181
7	Texas A&M-CC	26.870	242	-0.0189	309
8	Nicholls	26.450	252	0.0024	144
9	SE Louisiana	25.260	275	-0.0167	293
10	UT Rio Grande	24.220	295	-0.0161	291
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	23.650	315	-0.0032	195
12	Northwestern St	22.660	328	-0.0234	328

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	0.446	27	0.0314	37
2	SE Louisiana	0.415	66	0.0229	78
3	New Orleans	0.405	79	0.0237	72
4	Texas A&M-CC	0.386	132	0.0263	59
5	McNeese	0.384	136	-0.0048	264
6	Nicholls	0.372	156	-0.0019	237
7	Houston Baptist	0.370	160	0.0276	51
8	Incarnate Word	0.344	232	0.0070	173
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.311	298	0.0012	213
10	Lamar	0.308	303	0.0274	53
11	SF Austin	0.306	307	0.0034	195
12	UT Rio Grande	0.257	358	0.0089	156

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	116.693	95	1.0391	141
2	New Orleans	108.071	204	2.4978	35
3	SF Austin	107.847	206	3.2278	16
4	Nicholls	107.172	227	1.6481	86
5	UT Rio Grande	104.425	267	-0.5289	284
6	Incarnate Word	103.647	277	-0.2347	259
7	Northwestern St	103.554	281	0.7805	156
8	Lamar	102.626	292	-0.0570	246
9	Houston Baptist	102.329	294	1.1785	126
10	Texas A&M-CC	98.635	330	-1.4966	343
11	SE Louisiana	98.340	334	-0.1506	250
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	95.839	348	0.6532	170

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	42.332	15	-0.5208	280
2	SF Austin	41.027	43	0.7906	66
3	UT Rio Grande	39.224	109	0.1297	171
4	Incarnate Word	39.123	114	-1.9325	364
5	Lamar	37.476	199	0.1641	165
6	Texas A&M-CC	37.226	214	-0.6253	295
7	Nicholls	36.939	232	0.7598	68
8	Houston Baptist	36.238	259	-0.5685	285
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	34.993	301	-0.4584	268
10	New Orleans	34.982	302	0.8068	62
11	Northwestern St	34.824	307	0.2591	142
12	SE Louisiana	32.736	348	-1.0462	340

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	91.644	3	2.0685	15
2	McNeese	87.969	22	0.9818	70
3	Incarnate Word	87.212	36	-1.2163	319
4	Lamar	86.963	43	-2.0088	356
5	UT Rio Grande	85.138	98	-1.2144	318
6	Texas A&M-CC	83.226	199	-1.5637	337
7	Nicholls	82.590	230	-0.3847	234
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	81.205	277	0.2349	151
9	Houston Baptist	80.673	296	-1.0120	302
10	SE Louisiana	80.574	301	-1.4315	333
11	New Orleans	80.067	323	-0.3975	236
12	Northwestern St	77.157	358	-1.5688	339

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	48.357	50	-1.0252	330
2	UT Rio Grande	45.915	149	0.8766	65
3	Northwestern St	45.026	196	1.2777	28
4	Houston Baptist	45.022	197	-0.0998	212
5	Texas A&M-CC	44.937	202	0.0972	174
6	Incarnate Word	44.717	216	-1.5775	353
7	SF Austin	44.694	217	-0.1720	225
8	Nicholls	44.650	222	1.0993	35
9	New Orleans	43.942	256	1.0871	37
10	Lamar	43.237	280	1.3944	22
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	42.827	294	-0.6851	296
12	SE Louisiana	40.723	346	-0.5210	273

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	68.654	30	0.5992	115
2	Lamar	65.362	77	-0.4252	223
3	McNeese	64.972	89	-1.1737	290
4	Northwestern St	63.944	109	0.5591	121
5	New Orleans	62.567	139	-1.1212	282
6	Houston Baptist	62.297	147	1.3499	57
7	Incarnate Word	62.092	152	0.2399	151
8	SE Louisiana	60.277	183	0.4817	129
9	SF Austin	59.787	193	-0.5099	229
10	UT Rio Grande	57.307	242	-1.1712	289
11	Nicholls	54.500	306	-2.8760	349
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	53.626	322	0.6284	113

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	32.322	6	-0.5120	262
2	Texas A&M-CC	28.341	91	-0.4040	247
3	SF Austin	27.951	111	0.7374	69
4	Lamar	27.484	139	-0.1742	204
5	Incarnate Word	26.599	182	-1.2990	343
6	Houston Baptist	26.491	186	-0.0366	182
7	UT Rio Grande	25.565	226	-0.1611	201
8	Northwestern St	25.227	242	0.8757	55
9	New Orleans	24.786	256	0.2706	133
10	SE Louisiana	23.999	294	-0.8088	292
11	Nicholls	23.205	317	-0.5397	267
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	22.600	331	0.0518	171

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	57.240	32	-1.7068	326
2	McNeese	57.209	33	-0.4842	217
3	Texas A&M-CC	57.088	35	-0.5729	222
4	SF Austin	54.435	81	0.7488	104
5	Incarnate Word	54.048	86	-0.5554	221
6	Houston Baptist	50.063	187	0.5126	128
7	New Orleans	49.889	193	-1.2701	290
8	Northwestern St	49.331	211	-0.6510	234
9	UT Rio Grande	48.664	221	-1.5120	304
10	SE Louisiana	48.523	225	-0.6107	227
11	Nicholls	44.912	306	-2.7501	356
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	43.482	333	0.6127	118

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	56.241	77	-0.4210	246
2	UT Rio Grande	53.198	163	1.5910	27
3	Houston Baptist	53.074	167	-0.5003	253
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	51.759	221	-0.6165	268
5	Nicholls	51.702	223	1.6766	25
6	SF Austin	51.123	245	0.7123	102
7	Northwestern St	50.623	261	2.3634	7
8	Texas A&M-CC	50.077	278	-0.1109	214
9	SE Louisiana	49.938	282	-0.9407	298
10	New Orleans	49.782	287	1.5399	34
11	Incarnate Word	49.195	300	-1.6954	343
12	Lamar	47.754	323	1.1491	56

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	46.374	44	-0.6284	253
2	Nicholls	45.500	60	2.8760	17
3	UT Rio Grande	42.693	124	1.1712	77
4	SF Austin	40.213	173	0.5099	137
5	SE Louisiana	39.723	183	-0.4817	237
6	Incarnate Word	37.908	214	-0.2399	215
7	Houston Baptist	37.703	219	-1.3499	309
8	New Orleans	37.433	227	1.1212	84
9	Northwestern St	36.056	257	-0.5591	245
10	McNeese	35.028	277	1.1737	76
11	Lamar	34.638	289	0.4252	143
12	Texas A&M-CC	31.346	336	-0.5992	251

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Nicholls	13.734	50	1.2995	16
2	UT Rio Grande	13.659	54	0.2908	123
3	SF Austin	13.076	80	0.0533	180
4	Incarnate Word	12.524	99	-0.6336	317
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	12.393	111	-0.5103	302
6	New Orleans	10.196	247	0.5362	79
7	McNeese	10.010	261	-0.0088	197
8	Lamar	9.992	263	0.3383	110
9	Houston Baptist	9.747	274	-0.5319	303
10	Northwestern St	9.597	284	-0.6166	314
11	Texas A&M-CC	8.884	316	-0.2212	245
12	SE Louisiana	8.737	323	-0.2374	251

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	37.722	72	-0.3778	223
2	Nicholls	37.678	73	2.3654	25
3	SF Austin	37.209	82	1.3197	65
4	UT Rio Grande	36.474	100	0.2976	150
5	Incarnate Word	33.164	184	-0.6609	257
6	SE Louisiana	32.052	208	-0.8208	277
7	McNeese	30.760	236	1.4660	57
8	Houston Baptist	30.610	241	-1.5246	331
9	New Orleans	30.179	253	0.8726	95
10	Lamar	29.723	263	-0.3020	211
11	Northwestern St	27.826	308	-0.9178	286
12	Texas A&M-CC	26.138	333	-0.9908	293

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Nicholls	36.589	50	0.9398	102
2	UT Rio Grande	36.434	58	0.5972	138
3	Incarnate Word	35.988	76	-2.1018	346
4	SF Austin	35.077	124	-1.2980	313
5	Northwestern St	34.798	142	-0.6466	270
6	Lamar	34.164	174	1.9056	34
7	New Orleans	33.851	191	1.5079	57
8	Texas A&M-CC	33.770	197	0.4946	144
9	McNeese	33.076	227	-0.8624	284
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	32.174	262	-1.4193	324
11	Houston Baptist	31.242	301	-0.4136	244
12	SE Louisiana	28.343	356	0.2124	173

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	44.600	27	3.1385	37
2	SE Louisiana	41.500	66	2.2912	78
3	New Orleans	40.540	79	2.3648	72
4	Texas A&M-CC	38.580	132	2.6299	59
5	McNeese	38.360	136	-0.4804	264
6	Nicholls	37.230	156	-0.1952	237
7	Houston Baptist	37.040	160	2.7616	51
8	Incarnate Word	34.430	232	0.6998	173
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	31.070	298	0.1190	213
10	Lamar	30.820	303	2.7434	53
11	SF Austin	30.620	307	0.3446	195
12	UT Rio Grande	25.700	358	0.8935	156

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	25.438	39	1.7402	42
2	McNeese	25.109	45	0.6930	144
3	New Orleans	23.867	79	1.6983	46
4	SE Louisiana	21.999	149	0.1384	223
5	Houston Baptist	20.154	213	1.7986	39
6	Incarnate Word	20.003	219	0.3559	195
7	Nicholls	19.437	249	-0.1690	257
8	Texas A&M-CC	19.359	254	1.1555	87
9	Lamar	18.319	290	1.8424	37
10	UT Rio Grande	16.329	344	0.8532	126
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	16.307	345	-0.1579	256
12	SF Austin	16.120	347	0.9129	120

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	34.336	40	1.9179	54
2	McNeese	32.390	90	-0.0501	245
3	SE Louisiana	31.952	107	1.3776	97
4	New Orleans	31.718	113	1.5103	87
5	Houston Baptist	30.068	162	1.9788	52
6	Nicholls	29.595	179	-0.2398	264
7	Texas A&M-CC	29.091	196	1.4544	89
8	Incarnate Word	28.554	209	0.2658	199
9	Lamar	25.750	297	1.7347	66
10	SF Austin	24.938	311	1.0688	129
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	24.074	323	0.3101	196
12	UT Rio Grande	22.312	351	0.5140	177

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	76.816	30	2.4271	35
2	New Orleans	74.821	85	0.9693	119
3	Northwestern St	74.077	106	1.1191	102
4	UT Rio Grande	73.805	121	3.3582	15
5	SE Louisiana	70.812	224	-1.9744	331
6	Incarnate Word	69.738	254	-0.0967	218
7	Lamar	68.885	275	2.2702	42
8	Houston Baptist	67.203	317	1.7794	73
9	Nicholls	66.703	332	0.1136	199
10	Texas A&M-CC	66.582	333	0.6672	146
11	SF Austin	66.524	336	0.4851	171
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	66.199	339	-1.5209	311

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	65.284	9	0.6329	138
2	UT Rio Grande	60.677	25	2.8691	24
3	Houston Baptist	58.323	56	3.8908	6
4	Lamar	54.877	131	-1.1652	275
5	Nicholls	54.425	137	3.5742	13
6	SE Louisiana	54.021	149	0.8234	129
7	Texas A&M-CC	52.785	187	-2.5036	336
8	Northwestern St	50.983	234	-0.9617	259
9	SF Austin	50.210	254	-1.1053	271
10	New Orleans	48.991	276	-2.8900	346
11	McNeese	48.755	285	-0.7970	244
12	Incarnate Word	45.195	336	-0.3594	209

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	6.043	2	-0.1296	148
2	Incarnate Word	7.085	32	0.6977	329
3	SF Austin	7.234	40	-1.0518	10
4	Texas A&M-CC	7.751	69	0.3160	264
5	Nicholls	8.271	123	0.1594	231
6	UT Rio Grande	8.321	132	0.9436	353
7	SE Louisiana	8.551	165	0.1114	222
8	Houston Baptist	9.425	253	0.9451	354
9	Northwestern St	9.759	282	-0.2706	119
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	9.780	284	0.4387	293
11	Lamar	10.179	311	0.3078	261
12	New Orleans	10.775	331	0.3643	277

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	3.658	62	-0.3171	51
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	3.694	72	0.2258	258
3	Incarnate Word	3.966	117	0.1373	224
4	Houston Baptist	4.283	164	0.4212	306
5	Lamar	4.436	180	0.1480	228
6	Nicholls	4.534	202	-0.3298	48
7	UT Rio Grande	4.661	226	0.0841	211
8	SE Louisiana	4.694	233	0.5351	328
9	SF Austin	4.945	259	0.4607	317
10	Northwestern St	4.999	266	-0.2947	57
11	New Orleans	5.307	303	-0.4746	27
12	Texas A&M-CC	5.615	327	-0.2036	92

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	27.326	38	1.2379	55
2	Northwestern St	26.840	48	2.1687	6
3	SE Louisiana	26.134	66	1.3316	46
4	Lamar	23.490	191	1.1235	77
5	McNeese	23.435	194	0.3239	199
6	Nicholls	22.627	232	0.4543	179
7	Houston Baptist	20.958	303	1.5870	28
8	SF Austin	20.578	319	1.1581	69
9	Incarnate Word	20.478	320	1.1182	80
10	Texas A&M-CC	19.764	340	1.6573	23
11	UT Rio Grande	19.634	343	1.4083	37
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	19.631	344	0.5295	165

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	71.299	155	-0.5784	257
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	71.237	158	-0.1628	187
3	Nicholls	70.485	190	-0.3800	220
4	Texas A&M-CC	69.995	213	-0.4164	226
5	SF Austin	68.898	261	-0.9594	305
6	UT Rio Grande	68.703	270	-1.7809	358
7	McNeese	68.634	272	-0.0766	169
8	Incarnate Word	68.202	291	-0.4244	228
9	Northwestern St	67.958	301	-0.0860	171
10	SE Louisiana	67.769	309	-0.2071	193
11	Lamar	67.312	321	-0.9291	297
12	Houston Baptist	66.602	334	-0.3809	221

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.457	14	-0.0049	97
2	UT Rio Grande	0.492	95	-0.0090	57
3	Texas A&M-CC	0.502	128	-0.0081	64
4	McNeese	0.505	144	0.0213	350
5	New Orleans	0.507	152	-0.0107	39
6	Lamar	0.507	157	0.0012	183
7	SE Louisiana	0.522	223	-0.0073	68
8	Incarnate Word	0.531	256	-0.0104	41
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.540	282	-0.0046	98
10	Houston Baptist	0.562	336	0.0018	197
11	Northwestern St	0.564	338	0.0078	261
12	Nicholls	0.571	348	0.0292	362

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.950	16	-0.0163	43
2	Texas A&M-CC	1.002	65	-0.0330	8
3	McNeese	1.020	94	0.0276	308
4	Lamar	1.022	98	0.0099	202
5	UT Rio Grande	1.042	142	-0.0042	104
6	SE Louisiana	1.063	179	0.0019	144
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	1.094	250	0.0029	152
8	Incarnate Word	1.107	268	-0.0216	27
9	Nicholls	1.113	277	0.0405	345
10	New Orleans	1.132	308	0.0025	147
11	Houston Baptist	1.142	320	0.0144	230
12	Northwestern St	1.153	331	0.0006	134

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.216	5	0.0021	99
2	Nicholls	0.202	11	0.0093	27
3	SE Louisiana	0.188	45	0.0047	67
4	Texas A&M-CC	0.186	52	0.0116	15
5	Lamar	0.179	70	0.0006	129
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.170	110	-0.0042	229
7	Northwestern St	0.160	180	0.0022	96
8	SF Austin	0.158	190	-0.0057	262
9	UT Rio Grande	0.157	201	-0.0030	205
10	Incarnate Word	0.155	212	0.0004	132
11	Houston Baptist	0.149	247	-0.0004	151
12	New Orleans	0.126	352	-0.0087	309

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	75.470	38	0.0148	30
2	Texas A&M-CC	73.430	103	0.0074	76
3	Lamar	73.420	105	-0.0086	251
4	Houston Baptist	71.360	187	-0.0169	319
5	SE Louisiana	70.790	206	-0.0229	346
6	Incarnate Word	70.220	233	0.0034	118
7	UT Rio Grande	70.000	239	-0.0003	164
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	68.480	294	0.0059	89
9	New Orleans	67.880	309	-0.0064	221
10	Nicholls	67.820	311	-0.0241	348
11	Northwestern St	67.420	318	0.0176	20
12	McNeese	66.590	332	0.0064	82

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	0.308	60	0.0047	178
2	SF Austin	0.359	169	-0.0300	9
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.375	210	0.0128	232
4	UT Rio Grande	0.379	220	0.0164	258
5	Nicholls	0.413	288	-0.0088	79
6	New Orleans	0.417	296	0.0296	328
7	McNeese	0.419	298	0.0174	266
8	Northwestern St	0.424	309	0.0014	153
9	Incarnate Word	0.431	314	-0.0045	110
10	Texas A&M-CC	0.448	331	-0.0082	85
11	SE Louisiana	0.461	339	0.0280	320
12	Lamar	0.470	344	0.0300	331

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	105.081	68	0.0809	130
2	Texas A&M-CC	106.609	82	-0.7460	58
3	McNeese	110.056	148	0.6038	171
4	Lamar	111.289	169	0.2370	142
5	UT Rio Grande	111.553	174	-0.6757	62
6	SE Louisiana	114.149	205	0.4881	166
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	118.685	280	0.6349	175
8	Nicholls	118.708	281	1.9393	290
9	Incarnate Word	120.281	311	-0.0154	116
10	New Orleans	120.338	312	0.2275	141
11	Houston Baptist	123.500	339	2.0683	300
12	Northwestern St	125.545	347	2.6953	342

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	32.926	24	0.7530	292
2	SF Austin	33.553	36	0.3384	228
3	Lamar	33.764	44	-0.2476	128
4	Texas A&M-CC	33.892	50	-0.6547	58
5	SE Louisiana	35.038	89	-0.5741	67
6	UT Rio Grande	35.487	108	-0.8063	46
7	New Orleans	37.637	224	-0.8779	38
8	Incarnate Word	38.102	247	-0.6159	63
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.494	263	-0.5587	71
10	Nicholls	38.526	265	1.6776	352
11	Northwestern St	40.084	320	0.2304	206
12	Houston Baptist	41.595	346	0.2205	202

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	76.357	10	-1.3239	39
2	Lamar	76.767	14	-0.6409	106
3	Nicholls	77.120	18	-0.6651	105
4	SE Louisiana	77.285	20	-0.3602	136
5	McNeese	78.656	46	-1.1429	54
6	Incarnate Word	81.084	101	0.2597	226
7	Northwestern St	81.253	105	-1.2508	43
8	SF Austin	81.811	126	0.9872	295
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	82.828	173	0.1095	200
10	UT Rio Grande	83.228	189	-0.2908	144
11	Houston Baptist	85.664	289	0.7884	281
12	New Orleans	86.146	309	0.1206	202

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	41.028	38	-0.0921	153
2	McNeese	42.158	72	1.5991	347
3	UT Rio Grande	42.738	93	-0.8229	47
4	New Orleans	43.612	127	-1.1179	29
5	Lamar	43.913	144	0.0507	176
6	Texas A&M-CC	44.755	186	-0.0916	154
7	SE Louisiana	45.527	227	-0.4917	95
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	46.680	275	-0.7623	57
9	Incarnate Word	47.399	295	-0.7590	58
10	Houston Baptist	48.737	336	-0.2565	120
11	Northwestern St	49.296	344	0.9799	301
12	Nicholls	50.311	355	2.4885	363

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	51.373	12	-1.1027	79
2	UT Rio Grande	58.757	128	-0.8621	102
3	Houston Baptist	58.912	136	-2.2989	24
4	New Orleans	58.981	138	0.1749	211
5	Northwestern St	60.198	189	-0.1752	172
6	Lamar	60.942	202	-0.1501	175
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	61.070	205	-1.6216	51
8	SE Louisiana	62.823	251	1.9155	343
9	Nicholls	63.786	282	0.3707	231
10	Incarnate Word	64.344	303	-0.7362	110
11	Texas A&M-CC	65.711	330	1.5208	327
12	SF Austin	67.960	354	0.4262	240

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	19.654	4	0.0624	191
2	Lamar	23.231	47	-0.2706	134
3	SE Louisiana	24.679	112	-0.1252	158
4	UT Rio Grande	24.742	117	-0.6287	87
5	New Orleans	25.455	164	-1.0090	48
6	Texas A&M-CC	25.559	170	0.6165	270
7	SF Austin	25.913	189	0.8743	305
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	26.343	220	-1.1381	37
9	Nicholls	28.002	295	1.0652	324
10	Northwestern St	28.642	315	0.7317	284
11	Houston Baptist	28.775	321	-0.6144	90
12	Incarnate Word	29.162	326	-0.1903	145

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	40.536	5	-1.5437	52
2	Lamar	46.802	81	-0.5419	140
3	SE Louisiana	48.501	131	1.2976	310
4	Nicholls	48.824	144	-0.1369	184
5	UT Rio Grande	48.855	148	-0.9530	94
6	Northwestern St	49.029	153	-0.9505	95
7	Texas A&M-CC	50.045	194	0.2115	221
8	Houston Baptist	50.241	198	-1.4902	53
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	50.642	214	-1.3682	63
10	New Orleans	51.048	228	0.1877	218
11	Incarnate Word	52.115	263	-0.5591	135
12	SF Austin	55.521	337	0.9415	295

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	46.550	32	0.7240	250
2	McNeese	49.068	84	1.9939	338
3	Lamar	49.560	100	0.1217	187
4	New Orleans	50.329	128	-2.2113	9
5	SE Louisiana	51.151	160	-1.5490	35
6	UT Rio Grande	51.663	179	-0.2877	127
7	Texas A&M-CC	52.026	189	0.8880	267
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	52.068	192	-1.0227	61
9	Incarnate Word	56.594	314	0.4706	229
10	Houston Baptist	56.998	319	0.1533	192
11	Nicholls	58.162	341	2.1290	343
12	Northwestern St	58.657	347	2.3403	347

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	32.040	12	-0.4262	126
2	Texas A&M-CC	34.289	36	-1.5208	39
3	Incarnate Word	35.656	63	0.7362	256
4	Nicholls	36.214	84	-0.3707	135
5	SE Louisiana	37.177	115	-1.9155	23
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.930	161	1.6216	315
7	Lamar	39.058	164	0.1501	191
8	Northwestern St	39.802	177	0.1752	194
9	New Orleans	41.019	228	-0.1749	155
10	Houston Baptist	41.088	230	2.2989	342
11	UT Rio Grande	41.243	238	0.8621	264
12	McNeese	48.627	354	1.1027	287

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	7.641	5	-0.5359	51
2	Texas A&M-CC	8.333	14	-1.2712	6
3	Incarnate Word	8.939	30	-0.4256	73
4	SE Louisiana	10.360	116	-0.4489	71
5	Nicholls	10.524	130	0.6124	298
6	Lamar	10.532	131	0.0230	173
7	UT Rio Grande	10.746	153	-0.1776	125
8	Northwestern St	11.443	217	-0.5012	63
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	12.151	272	0.5794	292
10	New Orleans	12.182	274	0.1311	194
11	Houston Baptist	12.821	306	0.8348	319
12	McNeese	13.272	331	0.6906	303

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	26.290	14	0.0456	187
2	Texas A&M-CC	26.312	15	-1.5354	27
3	Nicholls	28.296	44	-0.5283	114
4	SE Louisiana	28.784	55	-1.6579	21
5	Incarnate Word	28.969	58	0.8188	268
6	Lamar	29.965	93	-0.0990	165
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	32.186	157	1.4777	317
8	Northwestern St	32.224	158	-0.3002	139
9	UT Rio Grande	34.373	228	0.6622	252
10	New Orleans	35.098	264	-0.0671	169
11	Houston Baptist	35.423	276	2.2786	345
12	McNeese	38.119	333	0.4008	228

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	28.989	14	-2.2487	17
2	Incarnate Word	31.003	67	-2.0328	23
3	UT Rio Grande	31.395	80	-1.0378	71
4	Texas A&M-CC	32.661	125	-2.1208	21
5	McNeese	34.463	213	1.2277	287
6	New Orleans	34.627	226	0.1208	184
7	Lamar	34.716	231	0.2831	201
8	Northwestern St	35.635	274	-1.0107	74
9	SE Louisiana	35.817	284	0.5855	233
10	Houston Baptist	36.544	317	0.2148	193
11	Nicholls	36.721	323	3.4837	359
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	37.375	337	-0.1041	155

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	30.760	60	0.4657	178
2	SF Austin	35.860	169	-2.9968	9
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	37.480	210	1.2800	232
4	UT Rio Grande	37.890	220	1.6386	258
5	Nicholls	41.340	288	-0.8756	79
6	New Orleans	41.670	296	2.9570	328
7	McNeese	41.890	298	1.7409	266
8	Northwestern St	42.440	309	0.1354	153
9	Incarnate Word	43.070	314	-0.4519	110
10	Texas A&M-CC	44.800	331	-0.8230	85
11	SE Louisiana	46.110	339	2.7966	320
12	Lamar	46.960	344	3.0015	331

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	18.144	62	0.1786	147
2	SF Austin	20.234	134	-1.7608	7
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	20.256	135	0.8261	241
4	UT Rio Grande	22.494	236	1.3678	306
5	McNeese	22.834	258	0.5674	203
6	Northwestern St	23.711	291	0.1023	138
7	Nicholls	23.739	292	0.1065	139
8	Texas A&M-CC	24.064	300	-0.7168	46
9	Lamar	24.133	304	1.4755	314
10	Incarnate Word	25.528	336	-0.4969	63
11	New Orleans	25.733	338	1.8828	337
12	SE Louisiana	25.883	341	1.7986	331

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	25.444	57	0.4316	181
2	SF Austin	28.814	156	-2.0756	8
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	29.901	198	1.2450	261
4	Nicholls	31.065	242	-0.7230	64
5	UT Rio Grande	31.136	245	1.3751	269
6	McNeese	31.999	269	0.9547	233
7	Northwestern St	33.483	303	-0.3414	98
8	Texas A&M-CC	33.916	313	-0.9376	48
9	Incarnate Word	34.507	323	-0.3399	99
10	SE Louisiana	34.729	328	1.7713	303
11	New Orleans	35.436	339	2.6758	345
12	Lamar	35.757	342	2.1521	323

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	66.896	14	-0.1054	148
2	Lamar	67.898	34	-0.1730	137
3	McNeese	69.689	82	-0.8929	84
4	SF Austin	70.009	102	-1.6335	44
5	Texas A&M-CC	71.068	154	-0.1585	139
6	UT Rio Grande	72.033	189	0.9747	251
7	Northwestern St	72.381	213	2.5222	345
8	Houston Baptist	72.538	221	0.1567	168
9	New Orleans	72.543	222	0.5229	208
10	Incarnate Word	73.130	246	-0.7933	89
11	SE Louisiana	73.950	282	1.3869	288
12	Nicholls	76.798	347	2.2460	335

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	44.472	21	-2.9899	13
2	SE Louisiana	48.844	91	-3.0930	11
3	Incarnate Word	52.084	173	0.0192	167
4	Northwestern St	54.273	236	-1.4403	72
5	Houston Baptist	54.278	237	1.8258	312
6	Lamar	55.682	265	1.6808	304
7	Texas A&M-CC	56.747	285	-0.5898	116
8	Nicholls	57.215	293	0.4876	218
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	57.269	295	0.1843	188
10	UT Rio Grande	60.090	332	1.1948	269
11	New Orleans	60.626	339	-0.7836	102
12	McNeese	60.973	345	3.0384	343

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	14.061	4	-0.2076	215
2	Nicholls	13.172	10	0.6698	40
3	SE Louisiana	11.439	51	-0.0185	156
4	Texas A&M-CC	10.611	96	0.2169	106
5	Lamar	10.560	102	0.1963	112
6	SF Austin	9.749	156	0.1677	120
7	Northwestern St	9.599	166	-0.0373	164
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	9.571	169	0.0159	148
9	Houston Baptist	9.311	186	-0.1656	196
10	UT Rio Grande	9.010	210	0.0641	140
11	Incarnate Word	8.474	252	-0.2967	238
12	New Orleans	7.080	336	-1.3646	363

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	6.705	35	-0.5398	330
2	McNeese	6.654	37	0.1777	129
3	New Orleans	5.918	69	0.9196	11
4	SF Austin	5.423	113	-0.5989	339
5	Houston Baptist	4.947	150	-0.0128	190
6	Texas A&M-CC	4.734	175	0.6920	30
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	4.421	204	-0.5055	325
8	SE Louisiana	4.257	218	0.7008	29
9	Incarnate Word	3.997	248	0.1445	135
10	UT Rio Grande	3.665	283	0.0019	180
11	Nicholls	3.273	317	-0.2140	255
12	Northwestern St	2.531	351	-0.8824	362

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	23.170	65	0.8577	287
2	SF Austin	25.283	169	-0.4432	74
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	25.306	171	0.7656	275
4	UT Rio Grande	26.265	228	0.4608	211
5	Nicholls	26.268	229	-0.2854	88
6	Northwestern St	27.031	289	-0.0780	116
7	Lamar	27.486	301	0.7924	279
8	New Orleans	28.103	325	1.7325	356
9	Incarnate Word	28.418	329	0.2861	177
10	SE Louisiana	28.560	332	0.9837	303
11	Texas A&M-CC	28.827	338	-0.2067	97
12	McNeese	29.122	345	0.6258	255

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	72.388	100	-0.3058	213
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	71.579	136	-0.2779	206
3	Nicholls	70.654	182	-0.3671	232
4	UT Rio Grande	70.045	214	-1.3605	343
5	Texas A&M-CC	69.373	251	0.1804	135
6	McNeese	69.131	258	0.0077	163
7	Northwestern St	68.241	297	0.0092	162
8	SF Austin	68.164	301	-0.7486	293
9	Lamar	67.831	310	-0.8266	301
10	SE Louisiana	67.210	325	-0.2471	201
11	Incarnate Word	66.398	344	-0.3371	224
12	Houston Baptist	66.173	349	0.1565	138

Location invert reset

Result invert reset

Game Type invert reset

Points Per Possession reset

Mean
Std
Median
Min
Max

selected out of records.

Showing - of

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Envo Magazine