Conferences – HoopSci

College Basketball Analytics, Insights, and Trends

Conferences
- America East
- American
- Atlantic 10
- ACC
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
- Big East
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
- Big West
- Coastal
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
- MAAC
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
- SEC
- Southern
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Teams
- America East
  - Albany
  - Bryant
  - Binghamton
  - Maine
  - New Hampshire
  - NJIT
  - UMass Lowell
  - UMBC
  - Vermont
- American
  - Charlotte
  - East Carolina
  - Florida Atlantic
  - Memphis
  - North Texas
  - Rice
  - Temple
  - Tulane
  - Tulsa
  - UAB
  - USF
  - UTSA
  - Wichita State
- Atlantic 10
  - Davidson
  - Dayton
  - Duquesne
  - Fordham
  - George Mason
  - George Washington
  - La Salle
  - Loyola-Chicago
  - Richmond
  - St. Josephs
  - Saint Louis
  - St. Bonaventure
  - Rhode Island
  - VCU
- ACC
  - Boston College
  - California
  - Clemson
  - Duke
  - Florida State
  - Georgia Tech
  - Louisville
  - Miami
  - NC State
  - North Carolina
  - Notre Dame
  - Pitt
  - SMU
  - Stanford
  - Syracuse
  - Virginia
  - Virginia Tech
  - Wake Forest
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
  - Arizona
  - Arizona State
  - Baylor
  - BYU
  - Cincinnati
  - Colorado
  - Houston
  - Iowa State
  - Kansas
  - Kansas State
  - Oklahoma State
  - TCU
  - Texas Tech
  - UCF
  - Utah
  - West Virginia
- Big East
  - Butler
  - Creighton
  - Depaul
  - Georgetown
  - Marquette
  - Providence
  - Seton Hall
  - St. John’s
  - UConn
  - Villanova
  - Xavier
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
  - Illinois
  - Indiana
  - Iowa
  - Maryland
  - Michigan State
  - Minnesota
  - Nebraska
  - Northwestern
  - Ohio State
  - Oregon
  - Penn State
  - Purdue
  - Rutgers
  - UCLA
  - USC
  - Washington
  - Wisconsin
- Big West
- Coastal
  - Campbell
  - Charleston
  - Drexel
  - Elon
  - Hampton
  - Hofstra
  - Monmouth
  - North Carolina A&T
  - Northeastern
  - Stony Brook
  - Towson
  - UNC Wilmington
  - William & Mary
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
  - Brown
  - Columbia
  - Cornell
  - Dartmouth
  - Harvard
  - Pennsylvania
  - Princeton
  - Yale
- MAAC
  - Canisius
  - Fairfield
  - Iona
  - Manhattan
  - Marist
  - Merrimack
  - Mt. St. Mary’s
  - Niagara
  - Quinnipiac
  - Rider
  - Sacred Heart
  - Saint Peter’s
  - Siena
- Mid-American
  - Akron
  - Ball State
  - Bowling Green
  - Buffalo
  - Central Michigan
  - Eastern Michigan
  - Kent State
  - Miami (OH)
  - Northern Illinois
  - Ohio
  - Toledo
  - UMass
  - Western Michigan
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
  - Belmont
  - Bradley
  - Drake
  - Evansville
  - Illinois State
  - Indiana State
  - Murray State
  - Northern Iowa
  - Southern Illinois
  - UIC
  - Valparaiso
- Mountain West
  - Air Force
  - Boise State
  - Colorado State
  - Fresno State
  - Grand Canyon
  - Nevada
  - New Mexico
  - San Diego State
  - San Jose State
  - UNLV
  - Utah State
  - Wyoming
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
  - American
  - Army
  - Boston University
  - Bucknell
  - Colgate
  - Holy Cross
  - Lafayette
  - Lehigh
  - Loyola (MD)
  - Navy
- SEC
  - Alabama
  - Arkansas
  - Auburn
  - Florida
  - Georgia
  - Kentucky
  - LSU
  - Mississippi State
  - Missouri
  - Oklahoma
  - Ole Miss
  - South Carolina
  - Tennessee
  - Texas
  - Texas A&M
  - Vanderbilt
- Southern
  - Chattanooga
  - East Tennessee State
  - Furman
  - Mercer
  - Samford
  - The Citadel
  - UNC Greensboro
  - VMI
  - Western Carolina
  - Wofford
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Games
Models
Statistics
Efficiency Trajectories
Articles
Contact

Search for:

Standings
Statistics
Trend Lab

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	7.074	100	-0.1971	192
2	SF Austin	4.139	126	2.7887	19
3	UT Rio Grande	-4.790	203	0.1247	162
4	Lamar	-9.674	244	-0.5888	227
5	New Orleans	-11.375	263	1.4897	73
6	Texas A&M-CC	-12.199	271	-1.0474	262
7	Nicholls	-13.424	279	-1.0532	263
8	SE Louisiana	-17.843	313	-1.1518	269
9	Houston Baptist	-20.969	331	-1.0356	261
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	-21.917	335	-0.0815	181
11	Northwestern St	-21.960	337	-1.2541	280
12	Incarnate Word	-22.134	339	-0.9061	257

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.227	30	-0.0059	214
2	SF Austin	0.179	53	0.0237	25
3	UT Rio Grande	0.029	172	0.0149	60
4	Lamar	-0.008	202	0.0008	158
5	Texas A&M-CC	-0.035	225	0.0014	152
6	Incarnate Word	-0.046	241	-0.0004	165
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	-0.052	246	0.0042	133
8	New Orleans	-0.088	271	0.0209	37
9	Nicholls	-0.114	290	0.0008	159
10	Houston Baptist	-0.125	298	-0.0114	266
11	SE Louisiana	-0.149	324	-0.0051	204
12	Northwestern St	-0.178	335	0.0052	118

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1663.057	38	11.4499	53
2	SF Austin	1570.199	90	21.0829	13
3	Texas A&M-CC	1485.661	202	-3.9685	230
4	Lamar	1471.655	216	1.8114	160
5	Nicholls	1470.121	220	-7.7419	264
6	UT Rio Grande	1433.754	265	6.7583	104
7	SE Louisiana	1403.209	295	-16.8748	335
8	Northwestern St	1393.945	309	-2.5478	208
9	Incarnate Word	1376.331	321	5.9054	117
10	New Orleans	1371.897	328	10.7645	57
11	Houston Baptist	1345.551	344	0.9159	169
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	1341.633	347	1.7836	161

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.581	54	0.0066	167
2	SF Austin	0.536	98	0.0067	163
3	Texas A&M-CC	0.488	202	0.0048	188
4	UT Rio Grande	0.481	212	0.0058	171
5	New Orleans	0.478	215	-0.0006	252
6	Nicholls	0.468	231	0.0114	100
7	Lamar	0.456	252	0.0000	245
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.452	265	0.0164	58
9	SE Louisiana	0.428	307	0.0007	231
10	Northwestern St	0.418	319	0.0034	198
11	Houston Baptist	0.405	331	0.0002	240
12	Incarnate Word	0.404	332	-0.0029	282

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	UT Rio Grande	0.533	104	0.0189	22
2	SF Austin	0.527	127	0.0207	14
3	Houston Baptist	0.521	154	0.0083	86
4	McNeese	0.517	169	-0.0158	345
5	Nicholls	0.509	202	-0.0083	288
6	New Orleans	0.507	211	0.0119	57
7	Northwestern St	0.505	216	0.0026	150
8	Incarnate Word	0.496	256	-0.0004	194
9	Lamar	0.489	276	0.0113	60
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.485	296	-0.0080	285
11	Texas A&M-CC	0.472	325	-0.0045	251
12	SE Louisiana	0.458	345	-0.0037	237

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1.188	24	-0.0102	277
2	SF Austin	1.129	88	0.0451	16
3	Incarnate Word	1.099	137	-0.0167	307
4	UT Rio Grande	1.098	138	0.0381	22
5	Northwestern St	1.055	229	0.0120	126
6	Lamar	1.045	243	0.0255	57
7	New Orleans	1.043	246	0.0247	59
8	Nicholls	1.043	247	-0.0197	324
9	Houston Baptist	1.039	257	0.0309	35
10	Texas A&M-CC	1.025	288	-0.0039	234
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.994	326	-0.0026	224
12	SE Louisiana	0.961	345	-0.0178	313

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.134	24	-0.0097	38
2	McNeese	0.140	55	-0.0005	228
3	Incarnate Word	0.155	152	0.0123	361
4	Nicholls	0.165	231	0.0046	310
5	UT Rio Grande	0.167	249	-0.0078	64
6	Lamar	0.168	257	-0.0013	206
7	Northwestern St	0.169	262	-0.0133	20
8	Texas A&M-CC	0.173	281	0.0059	322
9	SE Louisiana	0.175	293	0.0152	363
10	Houston Baptist	0.178	310	0.0076	337
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.189	341	-0.0082	57
12	New Orleans	0.195	350	0.0090	349

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	36.580	12	-0.0068	166
2	Lamar	34.370	37	0.0025	79
3	New Orleans	33.650	51	0.0192	17
4	SF Austin	32.300	77	-0.0134	226
5	Incarnate Word	30.520	121	-0.0150	245
6	Houston Baptist	29.140	158	0.0129	25
7	Texas A&M-CC	27.590	212	-0.0245	307
8	Nicholls	26.410	248	-0.0128	217
9	SE Louisiana	26.140	258	-0.0081	180
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	24.200	305	-0.0045	147
11	Northwestern St	23.800	314	-0.0199	273
12	UT Rio Grande	23.780	315	-0.0258	317

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	0.443	34	0.0733	1
2	SE Louisiana	0.441	36	0.0438	11
3	New Orleans	0.438	40	0.0435	12
4	Northwestern St	0.426	53	-0.0143	282
5	McNeese	0.406	75	0.0210	79
6	Houston Baptist	0.386	117	0.0314	33
7	Nicholls	0.371	164	-0.0008	212
8	Incarnate Word	0.341	236	0.0028	188
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.311	298	0.0027	190
10	SF Austin	0.304	313	-0.0022	216
11	Lamar	0.292	329	-0.0082	251
12	UT Rio Grande	0.278	347	0.0274	52

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	115.469	94	0.5894	171
2	SF Austin	109.372	179	2.6091	14
3	New Orleans	106.553	223	1.8712	41
4	UT Rio Grande	105.335	246	-0.6411	304
5	Northwestern St	103.859	273	0.8317	144
6	Houston Baptist	103.557	278	1.0140	121
7	Nicholls	103.300	279	0.9887	124
8	Lamar	102.849	284	0.1799	219
9	Incarnate Word	102.327	291	-1.1050	328
10	Texas A&M-CC	97.365	341	-1.2894	341
11	SE Louisiana	97.255	343	-0.4745	292
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	95.822	346	0.4048	197

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	41.422	31	-1.3328	347
2	SF Austin	41.350	33	1.3775	21
3	UT Rio Grande	39.532	96	0.9710	54
4	Incarnate Word	38.806	120	-0.8292	311
5	Lamar	38.005	164	0.8045	64
6	Houston Baptist	36.562	249	-0.0019	183
7	Texas A&M-CC	36.314	255	-1.3796	348
8	Nicholls	35.807	275	-0.9178	320
9	Northwestern St	35.699	281	1.0450	45
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	35.322	300	0.0201	180
11	New Orleans	34.865	310	0.1779	155
12	SE Louisiana	32.116	360	-1.5882	359

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	90.668	4	0.3898	132
2	Lamar	88.237	19	0.7661	82
3	McNeese	87.357	33	-0.2114	225
4	Incarnate Word	86.860	41	-1.2523	321
5	UT Rio Grande	84.554	132	-1.1049	308
6	Nicholls	82.676	231	-0.5697	268
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	81.922	263	0.9137	70
8	Texas A&M-CC	81.336	278	-2.6713	363
9	Houston Baptist	80.334	313	-1.0600	302
10	SE Louisiana	79.280	336	-2.7137	364
11	Northwestern St	78.936	343	1.2280	49
12	New Orleans	78.604	348	-1.8938	348

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	47.670	58	-1.3204	342
2	UT Rio Grande	46.578	103	1.7353	11
3	SF Austin	45.567	156	1.3550	31
4	Houston Baptist	45.559	158	0.5483	113
5	Northwestern St	45.150	180	0.6823	93
6	Texas A&M-CC	44.731	216	-0.3666	240
7	Incarnate Word	44.695	218	-0.1461	212
8	New Orleans	44.633	220	1.2103	34
9	Nicholls	43.309	280	-0.7626	293
10	Lamar	43.245	284	0.6706	95
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	42.841	301	-0.4776	253
12	SE Louisiana	40.551	347	-0.6388	272

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	68.946	23	0.6187	111
2	McNeese	65.797	67	0.5486	119
3	Lamar	64.694	97	-0.8336	266
4	Northwestern St	64.668	99	1.4445	51
5	New Orleans	64.485	103	0.8408	96
6	Houston Baptist	62.626	141	1.3683	58
7	Incarnate Word	61.728	156	-0.5860	240
8	SE Louisiana	59.667	197	-1.1839	294
9	SF Austin	59.338	206	-0.9831	280
10	UT Rio Grande	56.983	251	-0.3474	215
11	Nicholls	54.479	313	-1.6602	326
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	54.243	321	1.1065	72

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	31.795	6	-0.8933	302
2	Texas A&M-CC	27.710	123	-0.9749	314
3	SF Austin	27.603	131	0.0428	166
4	Lamar	27.358	141	-0.1175	192
5	Incarnate Word	26.393	179	-0.7418	285
6	Northwestern St	26.127	191	1.5899	10
7	Houston Baptist	26.119	193	-0.3596	236
8	UT Rio Grande	26.087	194	0.9663	41
9	New Orleans	25.368	231	0.3578	114
10	SE Louisiana	23.268	318	-1.6227	356
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	23.013	324	0.4205	108
12	Nicholls	22.703	329	-0.7874	289

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	57.485	27	0.2622	151
2	Lamar	57.399	28	-0.3056	216
3	Texas A&M-CC	56.020	48	-1.3561	312
4	Incarnate Word	53.591	100	-1.2048	304
5	SF Austin	53.504	104	-0.6084	249
6	Northwestern St	51.141	168	2.0204	24
7	New Orleans	50.412	183	-0.6620	254
8	Houston Baptist	50.073	188	0.4120	135
9	UT Rio Grande	48.127	233	-0.7587	264
10	SE Louisiana	47.438	251	-2.4371	355
11	Nicholls	44.943	308	-1.7898	335
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	44.445	317	1.4545	42

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	55.210	90	-1.5958	330
2	UT Rio Grande	54.784	102	2.8977	5
3	Houston Baptist	52.317	188	-1.0984	293
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	51.519	222	-0.7943	261
5	SF Austin	51.509	224	0.8587	79
6	Northwestern St	50.869	249	1.4197	35
7	Nicholls	50.477	267	-0.0076	187
8	New Orleans	50.377	273	1.2097	49
9	Texas A&M-CC	49.716	287	-0.7369	255
10	Incarnate Word	49.380	293	-0.0316	188
11	SE Louisiana	49.268	297	-1.1806	299
12	Lamar	47.575	332	0.2782	147

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	45.757	45	-1.1065	294
2	Nicholls	45.521	53	1.6602	40
3	UT Rio Grande	43.017	115	0.3474	151
4	SF Austin	40.662	160	0.9831	86
5	SE Louisiana	40.333	169	1.1839	72
6	Incarnate Word	38.272	210	0.5860	126
7	Houston Baptist	37.374	225	-1.3683	308
8	New Orleans	35.515	263	-0.8408	270
9	Northwestern St	35.332	267	-1.4445	315
10	Lamar	35.306	269	0.8336	100
11	McNeese	34.203	299	-0.5486	247
12	Texas A&M-CC	31.054	343	-0.6187	255

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	13.747	45	1.3348	13
2	UT Rio Grande	13.445	62	0.0046	189
3	Nicholls	13.104	76	-0.1303	218
4	Incarnate Word	12.413	111	-0.0875	209
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	12.309	115	-0.4004	276
6	Lamar	10.647	220	0.9220	30
7	Houston Baptist	10.443	235	0.3577	120
8	McNeese	9.628	281	-0.4395	288
9	Northwestern St	9.572	284	-0.5449	304
10	New Orleans	9.497	286	-0.1799	229
11	SE Louisiana	8.848	322	0.0344	178
12	Texas A&M-CC	8.604	335	-0.4047	278

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Nicholls	37.733	69	1.2202	55
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	37.477	76	-0.5408	254
3	SF Austin	37.164	88	0.9982	83
4	UT Rio Grande	36.427	106	-0.3462	224
5	Incarnate Word	33.269	181	-0.0475	187
6	SE Louisiana	31.842	213	-0.2766	217
7	Lamar	30.838	239	1.0717	71
8	Houston Baptist	30.261	254	-1.4720	328
9	McNeese	29.872	263	-0.4737	242
10	New Orleans	28.192	298	-1.2318	312
11	Northwestern St	27.795	306	-0.7924	277
12	Texas A&M-CC	25.316	346	-1.3153	319

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	36.637	47	2.1825	23
2	UT Rio Grande	36.281	59	0.8001	119
3	Incarnate Word	35.954	82	-0.1900	219
4	Lamar	34.895	131	1.8117	41
5	Nicholls	34.849	135	-1.6549	334
6	Northwestern St	34.690	148	-0.7718	284
7	Texas A&M-CC	33.874	185	0.2441	173
8	Houston Baptist	33.673	203	2.3605	19
9	New Orleans	33.178	220	0.8272	114
10	McNeese	32.580	251	-0.6501	271
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	32.254	268	-0.6990	277
12	SE Louisiana	28.680	360	0.3727	158

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	44.290	34	7.3317	1
2	SE Louisiana	44.120	36	4.3820	11
3	New Orleans	43.800	40	4.3474	12
4	Northwestern St	42.580	53	-1.4313	282
5	McNeese	40.570	75	2.1012	79
6	Houston Baptist	38.620	117	3.1444	33
7	Nicholls	37.070	164	-0.0767	212
8	Incarnate Word	34.120	236	0.2793	188
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	31.130	298	0.2753	190
10	SF Austin	30.420	313	-0.2159	216
11	Lamar	29.180	329	-0.8209	251
12	UT Rio Grande	27.840	347	2.7370	52

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	26.302	20	2.0841	31
2	New Orleans	25.076	37	2.2954	18
3	Northwestern St	24.519	49	-0.3447	249
4	SE Louisiana	23.057	105	1.3635	74
5	Texas A&M-CC	21.261	172	2.7719	9
6	Houston Baptist	21.251	174	2.5230	12
7	Incarnate Word	19.844	232	0.0720	208
8	Nicholls	19.566	239	0.0004	216
9	Lamar	17.799	312	0.0301	212
10	UT Rio Grande	17.283	330	1.8669	41
11	SF Austin	16.495	345	0.4171	169
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	16.426	346	0.1509	199

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	33.898	41	1.7782	62
2	New Orleans	33.379	56	2.6086	20
3	Northwestern St	32.979	59	-0.8534	278
4	SE Louisiana	32.883	66	1.8412	52
5	Texas A&M-CC	32.365	79	4.4386	1
6	Houston Baptist	30.808	134	2.1881	37
7	Nicholls	29.499	178	-0.1179	223
8	Incarnate Word	28.228	215	-0.0755	220
9	SF Austin	25.119	310	0.2910	183
10	Lamar	24.785	319	-0.5517	255
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	24.391	324	0.6388	144
12	UT Rio Grande	23.494	341	1.9994	46

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	77.143	29	2.6073	25
2	UT Rio Grande	75.014	77	3.2240	13
3	New Orleans	74.854	83	0.9577	129
4	Northwestern St	74.264	106	0.9559	130
5	SE Louisiana	71.427	208	-0.1528	231
6	Lamar	70.095	243	2.0903	47
7	Incarnate Word	69.961	249	0.1484	205
8	Houston Baptist	68.557	293	2.8997	18
9	SF Austin	66.982	328	0.2591	192
10	Nicholls	66.975	329	-0.0790	221
11	Texas A&M-CC	66.071	344	-0.1780	234
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	65.928	346	-1.1217	292

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	64.924	8	0.1939	159
2	UT Rio Grande	60.808	25	0.1849	160
3	Houston Baptist	58.989	46	2.5126	24
4	Lamar	56.846	83	1.8206	53
5	Nicholls	53.159	167	0.8466	108
6	SE Louisiana	52.529	187	-1.7579	307
7	Texas A&M-CC	52.128	201	-1.2112	272
8	Northwestern St	51.100	233	-0.3341	212
9	New Orleans	49.992	257	0.1804	162
10	SF Austin	49.416	273	-1.4874	294
11	McNeese	48.492	288	-0.3004	208
12	Incarnate Word	44.221	343	-1.2642	275

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	6.287	5	0.0032	187
2	SF Austin	7.533	44	-0.5368	41
3	Incarnate Word	7.905	77	1.0345	352
4	UT Rio Grande	8.083	95	-0.2245	125
5	Texas A&M-CC	8.140	100	0.1637	235
6	Nicholls	8.446	134	0.3160	265
7	SE Louisiana	9.224	225	1.0153	350
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	9.497	257	-0.2981	99
9	Northwestern St	9.573	265	-0.3867	80
10	Houston Baptist	9.980	298	0.8169	337
11	Lamar	10.244	315	0.0988	215
12	New Orleans	11.437	353	0.7736	330

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	3.713	68	-0.0567	148
2	Incarnate Word	3.948	95	-0.0105	172
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	4.262	150	0.8878	363
4	UT Rio Grande	4.292	154	-0.3356	59
5	Houston Baptist	4.399	176	0.2551	270
6	Nicholls	4.484	193	-0.2741	73
7	Lamar	4.611	215	0.4363	319
8	SF Austin	4.723	231	-0.0894	135
9	SE Louisiana	4.735	234	0.3404	292
10	Northwestern St	4.900	253	-0.3726	51
11	New Orleans	5.211	295	-0.4096	44
12	Texas A&M-CC	5.919	351	0.1591	238

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	27.749	20	1.3312	51
2	SE Louisiana	27.284	34	2.1802	12
3	Northwestern St	26.304	60	0.5004	167
4	McNeese	24.195	163	0.6204	149
5	Nicholls	23.328	202	1.2280	66
6	Lamar	23.092	214	-0.3401	291
7	Texas A&M-CC	23.013	222	4.1717	1
8	Houston Baptist	22.023	279	1.9702	16
9	Incarnate Word	21.246	309	1.0886	80
10	UT Rio Grande	21.107	316	2.5660	4
11	SF Austin	20.640	332	0.2229	226
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	19.475	358	-0.1224	267

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	71.541	132	-0.0500	120
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	70.834	163	-0.2573	161
3	Nicholls	70.415	188	-0.3241	174
4	Texas A&M-CC	68.660	259	-1.5737	342
5	Incarnate Word	68.561	263	0.4530	51
6	SF Austin	68.531	266	-1.1109	301
7	UT Rio Grande	68.067	285	-1.5507	340
8	McNeese	67.627	298	-1.2063	308
9	Lamar	67.604	299	-0.3336	175
10	SE Louisiana	67.599	300	-0.5607	214
11	Northwestern St	67.535	302	-0.2978	169
12	Houston Baptist	65.748	346	-1.0466	289

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.458	12	-0.0043	112
2	UT Rio Grande	0.489	77	-0.0051	96
3	New Orleans	0.497	100	-0.0201	7
4	McNeese	0.499	105	0.0034	209
5	Texas A&M-CC	0.506	142	0.0024	191
6	Lamar	0.508	151	-0.0000	160
7	SE Louisiana	0.524	236	0.0059	237
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.532	264	-0.0089	62
9	Incarnate Word	0.547	303	0.0172	340
10	Nicholls	0.554	324	-0.0011	152
11	Northwestern St	0.565	346	0.0077	253
12	Houston Baptist	0.568	349	0.0098	277

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.956	16	-0.0064	104
2	McNeese	1.006	63	0.0037	170
3	Texas A&M-CC	1.020	85	0.0059	181
4	UT Rio Grande	1.028	102	-0.0114	71
5	Lamar	1.037	116	0.0200	270
6	SE Louisiana	1.073	206	0.0228	289
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	1.090	244	-0.0015	138
8	Nicholls	1.095	251	-0.0007	143
9	New Orleans	1.109	274	-0.0343	10
10	Incarnate Word	1.141	319	0.0375	338
11	Houston Baptist	1.149	324	0.0162	250
12	Northwestern St	1.161	338	0.0128	218

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.218	3	0.0031	82
2	Nicholls	0.204	9	0.0089	17
3	Texas A&M-CC	0.189	28	0.0081	19
4	SE Louisiana	0.182	46	-0.0024	184
5	Lamar	0.169	112	-0.0109	332
6	UT Rio Grande	0.166	129	0.0074	26
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.165	133	-0.0079	290
8	Northwestern St	0.160	168	0.0018	103
9	SF Austin	0.157	186	-0.0046	233
10	Houston Baptist	0.153	212	0.0045	61
11	Incarnate Word	0.151	223	-0.0063	261
12	New Orleans	0.129	340	-0.0017	175

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	74.840	55	0.0033	142
2	Lamar	72.930	120	-0.0078	267
3	Texas A&M-CC	71.240	191	-0.0156	327
4	Houston Baptist	70.660	222	-0.0132	310
5	SE Louisiana	70.570	228	-0.0140	317
6	UT Rio Grande	69.730	262	-0.0035	214
7	Incarnate Word	69.560	268	-0.0027	208
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	68.330	300	0.0046	132
9	New Orleans	68.160	307	0.0067	101
10	McNeese	67.640	318	0.0079	85
11	Northwestern St	66.680	337	-0.0010	197
12	Nicholls	66.520	340	-0.0201	348

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	0.315	70	0.0106	255
2	SF Austin	0.340	127	-0.0275	22
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.367	202	0.0021	190
4	UT Rio Grande	0.390	255	0.0330	338
5	New Orleans	0.391	260	-0.0117	82
6	Nicholls	0.415	298	0.0031	197
7	Northwestern St	0.425	313	0.0075	233
8	Texas A&M-CC	0.448	332	-0.0036	140
9	McNeese	0.449	333	0.0433	355
10	SE Louisiana	0.454	339	0.0078	235
11	Incarnate Word	0.457	341	0.0249	315
12	Lamar	0.463	343	0.0054	213

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	105.233	73	0.1012	132
2	McNeese	108.394	122	0.7137	204
3	Texas A&M-CC	109.564	152	-0.5482	68
4	UT Rio Grande	110.125	160	-0.6063	64
5	Lamar	112.523	196	0.7608	209
6	SE Louisiana	115.099	249	0.6439	193
7	Nicholls	116.725	274	2.0495	326
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	117.739	284	0.6074	190
9	New Orleans	117.928	285	0.3844	163
10	Incarnate Word	124.461	348	-0.1159	108
11	Houston Baptist	124.527	349	2.1136	333
12	Northwestern St	125.819	353	2.1759	336

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	32.193	11	-0.3800	97
2	SF Austin	33.867	41	0.2378	207
3	Texas A&M-CC	34.398	56	0.0932	182
4	Lamar	34.403	58	0.4182	241
5	UT Rio Grande	34.949	80	-1.0330	30
6	SE Louisiana	35.408	97	0.5309	259
7	New Orleans	37.383	205	-1.1198	24
8	Nicholls	37.517	213	-0.4417	92
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.433	261	-0.3546	104
10	Incarnate Word	39.168	292	1.0156	296
11	Northwestern St	40.190	322	0.3694	230
12	Houston Baptist	41.876	352	0.4268	243

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-CC	77.267	14	-0.2295	147
2	Nicholls	77.308	15	-0.7048	84
3	McNeese	77.390	16	-1.5720	24
4	SE Louisiana	78.073	25	0.4744	229
5	Lamar	78.151	29	1.2077	312
6	Incarnate Word	80.798	86	-0.4220	117
7	Northwestern St	81.533	117	-0.5863	100
8	UT Rio Grande	82.169	135	-1.7799	19
9	SF Austin	82.929	168	1.2714	317
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	83.881	216	0.8577	272
11	Houston Baptist	85.020	264	-0.5070	108
12	New Orleans	86.991	329	0.5618	242

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	40.908	32	-0.3110	113
2	McNeese	41.881	58	0.3596	223
3	UT Rio Grande	42.515	75	-0.4666	95
4	New Orleans	42.927	88	-1.5757	10
5	Lamar	44.096	143	0.0093	166
6	Texas A&M-CC	44.783	188	0.1602	186
7	SE Louisiana	45.466	220	0.2832	208
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	46.143	256	-0.8127	54
9	Incarnate Word	48.703	339	1.3922	335
10	Nicholls	48.811	341	-0.2680	122
11	Northwestern St	49.253	345	0.7473	275
12	Houston Baptist	49.385	348	0.7281	272

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	52.918	15	0.9341	295
2	New Orleans	59.395	145	0.7121	269
3	Houston Baptist	59.984	167	-0.3562	147
4	UT Rio Grande	60.039	174	0.5636	254
5	Northwestern St	60.933	202	0.9099	292
6	SE Louisiana	61.212	211	-0.4977	123
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	61.583	225	-0.6414	107
8	Lamar	62.380	243	1.1969	313
9	Nicholls	63.025	267	-0.7811	95
10	Texas A&M-CC	64.055	296	-1.1623	70
11	Incarnate Word	64.942	319	-0.2863	157
12	SF Austin	67.153	350	0.0781	211

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	19.725	3	-0.0699	158
2	Lamar	23.877	69	0.2279	224
3	SE Louisiana	24.427	96	-0.1764	136
4	UT Rio Grande	24.438	97	-0.7820	50
5	Texas A&M-CC	25.415	152	-0.0386	164
6	New Orleans	25.627	166	-0.4114	97
7	SF Austin	25.716	171	0.3119	238
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	26.622	234	-0.3649	102
9	Nicholls	27.138	259	-0.6191	66
10	Northwestern St	28.386	311	0.3926	252
11	Houston Baptist	29.279	335	0.0798	199
12	Incarnate Word	29.613	340	0.4337	257

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	41.162	4	0.0691	199
2	SE Louisiana	47.621	89	-0.2322	157
3	Nicholls	48.376	116	-1.0447	67
4	Lamar	48.696	130	1.6308	338
5	UT Rio Grande	49.194	150	-0.7568	92
6	Texas A&M-CC	49.374	155	-1.1038	63
7	Northwestern St	49.783	177	0.3503	230
8	Houston Baptist	50.798	209	-0.5902	112
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	51.737	248	-0.0426	184
10	New Orleans	51.936	256	1.0037	293
11	Incarnate Word	52.288	269	-0.7286	96
12	SF Austin	55.606	341	0.9381	289

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	46.279	22	-0.1248	159
2	McNeese	48.559	65	-0.0253	166
3	Lamar	49.155	82	-0.7816	89
4	New Orleans	49.685	100	-1.9553	14
5	UT Rio Grande	50.520	129	-0.9533	69
6	SE Louisiana	51.488	163	-0.1628	154
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	51.699	171	-0.6046	105
8	Texas A&M-CC	52.195	193	0.8491	276
9	Nicholls	56.624	320	-0.4934	118
10	Incarnate Word	57.127	329	1.5870	330
11	Houston Baptist	57.312	333	0.5434	242
12	Northwestern St	57.420	336	0.4487	232

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	32.847	16	-0.0781	155
2	Incarnate Word	35.058	47	0.2863	209
3	Texas A&M-CC	35.945	70	1.1623	296
4	Nicholls	36.975	99	0.7811	271
5	Lamar	37.620	123	-1.1969	53
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.417	141	0.6414	259
7	SE Louisiana	38.788	155	0.4977	243
8	Northwestern St	39.067	164	-0.9099	74
9	UT Rio Grande	39.961	192	-0.5636	112
10	Houston Baptist	40.016	199	0.3562	219
11	New Orleans	40.605	221	-0.7121	97
12	McNeese	47.082	351	-0.9341	71

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	8.151	6	-0.0741	140
2	Texas A&M-CC	8.983	26	0.1318	195
3	Incarnate Word	9.555	55	0.5819	295
4	Nicholls	10.379	118	0.1774	207
5	UT Rio Grande	10.512	125	-0.2510	102
6	Lamar	10.526	127	0.1903	211
7	SE Louisiana	10.981	163	0.7072	310
8	New Orleans	11.757	240	-0.7084	31
9	Northwestern St	11.804	248	-0.0232	154
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	11.811	249	0.0103	163
11	McNeese	12.468	292	-0.3101	87
12	Houston Baptist	12.597	301	0.3470	251

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	27.324	18	0.3334	216
2	Texas A&M-CC	27.894	30	0.8744	281
3	Incarnate Word	28.511	43	0.3066	212
4	Nicholls	28.933	52	0.3398	218
5	Lamar	29.455	71	-0.4232	107
6	SE Louisiana	30.452	99	0.7066	265
7	Northwestern St	31.750	142	-0.9366	70
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	32.144	152	0.9003	282
9	UT Rio Grande	32.974	177	-1.0231	65
10	Houston Baptist	34.222	236	0.0832	180
11	New Orleans	35.055	267	-0.4419	104
12	McNeese	36.228	294	-1.6412	25

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	29.802	27	-0.4770	115
2	UT Rio Grande	31.939	85	0.1797	183
3	Texas A&M-CC	32.721	121	-0.5439	109
4	New Orleans	33.400	158	-1.7818	24
5	Incarnate Word	33.769	179	1.9052	329
6	McNeese	33.835	187	0.4205	214
7	Lamar	34.531	221	0.6522	242
8	Nicholls	35.588	272	0.7047	247
9	SE Louisiana	35.728	280	0.9507	274
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	36.402	309	-1.0648	69
11	Northwestern St	37.088	332	0.9351	272
12	Houston Baptist	37.168	333	1.0772	281

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	31.480	70	1.0602	255
2	SF Austin	34.020	127	-2.7534	22
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	36.670	202	0.2122	190
4	UT Rio Grande	38.970	255	3.3031	338
5	New Orleans	39.070	260	-1.1704	82
6	Nicholls	41.530	298	0.3070	197
7	Northwestern St	42.490	313	0.7507	233
8	Texas A&M-CC	44.810	332	-0.3594	140
9	McNeese	44.880	333	4.3259	355
10	SE Louisiana	45.410	339	0.7762	235
11	Incarnate Word	45.660	341	2.4859	315
12	Lamar	46.300	343	0.5392	213

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	18.558	68	0.4311	209
2	SF Austin	19.753	107	-1.0384	42
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	20.281	138	0.5432	222
4	UT Rio Grande	22.372	243	1.1805	301
5	McNeese	23.710	294	1.4418	322
6	Northwestern St	23.916	299	0.5671	227
7	Nicholls	24.074	304	0.6510	242
8	Texas A&M-CC	24.231	309	0.2782	183
9	Lamar	24.367	314	0.9843	277
10	New Orleans	24.424	316	-0.4788	96
11	SE Louisiana	25.478	339	0.5120	218
12	Incarnate Word	26.187	346	1.1394	297

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	26.019	72	0.8031	254
2	SF Austin	27.661	113	-1.8205	22
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	29.590	192	0.5124	215
4	Nicholls	31.383	258	0.2076	180
5	UT Rio Grande	31.427	259	1.9140	327
6	McNeese	33.058	298	1.8210	321
7	New Orleans	33.511	317	-0.7086	88
8	Northwestern St	33.795	319	0.5601	223
9	Texas A&M-CC	33.995	324	-0.0930	151
10	SE Louisiana	34.519	334	0.6423	232
11	Lamar	35.620	343	0.7785	251
12	Incarnate Word	35.720	346	1.6056	314

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	67.850	29	0.7353	233
2	Lamar	68.375	37	0.7917	241
3	McNeese	70.323	95	0.3747	197
4	UT Rio Grande	71.119	136	-0.4281	112
5	Texas A&M-CC	71.177	140	0.9094	258
6	SF Austin	71.449	152	0.8210	244
7	Northwestern St	71.895	176	0.8410	246
8	New Orleans	72.510	203	0.2032	183
9	Incarnate Word	72.951	227	0.2873	191
10	SE Louisiana	73.152	237	-0.1884	134
11	Houston Baptist	73.277	242	0.9666	262
12	Nicholls	77.009	356	1.7351	305

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	44.724	21	-2.5038	27
2	SE Louisiana	49.853	117	-0.7135	115
3	Incarnate Word	51.930	173	0.4279	213
4	Texas A&M-CC	52.435	189	-3.6168	8
5	Northwestern St	53.877	223	-1.1503	87
6	Houston Baptist	54.644	244	1.5145	298
7	Lamar	55.637	264	0.8419	250
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	55.821	265	-1.6780	54
9	Nicholls	56.208	278	0.6126	234
10	McNeese	59.022	324	0.1906	191
11	New Orleans	60.799	347	0.0462	184
12	UT Rio Grande	61.068	351	1.2673	279

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	14.605	1	0.4581	51
2	Nicholls	13.157	8	0.3414	70
3	Texas A&M-CC	10.729	86	0.2447	95
4	SE Louisiana	10.643	95	-0.7725	332
5	Lamar	9.858	145	-0.7811	335
6	SF Austin	9.711	158	-0.0875	184
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	9.697	159	0.0687	144
8	Northwestern St	9.549	172	-0.1468	199
9	UT Rio Grande	9.341	186	0.2572	93
10	Houston Baptist	9.187	192	-0.3222	241
11	Incarnate Word	8.135	276	-0.7571	330
12	New Orleans	7.589	319	-0.1073	189

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	6.894	25	0.5882	22
2	Lamar	6.872	26	-0.0621	189
3	New Orleans	5.416	107	-0.0625	191
4	SF Austin	5.099	127	-0.5004	319
5	Houston Baptist	4.973	140	-0.1040	201
6	Incarnate Word	4.490	199	0.4866	42
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	4.359	212	-0.4626	309
8	SE Louisiana	4.168	242	0.2263	98
9	Texas A&M-CC	4.039	248	-0.4690	310
10	UT Rio Grande	3.904	270	0.2775	86
11	Nicholls	3.681	286	0.4228	55
12	Northwestern St	2.631	348	-0.5605	333

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	23.200	62	0.7284	289
2	SF Austin	24.650	129	-0.3765	92
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	25.164	160	0.4563	247
4	UT Rio Grande	26.228	240	0.7582	293
5	Nicholls	26.338	256	-0.1596	125
6	Lamar	26.702	278	-0.4990	73
7	Northwestern St	26.995	288	0.2353	207
8	New Orleans	27.375	305	0.2436	210
9	SE Louisiana	28.746	338	0.6184	278
10	Incarnate Word	28.852	342	1.0637	322
11	McNeese	29.206	350	0.4381	244
12	Texas A&M-CC	29.718	360	1.0467	317

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	72.056	98	-0.4002	205
2	Nicholls	71.012	148	0.5407	58
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	70.749	166	-0.8128	273
4	UT Rio Grande	69.500	233	-1.1219	319
5	McNeese	68.209	282	-0.8045	271
6	SF Austin	68.154	285	-0.7153	255
7	Texas A&M-CC	68.115	289	-0.9624	299
8	Lamar	68.043	292	-0.3560	196
9	Northwestern St	67.615	308	-0.3565	197
10	SE Louisiana	66.898	324	-0.5906	233
11	Incarnate Word	66.851	326	0.4529	67
12	Houston Baptist	65.675	353	-0.3010	181

Location invert reset

Result invert reset

Game Type invert reset

Points Per Possession reset

Mean
Std
Median
Min
Max

selected out of records.

Showing - of

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Envo Magazine