Conferences – HoopSci

College Basketball Analytics, Insights, and Trends

Quick Links
Teams
- America East
  - Albany
  - Bryant
  - Binghamton
  - Maine
  - New Hampshire
  - NJIT
  - UMass Lowell
  - UMBC
  - Vermont
- American
  - Charlotte
  - East Carolina
  - Florida Atlantic
  - Memphis
  - North Texas
  - Rice
  - Temple
  - Tulane
  - Tulsa
  - UAB
  - USF
  - UTSA
  - Wichita State
- Atlantic 10
  - Davidson
  - Dayton
  - Duquesne
  - Fordham
  - George Mason
  - George Washington
  - La Salle
  - Loyola-Chicago
  - Richmond
  - St. Josephs
  - Saint Louis
  - St. Bonaventure
  - Rhode Island
  - VCU
- ACC
  - Boston College
  - California
  - Clemson
  - Duke
  - Florida State
  - Georgia Tech
  - Louisville
  - Miami
  - NC State
  - North Carolina
  - Notre Dame
  - Pitt
  - SMU
  - Stanford
  - Syracuse
  - Virginia
  - Virginia Tech
  - Wake Forest
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
  - Arizona
  - Arizona State
  - Baylor
  - BYU
  - Cincinnati
  - Colorado
  - Houston
  - Iowa State
  - Kansas
  - Kansas State
  - Oklahoma State
  - TCU
  - Texas Tech
  - UCF
  - Utah
  - West Virginia
- Big East
  - Butler
  - Creighton
  - Depaul
  - Georgetown
  - Marquette
  - Providence
  - Seton Hall
  - St. John’s
  - UConn
  - Villanova
  - Xavier
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
  - Illinois
  - Indiana
  - Iowa
  - Maryland
  - Michigan State
  - Minnesota
  - Nebraska
  - Northwestern
  - Ohio State
  - Oregon
  - Penn State
  - Purdue
  - Rutgers
  - UCLA
  - USC
  - Washington
  - Wisconsin
- Big West
- Coastal
  - Campbell
  - Charleston
  - Drexel
  - Elon
  - Hampton
  - Hofstra
  - Monmouth
  - North Carolina A&T
  - Northeastern
  - Stony Brook
  - Towson
  - UNC Wilmington
  - William & Mary
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
  - Brown
  - Columbia
  - Cornell
  - Dartmouth
  - Harvard
  - Pennsylvania
  - Princeton
  - Yale
- MAAC
  - Canisius
  - Fairfield
  - Iona
  - Manhattan
  - Marist
  - Merrimack
  - Mt. St. Mary’s
  - Niagara
  - Quinnipiac
  - Rider
  - Sacred Heart
  - Saint Peter’s
  - Siena
- Mid-American
  - Akron
  - Ball State
  - Bowling Green
  - Buffalo
  - Central Michigan
  - Eastern Michigan
  - Kent State
  - Miami (OH)
  - Northern Illinois
  - Ohio
  - Toledo
  - UMass
  - Western Michigan
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
  - Belmont
  - Bradley
  - Drake
  - Evansville
  - Illinois State
  - Indiana State
  - Murray State
  - Northern Iowa
  - Southern Illinois
  - UIC
  - Valparaiso
- Mountain West
  - Air Force
  - Boise State
  - Colorado State
  - Fresno State
  - Grand Canyon
  - Nevada
  - New Mexico
  - San Diego State
  - San Jose State
  - UNLV
  - Utah State
  - Wyoming
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
  - American
  - Army
  - Boston University
  - Bucknell
  - Colgate
  - Holy Cross
  - Lafayette
  - Lehigh
  - Loyola (MD)
  - Navy
- SEC
  - Alabama
  - Arkansas
  - Auburn
  - Florida
  - Georgia
  - Kentucky
  - LSU
  - Mississippi State
  - Missouri
  - Oklahoma
  - Ole Miss
  - South Carolina
  - Tennessee
  - Texas
  - Texas A&M
  - Vanderbilt
- Southern
  - Chattanooga
  - East Tennessee State
  - Furman
  - Mercer
  - Samford
  - The Citadel
  - UNC Greensboro
  - VMI
  - Western Carolina
  - Wofford
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Conferences
- America East
- American
- Atlantic 10
- ACC
- Atlantic Sun
- Big 12
- Big East
- Big Sky
- Big South
- Big Ten
- Big West
- Coastal
- Conference USA
- Horizon League
- Ivy League
- MAAC
- Mid-American
- MEAC
- Missouri Valley
- Mountain West
- Northeast
- Ohio Valley
- Pac-12
- Patriot League
- SEC
- Southern
- Southland
- SWAC
- Summit League
- Sun Belt
- WCC
- WAC
Games
Models
Statistics
Contact

Search for:

Standings
Statistics
Trend Lab

Team	Wins	Losses	Win Pct	Conf Wins	Conf Losses	Conf Win Pct	GB

Displaying:

Highlight:

Sort by:

Adjusted Efficiency Margin (Adj EM)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	8.382	103	1.3583	121
2	SF Austin	2.759	144	3.8976	27
3	Lamar	0.676	161	1.9852	88
4	UT Rio Grande	0.613	162	3.1485	47
5	New Orleans	-4.331	201	5.9461	1
6	SE Louisiana	-9.646	241	-0.2452	206
7	Texas A&M-CC	-9.960	243	-1.0974	247
8	Nicholls	-11.138	256	-0.7703	234
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	-11.188	257	0.9241	146
10	Houston Baptist	-13.411	269	2.0320	86
11	Incarnate Word	-19.060	310	-0.5867	229
12	Northwestern St	-25.410	343	-1.9506	280

Net Efficiency (PPP Differential)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.260	44	0.0226	93
2	SF Austin	0.197	74	0.0298	77
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.008	188	0.0451	32
4	UT Rio Grande	-0.002	194	0.0064	158
5	Lamar	-0.027	209	0.0001	183
6	New Orleans	-0.062	238	0.0315	68
7	Texas A&M-CC	-0.102	258	-0.0393	315
8	Houston Baptist	-0.132	285	-0.0061	205
9	Incarnate Word	-0.177	306	-0.0332	299
10	Nicholls	-0.222	322	-0.0608	345
11	SE Louisiana	-0.247	331	-0.0456	324
12	Northwestern St	-0.266	335	-0.0438	322

Elo

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1622.844	45	13.6856	30
2	Lamar	1511.138	166	19.6888	11
3	SF Austin	1488.439	200	-2.4103	206
4	Nicholls	1473.198	218	-7.7276	266
5	Texas A&M-CC	1471.338	221	-9.2962	293
6	SE Louisiana	1467.594	228	-3.2959	218
7	Incarnate Word	1433.565	277	24.8680	5
8	Northwestern St	1422.636	288	10.5072	61
9	UT Rio Grande	1400.694	311	7.8862	79
10	Houston Baptist	1368.226	337	13.4639	33
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	1364.225	344	-3.7136	222
12	New Orleans	1327.326	356	1.0421	160

RPI

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.612	37	0.0137	96
2	Incarnate Word	0.551	96	0.0252	47
3	SF Austin	0.543	106	0.0440	7
4	New Orleans	0.532	127	0.0403	12
5	Texas A&M-CC	0.480	203	-0.0026	187
6	Lamar	0.453	244	-0.0066	218
7	UT Rio Grande	0.446	264	-0.0040	200
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.443	269	-0.0143	263
9	SE Louisiana	0.431	286	-0.0270	315
10	Houston Baptist	0.407	311	-0.0054	209
11	Nicholls	0.396	322	-0.0312	331
12	Northwestern St	0.339	353	-0.0471	361

Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	0.538	102	0.0099	101
2	SF Austin	0.514	173	0.0001	206
3	UT Rio Grande	0.512	177	-0.0038	242
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.510	183	0.0204	26
5	McNeese	0.508	189	-0.0081	288
6	Incarnate Word	0.505	201	0.0165	45
7	Northwestern St	0.487	248	0.0063	141
8	New Orleans	0.481	271	-0.0044	248
9	Nicholls	0.472	290	0.0011	187
10	Lamar	0.465	301	-0.0021	225
11	SE Louisiana	0.444	336	0.0002	205
12	Texas A&M-CC	0.401	362	-0.0088	293

Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	1.233	17	-0.0037	230
2	Incarnate Word	1.223	22	0.0487	18
3	UT Rio Grande	1.099	139	0.0089	163
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	1.098	142	0.0455	23
5	SF Austin	1.076	181	0.0119	153
6	Lamar	1.035	251	0.0055	179
7	Houston Baptist	1.024	262	0.0201	97
8	Northwestern St	1.020	269	0.0100	162
9	New Orleans	0.966	323	-0.0102	270
10	Texas A&M-CC	0.961	326	-0.0274	333
11	Nicholls	0.940	338	-0.0169	301
12	SE Louisiana	0.931	343	-0.0179	305

Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Incarnate Word	0.139	56	-0.0031	120
2	McNeese	0.144	74	-0.0029	129
3	SF Austin	0.146	86	-0.0209	2
4	UT Rio Grande	0.151	105	-0.0153	6
5	Houston Baptist	0.151	108	-0.0086	41
6	Lamar	0.152	118	-0.0080	49
7	Texas A&M-CC	0.156	136	0.0017	201
8	Nicholls	0.162	171	0.0021	209
9	SE Louisiana	0.173	242	0.0092	324
10	Northwestern St	0.178	265	-0.0075	56
11	New Orleans	0.191	312	0.0042	241
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.197	338	-0.0114	16

Offensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	0.370	26	0.0443	46
2	McNeese	0.341	67	0.0083	209
3	Incarnate Word	0.318	105	0.0531	27
4	SF Austin	0.301	147	-0.0205	349
5	New Orleans	0.290	178	-0.0020	276
6	Houston Baptist	0.253	270	0.0171	146
7	Nicholls	0.252	275	-0.0232	354
8	SE Louisiana	0.248	282	0.0023	253
9	Texas A&M-CC	0.247	283	0.0134	165
10	Northwestern St	0.241	299	-0.0066	301
11	UT Rio Grande	0.232	314	-0.0036	288
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.218	336	0.0333	75

Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	0.445	40	0.0151	115
2	McNeese	0.438	52	0.0081	153
3	SE Louisiana	0.394	112	-0.0048	249
4	New Orleans	0.364	172	-0.0060	254
5	Incarnate Word	0.356	193	0.0236	79
6	Texas A&M-CC	0.346	220	-0.0071	265
7	Houston Baptist	0.338	235	0.0201	95
8	Nicholls	0.329	255	-0.0097	282
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.312	287	-0.0024	229
10	SF Austin	0.266	344	-0.0345	357
11	Lamar	0.256	350	-0.0064	258
12	UT Rio Grande	0.251	352	0.0015	200

Adjusted Offensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	112.309	91	0.6535	91
2	UT Rio Grande	106.776	159	1.1290	65
3	Incarnate Word	105.110	182	-0.2330	161
4	SF Austin	103.493	204	3.5070	10
5	New Orleans	102.946	214	2.3559	23
6	Houston Baptist	101.117	240	0.2529	121
7	Northwestern St	100.469	251	0.2514	122
8	Lamar	100.404	252	-0.6150	190
9	Nicholls	99.519	264	-1.6991	259
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	96.013	299	-0.2684	170
11	SE Louisiana	95.091	308	-1.8007	265
12	Texas A&M-CC	93.715	320	-3.2211	338

Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Incarnate Word	43.871	9	1.0974	63
2	McNeese	43.288	16	-0.3423	242
3	Lamar	40.771	74	0.9931	78
4	UT Rio Grande	40.168	89	0.3323	153
5	SF Austin	40.118	91	0.8903	83
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	40.065	95	1.7520	21
7	Houston Baptist	38.279	153	0.8801	87
8	Texas A&M-CC	35.073	282	-1.0690	321
9	Northwestern St	33.933	311	0.0004	202
10	Nicholls	33.326	321	-0.2829	229
11	New Orleans	32.643	340	-0.7474	291
12	SE Louisiana	31.892	348	-0.6597	275

Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	92.812	2	1.5856	35
2	SF Austin	90.407	9	2.6508	8
3	Incarnate Word	90.124	12	-0.0272	172
4	UT Rio Grande	87.806	38	1.0714	70
5	McNeese	86.133	76	-0.2757	209
6	Texas A&M-CC	84.544	126	-0.6566	251
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	83.442	171	0.8378	84
8	Houston Baptist	82.408	211	0.0065	170
9	Nicholls	82.193	221	-0.5500	237
10	SE Louisiana	80.091	290	-0.9250	277
11	New Orleans	79.811	296	-0.4535	226
12	Northwestern St	77.450	336	-0.9544	278

Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	50.339	32	-0.1636	223
2	Incarnate Word	48.490	75	1.2237	60
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	47.595	96	1.5933	33
4	Houston Baptist	46.409	131	1.0223	85
5	UT Rio Grande	45.642	169	-0.1694	225
6	SF Austin	44.483	219	-0.2591	241
7	Lamar	43.904	240	0.2985	158
8	Northwestern St	43.565	259	0.4197	149
9	Texas A&M-CC	41.898	306	-0.7995	294
10	New Orleans	41.329	318	-0.7485	290
11	Nicholls	40.420	331	-0.1050	214
12	SE Louisiana	39.916	343	-0.1937	228

2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	70.264	16	1.4109	52
2	Texas A&M-CC	68.237	36	-0.0245	170
3	McNeese	68.071	39	1.3243	56
4	Northwestern St	65.226	87	-0.2828	190
5	UT Rio Grande	62.553	140	3.0654	8
6	Incarnate Word	61.725	160	-0.6055	218
7	New Orleans	60.417	177	-2.3940	322
8	SF Austin	60.048	189	-0.6284	219
9	Houston Baptist	58.846	207	0.2102	150
10	Nicholls	56.975	246	-0.9158	241
11	SE Louisiana	55.690	271	-2.7565	340
12	Texas A&M-Commerce	54.020	300	0.1275	157

2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	34.844	2	0.8586	77
2	Lamar	32.159	13	1.7109	18
3	Incarnate Word	29.799	62	0.3222	152
4	Houston Baptist	27.379	146	0.9193	74
5	SF Austin	27.022	164	0.1570	174
6	Texas A&M-CC	26.868	174	-0.8740	307
7	UT Rio Grande	26.449	196	0.4956	128
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	26.088	211	0.8048	85
9	Northwestern St	24.430	272	-0.3030	227
10	SE Louisiana	22.945	301	-0.7961	297
11	Nicholls	22.211	323	-0.5938	268
12	New Orleans	22.031	327	-1.2278	329

2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	65.388	1	2.3524	16
2	McNeese	58.972	18	1.0359	75
3	Texas A&M-CC	57.354	29	-0.5075	203
4	Incarnate Word	55.532	62	-0.5149	204
5	UT Rio Grande	54.431	91	3.2929	5
6	SF Austin	54.292	94	1.0916	69
7	Northwestern St	50.581	174	-0.9183	238
8	Houston Baptist	48.392	223	0.1962	131
9	New Orleans	48.291	226	-2.2410	324
10	Nicholls	47.160	247	-1.0548	249
11	Texas A&M-Commerce	44.821	291	0.4952	113
12	SE Louisiana	44.482	298	-2.9219	344

2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	58.848	47	0.5531	171
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	57.892	63	1.3670	86
3	Houston Baptist	56.526	96	1.7471	61
4	Incarnate Word	53.454	176	1.0515	120
5	SE Louisiana	51.684	217	1.5642	73
6	Lamar	50.177	268	1.1990	105
7	SF Austin	49.581	280	-0.7497	290
8	UT Rio Grande	49.521	283	-1.8888	345
9	Northwestern St	47.882	317	0.0857	217
10	Nicholls	47.663	319	0.1215	209
11	Texas A&M-CC	46.808	324	-0.9336	305
12	New Orleans	46.223	331	-0.3059	246

3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	45.980	66	-0.1275	209
2	SE Louisiana	44.310	95	2.7565	26
3	Nicholls	43.025	120	0.9158	125
4	Houston Baptist	41.154	159	-0.2102	216
5	SF Austin	39.952	177	0.6284	147
6	New Orleans	39.583	189	2.3940	44
7	Incarnate Word	38.275	206	0.6055	148
8	UT Rio Grande	37.447	226	-3.0654	358
9	Northwestern St	34.774	279	0.2828	176
10	McNeese	31.929	327	-1.3243	310
11	Texas A&M-CC	31.763	330	0.0245	196
12	Lamar	29.736	350	-1.4109	314

3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Incarnate Word	14.072	48	0.7752	50
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	13.978	50	0.9472	36
3	UT Rio Grande	13.718	55	-0.1632	219
4	SF Austin	13.096	77	0.7333	59
5	Nicholls	11.115	180	0.3109	115
6	Houston Baptist	10.899	193	-0.0393	186
7	New Orleans	10.612	217	0.4804	89
8	Northwestern St	9.503	276	0.3034	118
9	SE Louisiana	8.946	301	0.1364	152
10	Lamar	8.612	308	-0.7178	327
11	McNeese	8.444	317	-1.2008	354
12	Texas A&M-CC	8.205	325	-0.1950	228

3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	38.621	67	0.3426	162
2	SF Austin	36.116	111	1.5592	65
3	SE Louisiana	35.609	123	1.9969	44
4	Nicholls	35.033	135	0.5048	149
5	Incarnate Word	34.593	144	0.4877	151
6	Houston Baptist	34.017	157	-0.1897	218
7	UT Rio Grande	33.375	172	-2.2216	351
8	New Orleans	31.520	218	1.7874	53
9	Lamar	27.424	305	-0.7668	265
10	Texas A&M-CC	27.190	311	-0.1491	214
11	McNeese	27.160	313	-1.3116	316
12	Northwestern St	26.869	318	-0.0361	200

3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Incarnate Word	40.723	14	1.7041	38
2	UT Rio Grande	38.866	33	1.3203	57
3	SF Austin	36.359	93	0.8048	98
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	35.561	115	1.9902	24
5	Northwestern St	35.049	129	1.0966	76
6	Lamar	32.921	206	-1.4509	307
7	Nicholls	32.601	222	1.0020	83
8	New Orleans	32.601	223	-0.5093	222
9	Houston Baptist	31.992	240	-0.1809	190
10	McNeese	30.925	277	-2.2751	343
11	Texas A&M-CC	29.652	305	-0.8710	260
12	SE Louisiana	26.885	348	-0.2397	196

Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Northwestern St	44.690	46	1.5086	115
2	McNeese	42.510	75	0.8101	153
3	SE Louisiana	37.307	151	-0.4805	249
4	New Orleans	36.541	172	-0.6030	254
5	Houston Baptist	35.889	190	2.0135	95
6	Incarnate Word	32.907	253	2.3615	79
7	Nicholls	32.750	255	-0.9707	282
8	Texas A&M-CC	32.320	261	-0.7093	265
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	28.949	317	-0.2433	229
10	UT Rio Grande	26.510	339	0.1505	200
11	SF Austin	26.299	340	-3.4515	357
12	Lamar	23.528	356	-0.6397	258

Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	28.268	16	1.5168	58
2	Northwestern St	24.650	78	0.6979	120
3	New Orleans	20.697	186	-0.0073	213
4	Incarnate Word	20.464	192	1.8982	35
5	SE Louisiana	20.327	199	-0.6021	282
6	Texas A&M-CC	17.705	289	-0.4040	265
7	Houston Baptist	17.578	292	0.3881	156
8	Nicholls	16.280	324	-1.4324	338
9	UT Rio Grande	15.851	331	0.3914	153
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	15.679	335	0.2507	181
11	SF Austin	14.231	350	-1.3265	332
12	Lamar	13.298	356	-0.6876	291

Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	35.494	47	0.6881	151
2	Northwestern St	33.892	75	0.8789	135
3	Houston Baptist	29.180	191	1.8473	67
4	SE Louisiana	29.081	194	-0.7564	287
5	Incarnate Word	28.876	199	2.0849	51
6	New Orleans	28.646	201	-0.4164	259
7	Texas A&M-CC	26.742	261	-0.7529	286
8	Nicholls	26.483	265	-0.9537	301
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	23.101	327	-0.0837	222
10	UT Rio Grande	22.596	338	0.5054	164
11	SF Austin	22.510	339	-2.2516	352
12	Lamar	21.583	343	-0.0389	218

Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	79.128	16	3.0071	18
2	New Orleans	72.925	138	1.2476	80
3	Northwestern St	72.261	160	0.3942	152
4	Incarnate Word	72.016	168	1.5672	58
5	SE Louisiana	70.976	195	-0.3241	214
6	UT Rio Grande	69.740	229	0.4250	148
7	SF Austin	67.009	291	1.9950	42
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	65.643	312	0.4147	150
9	Texas A&M-CC	65.422	314	-0.1683	197
10	Nicholls	63.624	338	-1.9359	309
11	Houston Baptist	61.349	351	-1.9582	310
12	Lamar	59.722	359	-3.0379	340

Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Texas A&M-Commerce	63.186	19	0.5112	159
2	Texas A&M-CC	60.323	43	2.9567	31
3	SE Louisiana	58.986	61	3.1033	25
4	Lamar	55.394	129	-0.8781	256
5	Houston Baptist	54.583	148	2.1608	59
6	New Orleans	51.954	203	0.9288	134
7	UT Rio Grande	51.494	207	-3.0425	346
8	Northwestern St	51.140	213	-0.6540	242
9	Nicholls	50.197	230	2.5358	45
10	McNeese	49.528	249	-3.1531	347
11	SF Austin	49.317	252	-0.7342	250
12	Incarnate Word	45.414	323	0.1699	191

Balls Stolen per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Incarnate Word	4.438	2	-0.9615	35
2	McNeese	4.627	4	-0.6911	71
3	UT Rio Grande	4.767	5	-1.1356	26
4	Houston Baptist	5.880	17	-1.4506	9
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	6.105	26	-1.9642	2
6	Texas A&M-CC	6.230	31	-0.8522	49
7	SF Austin	7.871	122	-1.1483	25
8	SE Louisiana	8.014	131	-0.0638	203
9	Lamar	8.136	142	-0.8398	51
10	Nicholls	9.104	217	0.0314	232
11	Northwestern St	9.387	241	-0.6282	89
12	New Orleans	10.309	297	0.0103	225

Balls Blocked per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Incarnate Word	1.504	1	-0.9711	7
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	2.005	7	-0.8846	8
3	Houston Baptist	2.859	34	-0.1453	163
4	Lamar	3.717	114	-0.2325	125
5	McNeese	3.967	147	-0.0573	196
6	SE Louisiana	4.304	191	-0.7287	21
7	SF Austin	4.879	253	0.3796	318
8	UT Rio Grande	5.060	281	0.3739	314
9	Northwestern St	5.842	334	-0.1969	140
10	Nicholls	5.895	337	0.2091	275
11	Texas A&M-CC	6.347	353	-0.0037	217
12	New Orleans	6.467	355	0.4219	322

Fouls Drawn per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	26.555	80	0.7854	73
2	Northwestern St	25.573	107	0.5339	94
3	SE Louisiana	23.090	183	-0.3442	218
4	McNeese	22.620	203	0.7437	79
5	Nicholls	21.056	256	-0.5569	240
6	Lamar	18.906	309	-0.9195	276
7	UT Rio Grande	18.447	320	0.3481	128
8	SF Austin	18.158	329	-1.1642	299
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	17.069	341	-0.9476	282
10	Texas A&M-CC	16.768	344	-1.4195	318
11	Incarnate Word	16.522	346	-0.6737	256
12	Houston Baptist	16.452	348	-0.1231	187

Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	74.469	75	0.8459	129
2	Texas A&M-CC	73.990	85	2.5787	13
3	UT Rio Grande	72.595	144	-0.4943	314
4	Nicholls	72.584	145	0.5987	159
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	71.441	187	1.1411	90
6	SF Austin	70.481	220	-0.0617	266
7	Northwestern St	68.962	277	0.8785	124
8	Lamar	68.840	282	0.0596	240
9	SE Louisiana	68.694	287	-0.3104	298
10	McNeese	68.167	311	0.5252	174
11	Incarnate Word	67.601	326	0.7308	141
12	Houston Baptist	65.493	354	-0.3032	297

Opp Shooting (Effective Field Goal Pct)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.456	35	-0.0066	98
2	McNeese	0.484	100	0.0041	213
3	New Orleans	0.494	130	-0.0048	115
4	Lamar	0.502	151	0.0041	212
5	UT Rio Grande	0.523	220	-0.0015	155
6	SE Louisiana	0.532	244	0.0012	184
7	Texas A&M-CC	0.538	264	0.0103	285
8	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.544	280	-0.0016	152
9	Incarnate Word	0.573	331	0.0066	250
10	Nicholls	0.581	341	0.0387	363
11	Houston Baptist	0.589	350	0.0209	337
12	Northwestern St	0.591	352	0.0244	348

Opp Points per Possession

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	0.960	52	-0.0070	121
2	Lamar	0.984	80	-0.0101	106
3	McNeese	1.020	133	0.0164	256
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	1.044	163	-0.0186	66
5	SE Louisiana	1.047	171	-0.0055	131
6	Texas A&M-CC	1.097	248	0.0219	283
7	UT Rio Grande	1.099	251	0.0109	228
8	New Orleans	1.101	256	-0.0017	161
9	Houston Baptist	1.118	282	0.0176	264
10	Nicholls	1.146	305	0.0532	354
11	Northwestern St	1.234	358	0.0463	349
12	Incarnate Word	1.236	359	0.0313	307

Opp Turnover Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	0.212	11	0.0045	104
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.211	13	0.0084	56
3	SE Louisiana	0.191	51	0.0091	50
4	Lamar	0.189	59	0.0082	57
5	Nicholls	0.182	83	0.0069	72
6	Houston Baptist	0.165	174	0.0027	138
7	Texas A&M-CC	0.163	182	-0.0052	287
8	SF Austin	0.163	186	-0.0112	349
9	Northwestern St	0.157	215	-0.0002	200
10	UT Rio Grande	0.146	267	-0.0093	337
11	Incarnate Word	0.141	300	-0.0025	243
12	New Orleans	0.131	338	-0.0019	233

Defensive Rebounding Pct

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	0.774	28	0.0081	72
2	SF Austin	0.760	57	0.0248	7
3	SE Louisiana	0.749	79	0.0067	84
4	Lamar	0.734	128	0.0162	22
5	Texas A&M-CC	0.722	165	-0.0001	149
6	Nicholls	0.705	214	0.0003	138
7	UT Rio Grande	0.705	215	0.0078	75
8	New Orleans	0.689	267	-0.0020	171
9	Incarnate Word	0.677	291	-0.0148	283
10	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.674	296	0.0066	87
11	Northwestern St	0.612	359	-0.0225	327
12	McNeese	0.608	360	-0.0307	349

Opp Free Throw Rate

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	0.289	49	0.0042	169
2	UT Rio Grande	0.399	253	0.0307	320
3	New Orleans	0.409	272	0.0262	301
4	SF Austin	0.411	276	0.0013	148
5	McNeese	0.411	277	0.0277	311
6	Nicholls	0.412	280	-0.0007	132
7	Lamar	0.432	312	0.0240	290
8	Incarnate Word	0.435	315	0.0223	280
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	0.461	335	0.0154	246
10	Texas A&M-CC	0.480	341	0.0134	236
11	Northwestern St	0.484	343	0.0468	354
12	SE Louisiana	0.484	344	0.0431	348

Adjusted Defensive Efficiency

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	99.729	72	-2.4865	58
2	SF Austin	100.734	84	-0.5237	197
3	Texas A&M-CC	103.675	127	-1.6794	102
4	McNeese	103.927	134	-0.5807	191
5	SE Louisiana	104.738	143	-1.4468	114
6	UT Rio Grande	106.163	170	-1.7979	94
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	107.201	190	-1.3116	124
8	New Orleans	107.278	192	-3.5818	17
9	Nicholls	110.657	237	-0.9548	160
10	Houston Baptist	114.528	296	-1.6535	104
11	Incarnate Word	124.170	359	0.4928	264
12	Northwestern St	125.879	363	2.2582	347

Opp Field Goal Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	32.218	38	-0.2298	149
2	McNeese	32.247	39	-0.0794	173
3	Lamar	33.484	71	-0.6324	92
4	SE Louisiana	34.476	102	-0.8497	69
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	34.618	105	-1.2113	45
6	Texas A&M-CC	35.742	139	0.4330	246
7	UT Rio Grande	36.728	183	-0.6528	88
8	New Orleans	36.988	196	-0.6021	99
9	Nicholls	38.622	264	1.7171	351
10	Houston Baptist	40.742	322	0.2919	230
11	Northwestern St	40.842	323	1.0198	312
12	Incarnate Word	41.870	340	0.6290	270

Opp Field Goal Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SE Louisiana	73.222	3	-2.6082	10
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	75.174	17	-1.5330	52
3	Lamar	75.650	22	-2.3375	14
4	Texas A&M-CC	76.387	33	-0.3476	171
5	Nicholls	77.537	50	-1.2064	81
6	SF Austin	78.237	60	-0.2742	182
7	Northwestern St	80.767	125	-1.4164	61
8	McNeese	81.163	138	-0.3541	170
9	Houston Baptist	81.798	160	-0.9025	110
10	Incarnate Word	81.822	163	-0.3041	179
11	UT Rio Grande	82.215	178	-0.4572	159
12	New Orleans	85.304	281	-0.5392	151

Opp Field Goal Percentage (FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	39.818	42	0.0909	177
2	SF Austin	41.157	70	-0.1588	150
3	New Orleans	43.231	129	-0.4747	109
4	Lamar	44.017	163	0.4184	218
5	UT Rio Grande	44.814	186	-0.5454	97
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	46.421	247	-0.6125	89
7	SE Louisiana	46.983	262	0.3921	215
8	Texas A&M-CC	47.249	274	0.8082	275
9	Nicholls	49.818	336	2.7838	363
10	Houston Baptist	50.410	342	1.0477	299
11	Northwestern St	50.547	346	2.0084	353
12	Incarnate Word	51.313	351	0.9247	288

Opp 2 Point Rate (2ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	52.113	21	-0.3259	176
2	UT Rio Grande	54.726	55	-2.6176	30
3	New Orleans	57.602	116	-0.5103	157
4	Houston Baptist	57.797	123	-2.8649	21
5	Northwestern St	58.235	135	-0.3140	178
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	58.427	139	-2.7201	25
7	Nicholls	58.902	152	-2.2144	38
8	Incarnate Word	61.444	211	-1.0897	112
9	Lamar	61.869	231	-0.1714	194
10	Texas A&M-CC	62.482	246	-0.8403	128
11	SE Louisiana	62.703	252	1.4954	327
12	SF Austin	71.495	359	2.7042	359

Opp 2 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	18.420	3	-0.5475	101
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	22.522	56	-1.7498	15
3	Lamar	24.157	119	-0.3431	131
4	UT Rio Grande	24.549	136	-1.2214	41
5	SE Louisiana	25.434	175	-0.0519	184
6	SF Austin	25.447	176	0.6298	286
7	Texas A&M-CC	25.676	188	0.0856	211
8	Nicholls	25.707	190	0.0838	210
9	New Orleans	26.409	221	-0.5031	109
10	Houston Baptist	26.823	237	-1.3074	33
11	Northwestern St	27.085	253	0.5047	264
12	Incarnate Word	32.306	361	1.0606	326

Opp 2 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	42.696	25	-0.3784	191
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	43.785	47	-3.1284	11
3	UT Rio Grande	44.944	70	-2.4377	29
4	Nicholls	45.460	81	-2.5641	26
5	SE Louisiana	45.934	89	-0.3772	192
6	Lamar	46.880	115	-1.5987	76
7	Houston Baptist	46.911	117	-3.0455	13
8	Northwestern St	47.221	127	-1.0455	128
9	Texas A&M-CC	47.784	142	-0.8642	146
10	New Orleans	49.465	197	-0.6029	166
11	Incarnate Word	50.372	216	-1.1671	117
12	SF Austin	56.309	333	2.0678	346

Opp 2 Point Percentage (2Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	43.874	17	-0.7807	84
2	SF Austin	45.011	27	-0.7887	82
3	Lamar	50.624	145	0.6663	219
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	52.304	190	-0.2150	128
5	New Orleans	53.980	224	-0.3210	120
6	SE Louisiana	55.335	267	0.4329	191
7	Texas A&M-CC	55.599	272	1.3425	283
8	UT Rio Grande	55.648	274	0.5004	199
9	Houston Baptist	57.219	306	0.6865	222
10	Nicholls	58.051	322	3.5966	360
11	Northwestern St	58.725	330	2.6014	347
12	Incarnate Word	64.417	362	3.2104	353

Opp 3 Point Rate (3ptA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	28.505	7	-2.7042	7
2	SE Louisiana	37.297	114	-1.4954	39
3	Texas A&M-CC	37.518	120	0.8403	238
4	Lamar	38.131	135	0.1714	172
5	Incarnate Word	38.556	155	1.0897	254
6	Nicholls	41.098	214	2.2144	328
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	41.573	227	2.7201	341
8	Northwestern St	41.765	231	0.3140	188
9	Houston Baptist	42.203	243	2.8649	345
10	New Orleans	42.398	250	0.5103	209
11	UT Rio Grande	45.274	311	2.6176	336
12	McNeese	47.887	345	0.3259	190

Opp 3 Point Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	6.771	6	-0.8596	25
2	SE Louisiana	9.042	62	-0.7978	33
3	Lamar	9.327	74	-0.2893	118
4	Incarnate Word	9.564	95	-0.4316	94
5	Texas A&M-CC	10.066	127	0.3474	250
6	New Orleans	10.579	167	-0.0990	156
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	12.096	257	0.5385	285
8	UT Rio Grande	12.179	262	0.5686	288
9	Nicholls	12.915	297	1.6333	358
10	Northwestern St	13.758	331	0.5151	283
11	McNeese	13.827	334	0.4681	273
12	Houston Baptist	13.919	336	1.5993	357

Opp 3 Point Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	21.928	2	-2.3420	9
2	SE Louisiana	27.288	31	-2.2310	11
3	Texas A&M-CC	28.604	65	0.5166	217
4	Lamar	28.770	71	-0.7388	92
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	31.390	137	1.5954	305
6	Incarnate Word	31.450	141	0.8630	259
7	Nicholls	32.077	164	1.3578	295
8	Northwestern St	33.545	200	-0.3709	127
9	Houston Baptist	34.887	244	2.1430	327
10	New Orleans	35.839	269	0.0638	182
11	UT Rio Grande	37.271	300	1.9805	321
12	McNeese	38.467	327	0.0244	178

Opp 3 Point Percentage (3Pt FGM/FGA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Incarnate Word	28.884	53	-2.5697	13
2	New Orleans	29.835	72	-0.1538	171
3	Lamar	31.572	127	-0.4165	138
4	SF Austin	31.899	135	-0.0094	193
5	SE Louisiana	33.265	185	-0.1849	168
6	UT Rio Grande	33.503	194	0.2321	219
7	Texas A&M-CC	35.361	256	0.6007	251
8	McNeese	35.919	272	1.2548	305
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	39.626	344	0.2229	218
10	Nicholls	39.714	345	3.3591	362
11	Houston Baptist	40.397	350	2.8143	358
12	Northwestern St	40.951	354	2.2236	349

Opp Free Throw Rate (FTA/FGA %)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	28.690	45	0.4220	169
2	UT Rio Grande	41.998	273	3.0696	320
3	Nicholls	42.167	275	-0.0677	132
4	SF Austin	42.326	279	0.1324	148
5	New Orleans	42.635	285	2.6237	301
6	McNeese	42.760	289	2.7691	311
7	Lamar	45.412	316	2.4006	290
8	Incarnate Word	45.654	319	2.2278	280
9	Texas A&M-Commerce	47.902	334	1.5376	246
10	SE Louisiana	50.309	342	4.3137	348
11	Texas A&M-CC	50.404	343	1.3421	236
12	Northwestern St	51.173	346	4.6813	354

Opp Free Throw Makes per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	16.433	39	-0.3929	99
2	Lamar	22.143	221	0.5867	211
3	Texas A&M-Commerce	23.083	255	0.0219	149
4	McNeese	23.701	277	1.3363	303
5	UT Rio Grande	24.238	284	1.8333	327
6	Nicholls	24.476	288	0.3078	178
7	SF Austin	24.766	296	0.6295	214
8	New Orleans	25.494	307	1.1394	286
9	SE Louisiana	26.719	331	1.9583	334
10	Northwestern St	27.906	348	2.0825	342
11	Texas A&M-CC	28.135	349	0.9903	268
12	Incarnate Word	30.341	360	2.3183	349

Opp Free Throw Attempts per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	22.824	31	0.1013	147
2	Nicholls	32.028	246	-0.5700	86
3	SF Austin	32.745	261	0.0953	146
4	McNeese	34.023	293	2.0965	314
5	Lamar	34.120	294	0.9758	234
6	UT Rio Grande	34.298	297	2.5869	336
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	34.300	298	0.5478	196
8	New Orleans	35.736	322	2.1252	317
9	SE Louisiana	36.684	334	2.2945	326
10	Incarnate Word	37.345	340	1.8918	302
11	Texas A&M-CC	37.671	341	0.9333	228
12	Northwestern St	40.113	352	3.0017	347

Opp Free Throw Percentage (FTM/FTA)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	65.978	45	-0.1409	172
2	Texas A&M-Commerce	67.128	61	-1.5254	71
3	Northwestern St	67.809	75	-0.9663	107
4	McNeese	68.771	99	-0.6496	127
5	UT Rio Grande	70.762	170	0.2083	207
6	New Orleans	71.209	189	-0.6879	123
7	SE Louisiana	71.547	199	0.7714	256
8	Texas A&M-CC	73.704	254	0.8604	262
9	Houston Baptist	74.412	277	-0.2062	169
10	SF Austin	76.628	323	1.9994	338
11	Nicholls	78.321	349	4.0972	365
12	Incarnate Word	81.001	363	2.9327	358

Opp Assists per Made Field Goal (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	SF Austin	46.977	80	-2.9774	23
2	SE Louisiana	51.220	160	-0.2740	141
3	Incarnate Word	51.337	162	-1.1638	78
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	53.222	199	-1.7533	50
5	Lamar	55.573	250	0.5932	211
6	UT Rio Grande	57.116	280	0.6964	215
7	Houston Baptist	57.189	283	3.5701	345
8	New Orleans	57.950	295	1.0805	250
9	McNeese	58.898	306	0.9087	238
10	Northwestern St	61.925	337	2.9835	335
11	Nicholls	64.264	354	3.9704	354
12	Texas A&M-CC	66.236	360	4.6691	364

Steals per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	McNeese	14.212	11	0.0446	164
2	Nicholls	12.916	22	1.1069	15
3	SE Louisiana	12.630	26	0.9077	31
4	Texas A&M-Commerce	11.033	86	0.0175	174
5	Houston Baptist	10.722	106	0.0437	165
6	Lamar	10.677	110	0.0726	154
7	Texas A&M-CC	9.696	172	-0.1117	205
8	Northwestern St	9.025	222	-0.4095	271
9	SF Austin	8.867	224	-0.8783	338
10	New Orleans	8.374	253	-0.1383	209
11	Incarnate Word	7.715	288	-0.1984	224
12	UT Rio Grande	7.595	291	-0.6180	309

Blocks per Shot Attempt (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Lamar	7.682	19	0.0888	147
2	SF Austin	7.357	27	0.5104	46
3	McNeese	7.089	29	0.2721	111
4	Houston Baptist	5.332	119	0.1195	142
5	New Orleans	4.501	191	0.3708	82
6	Northwestern St	4.023	232	-0.5947	327
7	Texas A&M-Commerce	3.971	238	-0.1881	237
8	Nicholls	3.637	267	-0.6553	333
9	Texas A&M-CC	3.570	272	-0.5020	311
10	UT Rio Grande	2.912	309	-0.1234	209
11	SE Louisiana	2.501	338	-0.1000	200
12	Incarnate Word	2.110	351	-0.9154	356

Fouls per Possession (%)

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	Houston Baptist	22.956	66	1.1170	311
2	Nicholls	25.845	205	-0.7032	44
3	SF Austin	26.981	259	0.2234	174
4	New Orleans	28.082	292	1.1889	321
5	Lamar	28.082	293	1.0516	307
6	Texas A&M-Commerce	28.908	320	1.1632	317
7	UT Rio Grande	29.283	331	1.3101	332
8	Texas A&M-CC	29.416	332	0.2634	184
9	SE Louisiana	30.780	349	1.6003	349
10	Northwestern St	30.831	350	1.8038	357
11	McNeese	30.873	352	1.5978	348
12	Incarnate Word	31.008	355	1.4227	340

Opp Offensive Possessions per Game

Rank	Team	Mean	D1 Rank	MACD	D1 Trend Rank	Trend Strength
1	New Orleans	74.338	76	0.6015	151
2	UT Rio Grande	73.728	92	0.1559	208
3	Texas A&M-CC	73.023	120	1.0291	93
4	Nicholls	72.306	152	0.5667	157
5	Texas A&M-Commerce	71.854	174	0.4152	173
6	Lamar	69.981	239	0.2537	192
7	SF Austin	69.628	247	-0.4387	302
8	Northwestern St	68.809	283	0.2463	194
9	McNeese	68.617	286	0.2578	188
10	SE Louisiana	67.737	323	-0.0989	253
11	Incarnate Word	66.114	347	-0.0869	249
12	Houston Baptist	65.279	359	-1.0039	342

Location invert reset

Result invert reset

Game Type invert reset

Points Per Possession reset

Mean
Std
Median
Min
Max

selected out of records.

Showing - of

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Envo Magazine